Sim coe County District School Board Pupil Accom m odation Review - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sim coe county district school board pupil accom m
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sim coe County District School Board Pupil Accom m odation Review - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sim coe County District School Board Pupil Accom m odation Review 2 0 1 1 :0 2 Coldwater Public School Moonstone Elementary School (Grades JK-6) Warminster Elementary School Public Meeting - October 27, 2011 Accommodation Review Committee


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sim coe County District School Board Pupil Accom m odation Review 2 0 1 1 :0 2

Coldwater Public School Moonstone Elementary School (Grades JK-6) Warminster Elementary School

Public Meeting - October 27, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Accommodation Review Committee Members

SCDSB Manager of Planning & Enrolment David Few SCDSB Superintendent of Education Steve Blake SCDSB Superintendent of Facility Services/ARC Chair John Dance SCDSB Trustee Jodi Lloyd SCDSB Trustee Peter Beacock Township of Severn (Voting) Community Rep.

  • Counc. Ron Stevens

Township of Oro-Medonte (Voting) Community Rep. Lila Osborne Tay Township (Voting) Community Rep. Alison Smith Warminster PS (Voting) Parent Rep. Karen Aigeldinger Warminster PS (Voting) Parent Rep. Kim Ball Warminster PS Principal Jeff Bell Moonstone ES (Voting) Parent Rep. Denise Osborne Moonstone ES (Voting) Parent Rep. Simon Kennedy Moonstone ES Principal Rose Phillips Coldwater PS (Voting) Parent Rep. Christine Bowman Coldwater PS (Voting) Parent Rep. Michele Clark Coldwater PS Principal Carol Carpenter

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Accommodation Reviews

  • The capital planning process addresses areas facing

particular challenges regarding:

  • enrolment (either too few or too many students)
  • the ability to deliver programming (multi grades or

scheduling classes), and

  • the condition of school buildings (the need for repairs)
  • On November 24, 2010, the Board approved

accommodation reviews for three groups of elementary schools

  • 2 0 1 0 :0 3 – Alliston Union PS, Ernest Cumberland ES
  • 2 0 1 1 :0 1 - Port McNicoll PS, Victoria Harbour ES,

Waubaushene ES (Grades 4-8), Waubaushene Pines ES (Grades JK-3)

  • 2 0 1 1 :0 2 – Coldwater PS, Moonstone ES, Warminster

ES

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Accommodation Review Committee (ARC) 2011: 02 consists of:
  • Coldwater Public School
  • Moonstone Elementary School (Grades JK-6)
  • Warminster Elementary School

ARC 2011: 02 Elementary Schools

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Board adopted Policy 2313, Pupil Accommodation Review on

June 20, 2007 and was revised on March 24, 2010

  • Policy 2313 is implemented by APM A5500, Pupil

Accommodation Review

  • The policy and APM are in keeping with the Ministry of

Education Pupil Accommodation Review Guidelines issued June 2009

Policy Background

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Staff present an alternative accommodation option(s) to the

ARC and community

  • The pupil accommodation review process is transparent and

consultative

  • An accommodation review focuses on a group of schools in an

area rather than on a single school

  • Each school will be assessed using a School Information Profile

(SIP)

  • The ARC makes recommendations
  • A Board resolution to close a school will include timelines for

closure

Policy Highlights

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Membership of the ARC is set out in section 4.2 of Policy 2313,

consisting of:

  • Voting membership consists of:

(a) two parents/ guardians, from the attendance area of each school, appointed by the school council; (b) one student appointed by student council (secondary schools); (c) one community representative from each municipality, appointed by the municipal council, who is a public school supporter

  • Non voting membership consists of;

(a) local trustee(s); (b) the principal(s); (c) the superintendent(s) of education K-12; (d) the director of education or designate who will chair the ARC

  • Membership provides balanced representation of affected

communities

  • Trustees may participate in the work of an ARC but are not

“voting” members

ARC Membership

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • All working sessions of the ARC are open to the public for
  • bservation and information shall be made available
  • Written comments will be received by the ARC Chair at any

time

  • The ARC shall hold a minimum of four public meetings and will

encourage feedback and comments from the community

  • The first public meeting will inform the community of the ARC’s

purpose, present the alternative accommodation option(s) and present the SIP

  • The final public meeting of the ARC will be the presentation of

the ARC recommendations to the community

  • Attendance at public meetings will be recorded

ARC Meetings

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Accommodation review process will take a minimum of 90 days

from date of first public meeting

  • ARC report submitted to Director by late February, 2012 (TBD)
  • ARC report will be received at a Special Board meeting
  • Another Special Board meeting shall be held within 30 days of

this meeting to hear delegations

  • The Board shall make a decision within 90 days of receiving

the ARC Report at the initial Special Board meeting

  • Community may seek an administrative review of Board

decision

  • Timelines do not include summer vacation, Christmas, Spring

break and adjacent weekends

  • ARC dissolves after submission of report to the Board of

Trustees

Timeline Milestones

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Value to Student

  • Student outcomes, program delivery
  • Extracurricular activities, accessibility

