Cal alif ifornia ornia Sta State Polyt lytechnic hnic Un Univ - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cal alif ifornia

• rnia Sta

State Polyt lytechnic hnic Un Univ iver ersity sity, , Pomona mona

Mas aster er Pla lan n Up Upda date Workshop

• rkshop # 1

# 1

• Advis

Advisor

• ry

y Com

• mmitt

ittee ee Kic Kick-of

• ff

f

08 November 2017

AGEN GENDA

Introductions Master Planning Process Campus Master Goals + Priorities

including discussion of Priorities Exercises + Visioning Exercise w/ discussion

Fall Conference Input

(Concerns, Issues, Opportunities)

Workshop Session Overview Q+A, Discussion + Next Steps

Advi Advisor sory y Com

• mmitt

ittee ee

Novembe ember 8, 2017; 12:00-3:00 3:00

ADVIS VISOR ORY Y CO COMMIT MMITTEE TEE

Stakeholders & Representatives:

Chair Vice President Manning FP&M Staff Support Walter Marquez, Dan Johnson, Julie Tsang ASI and Student Government Farris Hamza and Itzia Salinas Academic Planning & Student Success Sep Eskandari and Terri Gomez Deans Lisa Kessler and Joseph Rencis Academic Senate Chair Julie Shen Enrollment Mgmt & Services Meredith Kelley Student Life & Housing Chris Chisler and Megan Stang Dean of Students Thomas Cruz-Soto Advancement Doug Nelson Campus Health & Wellbeing Leticia Gutierrez-Lopez ASI Executive Director Roosa Millar City of Pomona City Planning Director Disability Resource Center Tracee Passeggi Foundation Aaron Neilson Police Chief Robinson Information Technology Operations Peter Deutsch Institutional Risk & Emergency Mgmt Whitney Fields Transportation and Parking John Lloyd and Mike Biagi Athletics AD Swanson Facilities (Ops, Utilities, Landscape) George Lwin, Richard Farmer, Jesse Ochoa Campus Consulting Architect HMC (Jim Wurst)

Introductions

Jack Black

Principal-in-Charge

Carolyn Krall

Project Manager

Linsey Graff

Campus Planner

Alex Staneski

Space Analytics

Planning Team: Ayers Saint Gross

Ayer ers s Sa Sain int t Gr Gros

• ss:

s: Fi Firm rm Prof Profile ile

All ll of

• f ou
• ur

r work

• rk is

is for

• r

mis ission sion- dri driven n cl clie ients. nts.

85% 85%

Higher Education

5% 5%

K-12 and Private Sector

15% 15%

Cultural Institutions

“We engage people and places to create designs that enrich the world.”

PHILOSOPY FOCUS FOUNDED STAFF

1912 160

Ayer ers s Sa Sain int t Gr Gros

• ss:

s: Ex Expe pertise tise

Our expertise comes from the completion

• f over 200 master plans in the past 25

years for higher education institutions.

200+ 200+

Abilene Christian University University of Arizona Arizona State University University of Baltimore Boise State University California State University Cal Poly Pomona College of Charleston University of Chicago University of Colorado University of Delaware Duke University Gettysburg College George Mason University George Washington University University of Georgia Harvard Medical School Harvard University, Hawaii Pacific University Johns Hopkins University Kansas State University University of Kentucky Lafayette College Lewis University Loyola University Maryland University of Maryland, University of Massachusetts, Montana State University University of New Hampshire University of New Mexico, University of North Carolina University of North Florida University of North Texas University of Notre Dame North West Missouri University Northern Arizona University Oglethorpe University Old Dominion University University of Rhode Island University of Richmond University of Rochester Rutgers University University of San Juan University of Scranton SUNY Brockport SUNY Oneonta Swarthmore College University of Texas at Austin University of Texas at El Paso Texas A&M University Texas State University Towson University University of Virginia Wake Forest University

Ayer ers s Sa Sain int t Gr Gros

• ss

s Pl Planning anning Ph Philoso ilosoph phy

• Fact/Data and Research based
• Educational in process and approach
• Unique to Cal Poly Pomona’s mission, vision,

culture, and strategic plan

• Engaging and inclusive of multiple campus and

community stakeholders

• Iterative, using analysis and planning to advance

the plan and build consensus

• Narrative shapes the campus vision
• Supports informed decision-making
• Establishes the foundation for change

Master Planning Process

• Role of the Advisory Committee, Executive Committee
• Planning Process
• Proposed Timeline
• Relationship to 2000 Master Plan, 2012 plan, current projects/plans
• Campus engagement + Communications
• Identifying stakeholders on campus and beyond

(City, neighborhoods, community partners)

En Enga gageme gement nt – St Stee eeri ring ng / Adv / Advisor isory y Co Comm mmitt ittee ee

Provide Planning Direction Lead Decision-making Represent Stakeholders, Advise, Become Plan Champions Participate, Provide Input Be Plan Communicators Orchestrate, Facilitate Provide Analysis, Expertise, Content

(analysis, plans, options)

President’s Cabinet (Executive Committee) Master Plan Advisory Committee Academics (Provost, Deans, Programs) Campus Stakeholder Groups, Interests Facilities Planning Master Plan Team

planners, architects, landscape architects, civil engineers, MEP systems engineers, sustainability experts, transportation engineers, cost estimators

En Enga gagem gemen ent t – St Steer eering ing / Ad / Advi visor sory y Co Comm mmitt ittee ee

St Step eps s in in th the e Pl Planning anning Process Process

Project Kick-Off

Precinct Studies

Observations & Analysis

Draft Plan

Conceptual Plans

Final Plan & Report

Draft Plan w /Phasing Final Plan & Report Area, Hub, Precinct Studies

Project Project Tim imeline eline – Fall all 20 2017 t 7 to F

• Fall

all 20 2018 8

TODAY

Wh Why y a m a mast aster er pla plan? n?

A m mas aster ter pla lan: n:

• Creates a vis

ision ion for the future which supports the mis issi sion

• n
• Rai

aises ses as aspi pirations rations + quality of campus to attract/retain the best

• Guid

ides es development elopment over time, supporting resilience

• Establishes a basis for in

informed med decis cision ion-maki making ng going forward

• Strengthens

rengthens rela lati tion

• nships

ships within the campus + with the community

• Result should provide

vide a r a road admap map + tools ls for implementation

Pl Planning anning is c is changing hanging

Tra raditio ditional nal Master er Plan

physical, technical, implementation-oriented; steered by committees toward consensus; map + reports to guide implementation

St Strat rategic gic Mast ster r Plan

high level, broad, capacity-oriented; leadership drives toward consensus; narrative, diagrammatic (specific plans follow)

SYNERG RGY PART RTNERIN ING IN INNOVATIN ING ENGAGIN ING

Cal Poly Pomona will be a unique hybrid – aligning the master plan with the strategic plan

Pr Previous vious Ca Cal l Pol

• ly

y Pom

• mona
• na Mas

Master er Pl Plan ans

2002 Campus pus Master er Plan

• 1. Excellence in teaching, learning
• 2. Effective acquisition, planning,

management of resources

• 3. Promote research, scholarly, professional,

creative activities

• 4. Enhance support for students
• 5. Improve campus environment

2012 Campus us Master er Plan n Re Revis visio ion

• 1. Concentrated academic campus
• 2. Student engagement + campus experience
• 3. Polytechnic university
• 4. Pedestrian-oriented campus
• 5. Identity
• 6. Sustainability

2012 is a treasure trove of information. Planners can test 2012 ideas again and see if they are still viable

SPACE CE ASSES ESSMEN SMENT T PROCE CESS SS

• Data collection + field verification
• Facilities, enrollment, course schedule
• Existing space distribution + uses
• By program, use type
• Classroom + class laboratory utilization analysis
• Type, size , seats, scheduling
• Space assessment + Prioritization of needs
• Baseline year + future scenarios
• Stakeholder meetings
• President, Vice Presidents, Deans, Directors
• Findings + outcomes
• Utilize SAMi™ to focus/prioritize critical needs
• Start with the basics of space

distribution across the total university (incl Foundation, etc)

• Include analysis of land uses

(acreage used for buildings, roads, parking, open space for informal use, rec/athletic fields, barns and pastures, agriculture/fields, ‘no-build’ steep slopes, etc.)

