Detailed Design Review P13465 Water Table February 8 th , 2013 H E - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

detailed design review
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Detailed Design Review P13465 Water Table February 8 th , 2013 H E - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Detailed Design Review P13465 Water Table February 8 th , 2013 H E A R I T A N D F O R G E T I T , S E E I T A N D R E M E M B E R I T , D O I T A N D U N D E R S T A N D I T Water Table MSD Team 2 Primary Customers: Ed


slide-1
SLIDE 1

“ H E A R I T A N D F O R G E T I T , S E E I T A N D R E M E M B E R I T , D O I T A N D U N D E R S T A N D I T ”

Detailed Design Review

P13465 – Water Table

February 8th, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Water Table MSD Team

Primary Customers: Ed Hanzlik John Wellin Faculty Guide: Gerald Garavuso Team Members: John Harrington, Project Manager Andrew Nauss, Lead Engineer Timothy Jordan, Project Engineer Dan Abdeen, Project Engineer

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Today’s Agenda

Overview (5 minutes, 1 Slide)

 Brief Project Description

Intended System Model Design (45 minutes, 13 Slides)

 Main Capabilities  System Components  CAD System Design  Assembly Plan  System Operation  Bill of Materials

Feasibility Analysis, Prototyping, & Experimentation (35 minutes, 11 Slides)

 Overview of Systems Analyzed  Feasibility Analysis for Major Components

System Testing (10 minutes, 2 Slides)

 Testing Plan

Updated Risk Assessment and What’s Next? (15 minutes, 3 Slides)

 Updated Risk Assessment  MSD II Phase Initial Plans

Concluding Comments (15 minutes, 1 Slide)

 Questions/Comments/Concerns

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Project Description – Water Table

 Force straight flow over an object of some geometry

to study fluid dynamic effects

 Primarily used for displaying concepts of:

 Streamlines  Flow Separation  Vortex Shedding

 Top down view  Variable flow speeds  To be used for educational use  Assist in fulfilling the ME department’s mission

statement

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Main System Capabilities

 Modular  Transportable  Variable test specimen geometry  Adjustable angle-of-attack  Variable flow from 1 to 12 in/s  Adjustable flow height  Adjustable nozzle section  Laminar flow regime only  Two main flow visualizers:

  • Electrolysis
  • Beads

 Ability to measure velocity through high speed camera and/or pulsing circuit  Future adaptability for fluids other than water and different setups  Will show concepts of flow separation, vortex shedding, and streamlines  Possible potential for many other educational fluid dynamic purposes that the team

is not responsible for demonstrating (concepts of energy balance, conservation of mass flow, electrolysis, Bernoulli equation, baffle design, nozzle design, head calculations, and many more)

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Systems Design (View 1 of 2)

Reservoir Tank PVC Piping Cart Water Table Enclosure Ball Valve Flex Piping Test Specimen Nozzle Section Honeycomb Flow Straighteners Baffle Drains Piping Support Table Flowmeter

6

Footprint: Cart: 31” x 52” Water Table: 28” x 58”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Systems Design (View 2 of 2)

Flex Tubing Inlet Baffle Butterfly Control Valve Piping Support Pump Power Box/ Emergency Stop Button Pulsing Circuit Enclosure Drains Pull Handle

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Tank Assembly Procedure (Part 1 of 3)

 Footprint of tank will be 28” x 58”  Tank will be made of HDPE with 3/8” walls to ensure

robustness

 Solvent welded joints manufactured by Curbell Plastics  Tank will rest on a supplied table during operation  The customer will be responsible for developing method of

  • storage. One suggestion is to create mounting holes to hang
  • n wall.

Holes could be drilled for mounting

  • n a wall

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Tank Assembly Procedure (Part 2 of 3)

Step #1- Drill Holes Step #2- Add Magnet Strip Step #3- Add Nozzle Section Step #4- Add Flow Straighteners Step #5- Add Baffle

Final Product

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Possible Adjustments needed for Baffle Design

 Baffle will initially not be permanently fixed to allow for

modifications

 Feasibility calculations yielded max force on top plate of 5 lbf  Baffle may need to be redesigned due to high pressure buildup  Possible modifications include altering hole patterns/size,

creating a horizontal baffle design, or adding a plate in front of flow straighteners to distribute flow better

Tank Assembly Procedure (Part 3 of 3)

Alternate Possible Design 1 Alternate Possible Design 2

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Cart Assembly Procedure (Part 1 of 2)

 Cart footprint will 31” x 52”  Cart will be made from 2x4” wood boards.

