Dry Matter Intake and Manure Production for Dry Matter Intake and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dry matter intake and manure production for dry matter
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Dry Matter Intake and Manure Production for Dry Matter Intake and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Understanding Nutrient & Sediment Loss at Breneman Farms 7 Dry Matter Intake and Manure Production for Dry Matter Intake and Manure Production for Management Intensively Grazed Dairy Cattle Kevan Klingberg and Dennis Frame UW


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Dry Matter Intake and Manure Production for

Understanding Nutrient & Sediment Loss at Breneman Farms ‐ 7

Dry Matter Intake and Manure Production for Management Intensively Grazed Dairy Cattle

Kevan Klingberg and Dennis Frame – UW Extension/Discovery Farms Dennis Cosgrove – UW‐River Falls

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Breneman Farms

  • On‐farm research was conducted on the Breneman farm to

investigate environmental challenges and opportunities for grass‐based dairies on the Wisconsin landscape, 2002‐2007. g p ,

  • While cooperating with the UW‐Discovery Farms Program,

pasture and dairy herd management information from this pasture and dairy herd management information from this farm was compiled within a larger pool of statewide farm information through a USDA Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) project. and Education (SARE) project.

– The Breneman farm was one of seven farms utilized for on‐farm research associated with a SARE project titled: “Nutrient research associated with a SARE project titled: Nutrient Management Planning for Dairy Farms Practicing Management Intensive Rotational Grazing.”

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Breneman Farms

Grazing‐based dairy. 42 paddocks. 80 crossbred dairy cows + young stock cows + young stock. (1.6 acres / AU) Coarse textured soil Out‐winter cows and

  • lder heifers

Columbia County, WI

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Grazing‐based Dairy

  • Grass‐based dairies have existed in Wisconsin since we

began milking cows.

  • While many dairies have moved cattle into

confinement facilities, the Wisconsin dairy industry l d d f includes an important and ever‐growing group of producers who practice Management Intensive Grazing (MIG).

  • In the past several years the interest in MIG has been

increasing as demonstrated in the 2004 Agricultural increasing, as demonstrated in the 2004 Agricultural Statistics, which indicates that about 14 percent of the state’s dairy operations were utilizing some version of managed grazing managed grazing.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Grazing‐based Dairy

  • Grazing systems allow producers to begin or continue

dairying with minimal investment in equipment on farms where their daily activities center on managing y g g grass and dairy animals.

  • As with any farming system there are many variations
  • As with any farming system, there are many variations

within rotational grazing, which include choices in the frequency of moving cattle, the types of facilities to h d ilk ttl d th th d t d ilk house and milk cattle, and the method to produce milk ‐ either conventionally or organically.

  • The use of MIG farming systems can be done with dairy

cattle, beef, sheep or any other form of livestock capable of utilizing forage‐based systems. capable of utilizing forage based systems.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Grazing‐based Dairy

  • Grass‐based dairy systems simultaneously

y y y combine grazing animals, actively growing pasture forage, paddock fences, watering facilities travel lanes and generally some type of facilities, travel lanes, and generally some type of low‐cost housing facilities.

  • These systems greatly minimize the need for

mechanical forage harvesting equipment, feed storage and handling and intensive housing storage and handling and intensive housing facilities, as well as manure storage, handling and hauling.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Grazing‐based Dairy

  • Dairies practicing MIG report increased profitability as a result
  • f lower feed, energy, equipment, and labor costs, as well as

improved animal health and lower veterinary costs.

  • Although Wisconsin studies have shown that when managed

correctly, both grazing and non‐grazing dairy systems can be correctly, both grazing and non grazing dairy systems can be profitable, a University of Wisconsin ‐ Center for Dairy Profitability study shows that the nine year average (1999‐ 2007) total basic costs on grazing dairies were $650 less per cow, compared to confinement dairies.

