Implementation of Artificial Insemination Programs in Beef Herds: Practical Considerations and Impact on Production
DVM Lucas E. Cutaia
Technical Manager SYNTEX SA
Implementation of Artificial Insemination Programs in Beef Herds: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Implementation of Artificial Insemination Programs in Beef Herds: Practical Considerations and Impact on Production DVM Lucas E. Cutaia Technical Manager SYNTEX SA Why we always talk about reproduction? Because we are experts in the family
DVM Lucas E. Cutaia
Technical Manager SYNTEX SA
Faostat, 2016
Brazil = 200 million cattle Argentina = 50 million cattle Southern Africa = 20 million cattle
7 % D O REBAN O M UN DIAL SE EN CONTRA NO TRÓPIC O
70 % of the world cattle population is in the tropical regions
85 days
1a OVULATION POST PARTUM IN COWS
Calving
In some conditions more than 100 days to get cows cycling !!!!!!!!!!!!
Cicling Cícling or Anestrus Anestrus
Day 0 Day 8 Day 10
48 h
FTAI
10 20 30 40 50 60 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96 102
% de ovulaciones
Cutaia et al., 2000
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 1,5 n=110 2,0 n=1196 2,5 n=3286 3,0 n=3066 3,5 n=1824 4,0 n=186
Cutaia et al., 2003 b c c d d a
MV Lucas E. Cutaia
Gerente Técnico SYNTEX SA
million doses sold as a API to produce other brands in major markets around the world.
Day 0 Day 8 Day 10
48 h
FTAI
NOVORMON
ab (P<0.03)
Cutaia et al., 2003
a a a b b a
52.7 50.9 31.3 54.2 30.6 59.6 Effect of use of eCG in FTAI Programs Cycling Non Cycling
Veterinarians, in the last 50 years resulting in a massive increase of different productive indicators.
programs results in an increase of between 20 to 60% in the gross margin depending on the productive context and the animal species involved.
capable of impacting in the same way on the productive results.
1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Dairy Beef Total
Etcheverry 2016, CABIA
Beef semen doses used FTAI Treat. Used
FTAI/AI %
Pietro S Baruselli Theriogenology Department /FMVZ/ University of São Paulo
*
IA: 5 a 6% das matrizes em reprodução IA: 10 a 12% das matrizes em reprodução 1% 4% 7% 11% 19% 25% 32% 35% 50% 55% 65% 67% 70% 77% 85% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2.000.000 4.000.000 6.000.000 8.000.000 10.000.000 12.000.000 14.000.000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Número de eventos
% IATF/IA Número de IA (ASBIA) Detecção de Cio + IA Número de IATF
Day 0
FTAI
Heat Detection
Day 0 Day 90 Day 90
➢ 600 Nelore Cows, 55-70 days after calving
Day 0
FTAI
Day 90 Day 45 Day 45 Day 45
US 30d US 30d US 70d US 70d
Day 17
Day 0
Heat Detection
Day 90 Day 45
US 70d US 70d US 120d US 120d US 120d US 120d
(Penteado et al.,2005)
Gráfico 1. Estimativa da prenhez acumulada de vacas Nelore submetidas a diferentes tipos de manejo durante a estação de monta (n=594). Camapuã. 2005.
(Penteado, 2005)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
Taxa de Prenhez (%) Dias de Estação de Monta
IA conv IATF + IA IATF+touro Touro
a c d b b a
11,8% 21,0% 8,0%
Annual Rainfall
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 J u l i
g
t
e p t i e m b r e O c t u b r e N
i e m b r e D i c i e m b r e E n e r
e b r e r
a r z
b r i l M a y
u n i
mm
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
PGF to Heifers
Day 0 Day 180 1/12 31/5
FTAI to Heifers
Day 0 Day 30-40 Day 120 1/12 5/1 31/3
FTAI (cow with calf)
Category Year 2002 Year 2003 Year 2004 TOTAL Heifers 148/292 50.7% 341/619 55.1% 564/1233 45.7% 1053/2144 49.1% Dry Cows
47.9%
47.9% Wet Cows 156/289 54.0% 345/790 43.7% 450/1199 37.5% 951/2198 43.2% TOTAL 304/581 52.3% 875/1803 48.5% 1014/2352 43.1% 2193/4736 (46.3%)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% SET OCT NOV DIC ENE FEB MAR
2002-03
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% SET OCT NOV DIC ENE FEB MAR
2003-04
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% SEP OCT NOV DIC ENE FEB MAR
2004-05
Cutaia et al., 2004
Cutaia et al., 2004
ab Medias con distintos superíndices en la misma columna difieren (P=0,00001)
Bulls CALVING Weaning Weight
PD 1
DIB
Weaning Weight Bull (n=137) Synch + Bull(n=111) Weaning Weight FTAI + Bull (n=105) FTAI
