deep dive
play

Deep Dive Strengthening practice and addressing industry challenges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Impact Measurement & Management Deep Dive Strengthening practice and addressing industry challenges January 29, 2018 1 Thank you for joining us today! Please note: All participants are muted. Use the chat function to submit


  1. Impact Measurement & Management Deep Dive Strengthening practice and addressing industry challenges January 29, 2018 1

  2. Thank you for joining us today! Please note: • All participants are muted. • Use the “chat” function to submit questions during the broadcast. • We’ll share a recording after the webinar. 2

  3. Kelly McCarthy Director, IRIS and Impact Measurement and Management 3

  4. Hannah Dithrich Associate, Research 4

  5. The State of Impact Measurement & Management Practice 169 impact investor respondents December, 2017 5

  6. A variety of motivations drive IMM practice Motivations for measuring and managing impact 83% 78% 75% 63% Percent of respondents 50% 45% 21% 16% To better To proactively report To manage or We believe that We need to We are required by There is client We are required by understand our our impact to key improve our impact. impact data have communicate our our investors or demand or pressure government impact. stakeholders. business value. impact for marketing donors to measure from changing regulations to and/or fundraising and report our cultural norms to measure and report purposes. impact. measure and report our impact. our impact. 6 n = 113 – 169; Source: GIIN

  7. Key challenges lie in collecting and analyzing impact data Percent of respondents reporting significant challenges 43% Percent of respondents 32% 17% 15% 13% 11% 10% 9% Collecting quality data Aggregating, Identifying/selecting Identifying/selecting Using impact data for Aligning expectations Understanding and/or Ensuring buy-in for analyzing, and/or appropriate impact appropriate impact decision-making with our investors defining our impact IMM among key interpreting data metrics targets and investees strategy and/or decision-makers at across a portfolio impact thesis our organization n = 155-167; Source: GIIN 7

  8. Key challenges lie in collecting and analyzing impact data Percent of respondents reporting significant challenges 43% Percent of respondents 32% 17% 15% 13% 11% 10% 9% Collecting quality data Aggregating, Identifying/selecting Identifying/selecting Using impact data for Aligning expectations Understanding and/or Ensuring buy-in for analyzing, and/or appropriate impact appropriate impact decision-making with our investors defining our impact IMM among key interpreting data metrics targets and investees strategy and/or decision-makers at across a portfolio impact thesis our organization n = 155-167; Source: GIIN 8

  9. Investors measure different types of impact Types of impact measured Measure social/environmental outputs 91% Number of respondents Measure social/environmental outcomes 77% Measure the breadth of our impact 43% Measure whether our impact is additional 38% Measure the depth of our impact 37% Benchmark our social/environmental performance 34% Measure whether our impact is attributable 30% Measure the longevity of our impact 20% n = 169; Source: GIIN 9

  10. …using a wide variety of resources Tools, standards, and indicator sets used IRIS 62% United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 42% Percent of respondents B Analytics / GIIRS 41% Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI) 22% SPI4 / Social Performance Task Force (SPTF) 14% Aeris CDFI ratings system 13% Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) 13% Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) ratings… 12% Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) 10% Global Alliance for Banking on Values (GABV) 6% Social Return on Investment (SROI) 5% PRISM 2% Total Impact Measurement and Management (TIMM) 2% n = 137; Source: GIIN 10

  11. Key challenges lie in collecting and analyzing impact data Percent of respondents reporting significant challenges 43% Percent of respondents 32% 17% 15% 13% 11% 10% 9% Collecting quality data Aggregating, Identifying/selecting Identifying/selecting Using impact data for Aligning expectations Understanding and/or Ensuring buy-in for analyzing, and/or appropriate impact appropriate impact decision-making with our investors defining our impact IMM among key interpreting data metrics targets and investees strategy and/or decision-makers at across a portfolio impact thesis our organization n = 155-167; Source: GIIN 11

  12. Investors use both customized and standard metrics Ways investors customize their impact metrics 37% Percent of respondents 24% 20% 19% We customize some metrics for each We use a set of standardized metrics We select a set of metrics for each We select a specific set of metrics for investment and use some metrics across all investments within our sector and/or impact objective within each investment. across our entire portfolio. portfolio. our portfolio. n = 169; Source: GIIN 12