  • Similarly, grazing dairies earned $230 more net farm income

Similarly, grazing dairies earned $230 more net farm income per cow compared to confinement operations over the same time period.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Grazing‐based Dairy

h h f h f f

  • At the heart of this farming system is a focus on

ruminant livestock harvesting high quality forage via grazing and spreading their own manure in via grazing and spreading their own manure in the process.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Grazing‐based Dairy•

Pastures are (usually) – delineated by permanent perimeter fences – further subdivided by temporary fencing – connected by travel lanes – watering systems in common areas

  • Cattle are systematically moved into

and out of paddocks – eating good quality fresh pasture – eating good quality fresh pasture forage f ll d b t i d th t – followed by a rest period that allows adequate time for the perennial grass and legume plants to re‐grow before the next grazing to re‐grow before the next grazing cycle.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Grazing‐based Dairy

  • UW ‐ Extension publication A3529, “Pastures

for profit: a guide to rotational grazing” covers for profit: a guide to rotational grazing covers the basics of setting up rotational grazing (MIG) on your farm. (MIG) on your farm.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Feed and Manure on Grazing Dairies

  • Nitrogen, phosphorus and other nutrients applied in an

i lt l t ti l l f th il t agricultural system continuously cycle from the soil to crops to feed to livestock to manure, and back to the soil.

  • Dairies practicing MIG uniquely fit into this cycle as cattle

are deliberately moved through a series of paddocks, eating forage plants and naturally depositing manure to the paddocks along the way.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Feed and Manure on Grazing Dairies

  • Grazing cattle spread their own manure,

bypassing the need for on‐farm manure storage bypassing the need for on farm manure storage and mechanical manure applications.

  • Similarly, grazing cattle harvest their own

forages bypassing the need for mechanical forages, bypassing the need for mechanical harvesting and on‐farm feed storage.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Feed and Manure on Grazing Dairies

  • Dairy herd managers must know how much feed their

y g cattle are consuming to properly balance rations.

– Dry matter intake (DMI) is a standard term used for the moisture‐free amount of feed an animal eats. – DMI is relatively easy to determine for animals that are offered y y a known quantity of feed at the barn or from a feed bunk.

Withi fi t ti th t t l d f f d

  • Within confinement operations, the total pounds of feed
  • ffered minus pounds of feed uneaten at the end of the

day equals daily DMI.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Feed and Manure on Grazing Dairies

  • Determining DMI for rotationally grazed dairy

Determining DMI for rotationally grazed dairy cattle becomes more challenging because pasture condition and forage quality vary seasonally.

  • Also, the actual amount of forage eaten is a

function of pre‐grazing pasture condition and plant material present minus post‐grazing plant material remaining.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Feed and Manure on Grazing Dairies

Dairy cattle eating mixed feed d li d i th b delivered in the barn. Dairy cow grazing on grass + legume pasture.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Feed and Manure on Grazing Dairies

  • The nutrient content of manure and the amount of

manure generated by individual dairy cows is a function of g y y their size, diet, feed utilization efficiency, and milk production.

  • Similar to determining DMI for confinement dairy systems,

determining manure generated within confinement dairies l l is relatively easy.

  • Confined livestock manure production can for the most
  • Confined livestock manure production can, for the most

part, be measured since almost all manure is captured in gutters, feedlots, or manure storage facilities.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Feed and Manure on Grazing Dairies

  • Again, determining manure generated by a grazing

animal is more challenging because the material is deposited naturally within paddocks as cows eat pasture forage.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Feed and Manure on Grazing Dairies

Dairy cows on MIG Liquid manure from a Dairy cows on MIG pasture, eating forage and naturally depositing manure confinement barn; stored, pumped, transported and applied to cropland manure. applied to cropland.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Feed and Manure on Grazing Dairies

  • It is important for dairy producers who practice MIG to be able to

determine how much pasture forage the cows are eating each day so that a large enough paddock is offered to the cows. y g g p

  • It is also important to have a good handle on the forage quality so

that a ration can be balanced by supplementing the correct that a ration can be balanced by supplementing the correct amount of additional forages, concentrates, minerals and other dietary materials, as needed.

  • Also, within grazing dairies, knowledge of manure volume

generated is a critical value necessary to make sure enough pasture land is utilized for natural manure deposition and to pasture land is utilized for natural manure deposition and to accurately credit manure nutrients toward pasture crop nutrient needs.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

SARE Study Design

  • A three year on‐farm research study was

conducted to improve nutrient management planning and implementation on dairy farms that planning and implementation on dairy farms that practice MIG, 2003‐2005.

– Pasture growth and quality were measured and farm information was collected from 7 WI dairy farms.

  • Evaluated the accuracy of four methods that MIG dairy

producers use to determine DMI of cows on pasture.

  • Refined current estimates for daily manure production from

grazing dairy cattle.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

SARE Study Design

  • Collect and analyze pasture forage samples for

quality before and after each grazing cycle.

  • Measure milk production during the time when

cows were in each sampled paddock. cows were in each sampled paddock.

  • Collect and analyze manure 5 times / farm to

y / define average nutrient content. h f b d l f

  • Gather information about amount and quality of

supplemental feed in ration.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

SARE Study Design

  • Determine pasture dry matter availability before and after each grazing cycle

using four different methods: l l h l l f – Clipping: Clip, dry and weigh plant material from representative areas within paddocks. Plate: Use pasture plate to partially compress fresh standing plant – Plate: Use pasture plate to partially compress fresh standing plant material from a small known area. Measure plant height. Multiply plant height x farm‐specific calibration of pounds of dry matter per inch of plant

  • height. See: http://www.uwex.edu/ces/forage/wfc/COSGROVE.html

– Height: Measure plant height directly and multiply by a defined constant for pounds of dry matter per inch of (uncompressed) plant height. – Energy: Utilize a simple energy balance equation. Identify daily quantities and net energy of lactation for stored and supplemental feed eaten daily per cow. Factor cow body weight, milk production and milk composition. p y g , p p Utilize energy balance equation, solving for remaining DMI necessary to produce measured daily milk.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

SARE Study Design

  • Estimate daily cow manure production using

Estimate daily cow manure production using feed amounts and quality, along with milk production amounts and quality production amounts and quality. I f i l f d i k l l f P

  • Information on total feed intake levels of P

and N and total P and N excreted in milk was d i d i i d used to estimate manure production required to excrete the remaining ingested P and N.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Results: Estimating DMI

  • Dry matter intake was estimated each day for

lactating dairy cows being fed in a MIG forage system.

  • Four methods were used and compared to determine

the accuracy and variability in estimating DMI the accuracy and variability in estimating DMI.

– clipping and weighing; – pasture plate; h i h – pasture height; – energy balance

  • Each of the methods could realistically be done on a

commercial dairy grazing farm.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Results: Estimating DMI

Estimate of pasture forage dry matter intake by four different methods Estimate of pasture forage dry matter intake by four different methods ******************************************************** Method 2003 2004 2005 Method 2003 2004 2005 ……………………DMI (lbs / cow / day)……………………….. Clipping 12.0 +/‐ 4.1 26.3 +/‐ 6.7 15.5 +/‐ 8.6 pp g Plate 13.4 +/‐ 3.2 27.2 +/‐ 6.9 16.2 +/‐ 5.0 Height 33.3 +/‐ 8.8 59.0 +/‐ 10.3 40.9 +/‐ 19.4 Energy 20.9 +/‐ 3.1 20.5 +/‐ 2.4 20.0 +/‐ 2.8 ******************************************************** Table from Estimating Dry Matter Intake of Grazing Dairy Cattle by Table from Estimating Dry Matter Intake of Grazing Dairy Cattle by Cosgrove and Cooper, UWEX

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Results: Estimating DMI

  • Of the four ways used to estimate DMI, the least

reliable was measuring plant height and multiplying by a constant for lbs dry matter / multiplying by a constant for lbs dry matter / inch of growth.

– This method generated the highest forage production estimate each year, and the greatest level

  • f variation
  • f variation.

– Based on stocking rates and measured milk d i hi d d i d h h h i h production, this study determined that the height method overestimates forage production, thus

  • verestimating DMI.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Results: Estimating DMI

  • Two of the other methods, clipping and the

pasture plate, both generated similar DMI i h d h h estimates when compared to each other annually.

– The annual difference in DMI prediction between clipping and plate to be approximately one pound. – Yet, both clipping and plate DMI estimation methods had a high enough level of variation (+/‐ 3 to 8 lbs g g ( / per day) that accurate ration balancing was not possible.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Results: Estimating DMI

  • The energy balance method had the most

consistent DMI estimates with minimal variability.

  • Even though the energy method requires more

information to use it also provides the most information to use, it also provides the most accurate estimate of a grazing cow’s actual DMI.

