Circumference of essentially 4-connected planar graphs Igor Fabrici - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

circumference of essentially 4 connected planar graphs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Circumference of essentially 4-connected planar graphs Igor Fabrici - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Circumference of essentially 4-connected planar graphs Igor Fabrici P.J. Saf arik University, Ko sice, Slovakia joint work with Jochen Harant, Samuel Mohr, Jens M. Schmidt Technische Universit at, Ilmenau, Germany Ghent, August


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Circumference

  • f essentially 4-connected planar graphs

Igor Fabrici P.J. ˇ Saf´ arik University, Koˇ sice, Slovakia joint work with

Jochen Harant, Samuel Mohr, Jens M. Schmidt

Technische Universit¨ at, Ilmenau, Germany

Ghent, August 12, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

circumference circ(G) is the length of a longest cycle of G

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

circumference circ(G) is the length of a longest cycle of G trivial separator A 3-separator S of a 3-connected planar graph G is trivial if one of two components of G − S is a single vertex.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction

circumference circ(G) is the length of a longest cycle of G trivial separator A 3-separator S of a 3-connected planar graph G is trivial if one of two components of G − S is a single vertex. essential connectivity A 3-connected planar graph G is essentially 4-connected if every 3-separator of G is trivial.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Lower bounds on circ for planar graphs

Let G be a planar graph and let n = |V (G)|.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Lower bounds on circ for planar graphs

Let G be a planar graph and let n = |V (G)|. 2-connected planar graphs circ(K2,n−2) = 4

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Lower bounds on circ for planar graphs

Let G be a planar graph and let n = |V (G)|. 2-connected planar graphs circ(K2,n−2) = 4 4-connected planar graphs Every 4-connected planar graph G is hamiltonian [Tutte, 1956], i.e. circ(G) = n.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Lower bounds on circ for planar graphs

Let G be a planar graph and let n = |V (G)|. 2-connected planar graphs circ(K2,n−2) = 4 4-connected planar graphs Every 4-connected planar graph G is hamiltonian [Tutte, 1956], i.e. circ(G) = n. 3-connected planar graphs For every 3-connected planar graph G, circ(G) ≥ cnlog3 2, for some c ≥ 1 [Chen, Yu, 2002]

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Lower bounds on circ for planar graphs

Let G be a planar graph and let n = |V (G)|.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Lower bounds on circ for planar graphs

Let G be a planar graph and let n = |V (G)|. essentially 4-connected planar graphs For every essentially 4-connected planar graph G, circ(G) ≥ 2

5(n + 2) [Jackson, Wormald, 1992]

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Lower bounds on circ for planar graphs

Let G be a planar graph and let n = |V (G)|. essentially 4-connected planar graphs For every essentially 4-connected planar graph G, circ(G) ≥ 2

5(n + 2) [Jackson, Wormald, 1992]

essentially 4-connected planar triangulations For every essentially 4-connected planar triangulation G, circ(G) ≥ 13

21(n + 4) [F., Harant, Jendrol’, 2016]

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Sharpness of a lower bound on circ

There is an infinite family of essentially 4-connected planar graphs (even triangulations) with circ(G) = 2

3(n + 4).

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Sharpness of a lower bound on circ

There is an infinite family of essentially 4-connected planar graphs (even triangulations) with circ(G) = 2

3(n + 4).

construction

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Sharpness of a lower bound on circ

There is an infinite family of essentially 4-connected planar graphs (even triangulations) with circ(G) = 2

3(n + 4).

construction G ∗ is a 4-connected plane triangulation on n∗ vertices

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sharpness of a lower bound on circ

There is an infinite family of essentially 4-connected planar graphs (even triangulations) with circ(G) = 2

3(n + 4).

construction G ∗ is a 4-connected plane triangulation on n∗ vertices a, b ∈ E(G ∗) adjacent edges, incident with no common face

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Sharpness of a lower bound on circ

There is an infinite family of essentially 4-connected planar graphs (even triangulations) with circ(G) = 2

3(n + 4).

construction G ∗ is a 4-connected plane triangulation on n∗ vertices a, b ∈ E(G ∗) adjacent edges, incident with no common face C ∗ is a hamiltonian cycle of G ∗ containing a, b

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Sharpness of a lower bound on circ

There is an infinite family of essentially 4-connected planar graphs (even triangulations) with circ(G) = 2

3(n + 4).

construction G ∗ is a 4-connected plane triangulation on n∗ vertices a, b ∈ E(G ∗) adjacent edges, incident with no common face C ∗ is a hamiltonian cycle of G ∗ containing a, b G ∗ has 2n∗ − 4 (triangular) faces

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Sharpness of a lower bound on circ

There is an infinite family of essentially 4-connected planar graphs (even triangulations) with circ(G) = 2

3(n + 4).