Sp Space Ana ace Analy lytics tics

Co Compo mponents nents of

• f th

the e Study Study

Assessment & Analysis Outcomes

Data Collection and Verification Utilization / Space Metrics Stakeholder Interviews Space Needs Assessment Alignment with Planning Process

Future session will include meetings with specific stakeholders to verify information On-going – working together to get accurate information All campuses have unique needs – for example, CPP has a large Ag component. What are the space types needed for the future of polytechnic learning? Assessment – what are the future needs? Is it more buildings, or should we use space better? Next workshop will include preliminary analysis

Key y Ter erms ms

Full-Time Time Equiv ivale alent nt (FTE) TE) – A unit for measuring students derived from credit hours taken per term (varies by institution) Headcoun

• unt

t Enro rollment lment – The number of unduplicated students attending an institution during a given term, regardless of full-time or part-time status Seat Fill l Rate e – Student enrollment for each course divided by the number of student stations in a room; weighted to reflect course meeting hours per week Weekly kly Room m Hours (WR WRH) H) – The number of hours each course meets in a room over a one week period Weekly kly Stu Student t Contact ct Hours s (WS WSCH) CH) – The average size of student enrollment for each course in a room multiplied by WRH and then totaled for all sections taught that room

Spa pace-Relat ated Course-Relat ated

Gro ross ss Square Feet et (GSF) F) – All areas of a building included within the outside faces

• f its exterior walls

Net et Assig signab nable le Square Feet et (NAS ASF) F) - Defined as the area measured within the interior walls of a room that can be assigned to a program; it does not include circulation, mechanical, or building service spaces

Workshop

• rkshop Bas

Based ed

• Tailored to Institutional Culture
• Active Listening + Collaborating
• Variety of Methods, Techniques + Tools
• Individual Interviews
• Steering / Advisory Group Charrettes
• Campus / Site Tours
• Topic Tables
• Stakeholder Workshops
• Community Forums
• Web-Based

Master Plan: Workshop 02 Agenda

HPU ATM & Piers 8-10 Tour

HPU Downtown Tour

Pro rogr gress ess to Date Pro rogr gress ess to Date

Cal al Poly ly Pomona mona

Advisory Committee workshops anticipated every 4-6 weeks.

• Lunch will always be provided
• Give Brenda feedback on the time –

do Wednesday’s mid-day work or is there a better day?

• Schedule and agendas will be

emailed and posted to website moving forward

Ca Camp mpus us Eng Engagem agement ent + C + Comm

• mmunications

unications

FOCUS CUS GROUP OUPS S STUDENT DENT OPEN EN HOUSE SE FACU CULTY/ Y/STAF AFF F OPEN EN HOUSE SE

Top

• pic

ic Tabl ables, es, Foc

• cus

us Groups Groups

Campus ampus / Si Site e Walk alks

Ca Camp mpus us Eng Engagem agement ent + C + Comm

• mmunications

unications

Web eb-Bas Based ed – Do Document cument + + Co Communicat mmunicate e

De Deli liverables erables

• Final Report Booklets
• Executive Summary
• Implementation Strategies
• Cost & Funding
• Master Plan Website
• Renderings
• Space Assessment & Needs – SAMi
• Digital 3D Model
• Campus Guidelines
• Architectural
• Landscape
• Infrastructure & Systems
• Sustainability
• Space Standards

Mt San Antonio College

Cal al Pol

• ly

y Pom

• mon
• na

City of Pomona

Ou Outreac treach h to P

• Par

artner tners s Be Beyon

• nd

d th the e Ca Camp mpus us

Di Discus scussion sion of

• f

Pr Proces

• cess,

s, Sc Schedule hedule

• Communications? website will be live in the next 2 weeks, presentations will be posted
• How does this process coordinate with the Lanterman planning? (South Campus)

RFQ has been issued to seek a master developer to lead the South Campus planning and

• development. The master plan will align the plans eventually, but they aren’t necessarily on

the same timeline. The master plan has to be comprehensive and unite the campus, no matter what the South campus future uses might be (it is not two separate campuses).

• How are we dealing with the quarter/semester/online shift?

Space analysis will create a picture of current conditions, including classroom scheduling and

• utilization. This will inform discussion of instructional space resources and current needs. The

semester schedules have been created and can be considered in space needs assessment (and to some extent modeled to demonstrate space impacts). CPP is also implementing new scheduling software in the next year or so and that may provide new challenges and

• pportunities to better coordinate and manage space, including use beyond scheduled courses

Master Plan Goals + Priorities

• Mission, Values, Goals
• Strategic Plan + Academic Plan Priorities
• Strategic Plan – Master Plan Nexus (U of Arizona case study)
• Priorities Exercises – results from President’s Cabinet, and Fall

Conference

• Discussion: Setting Goals, Objectives, Priorities
• Exercise: Visioning

MA MASTE TER R PLA LAN GO N GOAL AL Th The 2018 8 Cal al Poly ly Pomona mona Ma Master Plan lan Up Updat date wi will ll be be com comprehe prehensiv nsive, e, broa broad, d, an and d in intent entional ional about furthering Cal Poly Pomona’s place in the fu futur ure e of th f the co countr untry.