Value to the Board

  • Condition of the school, revenues, funding
  • Utilities, operational, and HR expenditures

Value to the Community

  • Community use of facility and grounds, community

partnerships

  • Program offerings for both students and community, heritage

designations

Value to the Local Economy

  • Contributions to local economy, support of local business
  • Socio-economic and cultural diversity, cooperative education

School Information Profile (SIP)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Alternative Accom m odation Option

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Enrolment

  • Enrolment at schools in the ARC has seen a slow steady decline over the past five

years and this trend is expected to continue

  • Full Day Kindergarten will minimize the impact of decline at Moonstone ES and

Warminster ES.

  • Coldwater PS will continue to decline at a higher rate
  • Continued enrolment decline will result in increasing program challenges
  • School enrolments are not balanced with school capacity. Coldwater PS is

becoming under capacity and Moonstone ES is 150% over capacity

  • Declining enrolment is not unique to this area and is prevalent in mature and

rural regions board wide

  • Projections have taken into account the implementation of the full time early

learning kindergarten program

  • No significant residential development is concentrated in the communities

Summary of Pressures

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Summary of Pressures Program

  • Declining enrolment is impacting the delivery of program

to students at all schools in the ARC

  • Grade splits
  • Availability of extracurricular and co-curricular activities
  • Negative impacts on program delivery will begin to have

a greater affect on these schools as they continue to decline

  • Moonstone PS accommodates JK – 6
  • Moonstone grade 7 and 8s are accommodated at

Coldwater PS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Summary of Pressures Facility Condition

  • Combined, there is an approximate $2.1 million backlog
  • f renewal projects needed at these schools
  • By 2021 approximately $7.2 million will be required to

address renewal projects needed at these schools

  • These estimations do not include upgrading schools to

current building code and accessibility standards

  • These estimations do not include upgrading program

spaces (library, gymnasium, special education, play area, kindergarten, administrative)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Alternative Accommodation Option

  • Pupil Accommodation Review Policy - 2313 requires

board staff to provide the ARC with at least one alternative accommodation option

  • Board staff accommodation option would require a

Capital Priority project to be submitted to the Ministry of Education

  • Sum m ary of option:
  • Close Moonstone ES (June 2015)
  • Transfer from Moonstone PS to Coldwater PS
  • – Approximately 114 students
  • Transfer from Moonstone ES to Warminster ES

– Approximately 43 students

  • Construct a 5 room addition at Coldwater PS and 1 room

addition at Warminster ES in 2015 to accommodate additional students

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Current Attendance Areas

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Proposed Student Transfers

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Enrolm ent History

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Coldwater PS Enrolment

*Note: 2010 projection for Coldwater PS in 2011 was 299.0 Actual for Coldwater PS in 2011 was 298.5 Difference: 0.5 **Note: All data assumes Full Day Kindergarten

Coldwater PS: History, Actual and Projections

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2020

Year Students

Ministry Capacity: 325

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Moonstone ES Enrolment (Grades JK – 6)

*Note: 2010 projection for Moonstone ES in 2011 was 144.5. Actual for Moonstone ES in 2011 was 144.5 Difference: 0 **Note: All data assumes Full Day Kindergarten

Moonstone ES: History, Actual and Projections

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2020

Year Students

Ministry Capacity: 89

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Warminster ES History

*Note: 2010 projection for Warminster PS in 2011 was 144.5 Actual for Warminster PS in 2011 was 149.5 Difference: 5.0 **Note: All data assumes Full Day Kindergarten

Warminster PS: History, Actual and Projections

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2020 2025

Year Students

Ministry Capacity: 167

slide-22
SLIDE 22

ARC 2011: 02 Enrolment

ARC 2011:02: History, Actual and Projections

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Students

Coldwater PS Moonstone ES Warm inster PS OTG: 325 OTG: 89 OTG: 167

2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 5 2 1 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 5 2 5 2 5 2 5

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Ontario Demographic Trends 2009-2036

  • Ontario’s population is projecting healthy growth over the next 27

years.

