Coldwater Community Schools FACILITY STUDY & MASTER PLANNING - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

coldwater community schools
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Coldwater Community Schools FACILITY STUDY & MASTER PLANNING - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Coldwater Community Schools FACILITY STUDY & MASTER PLANNING SITE INVESTIGATION August 29, 2017 How Did We Get Here Where weve been: Facility Assessments Community Forums 1, 2 & 3 What weve heard Long range


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Coldwater Community Schools

FACILITY STUDY & MASTER PLANNING – SITE INVESTIGATION

August 29, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

How Did We Get Here

  • Where we’ve been:
  • Facility Assessments
  • Community Forums 1,

2 & 3

  • What we’ve heard
  • Long

range District Vision – Master Plan

  • Lakeland

replacement sites

  • High School improvements
  • Timing
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Facilities Assessment – Mtg#1

NAME Jefferson El Max Larsen El Lakeland El Legg Middle High School Lincoln El Admin Total space in use Vacant Space Lincoln El (new) Fremont St Bldg BUILT 1956 2003 1956 1967 1954 1963 1975 2003 1957 RENO ‘63, ’03, ’16 ’16 ‘02, ’11 ‘02, ’12, ’13, ’15, ’16 ‘75, ’78, ’85, ’97, ’16 SIZE 45,316 sf 66,601 sf 44,703 sf 111,825 sf 198,350 sf 29,780 sf 11,602 sf 508,177 sf 14,200 sf 12,385 sf

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Facility Assessment – Mtg #1

Jefferson Elementary

  • Replace playground equipment & surface
  • Replace exterior insulation system & repair brick
  • Roof replacement (recommended 2018)
  • Improve site lighting

Budget range - $800,000 - $1.9 million (Proposed – 690,515)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Facility Assessment – Mtg #1

Max Larsen Elementary

  • Replace playground equipment
  • Replace light fixtures, emergency lighting & controls

Budget range - $0 - $1.3 million (Proposed 40,000)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Facility Assessment – Mtg #1

Lakeland Elementary

  • Partial parking lot paving
  • Replace playground equipment
  • Replace EIFS, windows, roof and reconstruct West wall
  • Renovate classrooms & toilet rooms
  • Add secure entry
  • Replace portable classrooms
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Facility Assessment – Mtg #1

Lakeland Elementary

  • Replace portable classrooms
  • Cafeteria addition
  • Replace Mechanical units & plumbing - mostly original (1956)
  • Replace Electrical system and fixtures – mostly original (1950’s)

Budget range - $4.7 million - $11 million (Proposed 0) Budget range – New Building - $20,070,077 million

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Facility Assessment – Mtg #1

Legg Middle School

  • Handicap and ADA access issues (PE, Gym, Planetarium)
  • Replace gym area doors, hardware, and locker rooms in
  • riginal section
  • Replace Mechanical units & plumbing - mostly original (1967)
  • Replace remaining lighting

Budget range - $6.5 million - $9.1 million (Proposed $4,948,432)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Facility Assessment – Mtg #1

Coldwater High School

  • Replace EIFS, windows, and selective roofing
  • ADA compliance at classroom entrances
  • Replace ceiling
  • Refinish gym and renovate locker rooms (‘54)
  • Replace doors and hardware(’54&‘76section)
  • Replace casework (‘54 & ’76)
  • Replace lockers
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Facility Assessment – Mtg #1

Coldwater High School

  • Replace mechanical controls
  • Replace plumbing
  • Replace site lighting and selective interior lighting

Budget range - $7.5 million - $10.4 million (Proposed $3,499,919)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What We Heard

  • Forum #2 asked for:
  • Study of student density / use near Lakeland 4-5
  • Enrollment

History / trend

  • Student distribution by grade level & school
  • Coldwater Budgets and financial picture
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Financial Assessment – Mtg #2 District Bond Debt Comparison

District Debt (4/2016) Sinking Fund Total Marshall Harper Creek Homer Colon Quincy Reading Union City Litchfield Coldwater Tekonsha Bronson 7.05 7.06 7.00 5.60 4.00 3.27 4.50 3.15 2.55 1.82 0.00 1.00 8.05 0.00 7.06 0.00 7.00 0.00 5.60 1.50 5.50 1.90 5.17 0.00 4.50 0.75 3.90 0.974 3.52 1.00 2.82 2.00 2.00

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Financial Assessment – Mtg #2 District Bond Debt Comparison

Item Amount Term Date Date Sinking Fund 0.974 mill 10 years 2010 2020 1994 Bond (‘09 refi) 0.10 mill 29 years 1994 2023 1994 Bond (‘07 refi) 1.35 mill 27 years 1994 2021 2001 Bond(‘15 refi) 1.10 mill 20 years 2001 2021

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Financial Assessment – Mtg #2 What does a mill generate in Coldwater?

