SLIDE 1
Conditioned Brownian Motion, Hardy spaces, Square Functions
Paul F.X. M¨ uller Johannes Kepler Universit¨ at Linz
SLIDE 2 Topics
- 1. Problems in Harmonic Analysis
(a) Fourier Multipliers in Lp(T) (b) SL∞(T), Interpolation, Approximation.
(a) SL∞(Ω) (b) Conditioned Brownian Motion (c) Permanence theorem
SLIDE 3 Fouriermultipliers.
To u ∈ Lp([0, 2π]) with Fourier series u(θ) =
∞
ak cos kθ + bk sin kθ. form the dyadic blocks ∆n(u)(θ) =
2n+1−1
ak cos kθ + bk sin kθ and define the transform v(θ) =
∞
ǫn∆n(u)(θ), ǫn ∈ {−1, 1}. Theorem 1 (Littlewood-Paley, Marcinkiewicz) There exists Cp > 0 so that for all ǫn ∈ {−1, 1}, vLp ≤ CpuLp, and Cp → ∞ for p → ∞ or p → 1.
SLIDE 4 Littlewood-Paley Function.
Let u(z), z ∈ D denote the harmonic exten- sion of u ∈ Lp([0, 2π]) obtained by integration against the Poisson kernel Pθ(z) = 1 − |z|2 |eiθ − z|2. The Littlewood Paley Funktion g2
D(u)(θ) =
|z|Pθ(z)dA(z) plays a central role in proving the multiplier theorem: Its proof consists of basically two independent components Pointwise estimates between the g functions gD(v)(θ) ≤ CgD(u)(θ), and Lp integral estimates C−1
p
vLp ≤ CpgD(v)Lp ≤ CpvLp.
SLIDE 5 Uniformly bounded Littlewood Pa- ley Functions
SL∞(T) denotes the space of all functions u with uniformly bounded Littlewood Paley Func- tion. uSL∞(T) = gD(u)∞. The conditions gD(u)∞ < ∞ contolls the growth
- f u and also its oscillationen. Chang-Wilson-
Wolff proved that there existists c > 0 so that
2π
exp(cu2(θ))dθ < ∞. On the other hand there exist E ⊆ [0, 2π[ so that g2
D(1E)∞ = ∞.
SLIDE 6
Multipliers into SL∞(T) and Marcinkiewicz-decomosition
We get two different endpoints of the Lp scale. L2 ⊃ · · · ⊃ Lp ⊃ · · · ⊃ BMO ⊃
L∞ SL∞(T) The relation of the endpoint SL∞ to the Lp scale is clarified by a Marcinkiewicz decompo- sition and by pointwise multipliers with values in SL∞(T).
SLIDE 7
A function f ∈ Lp is in the Hardy space Hp when its harmonic extension to the unit disc is analytic. Theorem 2 (P. W. Jones & P.F.X.M.) To f ∈ Hp and λ > 0 there exists∗ g ∈ SL∞∩H∞ so that gSL∞ + g∞ ≤ C0λ, f − g1 ≤ λ1−pfp
p
Non trivial pointwise multipliers. Theorem 3 (P. W. Jones & P.F.X.M.) To each E ⊆ [0, 2π[ there exists∗ 0 ≤ m(θ) ≤ 1 so that m1ESL∞ < C0 and
2π
m1Edθ ≥ |E|/2.
SLIDE 8
Conditioned Brownian Motion and Littlewood-Paley
Let (Ω, P) be Wiener Space. 2D-Brownian mo- tion Bt : Ω → R2 starting at B0 = 0 leaves the unit disk for the first time at τ = inf{t > 0 : |Bt| > 1}. The harmonic extension of u ∈ Lp defines the martingal u(Bt), t ≤ τ, with quadratic variation u(Bτ) =
τ
0 |∇u(Bs)|2ds.
Form the expectation u(Bτ) under the con- dition {Bτ = eiθ}, to obtain gD(u)(θ). Thus g2
D(u) = E(u(Bτ)|Bτ = eiθ).
SLIDE 9
Classical Lp Permanence.
Let 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, X ∈ Lp(Ω) and N(X)(eiθ) = E(X|Bτ = eiθ). N : Lp(Ω) → Lp(T) contracts, u = Nu(Bτ). X ∈ Lp(Ω) with stochastic integral representa- tion X = EX+
HsdBs has quadratic variation,
X =
∞
|Hs|2ds. 1 < p < ∞. The Permanence-theorem due to Zygmund, Burkholder, Doob (combined) as- serts that g2(N(X))Lp(T) ≤ CpNXLp(T), where Cp → ∞ if p → ∞ or p → 1.
SLIDE 10
Due to the behaviour of the constants Cp the classical theorem is limited to 1 < p < ∞. With a permanence theorem valid for p = ∞!! we could use stopping times and Ito calcu- lus to obtain random variables with bounded quadratic variation, then transfer and get functions in SL∞(T).