construction G ∗ is a 4-connected plane triangulation on n∗ vertices a, b ∈ E(G ∗) adjacent edges, incident with no common face C ∗ is a hamiltonian cycle of G ∗ containing a, b G ∗ has 2n∗ − 4 (triangular) faces G is the Kleetope of G ∗

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Sharpness of a lower bound on circ

There is an infinite family of essentially 4-connected planar graphs (even triangulations) with circ(G) = 2

3(n + 4).

construction G ∗ is a 4-connected plane triangulation on n∗ vertices a, b ∈ E(G ∗) adjacent edges, incident with no common face C ∗ is a hamiltonian cycle of G ∗ containing a, b G ∗ has 2n∗ − 4 (triangular) faces G is the Kleetope of G ∗ G is an essentially 4-connected planar triangulation

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Sharpness of a lower bound on circ

There is an infinite family of essentially 4-connected planar graphs (even triangulations) with circ(G) = 2

3(n + 4).

construction G ∗ is a 4-connected plane triangulation on n∗ vertices a, b ∈ E(G ∗) adjacent edges, incident with no common face C ∗ is a hamiltonian cycle of G ∗ containing a, b G ∗ has 2n∗ − 4 (triangular) faces G is the Kleetope of G ∗ G is an essentially 4-connected planar triangulation G has n = n∗ + (2n∗ − 4) = 3n∗ − 4 vertices

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Sharpness of a lower bound on circ

There is an infinite family of essentially 4-connected planar graphs (even triangulations) with circ(G) = 2

3(n + 4).

construction G ∗ is a 4-connected plane triangulation on n∗ vertices a, b ∈ E(G ∗) adjacent edges, incident with no common face C ∗ is a hamiltonian cycle of G ∗ containing a, b G ∗ has 2n∗ − 4 (triangular) faces G is the Kleetope of G ∗ G is an essentially 4-connected planar triangulation G has n = n∗ + (2n∗ − 4) = 3n∗ − 4 vertices circ(G) = 2n∗ = 2

3(n + 4)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Construction

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Construction

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Construction

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Construction

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Construction

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Construction

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Construction

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Construction

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Construction

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Construction

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Construction

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Construction

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Construction

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Construction

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Construction

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Construction

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Construction

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Results

Theorem (F., Harant, Mohr, Schmidt, 2019+) For every essentially 4-connected planar graph G

  • n n vertices,

circ(G) ≥ 5

8(n + 2).

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Results

Theorem (F., Harant, Mohr, Schmidt, 2019+) For every essentially 4-connected planar graph G

  • n n vertices,

circ(G) ≥ 5

8(n + 2).

Theorem (F., Harant, Mohr, Schmidt, 2019+) For every essentially 4-connected planar triangulation G

  • n n vertices,

circ(G) ≥ 2

3(n + 4).

Moreover, this bound is tight.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Proof: Tutte cycle

Let G be an essentially 4-connected plane graph and let C be a cycle of G of length at least 5. Tutte cycle A cycle C of G is a Tutte cycle if V (G) \ V (C) is an independent set of vertices of degree 3.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Proof: Tutte cycle

Let G be an essentially 4-connected plane graph and let C be a cycle of G of length at least 5. Tutte cycle A cycle C of G is a Tutte cycle if V (G) \ V (C) is an independent set of vertices of degree 3. more Tutte cycles Every cycle C ′ of G with V (C) ⊆ V (C ′) is a Tutte cycle as well.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Proof: Tutte cycle

Let G be an essentially 4-connected plane graph and let C be a cycle of G of length at least 5. Tutte cycle A cycle C of G is a Tutte cycle if V (G) \ V (C) is an independent set of vertices of degree 3. more Tutte cycles Every cycle C ′ of G with V (C) ⊆ V (C ′) is a Tutte cycle as well. extendable edge An edge xy ∈ E(C) is extendable if there is a common neighbour z ∈ V (C) of x and y.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Proof: a sketch

Let G be an essentially 4-connected plane triangulation

  • n n vertices.

for 4 ≤ n ≤ 10, G is hamiltonian

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Proof: a sketch

Let G be an essentially 4-connected plane triangulation

  • n n vertices.

for 4 ≤ n ≤ 10, G is hamiltonian let n ≥ 11

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Proof: a sketch

Let G be an essentially 4-connected plane triangulation

  • n n vertices.

for 4 ≤ n ≤ 10, G is hamiltonian let n ≥ 11 G contains a Tutte cycle of length at least 5

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Proof: a sketch

Let G be an essentially 4-connected plane triangulation

  • n n vertices.

for 4 ≤ n ≤ 10, G is hamiltonian let n ≥ 11 G contains a Tutte cycle of length at least 5 let C be a longest Tutte cycle of G

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Proof: a sketch

Let G be an essentially 4-connected plane triangulation

  • n n vertices.

for 4 ≤ n ≤ 10, G is hamiltonian let n ≥ 11 G contains a Tutte cycle of length at least 5 let C be a longest Tutte cycle of G C has no extendable edge

