External oligonucleotide standards enable cross laboratory and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

external oligonucleotide standards enable cross
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

External oligonucleotide standards enable cross laboratory and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

External oligonucleotide standards enable cross laboratory and exchange of real-time PCR data Jo Vandesompele professor, Ghent University co-founder and CEO, Biogazelle Roche Molecular Biology Days Vilvoorde, 7 oktober, 2009 biomarker


slide-1
SLIDE 1

External oligonucleotide standards enable cross laboratory and exchange of real-time PCR data

Jo Vandesompele professor, Ghent University co-founder and CEO, Biogazelle Roche Molecular Biology Days Vilvoorde, 7 oktober, 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

biomarker signature based stratification

slide-3
SLIDE 3

biomarker signature based stratification

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • meta-analysis of 7 published microarray gene

expression studies

  • literature screening of almost 800 abstracts from

single-gene studies

selection of a top ranking list of 59 prognostic markers

  • two PCR-based assays
  • capillary gel electrophoresis (Experion)

RNA quality control 700 samples

  • www.rtprimerdb.org

qPCR assay design and validation sample pre-amplification (WT-Ovation) real-time PCR 384-well plates (LC480)

  • Prediction Analysis of Microarrays
  • Kaplan-Meier
  • Cox proportional hazards

qbasePLUS data-analysis

study workflow

slide-5
SLIDE 5

classification of patients with respect to PFS and OS

50 100 150 OS total SIOPEN cohort (n = 313)

survival probability (%)

LR n=245 (5) HR n=68 (27)

p = <0.001 (log-rank)

20 40 60 100 80 time (months) 50 100 150 PFS total SIOPEN cohort (n = 312)

survival probability (%)

LR n=245 (42) HR n=67 (35)

p = <0.001 (log-rank)

20 40 60 100 80 time (months)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

value of the classifier in relation to currently used risk factors: PFS

50 100 150 20 40 60 80 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 LR n=94 (17) LR n=152 (25) LR n=234 (39) LR n=222 (31) LR n=8 (1) LR n=24 (11) HR n=48 (24) HR n=31 (18) HR n=34 (21) HR n=34 (15) HR n=34 (17) HR n=20 (12)

p = <0.001 (log-rank) p = <0.001 (log-rank) p = <0.001 (log-rank) p = <0.001 (log-rank) p = 0.12 (log-rank)

time (months) 50 100 150 time (months) 50 100 150 time (months) 50 100 150 time (months) time (months) time (months) 100 80 60 40 20

survival probability (%)

100 80 60 40 20

survival probability (%)

100 80 60 40 20

survival probability (%)

100 80 60 40 20

survival probability (%)

100 80 60 40 20

survival probability (%) survival probability (%)

PFS age <=12 months (n = 172) PFS not stage 4 (n = 256) PFS stage 4 (n = 58) PFS amplification (n = 42 ) MYCN PFS single copy (n = 265) MYCN PFS age > 12 months (n = 142) p = 0.22 (log-rank)

100 80 60 40 20

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Cox multivariate analysis independent predictor (age, stage, MYCN) multivariate cox analysis

PAM classifier strong independent predictor: patients with high molecular risk have a 19-fold higher risk to die from disease a 4-fold higher risk for relapse/progression compared to patients with low molecular risk

slide-8
SLIDE 8

 Vermeulen et al., The Lancet Oncology, 2009

slide-9
SLIDE 9

 synthetic control

 55 nucleotides  PAGE purification  blocking group  5 points dilution series: 150 000 molecules > 15 molecules

RCRP external oligonucleotide standards stuffer FP

slide-10
SLIDE 10

external oligonucleotide standards

 reproducibility across master mixes (5) and instruments (2)

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 1000000 100000 10000 1000 100 10 MM1 MM2 MM3 MM4 MM5

slide-11
SLIDE 11

external oligonucleotide standards cross lab comparison

5 standards (triplicates) 3 reference genes + 5 genes of interest 366 samples

slide-12
SLIDE 12

 5 standards (triplicates)

external oligonucleotide standards cross lab comparison

average ΔCq standards correction Cq samples Cq qPCR instrument 1, mastermix 1 Cq qPCR instrument 2, mastermix 2

16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36

slide-13
SLIDE 13

external oligonucleotide standards cross lab comparison

Cq 7900HT Cq LC480 abs (dCq)

 ARHGEF7 gene

 366 samples  use of 5 standards (triplicates) for correction

slide-14
SLIDE 14

external oligonucleotide standards cross lab comparison

 Vermeulen et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 2009

slide-15
SLIDE 15

 data analysis using qbasePLUS

 based on Ghent University’s geNorm and qBase technology  up to fifty 384-well plates  multiple reference genes for accurate normalization  detection and correction of inter-run variation

  • multiple IRC > more accurate
  • normalized relative quantities > greater flexibility

 dedicated error propagation  automated analysis; no manual interaction required

inter-run calibration requires specialized software

http://www.qbaseplus.com

slide-16
SLIDE 16

conclusions

 standardization is hot in real-time PCR

 MIQE and RDML contribute to higher quality and transparency  external oligonucleotides enable cross-laboratory studies

slide-17
SLIDE 17

acknowledgements

 Jan Hellemans (UGent, Biogazelle)  Filip Pattyn (UGent)  Steve Lefever (UGent)  Joëlle Vermeulen (UGent)  MIQE & RDML consortium

slide-18
SLIDE 18

January 28-29, 2010 Ghent, Belgium www.advances-in-genomics.org early bird registration October 31, 2009