Artificial Insemination; Is it Worth My Time? December 7 th , 2010 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

artificial insemination
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Artificial Insemination; Is it Worth My Time? December 7 th , 2010 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Artificial Insemination; Is it Worth My Time? December 7 th , 2010 Carl R. Dahlen Artificial Insemination (AI) in the US Dairy Herd NAHMS, 2009 Potential Benefits of AI: Increase Uniformity of Calf Crop Increase Weaning Weight Enhance


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Artificial Insemination; Is it Worth My Time?

December 7th, 2010 Carl R. Dahlen

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Artificial Insemination (AI) in the US Dairy Herd

NAHMS, 2009

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Potential Benefits of AI:

Increase Uniformity of Calf Crop Increase Weaning Weight Enhance Carcass Value Improve Genetics of Herd

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Potential Benefits of AI:

Reduce Risk of Disease Reduce Birth Weight Shorten Calving Season Produce Calves of Known Sex?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

35.0 1.6 19.5 14.3 3.9 2.2 18.0 7.6 7.9 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 Any Technology Embryo Transfer Semen Evaluation Body Condition Scoring Pelvic Measurement Ultrasound Palpation for Pregnancy Artificial Insemination Estrus Synchronization Percent of operations

NAHMS, 2010

Reproductive Technology Use in US Beef Herd

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Potential Drawbacks of AI:

Time and Labor T

  • o Complicated

Cost Facilities Do Not Work “Other” T

  • p 2 concerns = 55% of Operations

NAHMS, 2010

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Estrous Synchronization Protocols

T wo shot PGF 7-11 Synch Select Synch Ov-synch CO-synch MGA/PGF MGA Select CIDR/PGF Select Synch+CIDR & TAI Heat Synch Hybrid Synch Hybrid Synch+CIDR One shot PGF Presynch Resynch 7-d CO-synch + CIDR 5-d CO-synch + CIDR MGA-PG & TAI 14 d CIDR-PG & TAI PG-7-d CO-synch +CIDR CO-Synch + hCG Resynch

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What Makes a Good Protocol?

It HAS to work!!!

slide-9
SLIDE 9

CO-Synch + CIDR protocol

(Lamb et al., 2006; Larson et al., 2006)

Day -7 0 54-66 h

GnRH & TAI GnRH PGF CIDR

What do we expect: ~56% pregnant (range of 43-74%) How many cows does your bull cover in the first cycle? ~50% pregnant (Similar Range)

What Works?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

What Does AI Cost?

GnRH = CIDR = PGF = Semen = Labor = T

  • tal

$4.40 $2.00 $9.00

$15.00

$4.10

$34.50

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What Does AI Cost?

Still need to have cleanup bulls 50% pregnancy rate to AI = 50% the bulls don’t have to cover = 50% Fewer Bulls

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Determining Bull Cost in a Natural Service Herd

Purchase Price Feed Yardage Health Interest Stocking Rate Useful Life Depreciation Death Loss Salvage Value

slide-13
SLIDE 13

$365 $506 $6,506 $6,000 $91 $50

Example of Cost

Purchase Price Feed Yardage Health First Year Recurring Cost

$83.45

25 $2,086 $6,259 $1,260 $7,519 3

Useful Life Cost over Life Salvage Value Adj T

  • tal Cost

Adj Yearly Cost Stocking Rate Cost Per Cow

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Evaluation of Systems

Day -7 0 54-66 h

GnRH & TAI GnRH PGF CIDR

Day 0

Turn in Bull

Treatment (TAI): Control:

n = 582 n = 615

slide-18
SLIDE 18

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

Percentage of cows calving

Day of calving season

TAI Control

Cumulative Calving Distribution

slide-19
SLIDE 19

18 22 20 15 7 7 3 3 1 4 6 16 25 21 10 9 4 2 1 7

5 10 15 20 25 30

1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 80+ NC

% Days

P<.01

* * * ** **

Noncumulative Calving Distribution

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Item TAI Control Weaning weight, lbs 514 508 Cows weaning a calf, % 84x 78y Weaning weight per cow exposed, lbs 426x 388y

Weaning Results

x,yMeans Differ (P < 0.01)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Items of Interest

Calving Distribution/Ease Weaning Weight Physical Characteristics Frame, Muscling, Conformation Performance beyond weaning Backgrounding, finishing, metabolism Longevity in cow herd Genetic progress over time

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Summary

Using AI can reduce expenses in some situations Bull Price is the major influence on cost TAI influenced calving distribution TAI did not alter weaning weight Using TAI improved lbs weaned/exposed female