Im Impl plementing ementing GM M La Labo borat atori ories - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

im impl plementing ementing gm m la labo borat atori
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Im Impl plementing ementing GM M La Labo borat atori ories - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Im Impl plementing ementing GM M La Labo borat atori ories es Labs should share genomic data; many clinical labs willing but requires resources Dont put in clinical lab til well- established but WGS/WES breaks that


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Im Impl plementing ementing GM M – La Labo borat atori

  • ries

es

  • Labs should share genomic data; many clinical labs

willing but requires resources

  • “Don’t put in clinical lab til well-established” but

WGS/WES breaks that rule (66%-80% variants found in only one family)

  • Delivering information from available sequence

takes resources

  • Updating needs resources – changed categories

300 times, ~4% MD reports change per year

  • How to enable hospital/academic CLIA-certified labs

to move to NG sequencing (resources for infrastructure)

  • Much of recent growth in genomic testing is ID

(11%), germline and cancer 18%)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Im Impl plemen ementing ting GM M – La Labo borat atori

  • ries

es

  • “Whole genome” may imply complete or infallible
  • No CLIA standards yet for nextgen sequencing

(though CAP, ACMG, CLSI, and AMP developing checklists)

  • Uncertainty of regulatory oversight (i.e., allowed

as lab-developed test?)

  • Need genomic medicine specialty?
  • What is regulated under CLIA vs. what is art of

medicine in interpretation of sequences

  • Try to capture the marked variability in

interpretation to understand it

  • Need bioinformaticians incorporated into

pathology groups

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Im Impl plementing ementing GM M – Com

  • mmo

mon n Crite iteria ria fo for Ado dopt ptin ing g in in C Com

  • mmercia

mercial l La Labo borat ator

  • ries

ies

  • Well-controlled and adequately powered studies

demonstrating analytic validity and clinical utility where feasible)

  • Clearly actionable results:
  • Prevent drug toxicity
  • Identify treatment path
  • Diagnosis of rare heritable disorders and carrier

testing

  • Path to fair reimbursement
  • Freedom to operate: patent issue is huge

(clearinghouse for patents in development)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Seq eque uenc ncin ing g Wor

  • rki

king ng Grou

  • up
  • White paper laying out research and policy

agenda for implementation of sequencing

  • Focus on those that are gaps, not being done by
  • ther groups
  • Highest priorities– how to assign clinical

relevance to variants?

  • Wet lab moving so fast not clearly gap area
  • Consider genomic “critical values”
  • Determine what legal requirements are for data

return – varies by state

  • No substitute for knowing what pt and clinician

want to know

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Im Impl plemen ementing ting GM M – Fin inan ancia ial l Im Impa pact t an and d Rei eimb mburseme ursement nt

  • Utilization of imaging driven by regulatory approval

and reimbursement rather than by evidence they provide benefit

  • Evidence evaluation needs to work from clinical

problem rather than starting with test

  • Coverage policy principles
  • Services related to prevention, dx, tx
  • Info will affect course of treatment
  • Care and/or treatment likely to improve outcome
  • Improvement attainable outside investigational

settings

  • Services consistent with plan design
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Im Impl plemen ementing ting GM M – Fin inan ancia ial l Im Impa pact t an and d Rei eimb mburseme ursement nt

Evidence standards

  • Analytic validity, clinical validity, clinical utility
  • Final approval from appropriate regulatory

bodies helpful, or necessary when required

  • Demonstrated benefit

Telephonic genetic counselors substantial advance

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Im Impl plemen ementing ting GM M – Fin inan ancia ial l Im Impa pact t an and d Rei eimb mburseme ursement nt

  • Unit costs are biggest driver of escalation in

healthcare costs, not utilization

  • Costs for molecular diagnostics have risen

much faster than other costs (14%/yr 2008-10)

  • Payers should not fear innovation (always

seems to cost more) but look for those that disruptively replace more expensive and less effective technologies

  • Pu

Public ic-pr priv ivate ate-ac acad adem emic ic collabo bora ratio tions ns to develo elop, p, design, gn, fund, , conduc uct, t, interpr rpret et resea earc rch h to produce ce decisi sive ve inform rmati ation

  • n
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Im Impl plementing ementing GM M – Pu Publ blic ic Hea ealt lth

  • Potential partnerships:
  • Genetics and chronic disease leadership in

state health depts

  • Local cancer and heart disease coalitions
  • National professional and disease-related
  • rganizations
  • Genetic Alliance, Patients Like Me
  • Consider cross-cutting goals, impact on health

disparities

  • HFE homozygotes with s/s receiving iron
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Fa Fami mily ly His istory tory Wo Working ing Grou

  • up

p – Po Possi sible ble Opp ppor

  • rtun

tunities ities

  • SBIR/STTR with EPIC
  • Social network software and infrastructure for

collecting/correcting FHH info from relatives

  • FHH interventions
  • Optimize in emergency situations, especially

regarding potential MI

  • Bring to other environments such as rural,

underserved

  • Educational - residents in training
  • Does intervention work in usual care
  • Link to sequencing WG on both Mendelian and

complex traits

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Per erio iodo donta ntal l Mi Microb robiome iome Wor

  • rkin

ing g Grou

  • up
  • Management of patients with diabetes and

periodontitis

  • Management of dental patients
  • Pain
  • Coagulation
  • PGx data to dentists with CDS tools
  • Oral-systemic personalized medicine model
  • Sequencing may replace culture in micro lab –

potential for huge impact

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Pla lann nnin ing g Com

  • mmittee

mittee

Rex Chisholm Geoff Ginsburg Pearl O’Rourke Mary Relling Dan Roden Marc Williams Eric Green Teri Manolio Brad Ozenberger