Endocrine Disruption as the pilote of mapping the Human Toxome - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

endocrine disruption as the pilote of mapping the human
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Endocrine Disruption as the pilote of mapping the Human Toxome - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Endocrine Disruption as the pilote of mapping the Human Toxome Thomas Hartung Doerenkamp-Zbinden Professor and Chair for Evidence-based Toxicology, EHS Director, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT) Joint appointment: Molecular


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Thomas Hartung

Doerenkamp-Zbinden Professor and Chair for Evidence-based Toxicology, EHS Director, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT) Joint appointment: Molecular Microbiology and Immunology Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, US Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Konstanz, Germany

Endocrine Disruption as the pilote of mapping the Human Toxome

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Human endocrine health effects including cancer? 100,000 in commerce <3% tested for endocrine or reproductive tox.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Endocrine disruption

ECVAM

  • Task force
  • QSAR workshop
  • Validation
  • ReProTect

CAAT

  • White paper
  • NIH consortium
  • Conference Rome

17 Dec 2012

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Toxicology - $3 billion of testing to regulate $10 trillion of trade

Problems

  • Throughput
  • Costs
  • Predictivity
  • Too precautionary
  • Animal use
  • New products
  • New hazards
  • Mixtures
  • Individuals
slide-5
SLIDE 5

7’2010: 21st Century Validation for 21st Century Tools

All current toxicological information to date strongly suggest that the routine rodent models are inadequate for detection of EAS and assumed endocrine effects in humans

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Hershberger & uterotrophic

  • Not sensitive

enough

  • Unsuitable

validation design

  • Abrogation of

peer-review

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Animal test Reprotox

8 months $0.6 million/chemical 3,200 animals/chemical 64% positive Estimate human 2-3% positive

Problem inter-species differences

mice, rat, rabbit, guinea pig predict each other with 60% correlation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Serious doubt remains as to a major impact of more than a few chemicals as ED

But society wants problem addressed

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Combine the drivers of change from EU and US EU: legislation, funding, integrated testing,

  • rganizations

US: technologies, Tox- 21c, TSCA reauthor.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The pipeline 12 articles published (5 responses in Nature / Science) 6 articles in preparation 5 workshop reports published 7 reports pending 5 workshops planned Ambassadors Bas Blaauboer Alan Goldberg Thomas Hartung Marcel Leist

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Scientific roadmap for the future of animal- free systemic toxicity testing

May 2011: EC report on status of alternatives Sep 2011: Independent review by 19 international experts Oct 2011: Five white paper on the way forward Consensus workshop with 35 experts Feb 2012: Roadmap published Mar 2012: Stakeholder Forum in Brussels with 150 experts Early 2013: US Stakeholder Forum

slide-12
SLIDE 12

An atmosphere of departure in toxicology New technologies from biotech and (bio- )informatics revolution Mapping of pathways of toxicity (PoT)

NAS vision report Tox-21c

“We propose a shift from primarily in vivo animal studies to in vitro assays, in vivo assays with lower organisms, and computational modeling for toxicity assessments”

  • F. Collins, NIH, 2008

“With an advanced field of regulatory science, new tools, including functional genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, high- throughput screening, and systems biology, we can replace current toxicology assays with tests that incorporate the mechanistic underpinnings of disease and of underlying toxic side effects.” M.A. Hamburg, FDA 2011

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Initiatives implementing Tox-21c

Organization Approach Purpose Outcome US EPA & Tox21 (ToxCast Program) High-throughput testing Chemical prioritization (initially) “Biological signatures” Hamner Institute Case studies “Just do it” Proof-of-principle NIH project (CAAT-US) Pathway mapping Pathway ID & annotation Human Toxome

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Office of Research and Development National Center for Computational Toxicology

ToxPi - Endocrine Disruption Prioritization

HPTE

ToxScore

Pyrimethanil Tebuthiuron Linuron Methoxychlor Rotenone BPA

309 Chemicals sorted by ToxPi score ToxPi highest lowest

Ingenuity path ER AR TR Other XME/ADME KEGG path LogP_TPSA CaCO-2 Disease classes Other NR

Reif et al, EHP, 2010

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The concept of (finite number of) pathways of toxicity

Annotation to:

  • Hazard
  • Toxin (class)
  • Cell type
  • Species

Comprehensive list (Human Toxome) Negatives

Toxicant Toxicant

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Starting point: (Pre-)Validated Models Robust protocols, good cell models Regulatory acceptance Available reference substances Thresholds of adversity defined $300 million of research & validation spent Estrogenic endocrine disruption

  • PoT-based, well understood
  • many other tests
  • Testing needs

Reference substances Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Emerging bioinformatic integration for pathway identification

slide-17
SLIDE 17

PoToMaC - The Pathways of Toxicty Mapping Center

Transformative Research Grant: Mapping the Human Toxome by Systems Toxicology

7 companies, 3 stakeholders

European branch?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2 Mar 2012

“Driven both by legislative mandate and scientific need, a new suite of in vitro and cell culture-based animal-free methods are gaining a foothold in toxicology labs.”

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Evidence-based Toxicology “Evidence-based medicine goes toxicology!”

Hoffmann and Hartung “Toward an evidence-based toxicology”, Human Exp. Tox., 2006

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Mar 2011: US EBTC Oct 2011: Secretariat at CAAT Jan 2012: First conference hosted by EPA

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The difficulty lies, not in the new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones. John Maynard Keynes (1883 - 1946)