2016-2017 School Board Presentation October 10, 2017 Our Equity - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
2016 2017
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2016-2017 School Board Presentation October 10, 2017 Our Equity - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 05, 2023 360 likes •772 views

Mounds View Schools Equity Promise Accountability Report 2016-2017 School Board Presentation October 10, 2017 Our Equity Promise Our promise: Programs and services will be in place at all schools to ensure that race, class, and

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Mounds View Schools Equity Promise Accountability Report

2016-2017

School Board Presentation October 10, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Our Equity Promise

Our promise:

  • Programs and services will be in place at all schools to

ensure that race, class, and disability will not predict students’ success.

  • Students academic performance will not fall into patterns

identifiable by factors such as race, ethnicity, English language proficiency, socioeconomic status, or disability.

  • The school that a student attends will not be the predictor
  • f his or her success in school.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Our Plan

In order to address Achievement , Mounds View also addresses three other areas that are critical to increasing student achievement.

  • Aspirations – How do we support the hopes and

ambitions of ALL Students

  • Expectations – How do we meet the expectations of

ALL students and their families as they pursue college and career readiness?

  • Opportunities - How do we provide ALL students with

access to rigorous course work that prepares them for

  • pportunities of their choice after high school?

Addressing these four areas will help us to meet our Equity Promise.

See the full brochure: Our Promise, Our Plan, Our Progress on the Mounds View Public Schools Webpage

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Measuring the Opportunities

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Ways High School Students at Mounds View Schools Earn College Credit

Programs Descriptions Examples Anoka Ramsey Community College Course (ARCC) Students participate in ARCC course taught by high school staff (mentored by ARCC staff) and

  • ffered at the high school

Biology, Chemistry, Interpersonal Comm, College Algebra, Art Appreciation Advanced Placement (AP) Courses Students participate in AP approved course taught by high school staff and receive 3 or better on AP exam Language & Comp, Psychology, World Lang, Physics, History College in the Schools (CIS) Course Students participate in CIS course taught by high school staff and earn University of Minnesota College Credit Introduction to Literature, College Composition College Level Examination Program (CLEP) Students participate in course taught by high school staff and receive 50 or better on the CLEP exam Sociology, Marketing Post Secondary Enrollment Options (PSEO) Students participate in college/university courses at the college/university campus Various Career and Technical Education Articulated Credit Courses Students in grades 10-12 participate in CTE course and earn credit that will be honored at some Minnesota Community Colleges Accounting, Career Skills, Business, Construction, Auto Service

slide-6
SLIDE 6

16-17 Count of Students with Concurrent Enrollment in College Level Courses 64% of the

High School Students were enrolled in Concurrent Enrollment classes during the 16-17 school year. (61% in 15-16 61% in 14-15)

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Achievement Results

  • !"#

$% &% ! '% " (% )%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

NWEA Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)

:

!"

#

slide-11
SLIDE 11

NWEA Measures of Academic Progress

  • $%&'

"'" ()* (

  • +,-.

/ 01

  • 23#4 )5

/0 )5 / 0"1

slide-12
SLIDE 12

NWEA Reading Median RIT Scores by Year

Grade K Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 2014 164 185 199 210 216 223 225 229 234 2015 168 186 200 209 217 222 227 230 234 2016 169 189 200 209 218.5 223 226 231 233 2017 166 188 200 208 216 221 227 230 231 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 RIT

NWEA READING MEDIAN

3

2015 Norms: 158 178 189 199 206 212 216 218 220

slide-13
SLIDE 13

NWEA Reading Median RIT Scores by Year

Grade K Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 2014 168 190 200 216 226 236 239 243 250 2015 171 191 202 214 227 234 243 245 250 2016 173 194 203 215 227 235 240 247 250 2017 170 195 203 214 225.5 234 241 245 249 50 100 150 200 250 300 RIT

NWEA MATH MEDIAN

*

2015 Norms 159 181 192 203 214 221 225 229 231

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Progress on School Readiness Goal

This goal is in alignment with MDE World’s Best Work Force Focus Goals

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Percent of Students meeting

  • r exceeding Growth Target:

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 2015 68 72 65 63 61 60 64 67 2016 69 73 59 71 63 56 60 58 2017 62 61 53 64 52 53 59 55 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

PERCENT OF STUDENTS

NWEA READING GROWTH

  • Growth Calculated Using 2015

Norms NWEA Norm: 50% Benchmark Mounds View Goal: 65% 59th 61st 49th 61tst 50th 58th 62nd 59th National Percentile for this Growth

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Percent of Students meeting

  • r exceeding Growth Target:

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 2015 73 61 68 64 54 72 73 74 2016 75 66 64 69 55 71 69 67 2017 71 51 63 68 52 68 63 60 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

PERCENT OF STUDENTS

NWEA MATH GROWTH

National Percentile for this Growth 77th 49th 61st 68th 49th 68th 60th 57th

,

Growth Calculated Using 2015 Norms NWEA Norm: 50% Benchmark Mounds View Goal: 65%

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment (MCA-III)

" !

