Community Survey Results Deerfield Community School District Early - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

community survey results deerfield community school
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Community Survey Results Deerfield Community School District Early - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Community Survey Results Deerfield Community School District Early Summer 2020 SCHOOL PERCEPTIONS Our mission is to help educational leaders gather, organize and use data to make strategic decisions. Founded in 2002 to provide independent and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Early Summer 2020

Deerfield Community School District Community Survey Results

slide-2
SLIDE 2

SCHOOL PERCEPTIONS

Our mission is to help educational leaders gather,

  • rganize and use data to make strategic decisions.
  • Founded in 2002 to provide independent and

unbiased research

  • Conducted over 10,000 staff, parent, student, and

community surveys for school improvement

  • Helped more than 600 districts navigate the strategic

planning and referendum planning process

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Survey Summary

  • The survey was conducted in mid‐June through

early July of 2020.

  • Residents within the District were mailed a paper
  • survey. Each survey included a unique survey

access code for those who preferred to take the survey online.

  • Total responses = 643 (227 paper) – 452 in 2016
  • Participation rate = 32%
  • Margin of error = +/‐ 3.9%
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Respondent Information

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What is your age?

0% 10% 20% 30%

18‐29 30‐39 40‐49 50‐64 65 and over 3% 22% 26% 29% 20%

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Do you live in the Deerfield Community School District?

88% 12% Yes No

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Where do you live?

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Town of Pleasant Springs Town of Christiana Town of Cottage Grove Do not live in the school district Town of Deerfield Village of Deerfield 0.30% 2% 8% 9% 30% 51%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Are you employed by the Deerfield Community School District?

16% 84% Yes (n=105) No

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Do you have school‐age children?

50% 50% Yes (n=319) No

slide-10
SLIDE 10

What impact do you believe the quality of the District has on your home value?

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Positive impact Little to no impact Negative impact Do not own a home in the District 60% 25% 4% 11%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

How would you like to receive information regarding school district issues?

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Booster Clubs Cable Channel 986 (WDEE) Other Elementary PTO School board meetings Attend meetings at schools Independent Newspaper Tuesday Newsday folder Skyward Family Access District website District Facebook page District mass email

2% 2% 2% 11% 11% 13% 15% 33% 46% 60% 61% 79% 2% 10% 11% 2% 13% 4% 42% 3% 2% 48% 30% 33%

Non‐Parents (Non‐Staff) Parents (Non‐Staff)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Financial Background Information

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The District works very hard to control daily expenses and make decisions to improve District finances. During the last few years, long‐term bonds were refinanced, and the fund balance was increased to eliminate the need for short‐term borrowing. Both actions resulted in significant savings. As you can see in the chart below, since the 2011‐12 school year, the tax mill rate, which determines the school portion of local property taxes, has dropped.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Future Operational Funding Challenges

slide-15
SLIDE 15

In 2008, 2013, and again in 2016, Deerfield voters supported non‐ recurring operational referenda that allowed the District to maintain its programs and services as well as increase the technology available for our students. This funding will end on June 30, 2020. The funding from the most recent referendum provided $400,000 each year, allowing the District to: ‐ Implement a new reading program in grades K‐5 ‐ Purchase up‐to‐date textbooks/curriculum for various high school courses ‐ Maintain online curriculum software subscriptions ‐ Purchase classroom interactive whiteboards ‐ Purchase Chromebooks for 1‐to‐1 technology for students ‐ Invest in building maintenance and security enhancements

slide-16
SLIDE 16

As a result of the ongoing COVID‐19 pandemic, budgeting for the future includes: ‐ Increased operating expenses to protect the health of students and staff, which could include smaller classes, more technology/online instruction, and increased cleaning/supplies. ‐ Reduced funding from the state. (This year, the state is forecasting a $2 billion budget deficit. Consequently, funding for every school district, including Deerfield, is likely to decline for an extended period.)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Funding to Support Daily Operations

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Option 1: Deerfield voters could support a $500,000 referendum, allowing the District to maintain current programs/services AND address some of the additional future expenses anticipated from the COVID‐19 pandemic for each of the next five years. If the referendum is held in November, the tax mill rate is projected to not increase over the current level.

Would you support Option 1?

All Residents

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Definitely no Probably no Undecided Probably yes Definitely yes 6% 6% 13% 22% 53%

75% Yes 12% No

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Option 1: Deerfield voters could support a $500,000 referendum, allowing the District to maintain current programs/services AND address some of the additional future expenses anticipated from the COVID‐19 pandemic for each of the next five years. If the referendum is held in November, the tax mill rate is projected to not increase over the current level.

Would you support Option 1?

Staff Residents

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Definitely no Probably no Undecided Probably yes Definitely yes 0% 1% 5% 10% 84%

94% Yes 1% No

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Option 1: Deerfield voters could support a $500,000 referendum, allowing the District to maintain current programs/services AND address some of the additional future expenses anticipated from the COVID‐19 pandemic for each of the next five years. If the referendum is held in November, the tax mill rate is projected to not increase over the current level.

Would you support Option 1?

Parent Residents (Non‐Staff)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Definitely no Probably no Undecided Probably yes Definitely yes 3% 4% 8% 25% 60%

85% Yes 7% No

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Option 1: Deerfield voters could support a $500,000 referendum, allowing the District to maintain current programs/services AND address some of the additional future expenses anticipated from the COVID‐19 pandemic for each of the next five years. If the referendum is held in November, the tax mill rate is projected to not increase over the current level.

