Debate In season Shoulder Instability To operate or to wait? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

debate in season shoulder instability to operate or to
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Debate In season Shoulder Instability To operate or to wait? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Debate In season Shoulder Instability To operate or to wait? Anthony Miniaci MD FRCSC Professor of Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation Conflicts of Interest 1. Royalties/stock/equity 3. Educational/Research 1. Arthrosurface Institutional


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Debate In season Shoulder Instability To operate or to wait?

Anthony Miniaci MD FRCSC Professor of Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Conflicts of Interest

1. Royalties/stock/equity

  • 1. Arthrosurface
  • 2. Consulting/Honoraria

1.Stryker

  • 2. Arthrosurface
  • 3. Arthrex
  • 4. Smith and Nephew
  • 3. Educational/Research

Institutional

  • 1. Stryker
  • 2. Arthrex
  • 3. Arthrosurface
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Debate Instructions per Kevin Plancher

  • 1. Tell why you wait till

seasons end for shoulder instability surgery

  • 2. Tell why it is better than
  • perating on everyone

during the season

  • 3. I don’t care if that is

what you do or not !

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Primary Question- Debate-Can they RTP?

In-Season Athlete RTP

  • 1. NOT-What is the risk of

recurrence?

  • 2. Can an in-season athlete

return to sport?

  • 3. What is the harm in waiting?

1. does it change the treatment or result 2. What is the psychological or physical harm

  • 4. Which dislocator needs to be

fixed immediately?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Lets not argue- # 1) Risk of recurrence?

  • We know the risk is high

especially in contact sports and young patients

  • Rates vary 27-82% for first time

dislocators

  • Age<20, contact sport
  • Pathology 80% Bankart, 15%

bony Bankart, 70 % Hill Sachs lesion

  • Most will need surgery –BUT not

all !

  • Do they need it now or can they

have another shot at it?

Author Recurrence rate Wheeler Arthroscopy 1989 82% Arciero AJSM. 1994 80% Jakobsen 1994 27% Bottoni AJSM. 2000 75% Sachs JBJS. 2007 46% LeClere Sport Health. 2013 52% Kirkley et al Arthroscopy 1999 47%

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Mean Time to Return to Play 7 Days Return to Sport Distribution by Sport Fail Return to Sport

Football 66% Rugby 11% Wrestling 7% Baseball 4% Judo 6% Lacrosse 4% Boxing 2% Insuffienct Function 59% End of Season 33% Separated 8% Failed Return to Sport 25% Return to Sport 75%

Return to play and recurrent instability after in-season anterior shoulder instability: a prospective multicenter study. Dickens JF et al. AJSM 2014

75% Return to Play

Can they get back to play?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Return to Sport

Subluxation 42% Dislocation 58%

Subluxation

  • Median RTP 3

days

  • 76% completed

the season p=0.282 Dislocation

  • Median RTP 7

days

  • 56% completed

the Season

Subluxation 5.3x more likely to return to sport compared to dislocations (95%CI 1.00. 28.07; p=0.049)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Debate-Return to Sport after Shoulder Instability

  • 30 patients, contact

and noncontact sports

  • Mean 16 years old
  • 90% return to sport
  • Subjective: all athletes

at “same or near same level”

  • Mean time lost from

sport: 10 days

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Return to play

  • 30 patients,19 dislocations,

11 subluxations

  • 26/30 returned to their sport

for the complete season with an average missed time of 10.2 days

  • 37% experienced an

additional episode

  • 16 had off season surgery
  • “ no further injuries

attributable to the shoulder instability”

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Will the real Michael Freehill please stand up !

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What happens when they do return to play?

Successful Return to Sport After Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization Versus Nonoperative Management in Contact Athletes With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

  • 39 with another season of

eligibility

  • 10 chose rehab , no surgery
  • 20 chose surgery after season
  • 9 chose immediate surgery

after one event

  • 10 electing nonoperative

treatment, 4 (40%) successful RTP without recurrence during the subsequent season

  • 29 surgical, 26 (90%) RTP without

recurrence the following season

  • No long term differences as to

timing

  • Does waiting hurt?
  • Does it give you more pathology
  • r change the operation

Dickens JF Am J Sports Med.2017 Sep;45(11):2540-2546

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Arthroscopy 2007

  • 127 patients; diagnostic arthroscopy, x-rays (AP, Glenoid, West Point), MRI

Does waiting Hurt? Acute vs Chronic

slide-13
SLIDE 13

But are 2 episodes really chronic?

  • I think not !
  • Successful Return to Sport After

Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization Versus Nonoperative Management in Contact Athletes With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

  • Dickens JF Am J Sports Med.2017

Sep;45(11):2540-2546

  • 29/39 athletes surgical

stabilization

  • there was no difference in

RTP between the 9 stabilized after a single instability event (90% RTP rate) and the 20 stabilized after multiple in-season recurrent instability events (89% RTP rate).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Does it change the surgery?

  • Probably not !
  • Patients are already high risk

because of age/competition/contact sport

  • All hinges on the BONE LOSS
  • Need to think about this when

you assess the patient

  • Debate may be about type of

surgery not timing Balg & Boileau, JBJS-Br, ‘07

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Psychologic effects of not playing

Mind, Body and Sport: How being injured affects mental health

  • An excerpt from the Sport Science

Institute’s guide to understanding and supporting student-athlete mental wellness

  • The team physician is ultimately

responsible for the return-to-play decision, and addressing psychological issues is a significant component of this decision.

  • By Margot Putukian
  • 1. Sadness
  • 2. Isolation
  • 3. Irritation
  • 4. Lack of motivation
  • 5. Anger
  • 6. Frustration
  • 7. Changes in appetite
  • 8. Sleep disturbance
  • 9. Disengagement
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Importance of Team Play They are only young once!

  • 1. Builds confidence
  • 2. Provides consistent exercise
  • 3. Develops relationships.
  • 4. Contributes to stronger academics.
  • 5. Helps put winning into perspective.
  • 6. Teaches respect.
  • 7. Encourages family involvement.
  • 8. Chance to win as a team- very unique
  • nce in a lifetime opportunities
  • Dr. Freehill wants to take that away

from them !!

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Summary- My position! Based on the Evidence

  • RTP is possible after a first time

shoulder instability in season episode

  • 75 % RTP in 7-10 days for

dislocation 3-5 subluxation

  • 40 % may have a second in season

injury

  • Up to 40 % may not have anything

even after 2 seasons

  • 2 events and out
  • Remember to assess for bone loss
  • Remember you are treating the athlete

and not just their shoulder- avoid shattering dreams!

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Anthony Miniaci M.D. FRCSC Professor of Surgery Cleveland Clinic