Continuous Manufacturing Framing a Future for Patients Paul C. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

continuous manufacturing framing a future for patients
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Continuous Manufacturing Framing a Future for Patients Paul C. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Continuous Manufacturing Framing a Future for Patients Paul C. Collins, Ph.D. and Carla Luciani, Ph.D. Small Molecule Design and Development Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Indiana April 9-11, 2019 4th FDA/PQRI Conference on Advancing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Continuous Manufacturing – Framing a Future for Patients

Paul C. Collins, Ph.D. and Carla Luciani, Ph.D.

Small Molecule Design and Development Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Indiana

April 9-11, 2019 4th FDA/PQRI Conference on Advancing Product Quality: Patient- Centric Product Design, Drug Development, and Manufacturing

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Quality by Design… In the Beginning

QbD

 Mutual goal of industry, society, and regulators:

A maximally efficient, agile, flexible pharmaceutical manufacturing sector that reliably produces high-quality drug products without extensive regulatory oversight.

  • Dr. Janet Woodcock

Deputy Commissioner for Operations Oct 2005

 QbD raises interesting questions for us today

 What does it mean to be agile?  What does it mean to be flexible?  Are we entering the time in pharma where this finally matters?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

♦ What are the “new” things we are starting to see?

  • Peptides
  • Oligonucleotides
  • siRNA
  • Other nucleic acid therapeutics
  • Cell therapies
  • Associated delivery mechanisms

3

Is the dream of tailored/precision/personalized medicine finally here?

Personalized

erson

slide-4
SLIDE 4

♦ Many are low volume ♦ Most can appear niche from a material generation perspective ♦ Current unit operations have some problems:

  • Will lead to high costs
  • Will cause control strategy challenges

♦ Evolution of unit operations is needed for the future of patients

4

And are we ready to meet this challenge?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

♦ First question – for molecules made by chemical synthesis techniques, what is the “go to” method by which impurities are controlled? ♦ What would you do if every molecule you made was not crystalline? ♦ How should we handle this challenge?

5

A simple example scenario created by new treatment approaches

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

The future without crystallization?

Small Molecule – 3 registered steps, 4 Starting Materials

Synthesis Synthesis Synthesis Synthesis

Chromatography Chromatography Chromatography Chromatography

SM1 SM2 SM3 SM4

Step 1 Step 2

Chromatography

Step 3 Intermediate 1 Intermediate 2

Chromatography

API

Solids Isolation

  • Lots of chromatography
  • Lots and lots of solvent
  • Really slow isolation of solids

Chromatography

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Or should we choose this instead?

 Can we develop membranes to purify streams at a molecular level?  Can we develop multipurpose membranes?  Can we implement very selective recycle loops?  Can we replace purification approaches

  • f today with something like this?
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Or do we avoid the problem by producing extremely pure materials?

Photochemistry Electrochemistry Mechanochemistry Redox Sonochemistry

slide-9
SLIDE 9

♦ Many different therapeutic options ♦ None will be large volume – less than 1 MT API ♦ External network unlikely to be ready to handle these for commercial purposes ♦ Cannot spend large $$ on any one limited use medicine ♦ Need a shift in pharmaceutical manufacturing infrastructure ♦ All new approaches will require investment to achieve ♦ How might we fit and control all new treatment modalities into same framework that is small in size and investment?

9

Size does matter

slide-10
SLIDE 10

♦ It is NOT the solution, but without, there may be no solution ♦ It allows processing at a smaller scale

  • Cost issues are alleviated
  • New unit operations can be designed for purpose

♦ It removes/reduces mixing/scale up as the traditional most important process development variable

  • With appropriate regulatory connection, site flexibility, startup speed

are possible

  • Quickly mobilizing facilities is important for personalized approaches

♦ It represents the mindset shift that is needed to actually move

10

Why continuous manufacturing matters for patients

slide-11
SLIDE 11

How continuous can transform manufacturing

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Equipment Staging Area Std Continuous Processing Area Feed Prep & Delivery Room Finishing Suite Solids Charging Room Material Staging Area Continuous Processing Area (Hazardous Processing)

SVC API Facility

12

  • $35M Investment (Facility &

Equipment)

  • 18 months for construction

and qualification

  • Facility designed with a

unique ‘wheel and spoke’ approach, with raw materials feeding out from a central charge room

  • Production contained in dual-

access fume hoods

  • Facility designed for

throughput of 10 kg/day

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SVC Facility: Fume Hood View

  • Modular skids to support a wide

range of unit operations

  • Flexible and adaptable;

whenever possible, use of standard dimensions / components

  • PAT is a key component of the

manufacturing control system

  • Automated systems for sampling,

analysis, and transfer of results.