MI MISSION ON We cul cultiv tivat ate suc ucces cess s throu rough gh a di a diver erse se cu cult ltur ure e of f expe perientia iential l le lear arning, ning, di disco cover ery, , an and d in inno novation. ation.

STUD UDENT ENT LEARNIN NING G AND ND SUCCESS ESS

Valu alues es

ACAD CADEM EMIC IC EXCELL ELLENCE ENCE EXPERIENT ERIENTIAL IAL LEARN RNING NG INC NCLUSIVIT IVITY COMM MMUN UNIT ITY Y ENG NGAGEMEN GEMENT SOCIAL AL AND ND ENVIRON RONMEN MENTAL AL RESPO PONSI SIBILIT ILITY

Cal al Poly ly Pomona mona

Ca Cal l Pol

• ly

y Strat Strategic egic Pl Plan an

MISSION STATEMENT We cultivate success through a diverse culture of experiential learning, discovery, and innovation. VISION STATEMENT Cal Poly will be the model for an inclusive polytechnic university that inspired creativity and innovation, embraces local and global challenges, and transforms lives.

Strat Strategic egic In Initiativ itiatives es

Deliver ver quality ity pro program rams s that pro promot

• te integrativ

grative learn rning, ing, di discover very, , and d cre reati ativity vity. Enhance nce St Stude dent nt Learni rning, ng, Devel velopm pment, nt, and d Succ ccess ss Pre repa pare re our r stude dents ts for for the f future ure of work rk and d civic ic engage ageme ment nt St Stre rength ngthen n our r Econom nomic ic Vitality lity and d Impa pact ct Adv Advanc nce Org rganizational nizational Devel velop

• pme

ment nt and nd Empl ployee Excell llenc nce

Mas Master er Pl Plan an Ne Nexus us wi with th Strat Strategic egic Pl Plan an

• Engage

ageme ment nt wi with community unity

• Our

r pl place in our c r community munity, , in the re region, n, in the f future ure of the c country ntry

• Polytech

technic nic – tech and skills-

• riented, innovative/creative,

bridging learning and doing

• Divers

rsity ity – campus community reflects the demographic changes underway nationally

• Fu

Future re of Americ rica – social, economic, cultural strategies ‘undergirded’ by academic plan

• Refre

resh shed d missi sion n state teme ment nt which spe peaks s to stude dent nt acade ademic mic expe peri rience nce

• Stude

dent nt life and d engage geme ment nt

• adding more housing on campus is

good, but resident students are still in the minority

• commuting students should feel

equally ‘at home’ on campus

• HUBS of interes

rest t – where, how does multidisciplinary engagement happen?

Mas Master er Pl Plan an Ne Nexus us wi with th Aca cade demic mic Mas Master er Pl Plan an

• Academ

demic ic and nd Co-curr curricul icular ar ex experie erience nce

• HUB

UBS wit ith syner nergie gies, s, corrido rridors rs of coll llaborat aboration ion (bol

• ld

d pla lan) n)

• Chang

anging ing le lear arni ning ng/teach /teaching ing exp xpectat ectations ions and nd env nvir iron

• nme

ments nts

• Polyt

lytechnic echnic - this is is is the e fut utur ure e of wo work rk

• Epice

icenter nter for r cre reat ativit ivity, y, inn innovation vation and and dis iscovery covery

• Chal

allenge lenge of ge getting ing wo work rk done ne (nit nitty ty-gritty) gritty)