 Qty: 6 – 2X4” board, 52” long  Qty: 3 – 2X4” board, 31” long

 Deck screws will be used to secure each board.  Cart will be wheeled on 4 casters.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Cart Assembly Procedure (Part 2 of 2)

Step #1– Build cart Step #2- Mount water tank Step #3- Mount pump Step #4- Attach power post/box Step #5- Mount support board Step #6- Attach handle 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Piping Assembly Procedure (1 of 2)

 All piping/fittings will be commercially bought  Flowmeter will give rough idea of flow rate

 Pool flow meter- 40-150 GPM (±10%, ±15GPM)

 Assembled using PVC pipe primer/cement  FlexPVC used for inlet/outlet of table and for inlet to

pump

 PVC Unions used to disconnect table from

pump/reservoir cart

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Piping Assembly Procedure (2 of 2)

14

Butterfly Valve (located before inlet to water table) Ball Valve Wall Fitting Flow Meter Union

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Test Specimens

 Uses magnets to hold  2” Cylinder  Flat Plate  Contraction Section

 Bent out of metal, similar to

nozzle

 Airfoil

 Cast using resin, MET

department mold

10” 3”

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Budget / BOM (Part 1/2- Mechanical)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Budget / BOM (Part 2/2- Electrical)

*Projected budgeted for $2000 *Estimated total cost of project is totaled at $1959.70 *Conservative estimate for shipping costs

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Feasibility Analysis and Experimentation

Feasibility was performed on a wide range of items. Due to time constraints all of them will not be addressed in this presentation. Some of the feasibility analysis’ and experiments performed include:

 Pump calculations*  Magnet calculations*  Drain calculations (controlling flow)*  Water supply calculations  Electrolysis experimentation*  Water table construction experiment  Operating range analysis*  Cart FEA analysis for strength  Inlet flow force calculations  Baffle design *Will be discussed in presentation

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Pump Calculations (1 of 2)

Approach to Sizing Power:

 Step 1: Find flow rate

 3in x 10in x 12in/s = 93.5 gpm

 Step 2: Find power to overcome 2.5ft of head at the

flow (Power=Q*ΔP)

 Nominally ΔP=1.1psi

 Step 3: Calculate Major Head Losses

 Nominally ΔP=5.8psi

 Step 4: Compare pump head needed to pump

power/efficiency and pump curves

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Pump Calculations (2 of 2)

Unthrottled Operating Point Throttled Desired Operating Point

20

Pump Performance Curve:

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Drain/Flow Calculations

21

 Analyzed water table drain system as a circuit with

no resistance (i.e. no pump or valves)

 No resistance yields an outlet flow rate of 500+ gpm  Therefore, modeling the system with pump and

valves creates resistance needed to meet flow specifications

 Drain resistance is negligible

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Magnet Calculations

 Sidewalls and test

specimen held in using

 At 1 ft/s, estimated force

  • n walls ~1lbf side and

1/4lbf due to nozzle

 Assume μ=0.1, 4

magnets

 Pull force (normal force)

required is ~2.5 lb

 Pull force is expected to

be >10 lb per magnet

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Electrolysis Experimentation (1 of 3)

ASME WATER TABLE MET WATER CHANNEL Flow over a plate w/ electrolysis

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Electrolysis Experimentation (2 of 3)

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Electrolysis Experimentation (3 of 3)

 Pulsing circuit – Pulses the electrodes if desired.

