family planning in sub saharan africa progress or
play

Family Planning in sub-Saharan Africa: Progress or Stagnation? John - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Family Planning in sub-Saharan Africa: Progress or Stagnation? John Cleland*, Robert Ndugwa*, Eliya Zulu** *Centre for Population Studies, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine **African Institute for Development Policy, Nairobi,


  1. Family Planning in sub-Saharan Africa: Progress or Stagnation? John Cleland*, Robert Ndugwa*, Eliya Zulu** *Centre for Population Studies, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine **African Institute for Development Policy, Nairobi, Kenya International Conference on Family Planning: Research and Best Practices 15-18 November 2009 Kampala, Uganda

  2. Background Background Methods Results Discussion • Fertility transition in sub-Saharan Africa appears to have slowed down • Assumption -> sustained transition towards low fertility will be driven primarily by mass use of modern FP. • Fertility decline is unlikely to proceed at a fast sustained pace unless a large fraction of couples are ''ready, willing and able'' to use modern effective contraception. • Objective • Review progress, or lack of progress, towards mass uptake of modern contraception. • Using the framework of Readiness, Willingness, Ability.

  3. Background Methods Readiness , Willingness, Ability Results Discussion • Readiness refers to the subjective need or desire to postpone births or limit family size • Willingness represents favourable attitudes to the idea of contraception and to specific methods • Ability denotes knowledge of methods and supply sources and reasonable access to them. The 3 elements in this simple conceptual framework no doubt interact with each other.

  4. Background Methods Results Data & Methods Discussion • 24 sub-Saharan African countries that have conducted two or more DHSs – 13 from West Africa (WA) – 11 from East -Southern Africa (ESA) • Coverage : represent over 75% of the entire population of the sub-Saharan Africa. • Median years of first (1991/2) & most recent (2004) survey – ( middle survey variable used if missing from first or most recent survey) • Currently married/cohabiting fecund women (sterilized included)

  5. Background Methods Results Discussion Measures of Readiness, Willingness, Ability Measures used Indicators (N) 1. % Want to delay next child for 2+ years Ready (2) 2. % Want no more children or sterilized 1. % Woman and husband approve FP Willing (3) 2. % Intention to use modern method (among non-users) 3. % Discuss FP with partner Able (3) 1. % Know both pill and injectables 2. % Know source of Family planning 3. % Know pill and injectables and knows source for FP Using(3) 1. % Current use of modern method ( exposed only ) 2. Among those who want to delay next child after 2+ years, % using Modern method 3. Among those who want no more, % using Modern method

  6. Background Methods Results Measures of readiness Discussion Trends in % of women who want no more children Trends in % wanting to delay next child for 2+ years West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11] West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11] 60 40 50 % Want to delay next child % who want no more 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004] [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004] Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by living children, education and residence) (standardized by length of open interval, education and residence)

  7. Background Methods Results Discussion Measures of Willingness Trends in % of couples where wife approves Trends in % of women with intentions and reports that partner approves to use contraception West Africa(N=12) East Southern Africa(N=10) West Africa(N=13) East Southern Africa(N=11) 80 80 % who approve & partner approves % Intend to use contraception 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 [1991] [2003] [1992] [2003] [1991] [2004] [1992] [2004] Results are for fecund,non-abstaining currently married or co-habiting women Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by (standardized by education and residence) education and residence)

  8. Background Methods Results Measures of Willingness Discussion Trends in % who discuss FP with partner at least once in past year West Africa(WA)[N=12]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=10] 80 % who discuss FP with partner 60 40 20 [WA=1991] [WA=2003] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2003] Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by education and residence)

  9. Background Methods Measures of ability Results Discussion Trends in % of women who know both Trends in % of women who know pills and injectables where to access FP method West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11] West Africa(WA)[N=10]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=9] 100 100 % who know both pills & injectables % know where to access FP 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004] [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004] Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by education and residence) (standardized by education and residence) •Knowledge of the two methods most widely used by married women in Africa has greatly increased

  10. Background Methods Measures of ability Results Discussion Trends in % of women who know pills and injectables and know FP source among all current non-users Both regions show increases in West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11] % who know pill and injectable and FP source this indicator of ability which 80 combines knowledge of the two methods and of a supply source 60 and thus comes closer to a realistic measure of access. 40 20 BUT Knowledge of method and supply source remains low in WA (In 2004 - only 0 29%). [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004] Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by education and residence)

  11. Background Current use measures Methods Results Discussion Trends in % of women who are Trends in % of women who are currently using Modern contraception currently using Modern FP method West Africa(N=7) East Southern Africa(N=9) West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11] 80 80 % currently using modern FP % currently using modern FP 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 [1991] [1998] [2005] [1992] [1999] [2005] [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004] Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting exposed women (standardized by Results are for fecund, non-abstaining currently married or co-habiting women education and residence) (standardized by education and residence)

  12. Background Methods Results Current use measures Discussion Among those wanting no more Among those wanting to delay for 2+ years % using modern method % currently using modern method West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11] West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11] 80 80 % using modern method among % using modern method among those wanting no more those wanting to delay 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004] [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004] Results are for fecund, non-abstaining currently married or co-habiting women Results are for fecund, non-abstaining currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by length of open interval, education and residence) (standardized by length of open interval, education and residence)

  13. Background Methods Median percentage of Current use, Readiness or Non- Results readiness, Willingness, and Ability to use modern methods Discussion among current fecund, married or cohabiting, non-pregnant women in West (N=11) and East/Southern Africa (N=10). 100% 90% 80% 70% Percentage 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% West (1993) West (2003) East/South (1993) East/South(2003) Regions (Median year) Current users Ready+Willing+Able Ready+Able only Ready+Willing only Ready only Not Ready

  14. Background Methods Results Discussion Explanations for sub-regional divide • Health care delivery • Family planning effort (Ross index) • Human development index • Agricultural land availability • Sociological. – likely that the extended lineage, which acts to diffuse the costs of childbearing, remains more important in the West • Education of married women – % completed primary schooling – WA(13% to16%) – ESA(24% to 46%)

  15. Background Methods Results Discussion Changes emerging from WA region • In the 13 West African countries: subjective demand or need for contraception among married women remains low at about 35% and has not changed • Positive approval of family planning and intention to use in the future also remain low and have changed only modestly • Increase in contraceptive use is only 0.6 percent points per year.

  16. Background Methods Changes emerging from ESA region Results Discussion • Demand for contraception to limit family size (though interestingly not for postponement) has risen sharply to 45%, – attitudes have become more positive and access in terms of knowledge and a supply source is very high. • Current use of contraception has risen at an annual rate of 1.5 percent points, which is close to the general experience of developing countries over past decades. • One important caveat to this positive verdict is that the pace of increase in contraceptive use has slowed down appreciably, from an annual change of 2.7 points in the 1990s to 1.45 more recently.

  17. Acknowledgments • DFID (through funding to the Realizing Right Research program Consortia) • Wellcome Trust • FP Conference Organizers

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend