Disclosures/Conflicts There were no grants No Disclosures as - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

disclosures conflicts
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Disclosures/Conflicts There were no grants No Disclosures as - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

5/8/2014 Disclosures/Conflicts There were no grants No Disclosures as related to this talk There were no potential conflicts of interest. Introduction But Characterization of OCD in hallux valgus? Hallux valgus deformity


slide-1
SLIDE 1

5/8/2014 1

Disclosures/Conflicts

There were no grants No Disclosures as related to this talk There were no potential conflicts of interest.

Introduction

Hallux valgus deformity common

  • (Bock et al. JBJS Br 2004, Roukis et al. JFAS 2005)

15-20% dissatisfaction rate after hallux valgus correction

  • (Smith et al. FA 1984, Coughlin et al. JBJS Am 2007)

1st MTP joint lesions have been associated with hallux valgus deformities

  • (Bock 2004, Lui 2008, Roukis 2005)

But…

Characterization of OCD in hallux valgus? Correlation of cartilage lesions to patient symptoms/outcome? Correlation of cartilage lesions to severity of deformity? Prospective evaluation lacking

slide-2
SLIDE 2

5/8/2014 2

Goals

Detail articular erosion patterns Evaluate if damage is associated with deformity Prospectively evaluate effect on

  • utcomes

Hypothesis

Lesion grade and surface area would correlate with radiographic measures of deformity and patient clinical outcomes

Materials/Methods

  • Inclusion:
  • Isolated pain
  • Hallux valgus
  • Refractory to non-op

Exclusion:

Rheumatoid Inflammatory arthropathy Traumatic origin Revision DM neuropathy

slide-3
SLIDE 3

5/8/2014 3

Methods: Radiographic Outcomes

Traditional Angles:

  • HVA, IMA, HVIP,

DMMA

Grading-

(Coughlin (JBJS Am 2003)

Methods: Clinical Outcomes

  • VAS
  • Walking tolerance
  • Subjective numbness
  • AOFAS
  • Grading- International

Cartilage Repair Society scale

  • Location
  • (Roukis et al. JFAS 2005)

Pearson’s correlation coaefficient, student t-test, Post hoc power analysis- 44 would provide 90% power

Results

56 feet 91% with lesions At 24 months:

VAS 5 1, AOFAS 59 89 HVA 24 9, IMA 14 5

1 reoperation to fusion

Often these are below the “equator” and not actually seen during bunion surgery

*Mean area 50 mm2 *Avg grade 3 *80% were inferior > superior, medial > lateral *size/grade did not correlate w/age or differ by gender

slide-4
SLIDE 4

5/8/2014 4

Hallux valgus As oppose to Hallux rigidus

DORSAL

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5/8/2014 5 lesion max grade/number of lesions vs. radiograph outcomes lesion max grade/number of lesions vs. radiograph outcomes lesion max grade/number of lesions vs. radiograph outcomes

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5/8/2014 6

lesion area vs radiographic outcomes lesion area vs radiographic outcomes

slide-7
SLIDE 7

5/8/2014 7

Discussion

Roukis et al. (JFAS 2005)

Proposed map 100% w/ lesions >50 yo Realign in young

Lui et al. (Arthroscopy 2008)

Correlated HVA to prevalence of OCD of 1st MTP

Doty et al. (FAI 2013)

Cadeveric study- ant/inf > superior lesions More zones, higher grade of lesions Correlated grade/size to angular deformity

Conclusions

  • OCD in Hallux Valgus are anterior/medial/inferior
  • No Correlation

– High prevalence? – Pain Multifactorial? – Evaluation sensitive enough?

  • Significance of these lesions is unknown
  • fusion or chondral repair techniques needed?
  • Not poor prognostic factors
  • Realignment procedures are not contra-indicated

Thank You