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

SVC Facility for GMP API Manufacture

CSTR Skid Plug Flow Reactor Skid Feed System Skid

Skids are part of a platform to support chemical unit operations in any product

  • Modular to be combined into unit operations

(e.g. CSTR/mixer skids combined for a counter- current extraction).

  • Flexible and adaptable – simple skids with

standard components (where possible)

  • Plug into Distributed Control System (DCS)
  • Working with high end equipment e.g. gear

pumps & data management system. CM

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

♦ SVC Flexible Equipment Platform

Plug Flow Reactor Skid Plug Flow Reactor Skid CSTR Skid Filtration Skid Feed Canisters Feed Make-up Vessel Surge Collection Vessels Batch Isolation Feed Pump Skid Interconnect Tubing

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Modularity

Brick level

1 brick

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Modularity

Fume hood level

Fume hood 24 bricks

=

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Modularity

Facility level

1 facility 11 Fume Hoods

= =

264 bricks

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Modularity

Multi-Facility Level

New Modality 2 Small Molecule New Modality 1

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

It is all about Real Estate

Feed skids Divert skids (1) PFR (16) FTIR probe (6) Dilution carts AVS skids (2) CSTRs, Evaporator, MSMPRs (4)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Example 1 – Small Molecule (4 steps)

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4

185 Brick Process

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Small Molecule

DILUTION CART 26SK-62 DIVERT STATION FEED 1 FEED 2 DUAL FEED SYSTEM PFR BUCHI

Step 1

(2 fume hoods = 47 Bricks)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Small Molecule

DILUTION CART DIVERT STATION ZINCATE CSTR GRIGNARD CSTR FEED 4 FEED 3 DUAL FEED SYSTEM

Step 2

(1 fume hood=14 bricks)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Small Molecule

QUENCH CSTR DILUTION CART FEED 6 DIVERT STATION

Step 3

(4 fume hoods = 72 Bricks)

FEED FEED DUAL FEED BLANK Delay Coil FEED FEED DEPROTECTION CSTR NEUTRALISATION CSTR BACK EXTRACTION CSTR

SURGE

PFR DUAL FEED SYSTEM BLANK FEED 5 LOW FEED SKID

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Small molecule

MSMPR 2 DISSOLVE OFF/SLURRY OFF FILTERS FTIR MSMPR 1 EVAPORATOR FEED 7 FEED 8 FEED 9 FEED 7 MSMPR 3

Step 4

(3 fume hoods= 52 bricks)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Nucleic acid therapeutics

  • How many bricks are

needed for chromatography?

  • How do we replace

traditional chromatography by SMB?

  • How many bricks are

needed for nanofiltration?

  • How does a solid phase

synthesizer for SVC should look like? Don’t view as “new” approach. View as types and number of bricks…

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Unit Operation by Bricks – Today and Tomorrow

Unit Operation # of Bricks

Standard Prep. Chrom. >24 Amorphous Filtration >24 Nanofiltration 24 Surge (full decoupling) 24 Solvent exchanger (Buchi) 24 SMB 16 Dissolve off/Slurry off filter 16 PFR 16 MSMPR (large) 8 FTIR Probe 6 Evaporator 4 CSTR, MSMPR small 4 Dilution Cart 2 Divert Skid 1 Feed Skid 1

← 4000 L Feed + 60 cm Columns + ∼100L fraction collection ← 400 L Feed, 10 L fractions, 5 cm columns ← Standard AFD ∼0.5 m2 ← Independent of the area

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Conclusions, and challenges

♦ Next wave of medicines requires us to change ♦ Continuous manufacturing is the framework that allows us to address these needs ♦ SVC-style facilities gives flexibility already ♦ New unit operations are needed

  • Separations are key
  • Novel reaction platforms could reduce burden

♦ QbD should never have been about multivariate PARs, risk and control strategies – it’s about design

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Acknowledgments

29

♦ Marty Johnson ♦ Jen Groh ♦ Chris Polster ♦ Shujauddin Changi ♦ Nick Klitzing ♦ Sarah O’Keeffe ♦ Ray Boyce ♦ Rob Moylan ♦ Bret Huff