Family Planning in sub-Saharan Africa: Progress or Stagnation? John - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

family planning in sub saharan africa progress or
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Family Planning in sub-Saharan Africa: Progress or Stagnation? John - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Family Planning in sub-Saharan Africa: Progress or Stagnation? John Cleland*, Robert Ndugwa*, Eliya Zulu** *Centre for Population Studies, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine **African Institute for Development Policy, Nairobi,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Family Planning in sub-Saharan Africa: Progress or Stagnation?

John Cleland*, Robert Ndugwa*, Eliya Zulu**

*Centre for Population Studies, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine **African Institute for Development Policy, Nairobi, Kenya

International Conference on Family Planning: Research and Best Practices 15-18 November 2009 Kampala, Uganda

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • Fertility transition in sub-Saharan Africa appears to have

slowed down

  • Assumption -> sustained transition towards low fertility will

be driven primarily by mass use of modern FP.

  • Fertility decline is unlikely to proceed at a fast sustained

pace unless a large fraction of couples are ''ready, willing and able'' to use modern effective contraception.

  • Objective
  • Review progress, or lack of progress, towards mass uptake
  • f modern contraception.
  • Using the framework of Readiness, Willingness, Ability.

Background Methods Results Discussion

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Readiness, Willingness, Ability

  • Readiness refers to the subjective need or desire

to postpone births or limit family size

  • Willingness represents favourable attitudes to the

idea of contraception and to specific methods

  • Ability denotes knowledge of methods and supply

sources and reasonable access to them. The 3 elements in this simple conceptual framework no doubt interact with each other.

Background Methods Results Discussion

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Data & Methods

  • 24 sub-Saharan African countries that have conducted two
  • r more DHSs

– 13 from West Africa (WA) – 11 from East -Southern Africa (ESA)

  • Coverage : represent over 75% of the entire population of

the sub-Saharan Africa.

  • Median years of first (1991/2) & most recent (2004) survey

– ( middle survey variable used if missing from first or most recent survey)

  • Currently married/cohabiting fecund women (sterilized

included)

Background Methods Results Discussion

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Measures of Readiness, Willingness, Ability

1. % Want to delay next child for 2+ years 2. % Want no more children or sterilized

Ready (2)

1. % Know both pill and injectables 2. % Know source of Family planning 3. % Know pill and injectables and knows source for FP

Able (3)

1. % Current use of modern method (exposed only) 2. Among those who want to delay next child after 2+ years, % using Modern method 3. Among those who want no more, % using Modern method

Using(3)

1. % Woman and husband approve FP 2. % Intention to use modern method (among non-users) 3. % Discuss FP with partner

Willing (3)

Measures used Indicators (N)

Background Methods Results Discussion

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Measures of readiness

10 20 30 40 50 60 % who want no more [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004]

Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by living children, education and residence)

West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11]

Trends in % of women who want no more children

10 20 30 40 % Want to delay next child [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004]

Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by length of open interval, education and residence)

West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11]

Trends in % wanting to delay next child for 2+ years

Background Methods Results Discussion

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Measures of Willingness

20 40 60 80 [1991] [2003] [1992] [2003]

West Africa(N=12) East Southern Africa(N=10)

% who approve & partner approves

Results are for fecund,non-abstaining currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by education and residence)

Trends in % of couples where wife approves and reports that partner approves

20 40 60 80 [1991] [2004] [1992] [2004]

West Africa(N=13) East Southern Africa(N=11)

% Intend to use contraception

Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by education and residence)

Trends in % of women with intentions to use contraception Background Methods Results Discussion

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Measures of Willingness

20 40 60 80 % who discuss FP with partner [WA=1991] [WA=2003] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2003]

Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by education and residence)

West Africa(WA)[N=12]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=10]

Trends in % who discuss FP with partner at least once in past year

Background Methods Results Discussion

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Measures of ability

20 40 60 80 100 % who know both pills & injectables [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004]

Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by education and residence)

West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11]

Trends in % of women who know both pills and injectables Background Methods Results Discussion

20 40 60 80 100 % know where to access FP [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004]

Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by education and residence)

West Africa(WA)[N=10]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=9]

Trends in % of women who know where to access FP method

  • Knowledge of the two methods most

widely used by married women in Africa has greatly increased

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Measures of ability

Background Methods Results Discussion

20 40 60 80 % who know pill and injectable and FP source [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004]

Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by education and residence)

West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11]

Trends in % of women who know pills and injectables and know FP source among all current non-users

Both regions show increases in this indicator of ability which combines knowledge of the two methods and of a supply source and thus comes closer to a realistic measure of access. BUT Knowledge of method and supply source remains low in WA (In 2004 - only 29%).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Current use measures

Background Methods Results Discussion

20 40 60 80 % currently using modern FP [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004]

Results are for fecund, non-abstaining currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by education and residence)

West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11]

Trends in % of women who are currently using Modern FP method

20 40 60 80 [1991] [1998] [2005] [1992] [1999] [2005]

West Africa(N=7) East Southern Africa(N=9)

% currently using modern FP

Results are for fecund, currently married or co-habiting exposed women (standardized by education and residence)

Trends in % of women who are currently using Modern contraception

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Current use measures

20 40 60 80 % using modern method among those wanting to delay [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004]

Results are for fecund, non-abstaining currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by length of open interval, education and residence)

West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11]

Among those wanting to delay for 2+ years % currently using modern method Background Methods Results Discussion

20 40 60 80 % using modern method among those wanting no more [WA=1991] [WA=2004] [ESA=1992] [ESA=2004]

Results are for fecund, non-abstaining currently married or co-habiting women (standardized by length of open interval, education and residence)

West Africa(WA)[N=13]; East/Southern Africa(ESA)[N=11]

Among those wanting no more % using modern method

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Median percentage of Current use, Readiness or Non- readiness, Willingness, and Ability to use modern methods among current fecund, married or cohabiting, non-pregnant women in West (N=11) and East/Southern Africa (N=10).

Background Methods Results Discussion 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% West (1993) West (2003) East/South (1993) East/South(2003)

Percentage Regions (Median year) Current users Ready+Willing+Able Ready+Able only Ready+Willing only Ready only Not Ready

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Explanations for sub-regional divide

  • Health care delivery
  • Family planning effort (Ross index)
  • Human development index
  • Agricultural land availability
  • Sociological.

– likely that the extended lineage, which acts to diffuse the costs of childbearing, remains more important in the West

  • Education of married women

– % completed primary schooling – WA(13% to16%) – ESA(24% to 46%)

Background Methods Results Discussion

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Changes emerging from WA region

  • In the 13 West African countries: subjective demand or

need for contraception among married women remains low at about 35% and has not changed

  • Positive approval of family planning and intention to use

in the future also remain low and have changed only modestly

  • Increase in contraceptive use is only 0.6 percent points

per year.

Background Methods Results Discussion

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Changes emerging from ESA region

  • Demand for contraception to limit family size (though

interestingly not for postponement) has risen sharply to 45%, – attitudes have become more positive and access in terms of knowledge and a supply source is very high.

  • Current use of contraception has risen at an annual rate of 1.5

percent points, which is close to the general experience of developing countries over past decades.

  • One important caveat to this positive verdict is that the pace of

increase in contraceptive use has slowed down appreciably, from an annual change of 2.7 points in the 1990s to 1.45 more recently.

Background Methods Results Discussion

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Acknowledgments

  • DFID (through funding to the Realizing

Right Research program Consortia)

  • Wellcome Trust
  • FP Conference Organizers