4

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments-Series III

Mathematics: Summary of Results

  • "6
  • "1
  • "61,
  • 1
  • &(

"6 (1

  • $

7

  • 89 #1*.
  • 85#14.
  • 8#19.
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Mathematics MCA-III

2017 District and State Comparison

3 4 5 6 7 8 11 District 73.9 77 63.8 68.9 69.5 68.6 62.8 State 68.1 66.7 57.1 55.2 54.9 58 48.3 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % of Students Proficient Math Proficiency: % Meeting or Exceeding the Standards

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Mathematics MCA-III

2014-2017 District Historical Results

3 4 5 6 7 8 11 2014 78.9 76.3 69.8 66.3 66.7 70.8 65 2015 76.2 78.6 66.4 72.6 69.6 72.7 63.4 2016 78 76.7 67 72.2 71.8 67.9 62.4 2017 73.9 77 63.8 68.9 69.5 68.6 62.8 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % of Students Proficient Math Proficiency: % Meeting or Exceeding the Standards Mounds View Schools Percent Proficient: 2014=70.5; 2015=71.4; 2016= 71.0; 2017=69.4

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Mathematics MCA-III

2014-2017 District Historical Results

Economic Status=FRP

3 4 5 6 7 8 11 2014 58.1 59 46.9 39.5 40.7 48.8 34 2015 54.1 58.7 45.7 45.8 44.2 49.6 36.8 2016 59 54.3 40.5 51.1 46 44.6 36 2017 47.4 57.4 34.6 45.1 49.1 44.2 46.6 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent of Students Proficient Math Proficiency: % Meeting or Exceeding the Standards Percent of FRP Proficient: 2014=47.9%; 2015=46.0%; 2016=47.9%; 2017= 46.4%

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments-Series III

Reading: Summary of Results

  • "6
  • "1
  • "6/
  • 1
  • &(

"6 (1

  • $
  • 7
  • 8,-19.
  • 85 914.
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Reading MCA-III

2017 District and State Comparison

3 4 5 6 7 8 10 District 64.7 66.4 73.8 75 67.9 71.1 70.2 State 56.5 56.8 67.5 63.4 57.5 58.7 60.3 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % of Students Proficient Reading Proficiency: % Meeting or Exceeding the Standards

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Reading MCA-III

2014-2017 District Historical Results

3 4 5 6 7 8 10 2014 69.2 63.1 76.3 66.9 66.1 67.1 69.6 2015 65.8 69.8 74.1 76.7 67.4 70.8 70.7 2016 67.3 68.5 75.7 69.6 70.5 66.4 70.8 2017 64.7 66.4 73.8 75 67.9 71.1 70.2 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % of Students Proficient Reading Proficiency: % Meeting or Exceeding the Standards Mounds View Schools Percent Proficient: 2014=68.3; 2015=70.7; 2016=69.8; 2017=69.8

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Reading MCA-III

2014-2017 District Historical Results

Economic Status=FRP

3 4 5 6 7 8 10 2014 46.1 38.9 49.8 41.1 40.9 43.8 46.2 2015 38.2 44.3 53.6 53.9 38.4 44.6 44.6 2016 41.8 42.8 51.1 43.6 44.8 42.1 48.5 2017 35.5 42.4 49.1 50.8 44.4 46.7 46.5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent of Students Proficient Reading Proficiency: % Meeting or Exceeding the Standards Percent of FRP Proficient: 2014= 43.5%; 2015= 45.3%; 2016=44.8%; 2017= 45.1%

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Progress on Third Grade Literacy Achievement

Read Well by Third Grade plan demonstrates our commitment to monitoring students’ progress in the area of literacy beginning in Kindergarten. Mounds View Read Well By Third Grade Plan Measures Used to Monitor Student Progress: Letter Naming Fluency, Letter Sound Fluency, Dolch Word List, Nonsense Word Fluency, Oral Reading Fluency, Guided Reading Level, Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) Results from 16-17:

  • 91.4% of Kindergarten students knew 50 words on the Dolch Primary Word List
  • 79.5% of Kindergarten students met the Kindergarten Guided Reading Level (D)
  • 64.1% of First Grade students met the MAP Reading Target for Success on MCA Reading

(182)

  • 62.2% of Second Grade students met the MAP REading Target for Success on MCA

Reading (195)

  • 64.7 % of Third Grade students were proficient on the MCA Reading.

This goal is in alignment with MDE World’s Best Work Force Focus Goals

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments-Series III

Science: Summary of Results

  • "6
  • "1
  • "6313.
  • 1
  • $
  • 7
  • 8-,13.
  • 8531.
  • :;31*.
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Science MCA-III

2017 District and State Comparison

5 8 HS District 62.5 55.2 69.8 State 59.9 45.7 56.1 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % of Students Proficient Science Proficiency: % Meeting or Exceeding the Standards

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Science MCA-III

2014-2017 District Historical Results

5 8 HS 2014 68.9 52.4 60.6 2015 66.2 62.5 68.4 2016 68.7 57.3 67.5 2017 62.5 55.2 69.8 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % of Students Proficient Science Proficiency: % Meeting or Exceeding the Standards Mounds View Schools Percent Proficient: 2014=60.5; 2015=65.7; 2016=64.6; 2017= 62.4%

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Science MCA-III

2014-2017 District Historical Results

Economic Status=FRP 5 8 HS 2014 45.1 24 39 2015 41.6 33.6 43.6 2016 40.7 26.4 43.3 2017 33 30.1 48.3 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % of Students Proficient Science Proficiency: % Meeting or Exceeding the Standards Percent of FRP Proficient: 2014= 36.0%; 2015= 39.4%; 2016=36.8%; 2017= 36.6%

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Progress on Closing Achievement Gap

This goal is in alignment with MDE World’s Best Work Force Focus Goal to decrease the Achievement Gap in one half by 2017 and the Mounds View Achievement and Integration plan to reduce the Achievement Gap in Math

*

$(

  • / "
  • ("

'1 </

  • (

1 $ "6 ( / ( / 1

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Progress on Closing Achievement Gap

This goal is in alignment with MDE World’s Best Work Force Focus Goal to decrease the Achievement Gap in one half by 2017 and the Mounds View Achievement and Integration plan to reduce the Achievement Gap in Math

*3

  • !"
  • !"
  • !"
  • !"

= #

  • #1*

#13 31> 31 *15 *1# 91 *19 = $ %& '

  • <?

; 51* 51 3#1> 31# 3*1, 3*14 3*1> 391-

!'$("

*It is important to note that in these comparison subgroups, the number of students proficient increased for both groups. This resulted in the gap remaining much the same, even though there was an increase in the number of students reaching the proficient levels.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Graduating Class of 2016 Participation on Rigorous Course Work

()''"#

  • @?(
  • @?(
  • @AB

(B3-#?

  • B?(
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Progress on closing achievement gaps

To address achievement gaps, Mounds View Public Schools believes schools must first address the gaps that exist in the aspirations students have for their future, the opportunities available to them and the Expectations every family has for their school. Irondale Early College Fast Facts for the Class of 2016 Mounds View Early College Fast Facts for the Class of 2016

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Student Achievement Post Secondary Readiness

'$

*-

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Progress on college and career readiness

Mounds View Schools has supported all juniors in accessing the ACT as Juniors (Starting with the Class of 2012) and assesses students’ college and career readiness through their performance on this exam ACT Score out of 36 98% of the Grade 11 Class take the ACT each year This goal is in alignment with MDE World’s Best Work Force Focus Goals

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Progress on graduation rates

Mounds View School measures the percent of students who graduate in exactly 4 years + percent of those who continue according to their plan = Graduating according to plan

  • 3#9
  • 3#-
  • 3#,

';; >,1> >414 >413 & >51* >51# >414

  • >413

>415 >51# < >*1> >-1 >*13 ; >,1* >31# >,1#

  • >*1-

>-14 >31* "6 /9C D) 1 This goal is in alignment with MDE World’s Best Work Force Focus Goals

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Key Messages

  • $"6((
  • (/

1

  • "6
  • 1
  • "6

1

  • '
  • (/
  • "6/

; ';;

*5

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Questions?

7

  • "
  • '='
  • 1E1
  • ,-),3),#93

*>