  • Net migration is projected to account for 68 per cent of all population

growth

  • The number of seniors aged 65 and over is projected to more than

double

  • The children’s (0-4) share of population is projected to decline until

2015, rise slightly over the 2015–2026 period as the baby boom echo generation have children and then resume declining until 2036.

  • The number of Ontarians aged 15–64 is projected to grow from

9.1 million in 2009 to 10.8 million by 2036.

  • The Greater Toronto Area (GTA) is projected to be the fastest growing

region of the province, with its population increasing by 3.0 million by 2036.

  • Total fertility rate in Ontario reached its lowest level ever recorded in

2002, at 1.48 children per woman. Since then it has increased to 1.57 in 2007 (latest available). It is believed over the long term values below the replacement level (2.1) are likely.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Factors Affecting Enrolment

Pupil Yields

Elementary Secondary 1988 1998 2003 2008 1988 1998 2003 2008 Adjala-Tosorontio 0.35 0.41 0.1 0.2352 NA 0.19 0.18 0.0897 Barrie 0.32 0.31 0.21 0.0994 NA 0.14 0.13 0.0256 Bradford West Gwillimbury 0.38 0.32 0.14 0.1469 NA 0.14 0.09 0.0579 Clearview 0.31 0.38 0.22 0.2562 NA 0.17 0.07 0.062 Collingwood 0.32 0.38 0.05 0.1148 NA 0.17 0.02 0.0488 Essa 0.38 0.31 0.2 0.2095 NA 0.13 0.13 0.0605 Innisfil 0.29 0.31 0.2 0.2057 NA 0.14 0.15 0.0703 Midland 0.34 0.28 0.05 0.0526 NA 0.13 0.12 0.0338 New Tecumseth 0.38 0.3 0.12 0.1237 NA 0.13 0.08 0.0426 Orillia 0.29 0.27 0.12 0.1849 NA 0.12 0.14 0.038 Oro-Medonte 0.36 0.37 0.1 0.1989 NA 0.17 0.11 0.0449 Penetanguishene 0.27 0.19 0.2 0.0746 NA 0.08 0.1 0.0282 Ramara 0.32 0.37 0.08 0.1301 NA 0.16 0.02 0.0458 Severn 0.31 0.39 0.05 0.1946 NA 0.16 0.07 0.0984 Springwater 0.34 0.36 0.18 0.2703 NA 0.16 0.04 0.08 Tay 0.3 0.32 0.08 0.0966 NA 0.15 0.03 0.0397 Tiny 0.28 0.24 0.04 0.0812 NA 0.11 0.03 0.0241 Wasaga Beach 0.27 0.25 0.11 0.1319 NA 0.11 0.04 0.0325 County Average 0.32 0.32 0.13 0.1533 NA 0.14 0.09 0.0492

Note: Yields are a weighted factor between different unit types and tenure

Source: Watson & Associates – SCDSB EDC Background Study, October 2008

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Pupil Yield Cycle

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Facility Condition

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Facility Condition Review

  • Building condition
  • Renewal needs
  • Barrier free accessibility
  • Building code compliance
  • Maintenance issues
  • Energy performance

Background

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Renewal Needs - Building Condition

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Renewal Needs - Building Condition

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Renewal Needs - Building Condition

41% $ 1,208,611 27% $ 788,611 $ 2,933,006 20,361 s.f. Warminster ES 98% $ 1,367,170 49% $ 684,355 $ 1,398,377 13,423 s.f. Moonstone ES 41% $ 2,018,450 17% $ 848,950 $ 4,940,932 34,586 s.f. Coldwater PS 5 Year FCI 5 Year Renewal Needs Current FCI Current Renewal Backlog Ministry Replacement Value Area School

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Contacts and Information

  • Visit the Board’s website for up to date information on meeting dates,

presentations, notices of public meetings and information at: w w w .scdsb.on.ca

  • Written comments can be provided on the comment forms and left this

evening or dropped off at your school,

  • r

Email comments to: Lorraine Ryder lryder@scdsb.on.ca

  • Comments must be received by noon Monday October 31, 2011 for inclusion

in the minutes of this meeting.

  • If you have any inquiries, please contact David Few, Manager of Planning

and Enrolment at dfew@scdsb.on.ca or by telephone at (705) 734-6363 Ext. 11218