Debate In season Shoulder Instability To operate or to wait? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Debate In season Shoulder Instability To operate or to wait? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Debate In season Shoulder Instability To operate or to wait? Anthony Miniaci MD FRCSC Professor of Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation Conflicts of Interest 1. Royalties/stock/equity 3. Educational/Research 1. Arthrosurface Institutional
Conflicts of Interest
1. Royalties/stock/equity
- 1. Arthrosurface
- 2. Consulting/Honoraria
1.Stryker
- 2. Arthrosurface
- 3. Arthrex
- 4. Smith and Nephew
- 3. Educational/Research
Institutional
- 1. Stryker
- 2. Arthrex
- 3. Arthrosurface
Debate Instructions per Kevin Plancher
- 1. Tell why you wait till
seasons end for shoulder instability surgery
- 2. Tell why it is better than
- perating on everyone
during the season
- 3. I don’t care if that is
what you do or not !
Primary Question- Debate-Can they RTP?
In-Season Athlete RTP
- 1. NOT-What is the risk of
recurrence?
- 2. Can an in-season athlete
return to sport?
- 3. What is the harm in waiting?
1. does it change the treatment or result 2. What is the psychological or physical harm
- 4. Which dislocator needs to be
fixed immediately?
Lets not argue- # 1) Risk of recurrence?
- We know the risk is high
especially in contact sports and young patients
- Rates vary 27-82% for first time
dislocators
- Age<20, contact sport
- Pathology 80% Bankart, 15%
bony Bankart, 70 % Hill Sachs lesion
- Most will need surgery –BUT not
all !
- Do they need it now or can they
have another shot at it?
Author Recurrence rate Wheeler Arthroscopy 1989 82% Arciero AJSM. 1994 80% Jakobsen 1994 27% Bottoni AJSM. 2000 75% Sachs JBJS. 2007 46% LeClere Sport Health. 2013 52% Kirkley et al Arthroscopy 1999 47%
Mean Time to Return to Play 7 Days Return to Sport Distribution by Sport Fail Return to Sport
Football 66% Rugby 11% Wrestling 7% Baseball 4% Judo 6% Lacrosse 4% Boxing 2% Insuffienct Function 59% End of Season 33% Separated 8% Failed Return to Sport 25% Return to Sport 75%
Return to play and recurrent instability after in-season anterior shoulder instability: a prospective multicenter study. Dickens JF et al. AJSM 2014
75% Return to Play
Can they get back to play?
Return to Sport
Subluxation 42% Dislocation 58%
Subluxation
- Median RTP 3
days
- 76% completed
the season p=0.282 Dislocation
- Median RTP 7
days
- 56% completed
the Season
Subluxation 5.3x more likely to return to sport compared to dislocations (95%CI 1.00. 28.07; p=0.049)
Debate-Return to Sport after Shoulder Instability
- 30 patients, contact
and noncontact sports
- Mean 16 years old
- 90% return to sport
- Subjective: all athletes
at “same or near same level”
- Mean time lost from
sport: 10 days
Return to play
- 30 patients,19 dislocations,
11 subluxations
- 26/30 returned to their sport
for the complete season with an average missed time of 10.2 days
- 37% experienced an
additional episode
- 16 had off season surgery
- “ no further injuries
attributable to the shoulder instability”
Will the real Michael Freehill please stand up !
What happens when they do return to play?
Successful Return to Sport After Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization Versus Nonoperative Management in Contact Athletes With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Prospective Multicenter Study.
- 39 with another season of
eligibility
- 10 chose rehab , no surgery
- 20 chose surgery after season
- 9 chose immediate surgery
after one event
- 10 electing nonoperative
treatment, 4 (40%) successful RTP without recurrence during the subsequent season
- 29 surgical, 26 (90%) RTP without
recurrence the following season
- No long term differences as to
timing
- Does waiting hurt?
- Does it give you more pathology
- r change the operation
Dickens JF Am J Sports Med.2017 Sep;45(11):2540-2546
Arthroscopy 2007
- 127 patients; diagnostic arthroscopy, x-rays (AP, Glenoid, West Point), MRI
Does waiting Hurt? Acute vs Chronic
But are 2 episodes really chronic?
- I think not !
- Successful Return to Sport After
Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization Versus Nonoperative Management in Contact Athletes With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Prospective Multicenter Study.
- Dickens JF Am J Sports Med.2017
Sep;45(11):2540-2546
- 29/39 athletes surgical
stabilization
- there was no difference in
RTP between the 9 stabilized after a single instability event (90% RTP rate) and the 20 stabilized after multiple in-season recurrent instability events (89% RTP rate).
Does it change the surgery?
- Probably not !
- Patients are already high risk
because of age/competition/contact sport
- All hinges on the BONE LOSS
- Need to think about this when
you assess the patient
- Debate may be about type of
surgery not timing Balg & Boileau, JBJS-Br, ‘07
Psychologic effects of not playing
Mind, Body and Sport: How being injured affects mental health
- An excerpt from the Sport Science
Institute’s guide to understanding and supporting student-athlete mental wellness
- The team physician is ultimately
responsible for the return-to-play decision, and addressing psychological issues is a significant component of this decision.
- By Margot Putukian
- 1. Sadness
- 2. Isolation
- 3. Irritation
- 4. Lack of motivation
- 5. Anger
- 6. Frustration
- 7. Changes in appetite
- 8. Sleep disturbance
- 9. Disengagement
Importance of Team Play They are only young once!
- 1. Builds confidence
- 2. Provides consistent exercise
- 3. Develops relationships.
- 4. Contributes to stronger academics.
- 5. Helps put winning into perspective.
- 6. Teaches respect.
- 7. Encourages family involvement.
- 8. Chance to win as a team- very unique
- nce in a lifetime opportunities
- Dr. Freehill wants to take that away
from them !!
Summary- My position! Based on the Evidence
- RTP is possible after a first time
shoulder instability in season episode
- 75 % RTP in 7-10 days for
dislocation 3-5 subluxation
- 40 % may have a second in season
injury
- Up to 40 % may not have anything
even after 2 seasons
- 2 events and out
- Remember to assess for bone loss
- Remember you are treating the athlete