SLIDE 11
The SL∞−Permanence theorem. For X ∈ Lp(Ω) define X ∈ SL∞(Ω) if X ∈ L∞(Ω). Theorem 4 (P.W. Jones, P.F.X. M. ) N : SL∞(Ω) → SL∞(T), X → E(X|Bτ = eiθ) is bounded, since we have the pointwise esti- mates g2
D(N(X))(·) ≤ C0N(X)(·).
Using random variables with uniformly bounded quadratic variation as input the SL∞− perma- nence theorem generates functions with uni- formly bounded Littlewood Paley function.
SLIDE 12
Applications of SL∞−Permanence.
Solution of the Interpolation Problem. Part 1. f ∈ Hp(T) induces holomorphic mar- tingal f(zt) =
t
0 f′(zs)dzs,
zt = B(1)
t
+ iB(2)
t
With the stopping time ρ(ω) = inf{r :
r
0 |f′(zs)|2ds > λ, |f(zr)| > λ}
f(zρ) on Wiener space is bounded with uni- formly bounded quadratic variation.
SLIDE 13
Part 2. First, g = N(f(zρ)) is in H∞(T), with gL∞ ≤ f(zρ)∞ ≤ λ. And by the SL∞− permance theorem it satis- fies gSL∞ ≤ CNf(zρ)∞ ≤ Cλ. With Theorems of Doob and Burkholder we get for h = f − g the error estimates h1 ≤ Cpλ1−pfp
p.
SLIDE 14
Solution of Multiplier Problems. Part 1. E ⊆ [0, 2π[. Let 1E(z) be the harmonic extension of the indicator function 1E. Define the bounded and non-negative multi- plier in Wiener space µt = exp(1E(Bt)−
t
0 |∇1E(Bs)|2(1
2+ 1 1E(Bs))ds). By Feynman-Kac-Stochastic Calculus: µt1E(Bt) t < τ, is a martingale and has uniformly bounded quadratic variation µτ1E(Bτ) ≤ C.
SLIDE 15 Part 2. Define mulitplier on the disk m = N(µτ). Then by SL∞−Permanence theorem m1E = N(µτ1E(Bτ)) has bounded Littlewood Paley function and mean
- m1Edt = Eµτ1E(Bτ) = µ01E(B0).
SLIDE 16 Holomorphic Random Variables X ∈ Lp(Ω), is holomorphic RV if X = EX +
Example: f(zρ) = f(0) +
ρ
0 f′(zs)dzs.
If X ∈ Lp(Ω) is holomorphic RV then the har- monic Extension of E(X|zτ = eiθ) is analytic and
E(X|zτ = eiθ) ∈ Hp.
Covariance formula for holomorphic RV gives
E(XPθ(zτr)) = EX + E
τr
Fs∂zPθ(zs)ds. Use Power series ∂zPθ(zs) =
∞
an(zs)einθ and put bn = E
τr
0 an(zs)ds to get
E(XPθ(zτr)) = EX +
∞
bneinθ.
SLIDE 17 The harmonic Extension of N(X). X ∈ L2(Ω), X = EX +
zs. The sum of
E
τ
0 Fs
π
π ∂zPθ(zt)∇wPθ(w)dθ
and
E
τ
0 Gs
π
π ∂¯ zPθ(zt)∇wPθ(w)dθ
is ∇wN(X)(w). Start with N(X)(θ) = EX+E
τ
0 Fs∂zPθ(zs)+Gs∂¯ zPθ(zt)ds
integrate against the Poisson kernel Pθ(w) and form the gradient with respect to w.
SLIDE 18 The Whitney Decomposition of the Unit Disk. The Littlewood Paley Funktion of N(X) g2
D(N(X))(θ) =
|w|Pθ(w)dA(w) satisfies the pointwise estimate g2
D(N(X)(θ) ≤ C0E τ
0 (|Fs|2 + |Gs|2)Pθ(zt)ds.
W = {Q : Q is Whitney Cube in D}. Whitney cubes are pairewise disjoint and sat- isfy dist(Q, ∂D) ∼ diamQ. Lokalization: On Whitney Cubes we obtain stabilization of Green-funktion, Poisson-kern, Poincare-metrik studied in Potential theory. Die Whitney decomposition defines a conformal in- variant.
SLIDE 19 The integral kernels defining ∇wN(X)(w) lead to almost diagonal matrices: For Q1, Q2 ∈ W, put k(Q1, Q2) =
π
−π ∂zPθ(Q1)∇wPθ(Q2)dθ
Then, k(Q1, Q2) ∼ 0 except when Q1 is close to Q2, (in the sense of the Poincare metric). This gives rise to almost diagonal matrices encoun- tered in the proof of the David Journe T(1)
- theorem. Hence ℓ2 estimates.