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

NEXUS

OF STRATEGIC PLAN + MASTER PLAN

PROCESS + ANALYSIS

2003 MASTER PLAN 2009 PLAN UPDATE 2015 STRATEGIC PLAN

UA PLANNING EFFORTS

ENGAGING INNOVATING PARTNERING SYNERGY

NEXUS OF STRATEGIC PLAN + MASTER PLAN Case Study: Unive versity of Arizona

ENGAGING INNOVATING PARTNERING SYNERGY

UA 2015 STRATEGIC PLAN to MASTER PLAN

CAMPUS DIAGRAMS

GATEWAYS PLACES FOR COMMUNITY GREENSPACE USE DISTRICTS TRANSIT HUBS NEIGHBORHOOD INTEGRATION HUBS BASED ON AFFILIATED USES NEIGHBORHOOD EDGE CONDITIONS HIGH DENSITY ZONES CENTRAL PLANT LOCATIONS PARKING STRUCTURES

CAMPUS DIAGRAMS (analysis overlays)

ENGAGING – CAMPUS DIAGRAMS

CAMPUS GATEWAYS USE DISTRICTS TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD EDGE CONDITIONS

STRATEGIES FOR

ENGAGEMENT

• Dynamic learning

environments

• Diversify space types
• Create more collaborative

resources

• Change pedagogy and

curriculum

• Display engagement

SYNERGY – CAMPUS DIAGRAMS

GREENSPACE TRANSIT HIGH DESNITY ZONES CENTRAL PLANT LOCATIONS PARKING STRUCTURES

SYN YNERGIE GIES

OF INFRASTRUCTURE

• Identify

entify under der uti tilized lized resour

• urce

ces

• Br

Broad aden en as aspects ects of infras astructure tructure

• Alternative energy
• Water management
• Up

Updat date e tr tran anspor sportation tation at at south uth end d of ca campus us

• Ed

Edge ge co condi nditions tions wi with th var ariab ability's lity's of uses

UA CAMPUS PLAN STRATEGIC INITIATIVES

ENGAGING SYNERGY PARTNERING INNOVATING

EX EXER ERCISE: CISE: Bi Big g Pic icture ture Pri riorities

• rities

Wh What at are are you

• ur

r TOP OP 5? 5? Bi Big Pic g Pictur ture e Pr Prio iorities rities

Bi Big Pic g Pictur ture e MP MP Pr Prio iorities rities (President’s Cabinet)

Pinks are Student-Oriented

Yellow-Orange is Faculty/Staff + Supporting Facilities

Blue is Community

Green is Campus

Bi Big Pic g Pictur ture e MP MP Pr Prio iorities rities (President’s Cabinet)

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Campus encourages collaboration, gathering hubs and crossroads Attracting/retaining top quality faculty, staff Increasing enrollment, persistence, retention and student success Optimizing alignment and utilization between programs and facilities Facilities supporting dynamic instruction and active learning

Result ults: s:

Ex Exer ercise: cise: Bi Big Pic g Picture ture Pr Prioritie iorities (F

(Fall all Con

• nference)

erence)

Ex Exer ercise: cise: Bi Big Pic g Picture ture Pr Prioritie iorities

• 1. Quality facilities supporting dynamic instruction and active learning
• 2. Attracting/retaining top quality faculty and staff
• 3. Increasing enrollment, persistence, retention and student success
• 4. Wild Cards!
• 5. Optimizing alignment between programs and facilities

Respondent Quality facilities supporting dynamic instruction and active learning Attracting and retaining top quality faculty and staff Increasing enrollment, persistence, retention and student success Wild Card! Optimizing alignment, and utilization between programs and facilities Engaging Identifiable Campus, Civic, Student and Community Spaces Campus Orientation for Students and Visitors to Enhance Wayfinding Meeting community, educational goals, needs, market demand Invest in student life and engagement, housing, rec, student resources, collaboration Expanding degree/progra m offerings

TOTAL VOTES 103 65 65 61 57 43 39 37 27 13 Percent 20% 13% 13% 12% 11% 8% 8% 7% 5% 3%

Results ults:

Ex Exer ercise: cise: Bi Big Pic g Picture ture Pr Prioritie iorities

#4 WILD CARDS:

• Visibility of Artwork on campus
• Visibility of Student Work
• Demonstrate Sustainability
• Improve Access for Bikes
• Creation of Transit Hub/Stop

Respondent Quality facilities supporting dynamic instruction and active learning Attracting and retaining top quality faculty and staff Increasing enrollment, persistence, retention and student success Wild Card! Optimizing alignment, and utilization between programs and facilities Engaging Identifiable Campus, Civic, Student and Community Spaces Campus Orientation for Students and Visitors to Enhance Wayfinding Meeting community, educational goals, needs, market demand Invest in student life and engagement, housing, rec, student resources, collaboration Expanding degree/progra m offerings

TOTAL VOTES 103 65 65 61 57 43 39 37 27 13 Percent 20% 13% 13% 12% 11% 8% 8% 7% 5% 3%

EXERCISE: Cal Poly Pomona’s Well Aligned Priorities

President’s Conference

• 1. Attracting/retaining top quality

faculty/staff

• 2. Campus encourages collaboration,

gathering hubs, crossroads 3.