Would you support Option 1?

Non‐Parent Residents (Non‐Staff)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Definitely no Probably no Undecided Probably yes Definitely yes 10% 8% 19% 23% 40%

63% Yes 18% No

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Option 2: Deerfield voters could support a $400,000 referendum, allowing the District to maintain current programs and services for each of the next five years. If the referendum is held in November, the tax mill rate is projected to decline by at least $20 for each $100,000 of assessed property value.

Would you support Option 2?

All Residents

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Definitely no Probably no Undecided Probably yes Definitely yes 7% 6% 19% 23% 45%

68% Yes 13% No

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Option 2: Deerfield voters could support a $400,000 referendum, allowing the District to maintain current programs and services for each of the next five years. If the referendum is held in November, the tax mill rate is projected to decline by at least $20 for each $100,000 of assessed property value.

Would you support Option 2?

Staff Residents

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Definitely no Probably no Undecided Probably yes Definitely yes 2% 8% 10% 10% 70%

80% Yes 10% No

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Option 2: Deerfield voters could support a $400,000 referendum, allowing the District to maintain current programs and services for each of the next five years. If the referendum is held in November, the tax mill rate is projected to decline by at least $20 for each $100,000 of assessed property value.

Would you support Option 2?

Parent Residents (Non‐Staff)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Definitely no Probably no Undecided Probably yes Definitely yes 6% 7% 13% 24% 50%

74% Yes 13% No

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Option 2: Deerfield voters could support a $400,000 referendum, allowing the District to maintain current programs and services for each of the next five years. If the referendum is held in November, the tax mill rate is projected to decline by at least $20 for each $100,000 of assessed property value.

Would you support Option 2?

Non‐Parent Residents (Non‐Staff)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Definitely no Probably no Undecided Probably yes Definitely yes 9% 6% 25% 25% 35%

60% Yes 15% No

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Cost Cutting Options

slide-27
SLIDE 27

If additional budget cuts are necessary, please give your recommendation for each item. (Slide 1/2)

Keep (3), Reduce (2), Eliminate (1)

Item All Residents Staff Residents Parent Residents (Non‐Staff) Non‐Parent Residents (Non‐Staff)

Computer education for grades K‐12 Includes keyboarding, basic computer skills, technology literacy, computer programming, and multi‐ media technology.

2.86 2.87 2.92 2.81

Technology education for MS & HS Includes woods, metals, consumer/home auto, CAD/mechanical drafting/engineering, construction, and introduction to agriculture.

2.84 2.91 2.87 2.80

Business education for MS & HS Includes accounting, marketing, personal finance, keyboarding, and yearbook publications.

2.84 2.93 2.86 2.79

Physical education for grades K‐12 Includes team activities and life‐long health/wellness offered in grades K‐12 by a certified teacher.

2.82 2.88 2.85 2.78

At‐risk programs for MS & HS Alternative education programs provide coursework and support for students at risk of not graduating.

2.76 2.87 2.77 2.74

Funding for technology Includes replacing student computers, updating software, and maintaining the wireless infrastructure.

2.83 2.91 2.91 2.73

College preparation/Advanced placement classes Includes AP high school course offerings.

2.76 2.81 2.83 2.68

Health education for MS & HS Health education is a goal of the health and wellness policy and currently offered in 7th grade and high school.

2.72 2.85 2.77 2.65

slide-28
SLIDE 28

If additional budget cuts are necessary, please give your recommendation for each item. (Slide 2/2)

Keep (3), Reduce (2), Eliminate (1)

Item All Residents Staff Residents Parent Residents (Non‐Staff) Non‐Parent Residents (Non‐Staff)

Funding to maintain curriculum Our current plan calls for making at least

  • ne major curriculum resource update for each of the next five years.

2.75 2.83 2.84 2.65

Band for grades 5‐12 Includes lessons, concerts, jazz band, pep band, marching band, solo, and ensemble performances.

2.72 2.85 2.77 2.63

Art for grades K‐12 Visual art programming that uses hands‐on and project‐based learning, including drawing, ceramics, painting, photography, etc.

2.73 2.93 2.78 2.62

MS/HS sports Includes football, basketball, baseball, softball, soccer, volleyball, cross‐country, cheerleading, wrestling, and track.

2.69 2.75 2.75 2.62

Vocal music for grades K‐12 Includes student performances, concerts, musicals, solo and ensemble, treble choir, and show choir.

2.64 2.85 2.71 2.53

HS clubs and academic activities Includes Forensics, Musical, Student Council, National Honor Society, Art Club, Academic Decathlon, Club Unify, GSA, Leo Club, True I.D.

2.53 2.78 2.56 2.43

Family/Consumer education for MS & HS Includes Foods, Child and Parenting, Assistant Child Care Certification, Housing/Interior Design, and Sewing.

2.48 2.72 2.47 2.43

Foreign languages for grades 4‐12 Spanish as a second language, offered in grades 4‐12.

2.56 2.71 2.69 2.40

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Thank you!

Parent Surveys ‐ Staff Surveys ‐ Student Surveys ‐ Community Surveys www.schoolperceptions.com (262) 644‐4300