I nstruc to r L e a se -Ba c k Pro g ra m A BLE 1 1 : DANI E L - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

I nstruc to r L e a se -Ba c k Pro g ra m A BLE 1 1 : DANI E L DORNSE I F(I NDE PE NDE NT AI RL I NE PI L OT ), GAI L AVE NDANO T (WE ST MI NST E R COL L E GE ), JOHN SCHAE F E R (SWA), GRE GORY SCHWAB (CE NT RAL WASHI NGT ON UNI VE RSI T Y), MI CHE L L EHI GHT(E RAU), JAY SUT HE RAND, DANI E L SUT L I F F , (UTVAL L E Y UNI VE RSI T Y), JUL I E SPE AK E S (DE L T A ST AT E UNI VE RSI T Y)

Po ssib le sta ke ho lde rs  Airline s  Unive rsitie s  F e de ra l Go ve rnme nt

I s the re a CF I sho rta g e ?  Ma ny unive rsitie s re po rt sho rta g e s, re te ntio n pro b le ms  Sho rta g e o f “Supe r” CF I s:  >2 ye a rs o f e xpe rie nc e  Ca n sig n o ff o n o the r CF I s

I mpo rta nt q ue stio ns  Ne e d fo r mo re b usine ss re se a rc h to ide ntify the ro o t pro b le ms  De fining the pro b le m  Po litic a l fa c to rs  E c o no mic fa c to rs  Ca n we use a dditio na l simula tio n to fill g a ps?  Ca n we e nlist a irline pilo ts fo r re mo te g ro und sc ho o l tra ining ?  Ca n/ sho uld a irline pilo ts b e re turne d to the e duc a tio na l se tting ?  Wo uld the y ma ke g o o d instruc to rs?  Wo uld a irline s b e willing to g ive “re se rve le a ve ”?  Wo uld pilo ts b e willing to pa rtic ipa te ?

I nc e ntive s  F ina nc ia l I nc e ntive s  F e de ra l ta x inc e ntive s fo r pilo ts (o ffse t lo ss o f pa y)  F e de ra l ta x inc e ntive s fo r a irline s  Re se a rc h studie s o n pub lic suppo rt?  I RS suppo rt? Da ta ?  F AA e xe mptio ns to pa rt 117.23 (F lig ht time c umula tive limita tio ns)  Re se a rc h study o n a ve ra g e flig ht time s fo r re g io na l pilo ts

Pa thwa y pro g ra ms  E sta b lish & Ma inta in re la tio nships b e twe e n a irline s a nd unive rsitie s  T a ke pa thwa y pro g ra ms o ne ste p furthe r:  Pro vide stude nt/ g ra dua te CF I s with se nio rity numb e rs  Be g in whe n CF I b e g ins flig ht instruc tio n a t the unive rsity  T his c o uld so lve the “se nio rity” issue  L e ss re se rve time a t re g io na ls  L ife style & F a mily b e ne fits  E mplo ye e b e ne fits

Adva nta g e s & c ha lle ng e s  Adva nta g e s:  L o ng e r te rm so lutio n to the CF I sho rta g e  Pilo t sta ff with e xte nsive pro fe ssio na l instruc ting e xpe rie nc e : impro ve d c he c k a irma n po o l  Cha lle ng e s:  Airline Unio ns  I nc e ntive s fo r pilo ts  T a xpa ye r b uy-in  Re g io na l b uy-in  Ne w rule s fo r minimum line flig ht time o r time in type ne e de d