• 3. In

Increasing creasing enrol

• llment,

lment, persis sistence, ence, retention, ention, st studen udent t su succ ccess ess

• 4. Quality facilities supporting active

learning 5.

• 5. Optimizi

imizing ng al alig ignment ment betwee een n programs rograms an and fa faci cili lities ies

Fal all l Conf nfere erence nce

• 1. Quality facilities supporting active

learning

• 2. Attracting/retaining top quality

faculty/staff 3.

• 3. In

Increasing creasing enrol

• llment,

lment, persis sistence, ence, retention, ention, st studen udent t su succ ccess ess

• 4. Wild Card!

5.

• 5. Optimizi

imizing ng al alig ignment ment betwee een n programs rograms an and fa faci cili lities ies

Sustainability + Goal Setting

“Sustainable development is the kind of development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their

• wn needs.”

Di Diver ersity sity - Le Leade adership ship - Inno novation ation - Collabor llaboration ation

Water Health Resources Resilience Climate Action

Di Discus scussion sion of

• f

Goa Goal l Se Sett tting ing

• Committee confirms strong agreement on the ‘Big Picture Priorities’ and alignment with Master

Plan and Strategic Plan goals

• Appreciate the broader approach to sustainability goals, beyond just the environmental aspects
• .

EXER ERCIS CISE: E: Vi Visions ions for the Fut uture ure

Advisory Committee provided written responses which were shared and discussed - see posted ‘Exercise + Responses’ pdf

1) 1) What t ph physi sical cal tr transf ansformations rmations do you u want ant to se see? e? 2) 2) Wh What t impr provements ements cou

• uld

ld en enhance hance th the e st stud udent ent exp xperience? erience? 3) 3) What t sh should uld campus pus do/c /change hange to b be e bett etter er pr prep epare ared d for th the n e next xt 10+ yea ears? s? Looking further into the future…. 4) 4) How w do you u en envision sion th the e campus pus in 20+ yea ears? s?

Fall all Co Conf nference erence Ov Over ervie view

65 65

Attendees 30-min Presentation with Q/A Open Forum/Activities:

• Big Picture Priorities
• SWOT Dot Maps
• Sustainability Table Topic
• Space Analytics

Demonstration Campus Tour

SWOT Dot Dot Maps Maps

Pl Place aces s you

• u lo

love! e!

Love…

• university quad
• civic spaces and plazas
• views of the mountains
• natural areas
• courtyards, community feel
• Japanese Garden, gardens
• Kellogg Arabian Center
• Lyle Center
• net zero buildings
• sustainable materials
• agricultural fields, Ag Valley

Drive More….

• bike lanes
• public transit access
• art galleries, sculpture

garden

• solar panels above parking
• sustainable building

materials

Pl Place aces s th that at co could uld us use e so some me he help lp

Disli like.. e.... ..

• asphalt surface parking lots
• traffic (Temple, S Campus Dr)
• too much lawn, herbicide
• bike/ped path conflicts

Improve….

• pedestrian safety, crossings,

lighting

• signage, wayfinding
• BSS needs renovation (older part)
• pedestrian mall + University Park
• expand structural testing lab
• crappy classrooms (Bldg 2,3,7?)
• storm water runoff (areas that

flood, intersections), capture + recycle water

• sidewalks, accessibility
• move Student Heath Center to

more central + accessible location

• move Children’s Center to edge
• add drop-off areas for

destinations

SWOT Dot Dot Maps Maps

SWOT Dot Dot Maps Maps

Love…

• natural habitat

Improve….

• transit, shuttles, BRT, light

rail connections

• trails, walking/biking paths

between Cal Poly and MT SAC

• make San Jose Creek a bike

corridor

• signage, wayfinding, lighting
• storm water collection,

recycling, reuse

• town/gown access to

shopping and activity, entertainment areas

• noise reduction from the

freeway

SWOT T Dot Dot Maps Maps

Like….