Day 38-54 Day 0 PD 2 Day 64-74 PD 3 Day 95-120 PD 4 Day 120-153
Bulls
Day 38-54 Day 0 Day 64-74 Day 95-120 Day 120-153 Day 8
CALVING CALVING
Day 38-54 Day 0 Day 64-74 Day 95-120 Day 120-153 Day 8
Bulls
Day 280-290 Day 280-290 Day 280-290 Day 486-511 Day 486-511 Day 486-511
Cristian Burtre Thesis of IRAC Specialisation
DIB
PD 1 PD 2 PD 3 PD 4 PD 1 PD 2 PD 3 PD 4
137
105
Cristian Burtre Thesis of IRAC Specialisation
183.7 202.8 211.3
50 100 150 200 250 Bull Synch + Bull FTAI + Bull
8,5 kg 19,1 kg 27,6 kg Average weight of calves
Cristian Burtre Thesis of IRAC Specialisation
125 172 194
50 100 150 200 250 Bull Synch + Bull FTAI + Bull
22 kg 47 kg 69kg
Dr Danie Odendaal, Dr Dries Lessing, Dr Rikus Janse Van Rensburg, Dr JG Nel, Dr Jan Wentzel, Dr Lucas Cutaia
In press, IRRS 2018
Day 0 Day 63
Day 0
FTAI
Day 63 Day 45
US 30d US 70d
Day 2
US 70d US 120d US 120d US 120d Treated Group (T) Non Treated Group (NT)
P=0.9 P=0.069 75-105 days after calving 45-85 days after calving
General objective Determine the impact of implementation of progesterone based synchronization with eCG and FTAI on cumulative pregnancy rates in suckling beef cows and early weaned cows.
Impact of the implementation of synchronization with the use of eCG and FTAI on cumulative pregnancy in suckling beef cows and early weaned beef cows in Zambia
Cutaia, L., Nel JG
Bonsmara herd:
weaned early, to compare the cumulative pregnancy rate in animals subjected to a progesterone based synchronization program with fixed time artificial insemination (FTAI) at the start of the breeding season followed by the introduction of “sweeper bulls” and animals subjected to a re-synchronization program with the introduction of “sweeper bulls” after the second FTAI.
Boran herd 1 – Savuti
cows to compare the cumulative pregnancy rate in animals subjected to a progesterone based synchronization program with fixed time artificial insemination (FTAI) at the start of the breeding season followed by the introduction of “sweeper bulls” and animals in a controlled group not subjected to synchronization and relying only on “sweeper bulls” to conceive.
Boran herd 2 – Mumembe
cows to compare the cumulative pregnancy rate in animals subjected to a progesterone based synchronization program with fixed time artificial insemination (FTAI) at the start of the breeding season followed by the introduction of “sweeper bulls” and animals in a controlled group not subjected to synchronization and relying only on “sweeper bulls” to conceive.
Boran herds – Savuti & Mumembe
Day 0 Day 90
Day 0
FTAI
Day 90 Day 45
2nd FTAI US 70d
Day 30
US 70d US 120d US 120d US 120d Resynch Group FTAI Group
FTAI
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Day 0 Day 10 Day 20 Day 30 Day 40 Day 50 Day 60 Day 70 Day 80 Day 90 Day 140
Bonsmara
FTAI+Bull FTAI+Resynch+Bull
BCS=3 BCS=3.5
Boran herds – Savuti & Mumembe
Day 0 Day 90
Day 0
FTAI
Day 90 Day 45
US 30d US 70d
Day 2
US 70d US 120d US 120d US 120d Treated Group (T) Non Treated Group (NT)
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Day 0 Day 10 Day 20 Day 30 Day 40 Day 50 Day 60 Day 70 Day 80 Day 90 Day 115
Savuti FTAI+Bull Bull
BCS=2.25 BCS=2.75
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Day 0 Day 10 Day 20 Day 30 Day 40 Day 50 Day 60 Day 70 Day 80 Day 90 Day 115
Mumembe
FTAI+Bull Bull
BCS=2 BCS=2.25
Technical Manager - Syntex SA lcutaia@syntexar.com
54.90% 48.70%
20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 45.00% 50.00% 55.00%
British n=68878 Indicus Cross n=95152
Cutaia et al., 2015
51.6% 47.7% 52.0% 0.54 51.1%
40.0% 42.0% 44.0% 46.0% 48.0% 50.0% 52.0% 54.0% 56.0% 58.0% 60.0%
Wet Cows n=65,529 Early Weaning n=308 Dry Cow n=39,279 15 Month Heifers n=24,900 2 YO Heifers n=29,317
51.6 %
Cutaia et al., 2015
47.8 % 52.0 % 54.0 % 51.1 %
Number pregnant Percentage 8 weeks pregnant (AI) 25 / 42 59.52% 5 weeks pregnant (bul) 13 / 42 30.95% Open / under 3 weeks pregnant 4 / 42 9.52%
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% Day 10 (Conception with AI) Day 35 (Follow-up bull) Day 70 (Follow up Bull) Pregnancy percentage
Days
Cumulative Pregnancy
59.52% 90.47%
lcutaia@syntexar.com jg.nel@ascendishealth.com