Imaging Based Analysis of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Rob - - PDF document

imaging based analysis of patients with atrial
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Imaging Based Analysis of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Rob - - PDF document

Imaging Based Analysis of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Rob MacLeod, University of Utah CARMA Center, SCI Institute, CVRTI Bioengineering Department !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*-


slide-1
SLIDE 1 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Imaging Based Analysis

  • f Patients with Atrial

Fibrillation

Rob MacLeod, University of Utah CARMA Center, SCI Institute, CVRTI Bioengineering Department

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%
slide-2
SLIDE 2 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&% !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

CARMA

slide-3
SLIDE 3 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

What is Atrial Fibrillation? = Afib = AF

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Normal Contraction Atrial Fibrillation

slide-4
SLIDE 4 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Miyasaka et al. Circulation. 2006;114:119-125.

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

5.1 5.1 5.6 5.9 6.7 6.1 6.8 7.7 8.9 7.5 8.4 10.2 9.4 11.7 13.1 10.3 11.1 14.3 15.2 15.9 11.7 12.1

Projected Number of Persons With AF (millions) Year Current age-adjusted AF incidence Increased age-adjusted AF incidence

AF Prevalence

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

We All Get Older

3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 <55 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 >85 11.1 10.3 7.3 5.0 3.0 1.7 0.9 0.2 9.1 7.2 5.0 3.4 1.7 1.0 0.4 0.1

Prevalence (%)

Age (years) Women (n=7,801) Men (n=10,173)

Go AS, et al. JAMA. 2001;285:2370-2375.
slide-5
SLIDE 5 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

So What?

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

20% of Strokes

$20 billion/year

slide-6
SLIDE 6 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

What Causes AFib?

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Substrate Trigger +

slide-7
SLIDE 7 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Subsrate:Fibrosis

Lee KW, et al. Circ. 2006: 1703-1712.

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Complex Propagation

de Groot, .... Allessie MA. Circ. 2010: 1674-1682.

slide-8
SLIDE 8 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

LAA PV PV LA

Substrate: Extension of muscle sleeves

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

*

Pulmonary Veins

Left Atrium

Triggers

* * *

slide-9
SLIDE 9 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Clinical Result

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Clinical Result

slide-10
SLIDE 10 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Treatment?

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Catheter Ablation

slide-11
SLIDE 11 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Imaging in AF

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Ultrasound Fluoroscopy

Imaging Modalities in AF

MR Angiography Electroanatomical

Real time MRI

slide-12
SLIDE 12 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Electroanatomical Mapping

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

MR Angiography

Pre First Pass Subtraction

slide-13
SLIDE 13 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Late Gadolinium Enhancement

Pre-treatment 3 month Post

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Evaluation

Patient Workflow

Treatment Followup

slide-14
SLIDE 14 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Fibrosis and Outcome

Pseudo-color

Normal Low-voltage Enhanced (fibrosis?)

Pseudo-color

Normal Low-voltage Enhanced (fibrosis?)

Electroanatomical Map Electroanatomical Map

Evaluation

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Utah Scoring Scheme

Evaluation

Akoum et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 22:16-22, 2011

< 5% 5-20% 20-35% > 35%

slide-15
SLIDE 15 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Fibrosis Image Analysis Evaluation

Pixel Intensity Frequency

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Past Workflow

Evaluation

slide-16
SLIDE 16 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Corview

Evaluation

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Evaluation

Patient Workflow

Treatment Followup

slide-17
SLIDE 17 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Ablation Guidance

Treatment

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

MRI Guided Ablation

slide-18
SLIDE 18 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Real Time MRI

March, 2011

Treatment

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Segmentation for Guidance

Treatment

slide-19
SLIDE 19 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Electroanatomical Mapping

Treatment

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Evaluation

Patient Workflow

Treatment Followup

slide-20
SLIDE 20 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

EAM vs. MRI

Followup

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Tracking Ablation

LGE (pre) LGE (<1 hr) LGE (3 mo)

Followup

slide-21
SLIDE 21 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Repeat Ablation

Incomplete Isolation

Complete Isolation

Patient 1

First PVAI - Posterior Left Second PVAI - Posterior Left

Incomplete Isolation Complete Isolation

Patient 2

First PVAI - Posterior Left Second PVAI - Posterior Left

McGann et al. JACC,52(15): 1263-1272, 2008

Followup

!"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Evaluation

Open Challenges

Treatment Followup

Image quality Signal Acq./Proc. LA Segmentation Fibrosis Detection Scar Detection Lesion Imaging Case Simulation

slide-22
SLIDE 22 !"#$%&'&()*+&,-%%./'#*- %&)&-%!',0,#-(-1&#&(/,!&(/&%

Clinical Impact