 Range of operation: Fully on through pulses of 5s off / 5s on

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Operating Range of Table (Flow Rate)

*Water is the working fluid *Max Flow Rate ≈ 93.5 GPM *Typical operation would be at 3 inches depth

26

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 0.5 1.3 2.6 3.9 5.2 6.5 7.8 9.1 10.4 11.7 13.0 14.3 15.6 16.9 18.2 19.5 20.8 22.1 23.4 1 2.6 5.2 7.8 10.4 13.0 15.6 18.2 20.8 23.4 26.0 28.6 31.2 33.8 36.4 39.0 41.6 44.2 46.8 1.5 3.9 7.8 11.7 15.6 19.5 23.4 27.3 31.2 35.1 39.0 42.9 46.8 50.6 54.5 58.4 62.3 66.2 70.1 2 5.2 10.4 15.6 20.8 26.0 31.2 36.4 41.6 46.8 51.9 57.1 62.3 67.5 72.7 77.9 83.1 88.3 93.5 2.5 6.5 13.0 19.5 26.0 32.5 39.0 45.5 51.9 58.4 64.9 71.4 77.9 84.4 90.9 97.4 103.9 110.4 116.9 3 7.8 15.6 23.4 31.2 39.0 46.8 54.5 62.3 70.1 77.9 85.7 93.5 101.3 109.1 116.9 124.7 132.5 140.3 3.5 9.1 18.2 27.3 36.4 45.5 54.5 63.6 72.7 81.8 90.9 100.0 109.1 118.2 127.3 136.4 145.5 154.5 163.6 4 10.4 20.8 31.2 41.6 51.9 62.3 72.7 83.1 93.5 103.9 114.3 124.7 135.1 145.5 155.8 166.2 176.6 187.0 4.5 11.7 23.4 35.1 46.8 58.4 70.1 81.8 93.5 105.2 116.9 128.6 140.3 151.9 163.6 175.3 187.0 198.7 210.4 5 13.0 26.0 39.0 51.9 64.9 77.9 90.9 103.9 116.9 129.9 142.9 155.8 168.8 181.8 194.8 207.8 220.8 233.8 5.5 14.3 28.6 42.9 57.1 71.4 85.7 100.0 114.3 128.6 142.9 157.1 171.4 185.7 200.0 214.3 228.6 242.9 257.1 6 15.6 31.2 46.8 62.3 77.9 93.5 109.1 124.7 140.3 155.8 171.4 187.0 202.6 218.2 233.8 249.4 264.9 280.5 6.5 16.9 33.8 50.6 67.5 84.4 101.3 118.2 135.1 151.9 168.8 185.7 202.6 219.5 236.4 253.2 270.1 287.0 303.9 7 18.2 36.4 54.5 72.7 90.9 109.1 127.3 145.5 163.6 181.8 200.0 218.2 236.4 254.5 272.7 290.9 309.1 327.3 7.5 19.5 39.0 58.4 77.9 97.4 116.9 136.4 155.8 175.3 194.8 214.3 233.8 253.2 272.7 292.2 311.7 331.2 350.6 8 20.8 41.6 62.3 83.1 103.9 124.7 145.5 166.2 187.0 207.8 228.6 249.4 270.1 290.9 311.7 332.5 353.2 374.0 8.5 22.1 44.2 66.2 88.3 110.4 132.5 154.5 176.6 198.7 220.8 242.9 264.9 287.0 309.1 331.2 353.2 375.3 397.4 9 23.4 46.8 70.1 93.5 116.9 140.3 163.6 187.0 210.4 233.8 257.1 280.5 303.9 327.3 350.6 374.0 397.4 420.8 9.5 24.7 49.4 74.0 98.7 123.4 148.1 172.7 197.4 222.1 246.8 271.4 296.1 320.8 345.5 370.1 394.8 419.5 444.2 10 26.0 51.9 77.9 103.9 129.9 155.8 181.8 207.8 233.8 259.7 285.7 311.7 337.7 363.6 389.6 415.6 441.6 467.5 = expected flow rates Flow Rate (gpm) forTest Section Width

  • f

10 in Speed (in/s) Depth (in)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Operating Range of Table (Re Number)

*Intended flow speed of 12 in/s maximum *Typical operation would be at a characteristic length of 2-5 inches

