Chapkrt
I :
can
we
win ?
Chapkrt win ? can I : we distribution ps.iq So with iid Last time - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Chapkrt win ? can I : we distribution ps.iq So with iid Last time : { G) new let be . at ?g Define " hitting tines " - 1 let 2 Ci Xu . - O } , = inf { n > O : Xu - c } and To - int { n 30 - : Xn Te - - .
Chapkrt
I :
can
we
win ?
Last time :
let
{ G) new
be
iid
with
distribution ps.iq So
.let
Xu
at ?g
,2 Ci
Define
"hitting tines
"Te
and
To
= inf { n > O : XuPIT.
peek
pEx
p
a
99900
100000
1,8%
900001000002×10-17+17
keawwg
:if
you
increase your
but
size
to
$1000 in
The
last
case
,
you
significantly
increase your
If yer bet
$10000
at
a
time
, you're in thea-
9 ,
c
scenario
→
88%
chance !
In
the
coin flip game
,
can we charge
gambling
strategy
to
" do
better
" ?
Dein ( Gambling Policy)
keeping
the
nothin
from
last
time
, let
Xu
bet
where Wi 30
and
Wi
Exe
( Bold
Play)
Suppose
we
want to reach
c
dollars
.let
Wi
=min ( Xi - i
, c
idea : bet the
most you
can
without going
Deep theorem : this
strategy
maximizes
IPL To < To)
.EI
( Double til you
win)
let
W , =L ,
and
Wi . {
2
" '
it
c.
=O
else
if
4--1
,
then
X
, = att = Xz=Xs : Xycut
, then
X ,
and
Xz
else
4=1 , then
X
,,
Xa=
a -I -2
X,
=a
can
check
if
N'
Xn
att
Note
,in
this
scenario
we
get
IP( "Y X n
Question
c .does
this
mean
that
" double tilyou
win
"gives
a
winning strategy
in
this game? IE ( "nm Xn )
Answer
:no
, becauseyour
pockets aren't deep enough
.let
KEN
be
the
largest
integer
with
azitzt-e.tk lie ,
we
can
play
" bdovble lil youwin "
K
times)
we
have
Xµ= att
if
inffnza.cn
else
Xk
.if iuxffn > : Cal )
> kwe
see
⇐ (Xk)
= att
This
is
less
than
a
if
pet
.We've
seen
double
til you
win
doesn't actually
" beatthe
casino
" .will
any
system ?
Recall
Xu
= at÷2
,Wilhoit)
= at II ,wi @Ci - t )
t Wn @Cn
Xu , t Wn ( kn
But
we
knew Wn
where
C
. . - - , Cn - i , Cnare
independent
.So
Wn
and
2cm - I
are
independent,
so
⇐ ( Xn)
=⇐ ( Xu - it win @Cn -t))
=IE ( Xn
. . )t
⇐ ( Wn @ en
IE ( Xu - i) t
⇐(Wn) ⇐ ( kn -t)
" IE (Xn . .) t
IELWN )lp
So : if
p
then
a - IECX, )
petz , then
a > IECX,)3IECXz) 's
p >
'z , thin
as
(X.Is # ( Xz) E
Nate this gives
bum IE( Xn) sa
if
pet
.In
contrast
, with
double til you win
, we
saw
⇐ (
"nm Xn )
when
is
by # Xn)
We
know
EXIT
I;mXn
, thenMCT
says
linm # ( Xn)
nm Xa)
.Thou
( Bounded convergence
Theorem)
Ippon
that
lynx.
exists
almost surely
. IfKEIR
so
for
all
n we
have
"
nm Elk)
=E- (
"nm Xu)
.PI
Dude
in Xu
The triage inequality
say, for;4
I ⇐(x)
=
I ⇐ ( X
E IE( IX
We
want
: forall
e > 0
we
have
NEIN
so for all
n z N
we get
IIECX)
we
do this
by
shewing
El IX
as
a -50
.let E >0
.Define
An
I Xlw)
We
have for
all
we.r
we
have
I Xlw)
Take
expectations
⇐ ( lxlw)
E
IEC et 2K Iancu ))
=et 2K IPC An)
Naw
take
kmsup
both sides
"map
⇐ ( IX
E
Et 2K
"TYP MAN) set 2K Pl
''m:P An)
But limsup
An
is the
set
w
with
line Xnlw) t Xlw)
,
which
is
just
{ wer :
hnmxnlw)
DNE)
.But
by hypothesis
this
set is
measure
zero .
Hence
"mhm
⇐ ( IX
E
Et 2K
"TYP MANI
''m:P An)
E
E
.S .
"msn.PE/lX-Xal) < E
fer
all
s , s.
"I'm IEHHXND
= Off