GEOBS : TOWARD AN OBSERVATORY PROTOTYPE OF THE 65 FRENCH SDI S M - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GEOBS : TOWARD AN OBSERVATORY

PROTOTYPE OF THE 65 FRENCH SDIS

Financial parterns : Region Aquitaine, CNRS, Université de Bordeaux Montaigne

MATTHIEU NOUCHER (CNRS – UMR ADESS) FRANÇOISE GOURMELON (CNRS – UMR LETG) JADE GEORIS-CREUSEVEAU (CNRS - UMR ADESS)

• 1. Context
• 2. Goals and scientific positioning
• 3. Research questions
• 4. Observatory prototype
• 5. Preliminary results
• 6. Outlook and conclusion

International context: democratization of geographical information

VGI 2007 GIS Standalone SDIs Web 1970 2000 GIS ICT Network 1980 1990

International context: multiplication of stakeholders

Albania Ireland Republic of Macedonia Belgium Bulgaria Finland Germany Netherlands Slovenia Turkey United Kingdom Croatia Czech Republic Portugal Spain Italy Poland France 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 5 6 17 19 52

French context: numerous SDIs (multi-level and multi-thematic)

Number of subnational SDIs identified in 2009 and 2011 EUROGI/eSDI-net project (EUROGI, 2014)

Open data

French context: complexity of the informational restructuring

65 operational SDIs January 2017

Context: SDI assessment

INSPIRE Directive : Monitoring follows a quantitative approach every year List of spatial data sets and services Indicators to evaluate the Conformity and the Accessibility of metadata and data sets Even if Reporting covers more qualitative aspects (every 3 years), almost no analysis of data use and relevance

GEOBS: Goals and scientific positioning Goals : Understand new ways to produce and manage environmental knowledge by analysing the (re)positioning of public authorities in the environmental sector

SDIs : As a research object As sociotechnical systems (Akrich, 1993)  better understanding of the flows and the governance of environmental information

GEOBS: research questions

Question 1: How SDIs influence the ways the environment is represented Question 2: How SDIs help to manage geographical information flows Question 3: How SDIs facilitate the ways geographical information are used and appropriated by public bodies

GEOBS : Observatory prototype

• f the 65 French SDIs based on 3 axis

2015 2016 2017 Content Analysis Strategy Analysis Use Analysis

OBSERVATORY

PROTOTYPE February 2015

Preliminary results: Content analysis (Axis 1)

966 Scraping by Python

Who? What ?

Query by XQuery

Where ?

Python

Graphics

Python

Maps

PostGIS

Geocatalogs [geonetwork]

SDIs PIGMA, PEGASE, GeoLimousin

QGIS

When ?

http://www.pigma.org

Corpus of metada [fichiers XML] Analysis [CSV et GeoJSON]

3134 504 http://www.pegase- poitou-charentes.fr http://www.geolimousin.fr

GÉOLIMOUSIN

ETAT ETABLISSEMENTS PUBLICS

PEGASE

COLLECTIVITES TERRITORIALES ASSOCIATION

PIGMA

Preliminary results: Content analysis (Axis 1)

PIGMA GEOLIMOUSIN PEGASE

Services de l’État Organismes publics Collectivités territoriales Sociétés privées ONG Associations Enseignement recherche

Who?

Public bodies Governmental bodies Territorial authorities Research

• rganizations

NGO Associations Private companies

What?

Preliminary results: Content analysis (Axis 1)

20 40 60 80 100 120 Referentiels de coordonnees Systemes de maillage geographique Denominations geographiques Unites administratives Adresses Parcelles cadastrales Reseaux de transport Hydrographie Sites proteges Altitude Occupation des terres Ortho_imagerie Geologie Unites statistiques Batiments Sols Usage des sols Sante et securite des personnes Services d_utilite publique et services… Installations de suivi environnemental Lieux de production et sites industriels Installations agricoles et aquacoles Repartition de la population_demographie Zones de gestion, de restriction ou de… Zones a risque naturel Conditions atmospheriques Caracteristiques geographiques… Caracteristiques geographiques… Regions maritimes Regions biogeographiques Habitats et biotopes Repartition des especes Sources d_energie Ressources minerales PIGMA PEGASE GéoLimousin

What?