27

0.1 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 0.5 34.7 173.6 347.2 694.4 1042 1389 1736 2083 2431 2778 3125 3472 3819 4167 4514 4861 5208 5556 5903 6250 1 69.4 347.2 694.4 1389 2083 2778 3472 4167 4861 5556 6250 6944 7639 8333 9028 9722 10417 11111 11806 12500 1.5 104 520.8 1042 2083 3125 4167 5208 6250 7292 8333 9375 10417 11458 12500 13542 14583 15625 16667 17708 18750 2 139 694.4 1389 2778 4167 5556 6944 8333 9722 11111 12500 13889 15278 16667 18056 19444 20833 22222 23611 25000 2.5 174 868.1 1736 3472 5208 6944 8681 10417 12153 13889 15625 17361 19097 20833 22569 24306 26042 27778 29514 31250 3 208 1042 2083 4167 6250 8333 10417 12500 14583 16667 18750 20833 22917 25000 27083 29167 31250 33333 35417 37500 3.5 243 1215 2431 4861 7292 9722 12153 14583 17014 19444 21875 24306 26736 29167 31597 34028 36458 38889 41319 43750 4 278 1389 2778 5556 8333 11111 13889 16667 19444 22222 25000 27778 30556 33333 36111 38889 41667 44444 47222 50000 4.5 313 1563 3125 6250 9375 12500 15625 18750 21875 25000 28125 31250 34375 37500 40625 43750 46875 50000 53125 56250 5 347 1736 3472 6944 10417 13889 17361 20833 24306 27778 31250 34722 38194 41667 45139 48611 52083 55556 59028 62500 5.5 382 1910 3819 7639 11458 15278 19097 22917 26736 30556 34375 38194 42014 45833 49653 53472 57292 61111 64931 68750 6 417 2083 4167 8333 12500 16667 20833 25000 29167 33333 37500 41667 45833 50000 54167 58333 62500 66667 70833 75000 6.5 451 2257 4514 9028 13542 18056 22569 27083 31597 36111 40625 45139 49653 54167 58681 63194 67708 72222 76736 81250 7 486 2431 4861 9722 14583 19444 24306 29167 34028 38889 43750 48611 53472 58333 63194 68056 72917 77778 82639 87500 7.5 521 2604 5208 10417 15625 20833 26042 31250 36458 41667 46875 52083 57292 62500 67708 72917 78125 83333 88542 93750 8 556 2778 5556 11111 16667 22222 27778 33333 38889 44444 50000 55556 61111 66667 72222 77778 83333 88889 94444 1E+05 8.5 590 2951 5903 11806 17708 23611 29514 35417 41319 47222 53125 59028 64931 70833 76736 82639 88542 94444 1E+05 1E+05 9 625 3125 6250 12500 18750 25000 31250 37500 43750 50000 56250 62500 68750 75000 81250 87500 93750 1E+05 1E+05 1E+05 9.5 660 3299 6597 13194 19792 26389 32986 39583 46181 52778 59375 65972 72569 79167 85764 92361 98958 1E+05 1E+05 1E+05 10 694 3472 6944 13889 20833 27778 34722 41667 48611 55556 62500 69444 76389 83333 90278 97222 1E+05 1E+05 1E+05 1E+05 = expected Re #s Test Piece Characteristic Length (in) Reynolds Number Speed (in/s)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Operating Range of Table (Fr Number)

*Froude number is the ratio between channel velocity and wave speed of the free surface *Fr>1 = supersonic flow analogy 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 3.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 = supersonic analogy = expected Fr #s Froude Number for Test Section Speed (in/s) Depth (in)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Testing Plan (1 of 2)

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Testing Plan (2 of 2)

30

*Testing plan also includes sampling size (where applicable), data analysis required, and person responsible. [Not pictured in slides, but available on EDGE]

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Risk Management Update (1 of 1)

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Risk Management Update (2 of 2)

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Initial MSD II Phase Plans

3 Week MSD II Plan:

Tank Assembly

Build Time: 3/4/13-3/8/13 (Week 1)

Person Responsible: John Harrington

Cart Assembly

Build Time: 3/4/13-3/12/13 (Week 1 – Beginning of Week 2)

Person Responsible: Tim Jordan

Electrical Components

Build Time: 3/8/13-3/15/13 (End of Week 1 – Week 2)

Person Responsible: Dan Abdeen

Piping Assembly

Build Time: 3/13/13-3/21/13 (Mid-Week 2 –Week 3)

Person Responsible: Andrew Nauss

Week 3 Customer Demonstration Future Targets:

Testing/Debugging (Week 4 – Week 7)

Week 6 Customer Demonstration

Week 9 Final Demonstration

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Questions/Comments/Concerns

Thank you you for for at atte tendin ing

  • u
  • ur Deta

tailed Des esig ign Rev eview!

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

FEA Analysis of Cart (Backup Slide)

35