• solar panels above parking
• net zero buildings
• sustainable building

materials

• sustainable lighting at

night

• Lyle Center for

Regenerative Studies

• gardens, civic places
• agricultural fields
• roundabouts

More….

• art, inside and outside
• gathering spaces outside,

with seating in the shade

• performance spaces
• bike lanes
• car charging stations
• shuttles, bus stops
• public transit access

SWOT Dot Dot Maps Maps

Improve….

• public transit access!!!!
• bike access, bike + ped safety!!!
• signage, wayfinding, lighting, paths
• town-gown connections to shopping,

fun!

• visitor parking booth, spaces,

signage

• art galleries, art storage space
• storm water run-off management
• waste management, sawdust

disposal (wood shop), recycling

• agricultural stewardship
• resiliency

Expand….

• food hours and options, restaurants
• Project Blue
• community sustainability
• Living Building Challenge
• use of campus for informal learning

Add….

• sculpture garden

SWOT T Dot Dot Maps Maps

Dislike…

• closing tunnel under Kellogg to

field/barns

• herbicide treatments
• asphalt surface parking lots, heat island

Improve….

• pedestrian safety, crossings, lighting
• BSS needs renovation (older part)
• BSS pedestrian mall, university park
• structural testing lab needs to be

expanded

• crappy classrooms (Bldg 2,3,7?)
• signage, wayfinding
• management of the feedlot area
• storm water run-off (areas that flood,

intersections)

• sidewalks

Change….

• move Student Heath Center to more

central, accessible location

• move Children’s Center to campus edge
• visitor parking booth closer to campus

entry

• add drop-off areas for destinations

Sustainability Topics and Input

• Interest in resilien

siliency cy an and structura ructural l mat ateria erials ls, Tall Wood Institute initiatives on Mass Timber Construction for low carbon, earthquake-resilient buildings (Mikhail Gershfield, Civil Engineering)

• Departments not recycling, lack of

communications (faculty and staff) on integrating egrating recycling cling

• Interes

erest in Living ng Build lding ing Challen allenge ge (Barny Peake, Associated Students, Inc. (ASI))

• There was a transit stop in middle of

campus, discontinued due to inadequate road section. Since Kellogg was redone, perhaps a new transit hub? (John Lloyd, Chair of Transportation Committee)

• Foothill Transit may contribute to a Transit

Hub if CPP provides location (Doran Barnes)

• LA County Greenway Plan, see plans for

Linear Parks, bike paths to Pomona

• Project

roject Blue ue – mapping pre-development watershed of campus; goal to restore water systems and educate on benefits of functioning hydrological systems. Campus was a floodway which explains high water table (Tina Hartney – Associate Dean of Academics and Research, College of Science, Professor Biology)

• Interes

erest in Net-Zer Zero

• En

Energy rgy Buildings ildings (Andrew Naranjo, Hospitality)

• Lyle Center is disconnected from main

campus, should be more integrated; students want to see how sustainability is integrated in real practice in the master planning (two students from Lyle School)

Spa Space ce An Analy alytics tics Process Process

• Data collection + field verification
• Facilities, enrollment, course

schedule

• Existing space distribution + uses
• By program, use type
• Classroom + class laboratory

utilization analysis

• Type, size , seats, scheduling
• Space assessment + Prioritization of

needs

• Baseline year + future scenarios
• Stakeholder meetings
• President, Vice Presidents, Deans,

Directors

• Findings + outcomes
• Utilize SAMi™ to focus/prioritize

critical needs

Ca Campus mpus Tou

• ur

Ca Campus mpus Tou

• ur:

r: Wh What at we he e heard ard

Use pavers s to gu guide de people to special areas of the campus Improve lighting throughout to improve safety Create an Arts s District trict Hub Conver ert t Olive e St Street reet into

• true

ue pede destria strian n mal all Improve old Library entrance (unused bridge, sometimes a food truck location). Convert moat into a usable area (opens to the building) Service vehicles, parked or driving in major pedestrian ways, are a challen allenge ge to the visually ually impaire paired Incre reas ase e ac activity vity an and vi visibility ibility into