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Proof: Tutte cycle with chords

let H = G[V (C)] H is a plane triangulation and C is a hamiltonian cycle of H

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Proof: empty faces

non-empty non-empty a face of H is empty if it is also a face of G F0 is the set of all empty faces of H; f0 = |F0|

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Proof: j-faces

a j-face of H is incident with exactly j edges of E(C) each 2-face and each 1-face of H is empty

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Proof: number of empty faces

Fact |V (C)| ≤ f0

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Proof: number of empty faces

Fact |V (C)| ≤ f0

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Proof: number of empty faces

Fact |V (C)| ≤ f0 2n − 4 = |F(G)| = f0 + 3(n − |V (C)|)

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Proof: number of empty faces

Fact |V (C)| ≤ f0 2n − 4 = |F(G)| = f0 + 3(n − |V (C)|) 3|V (C)| = n + 4 + f0 ≥ n + 4 + |V (C)|

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Proof: number of empty faces

Fact |V (C)| ≤ f0 2n − 4 = |F(G)| = f0 + 3(n − |V (C)|) 3|V (C)| = n + 4 + f0 ≥ n + 4 + |V (C)| 2|V (C)| ≥ n + 4

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Proof: number of empty faces

Fact |V (C)| ≤ f0 2n − 4 = |F(G)| = f0 + 3(n − |V (C)|) 3|V (C)| = n + 4 + f0 ≥ n + 4 + |V (C)| 2|V (C)| ≥ n + 4 |V (C)| ≥ 1

2(n + 4)

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Proof: number of empty faces

Fact |V (C)| ≤ f0 2n − 4 = |F(G)| = f0 + 3(n − |V (C)|) 3|V (C)| = n + 4 + f0 ≥ n + 4 + |V (C)| 2|V (C)| ≥ n + 4 |V (C)| ≥ 1

2(n + 4)

Claim 3|V (C)| ≤ 2f0

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Proof: number of empty faces

Fact |V (C)| ≤ f0 2n − 4 = |F(G)| = f0 + 3(n − |V (C)|) 3|V (C)| = n + 4 + f0 ≥ n + 4 + |V (C)| 2|V (C)| ≥ n + 4 |V (C)| ≥ 1

2(n + 4)

Claim 3|V (C)| ≤ 2f0

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Proof: number of empty faces

Fact |V (C)| ≤ f0 2n − 4 = |F(G)| = f0 + 3(n − |V (C)|) 3|V (C)| = n + 4 + f0 ≥ n + 4 + |V (C)| 2|V (C)| ≥ n + 4 |V (C)| ≥ 1

2(n + 4)

Claim 3|V (C)| ≤ 2f0 3|V (C)| = n + 4 + f0 ≥ n + 4 + 3

2|V (C)|

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Proof: number of empty faces

Fact |V (C)| ≤ f0 2n − 4 = |F(G)| = f0 + 3(n − |V (C)|) 3|V (C)| = n + 4 + f0 ≥ n + 4 + |V (C)| 2|V (C)| ≥ n + 4 |V (C)| ≥ 1

2(n + 4)

Claim 3|V (C)| ≤ 2f0 3|V (C)| = n + 4 + f0 ≥ n + 4 + 3

2|V (C)| 3 2|V (C)| ≥ n + 4

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Proof: number of empty faces

Fact |V (C)| ≤ f0 2n − 4 = |F(G)| = f0 + 3(n − |V (C)|) 3|V (C)| = n + 4 + f0 ≥ n + 4 + |V (C)| 2|V (C)| ≥ n + 4 |V (C)| ≥ 1

2(n + 4)

Claim 3|V (C)| ≤ 2f0 3|V (C)| = n + 4 + f0 ≥ n + 4 + 3

2|V (C)| 3 2|V (C)| ≥ n + 4

|V (C)| ≥ 2

3(n + 4)

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Proof: empty faces

Lemma Let [w, x, y, z] be a subpath of C, let α = [x, y, z] be a 2-face

  • f H1 and let β = α be the face of H incident with xz.

If ϕ = [w, x, y] a 2-face of H2 then β is an empty face. w x y z α β

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Proof: empty faces

Lemma Let [w, x, y, z] be a subpath of C, let α = [x, y, z] be a 2-face

  • f H1 and let β = α be the face of H incident with xz.

If ϕ = [w, x, y] a 2-face of H2 then β is an empty face. w x y z α β ϕ

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Proof: empty faces

Lemma Let [w, x, y, z] be a subpath of C, let α = [x, y, z] be a 2-face

  • f H1 and let β = α be the face of H incident with xz.

If ϕ = [w, x, y] a 2-face of H2 then β is an empty face. w x y z α ϕ empty face

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Proof:

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Proof: empty faces

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Proof: empty faces

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Proof: empty faces

empty face

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Proof: empty faces

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Proof: empty faces

empty face

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Thank you.