Term Generates .974 mil Sinking Fund Annual $780,000 1.44 Mil Bond (Proposed) 29.25 years $29.75 million

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The following chart is an example of how a 1.44 mill increase would affect homeowners on a monthly and yearly basis.

Market Value Taxable Value 1.44 Mills/Annual Monthly $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 36.00* $ 3.00 $100,000 $ 50,000 $ 72.00* $ 6.00 $150,000 $ 75,000 $108.00* $ 9.00 $200,000 $100,000 $144.00* $12.00 $250,000 $125,000 $180.00 $15.00 $300,000 $150,000 $216.00 $18.00 *90% of all property in the Coldwater School District falls into these categories

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What We Heard

  • Forum #3 asked for:
  • Concept for Lakeland 4-5

building near Coldwater

  • Address Middle School and High School basics
  • Consider long term solution at Max Larsen
  • Jefferson and Max Larsen are currently ‘right sized’

– path for anticipated district growth?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Master Plan Ideas

1. Relocate current Lakeland 4-5 into a new 4-5 facility in Coldwater 2. Sell Fremont Street property to NRP (no longer an

  • ption)

3. Sell administration property and relocate to Lincoln 4. Maintain Jefferson, Max Larsen, and Middle School to keep up with maintenance and capacity 5. Update Coldwater High School 6. Address District Growth Potential at Elementary Schools

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Lakeland Replacement

  • New 4-5

Building on a new site.

  • How Many Acres? General *guidelines:
  • Elementary

= 10 acre, plus 1 acre for every 100 students

  • Junior / Middle = 20 acres,

plus 1 acre for every 100 students

  • High School = 30 acres,

plus 1 acre for every 100 students

  • Ideal

Site Parameters:

  • 12

– 20 acre site

  • Adequate traffic access

(preferably two streets) and site circulation

  • Proximity to other buildings in the school

district

* Based on CEFPI recommendations

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Sites Considered:

Western Site 2 15.11 acres Bishop Ave. Site 8.02 acres Western Site 1 12.39 acres Fremont St. Site 9.32 acres 5.39 acres buildable

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Western Avenue - Site 1

  • Creates Campus Feel with

Middle School and High Schools

  • Proximity to Aquatic Center/LMS
  • Easy Access-Multiple Site

Entry Opportunities

  • Requires Relocation of

Little League Fields

  • Provides Additional Educational

Opportunity for

  • ur

Kids

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Western Avenue - Site 2

  • Single Entry Point
  • Reduces Traffic Volume

Near MS/HS Site

  • Site Grading Required
  • Does

Not Require Relocation of Little League Fields

  • Provides Future Expansion

Opportunities

  • Site not for sale - City owned
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Bishop Avenue Site

  • Development

Impacts Current High School Site Programming (practice fields and transportation)

  • Development

Limits Long Term HS Site Development

  • Increases

Traffic Volume at Green St./Bishop Ave. Intersection

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Michigan Avenue Site

  • Site not for

sale

slide-25
SLIDE 25

US 12 Site

  • 10.92

Acres

  • Northshore Dr.

Access

  • Too far for

PE/Aquatic Classes

  • Too far for Advanced

Classes at LMS

  • Single road access to

site

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Western Avenue Site 1

  • Two Story Elementary
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Little League Relocation

  • 6 Field Option vs. 4 Field
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Little League Relocation

  • Proposed 4 Field City Plan
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Timeline to a Bond

1. Board direction on initial scope Feb. 6, 2017 2. Community Survey (discuss timing) 3. Final bond decision & scope by May 22, 2017 4. Assemble treasury application May 22nd – June 15th 5. Set Treasury date June 21, 2017 6. Communicate Information June 2017 – Nov 2017 7. Bond vote Nov 7, 2017 8. Design Dec 2017 – Feb 2019 9. Construction April 2019 – August 2021