  13. Key challenges lie in collecting and analyzing impact data Percent of respondents reporting significant challenges 43% Percent of respondents 32% 17% 15% 13% 11% 10% 9% Collecting quality data Aggregating, Identifying/selecting Identifying/selecting Using impact data for Aligning expectations Understanding and/or Ensuring buy-in for analyzing, and/or appropriate impact appropriate impact decision-making with our investors defining our impact IMM among key interpreting data metrics targets and investees strategy and/or decision-makers at across a portfolio impact thesis our organization n = 155-167; Source: GIIN 13

  14. Most investors set impact targets Percent of respondents that set impact targets 41% Yes No 59% n = 169; Source: GIIN 14

  15. Investors use evidence to select impact targets and metrics Ways of selecting impact targets and metrics 74% 73% Percent of respondents 51% 25% 20% 16% 10% 7% We select them based on the existing We select them based on a rating We select them based on the We select them based on regulatory evidence we used to develop our system, index, analytics tool, or other Sustainable Development Goals. and/or tax credit requirements. strategy (e.g., theory of change or logic system (e.g., IRIS). model). Impact metrics Impact targets Impact metrics: n = 146; impact targets: n = 106; Source: GIIN 15

  16. Impact data inform key investment decisions Uses of impact data for investment management 76% 74% 48% 45% Percent of respondents 37% 31% 16% For pre-screening Inform investment Identify Inform portfolio Improve investees' Help design or Inform exit or due diligence selection / portfolio opportunities for modeling and operational refine decisions and/or allocation decisions capacity-building strategy efficiency products/services exit timing support or of our investees technical assistance n = 144; Source: GIIN 16

  17. …and improve impact achieved Uses of impact data in impact management 85% 72% 67% 64% 62% 58% 52% Percent of respondents Communicate Identify or refine Improve our Assess impact and Set or revise Refine our data Identify which results to appropriate process for ESG risk factors impact collection process stakeholders are stakeholders metrics analyzing and expectations affected by our interpreting impact and/or impact investments data targets n = 148; Source: GIIN 17

  18. Investors perceive progress in IMM, but challenges remain Significant progress Significant challenge Investor/donor understanding of IMM practice and 26% 27% reporting Sophistication of IMM tools and frameworks 26% 26% Percent of respondents Addressing ESG risk 25% 13% 23% 20% Availability of research/data on IMM practice Availability of professionals with IMM-relevant skills 21% 18% 14% 50% Addressing fragmentation in IMM approaches 12% Addressing impact risk 17% 11% Integration of impact and financial management 35% 11% Transparency on impact performance, including targets 34% and results 18 n = 104-126; Source: GIIN

  19. Transparency and standardization key to advancing practice Importance of opportunities to strengthen IMM practice (% selecting ‘significant’) Percent of respondents 76% 58% 53% 53% 53% 46% 39% 36% 34% Transparency in Common impact- Consideration of Development of an Integration of Tools to Impact Third-party audit Standard term impact data and based principles impact data with impact benchmark impact data into strengthen impact measurement and validation of sheets that include results for investing equal emphasis financial screening certification and impact data and impact targets or and rigor to accounting credentialing for performance incentives financial risk and standards and impact funds return in decision- reports and/or analysts making n = 128-136; Source: GIIN 19

  20. Lissa Glasgo Senior Associate, IRIS and Impact Measurement & Management 20

  21. Key Challenges in IMM Percent of respondents reporting significant challenges 43% Percent of respondents 32% 17% 15% 13% 11% 10% 9% Collecting quality data Aggregating, Identifying/selecting Identifying/selecting Using impact data for Aligning expectations Understanding and/or Ensuring buy-in for analyzing, and/or appropriate impact appropriate impact decision-making with our investors defining our impact IMM among key interpreting data metrics targets and investees strategy and/or decision-makers at across a portfolio impact thesis our organization n = 155-167; Source: GIIN 21

  22. Challenge: Connecting Objectives to Metrics IMPACT OBJECTIVES 22 METRICS

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend