FULLFILING THE PROMISE: PREPARING ALL CHILDREN FOR SCHOOL THROUGH - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

fullfiling the promise preparing all children for school
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

FULLFILING THE PROMISE: PREPARING ALL CHILDREN FOR SCHOOL THROUGH - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FULLFILING THE PROMISE: PREPARING ALL CHILDREN FOR SCHOOL THROUGH EARLY LEARNING PARTNERSHIPS WITH K-12 . Barbara T. Bowman Irving B. Harris Professor, Erikson Institute Chief Officer, Office of Early Childhood Education (OECE)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

FULLFILING THE PROMISE: PREPARING ALL CHILDREN FOR SCHOOL THROUGH EARLY LEARNING PARTNERSHIPS WITH K-12.

Barbara T. Bowman Irving B. Harris Professor, Erikson Institute Chief Officer, Office of Early Childhood Education (OECE) bbowman@erikson.edu

Office of Early Childhood Education • Chicago Public Schools • 773-553-2010

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

CHICAGO OFFICE OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATON

2010 40,800 Children and families Budget: $1,920,000

Office of Early Childhood Education • Chicago Public Schools • 773-553-2010

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

RATIONAL FOR INVESTMENT

Early experience affects brain development.

0 - 5 programs can change educational and social outcomes.

Specific academic and social/emotional skills and knowledge at preschool age predict later school achievement.

Economic and social benefits from preschool.

Office of Early Childhood Education • Chicago Public Schools • 773-553-2010

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

THE CHALLENGE

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

In varying periods of time (full day/half day, one year/five years) under various auspices (centers, homes, schools),

teachers and caregivers will teach all children (particularly those at risk of school failure),

so at the end of the preschool years, children will have the same outcome (kindergarten readiness),

allowing them to learn in school (large units grouped by age), the same things (academic subjects and social behavior), with diverse curricula as measured by standardized tests.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

THE SAME OUTCOMES?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

It really is rocket science

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

CPS PROGRAMS

PRESCHOOL FOR ALL – 32,000

Preschool (schools: 14,000; agencies: 10,000) Prevention Initiative (agencies – infants/toddlers: 3,000) families: 5,000)

HEAD START (In schools)– 7,200 TUITION BASED PRESCHOOL – 500 CHILD-PARENT CENTERS – 1,100

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

HOW DID CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS (CPS) GET HERE?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

EARLY EDUCATION AND CHILD CARE CAME TOGETHER

1960s Began mending the division between child care and early education (CAEYC)

1966 Head Start cut across organizations and institutions

1970s Joined together to revise licensing standards locally and nationally

1980s Joint committees organized by Mayor and Governors.

Today: Early Learning Council

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

RESEARCH DISSEMINATED

Westinghouse

Intervention Studies

HIGH/SCOPE

CHILD PARENT CENTERS

ABCEDARIAN

Brain development

Early Intervention

Economic benefits

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

PHILANTHROPIC COMMUNITY ENGAGED

Long history of preschool education

Frances Parker

Mental health interventions

Institute for Psychoanalysis

Institute for Juvenile Research

Public/private partnerships

Ounce of Prevention

Long term funding commitments

McCormick Foundation

University research

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

PREK in CPS

2010 State 0 -5 Budget 127m

1930s Experimental Preschool - ended 1942

1965 Summer Head Start in Chicago Public Schools

1968 Year-around Head Start

1975 Certification for Prekindergarten (Special Ed) extended to Prek-3

1986 State Preschool Initiated

Infant Prevention Initiative

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

THE ILLINOIS MODEL

Agencies and private schools can receive Preschool for All $.

State education funding can be combined with Head Start, Child Care, and special ed.

Layered model: Child Care Block Grant + Head Start + Preschool for All + Special Education

Most at-risk children received most public funding.

Set asides for Prevention 0 – 3.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

THE CHICAGO MODEL: CPS/FSS WORK TOGETHER

Fund each other’s programs (Head Start/PFA).

Share services

Share data (C-PEP, ECERS, ELLCO, CLASS).

Top administrators meet together bimonthly.

Work with DCFS for licensing, homeless, foster children, etc.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

WHY FOCUS ON EDUCATION?

THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

74% 88% 51% 35% 66% 44% 68% 82%

20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2003 2004 2005 2006

Percent Meeting/Exceeding

Asian/Pacific Black Hispanic White

READING ACHIEVEMENT GAPS…

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

80% 94% 53% 32% 75% 48% 70% 86%

20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2003 2004 2005 2006

Percent Meeting/Exceeding

Asian/Pacific Black Hispanic White

MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT GAP….

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

MYTHS

CHILDREN WHO ARE DEVELOPMENTALLY COMPETENT WILL AUTOMATICALLY DO WELL IN SCHOOL

ALL CHILDREN CAN LEARN WITH THE SAME CURRICULUM.

CHILDREN MUST KNOW THEIR HOME LANGUAGE BEFORE THEY LEARN ANOTHER.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

WHAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE IN INTERVENTION

Structural factors

Ratios

Group Size

Teacher knowledge

Content

Children’s prior knowledge

Interactional variables

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT EFFECTIVE PROGRAMS?

Content matters

Alignment matters

Relationships are important

Teaching is hard work

Office of Early Childhood Education • Chicago Public Schools • 773-553-2010

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

TOOLS TO MEET THE CHALLENGE

Early Learning Standards

Program assessment instruments

Curricula planning technology

Intervention/motivation strategies

Parent involvement

Professional development

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

ISSUES

Either/or ideologies

Assessment of children

½ day/full day programs

Bilingual education

Inclusion

Parent involvement

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

WHAT SHOULD TEACHERS DO?

Make sure children love them and love learning.

Teach the facts, what they mean, and why they are important.

Teach thinking; it doesn’t just happen.

Children are continuously engaged in learning; children who are interested and busy are less likely to be naughty and whiney.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

WHAT SHOULD PRINICIPALS & DIRECTORS DO?

Address factors leading to better outcomes for children (curriculum, grouping, differentiation).

Align expectations across grades.

Assess teaching and learning.

Try out new ways to enhance learning. (Nothing changes if nothing changes.)

Office of Early Childhood Education • Chicago Public Schools • 773-553-2010

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

WHAT SHOULD K-12 SYSTEMS DO?

Collaborate with childcare and Head Start to set common expectations for K.

Require positive parent and community involvement

Provide or cooperate in the development of before and after school options.

Provide IT assistance to agencies for data management.

Set performance standards.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

WHAT SHOULD ADVOCATES DO?

Campaign for improvement -- but recognize reality.

Develop a model that is flexible; everyone doesn’t need the same things.

Review teacher preparation programs.

Make alliances; no one group can have everything.

Do your homework; you need levers to change.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

WHAT I HAVE LEARNED!

Change is a messy process: stake holders interests make it harder.

All services are important; focus on the children.

Families do not always care about the same things professionals want. Neither is right or wrong. Compromise.

Get thick skin. Someone will not want what you propose.

Everyone can change -- even me.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

“Education costs money, but then so does ignorance."

  • - Sir Claus Moser