Preliminary results: Content analysis (Axis 1)

20 40 60 80 100 120 Referentiels de coordonnees Systemes de maillage geographique Denominations geographiques Unites administratives Adresses Parcelles cadastrales Reseaux de transport Hydrographie Sites proteges Altitude Occupation des terres Ortho_imagerie Geologie Unites statistiques Batiments Sols Usage des sols Sante et securite des personnes Services d_utilite publique et services… Installations de suivi environnemental Lieux de production et sites industriels Installations agricoles et aquacoles Repartition de la population_demographie Zones de gestion, de restriction ou de… Zones a risque naturel Conditions atmospheriques Caracteristiques geographiques… Caracteristiques geographiques… Regions maritimes Regions biogeographiques Habitats et biotopes Repartition des especes Sources d_energie Ressources minerales PIGMA PEGASE GéoLimousin

10.7 9.6 7.0 6.7 5.0 3.6 0.13

AQUITAINE : PIGMA

N = 3134

LIMOUSIN : GÉOLIMOUSIN

N = 504

64.7 60.5 58.1 54.1 6.2 1.2 0.6

POITOU-CHARENTES : PÉGASE

N = 966

63.3 58.7 57.6 55.6 21.2 2.2 0.3

Preliminary results: Content analysis (Axis 1)

Where?

10.7 9.6 7.0 6.7 5.0 3.6 0.13

AQUITAINE : PIGMA

N = 3134

LIMOUSIN : GÉOLIMOUSIN

N = 504

64.7 60.5 58.1 54.1 6.2 1.2 0.6

POITOU-CHARENTES : PÉGASE

N = 966

63.3 58.7 57.6 55.6 21.2 2.2 0.3

Preliminary results: Content analysis (Axis 1)

Evolution

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 mars-10 mai-10 juil.-10 sept.-10 nov.-10 janv.-11 mars-11 mai-11 juil.-11 sept.-11 nov.-11 janv.-12 mars-12 mai-12 juil.-12 sept.-12 nov.-12 janv.-13 mars-13 mai-13 juil.-13 sept.-13 nov.-13 janv.-14 mars-14 mai-14 juil.-14 sept.-14 nov.-14 janv.-15 mars-15

March 2010 - March 2015

GEOLIMOUSIN PEGASE PIGMA SIGORE

Preliminary results: Content analysis (Axis 1)

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 mars-10 mai-10 juil.-10 sept.-10 nov.-10 janv.-11 mars-11 mai-11 juil.-11 sept.-11 nov.-11 janv.-12 mars-12 mai-12 juil.-12 sept.-12 nov.-12 janv.-13 mars-13 mai-13 juil.-13 sept.-13 nov.-13 janv.-14 mars-14 mai-14 juil.-14 sept.-14 nov.-14 janv.-15 mars-15 GEOLIMOUSIN PEGASE PIGMA

OCA BxM ADELIE

Quand ? Quelle temporalité de montée en charge ?

INSPIRE monitoring Geocatalogue harvesting Changes in personnel

Outlook: Strategy analysis (axis 2)

Octobre 2014 July 2018

2015 2016 2017 Content Analysis Strategy Analysis Use Analysis

OBSERVATORY

PROTOTYPE Data collection: Web site analysis & Interviews with SDI administrators about : SDIs goals, policy, vision Data Analysis: matrix analysis Rebai et al. (2013)

Outlook: Use analysis (axis 3)

Octobre 2014 July 2018

2015 2016 2017 Content Analysis Strategy Analysis Use Analysis

OBSERVATORY

PROTOTYPE Data collection: online survey and Interviews with SDI users about : usefulness, effective use, information Effectiveness, etc. Data Analysis: Integrated methodology that combines, among others, statistical and social network analysis Georis-Creuseveau et al. (2014)

Conclusion

Observatory prototype  bring greater visibility to institutional geographical information Integrating content, strategic and use-based approaches  flows of geographical information into perspective Monitoring the changes in SDIs evolution Bring some answers concerning the new stakes of environmental governance

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION GÉOBS: TOWARD AN OBSERVATORY PROTOTYPE

OF THE 65 FRENCH SDIS

http://www-iuem.univ-brest.fr/pops/projects/geobs

Matthieu Noucher & Françoise Gourmelon Xavier Amelot Marina Duféal Amarilis Dorta Pierre Gautreau Jade Georis-Creuseveau Antoine Laumond Adeline Maulpoix Guy Melançon Julie Pierson Bruno Pinaud Nathalie Pinède Oliver Pissoat Ines Priat Mathias Rouan Karel Soumagnac-Colin