  • A spread sheet was developed to estimate pasture

DMI using the energy balance method: Pasture DMI using the energy balance method: Pasture Forage Intake Calculator for Dairy Cows, http://www.uwrf.edu/grazing/DMI.xls.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Results: Estimating Manure Production

  • The solid feces portion of manure generated by

grazing dairy cattle was estimated to be 85 grazing dairy cattle was estimated to be 85 pounds per cow per day.

– Mathematically determined using the seven MIG dairy herds and three years of feed ration nutrient analysis, and milk production nutrient analysis. – N and P budgets were developed such that total N and P feed intake levels and total N and P output in and P feed intake levels and total N and P output in milk was used to estimate manure production required to excrete the remaining N and P.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Results: Estimating Manure Production

  • When urine was accounted for, the total manure

production increased to 120 pounds per day.

– similar to the value currently used in Wisconsin for 1,200‐pound dairy cows for nutrient management l planning USDA NRCS N t i t M t St d d 590 – USDA‐NRCS Nutrient Management Standard ‐ 590 and WI Conservation Planning Technical Note, 2005

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Outreach

f i d f hi j h b i d i

  • Information generated from this project has been incorporated into UW ‐

Extension Grazing Schools that train producers and agriculture professionals in Wisconsin:

  • http://www.uwex.edu/ces/regionalwaterquality/conservationtraining/grazing.cfm

p g q y g g g

  • A fact sheet and associated spreadsheet has been developed by Dr. Dennis

C d D D i C UW E t i S i li t UW Ri F ll Cosgrove and Dr. Dennis Cooper, UW‐Extension Specialists, UW‐River Fall: – 1) Estimating Dry Matter Intake of Grazing Dairy Cattle: http://www.uwex.edu/ces/crops/uwforage/GN‐EstimatingDMintake.pdf; – Pasture Forage Intake Calculator for Dairy Cows: http://www.uwrf.edu/grazing/DMI.xls.

  • Wisconsin nutrient management planning software SNAP Plus has been updated

to reflect the information generated from this study. SNAP Plus can be downloaded at http://www.snapplus.net/. downloaded at http://www.snapplus.net/.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Conclusions

  • Nitrogen and phosphorus cycle on livestock farms

from soil to crops to feed to livestock to manure, p , and back to the soil. l d h

  • Grazing cattle spread their own manure,

minimizing the need for on‐farm manure storage and mechanical manure applications. and mechanical manure applications.

  • Grazing cattle also harvest most of their own

g forages, reducing the need for mechanical harvesting and on‐farm feed storage and handling.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Conclusions

  • This project found that an energy balance method

This project found that an energy balance method was the most accurate and reliable way for dairy producers who practice MIG to determine how much pasture forage the cows are eating each day much pasture forage the cows are eating each day (DMI).

  • This project also confirmed that the estimated

amount of daily manure produced by a 1,200‐ d l t ti d i (120 d d ) i pound lactating dairy cow (120 pounds per day) is in line with current nutrient management planning guides. g

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Conclusions

  • For more information about SARE Project
  • For more information about SARE Project

LNC03‐237 contact:

D D i C UW Ri F ll D t t – Dr. Dennis Cosgrove, UW – River Falls, Department

  • f Plant and Earth Science, 410 S 3rd St, River Falls,

WI 54022 715‐425‐3745 WI 54022. 715 425 3745. Dennis.r.cosgrove@uwrf.edu. – Project details can also be found at www.sare.org by searching for project number LNC03‐237. y g p j

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Information Available

  • This presentation is the seventh in a series of

seven developed to provide the data and seven developed to provide the data and information collected at Breneman Farms.

  • All of the presentations, factsheets and briefs

are available on the UW ‐ Discovery Farms are available on the UW Discovery Farms website.

  • http://www.uwdiscoveryfarms.org
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Information Available

  • There are seven factsheets available for

Breneman Farms.

  • There are eight briefs available for Breneman

Farms (2 page summaries of the factsheets) Farms (2 page summaries of the factsheets). Th t ti il bl f

  • There are seven presentations available for

Breneman Farms.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

For Additional Information http //www uwdiscoveryfarms org http://www.uwdiscoveryfarms.org

UW Discovery Farms UW Discovery Farms 40195 Winsand Drive PO Box 429 PO Box 429 Pigeon Falls, WI 54760 1‐715‐983‐5668 1 715 983 5668

jgoplin@wisc edu or drframe@wisc edu jgoplin@wisc.edu or drframe@wisc.edu