• buildi

ilding ngs s along the ground plane of major pedestrian malls and open spaces The small seating areas scattered throughout campus are used often and seen as a positive attribute The more nat atural ural ar areas as of cam ampu pus are seen as an asset, and would bene nefit it from rom bett etter r ac acces ess s an and conn nnectiv ectivity ity (ie. Voorhis Ecological Preserve) Engineering Meadow is a lar arge ge open en space, ace, but t could uld use e bett tter er conn nnectivity ctivity an and ac activity ity to activate the space There is uncer certa tainty inty ab about

• ut new circu

rculation ation pat atterns rns once the Student Services Building

• pens

Improve signage, wayfinding and lighting

• to campus core and venues from parking
• to Lyle Center
• to south campus destinations

More Lighting, and sustainable lighting! Many comments about improving pedestrian access both on the campus and between the campus and the community through

• Bridging, Tunnels
• Improved sidewalks
• Transforming roads into pedestrian malls

Improve access and views to natural areas Keep AG land Move Health Center to a more central location Move Children's Center to edge of campus Move athletic facilities to south campus Use campus as a learning laboratory

• more Art and Performance Spaces
• more gathering places with seating, shade

Tie into existing projects and initiatives (Project Blue) Expand Sustainability on Campus

• More Solar over parking, garages
• Improve Storm water run-off management
• Harvest/recycle storm water for irrigation
• Living Building Challenge
• Sustainable Materials in campus buildings
• Improve recycling and waste management
• Expand communications about sustainability

Mobility

• Better bike access. bile lanes, connections to

city and regional bike trails

• Create a transit hub to link campus to public

transportation (busses, BRT, LRT)

• More bus stops and shuttles on campus and

to Mt SAC and local shopping, activity areas

• Improve traffic flow on and around campus
• More parking structures, less surface lots

Campus Tour: What we heard…(con’t)

Workshop Overview

Preliminary Campus Observations – please attend tomorrow!

Campus Development

1995 2002 2014

Ca Campus mpus Edg Edges es an and d Ide Identity ntity

Co Connectivity nnectivity Sy Syst stems ems

Veh ehicular icular Ent Entrances rances an and Gat d Gateways ys

Ga Gateways ys

On On-Cam Campus pus Parking arking

On On-Cam Campus pus Parking arking la

land nd are rea = a = aca cademic demic co core re

13, 3,246 46

TOTAL SPACES ON CAMPUS

Stu Students ts 9,081 Faculty/Sta ty/Staff 1,595 Disable abled 267 267 Visit itor

• r

78 78 Housin sing 1,481 Other 744

Ca Campus mpus Us Uses es wi with th Transit ransit

Academic Housing Agriculture Athletics/Rec Partnership Laboratory Service

Bi Bicy cycle cle Rou

• utes

es

Multi-Use Path Sharrow Bike Path/Sidewalk Future Multi-Use Path

Mul Multi ti-Modal Modal Su Succe ccess ss

NA NAME??? E???

Ca Campus mpus Us Use e Di Diagram agram

Academic Housing Agriculture Athletics/Rec Partnership Laboratory Service

Ca Campus mpus Us Uses es wi with th Walk alking ing Radi Radii

Academic Housing Agriculture Athletics/Rec Partnership Laboratory Service

Ca Campus mpus Us Uses es wi with th Walk alking ing Radi Radii

Academic Housing Agriculture Athletics/Rec Partnership Laboratory Service

Ele Eleme ments nts of

• f a P

a Ped edestrian estrian En Envi vironment

• nment

Ample Seating/Gathering Provide Shade Address Topography Challenges Plan for Safety

Wayfindi yfinding ng an and Sign d Signage age

Ped edestrian estrian

Veh ehicular icular an and P d Parking arking

Ca Campus mpus Lig Lighting hting

Ca Campus mpus Op Open en Spa Space ce Ch Charact aracter er - Typ ypes es

Academic Core Athletics and Rec. Agriculture Reserve/Wooded

??

Ca Campus mpus Op Open en Spa Space ce Ch Charact aracter er - Typ ypes es

Academic Core Agriculture Reserve Athletics and Recreation

Ex Exer ercises: cises: SWOT T Dot Dot An Analy alysis sis Map Map

St Stre rength ngths/Op s/Oppo portunities tunities: : Characteristics of the campus that provide an advantage over others. Elements that the campus could exploit to its advantage. Challenge nges/Iss s/Issue ues: s: Characteristics that place the campus at a disadvantage relative to others. Elements in the environment that could cause trouble for the campus.

Ne Next xt St Steps eps

Open Workshop, Thursday Nov 9, 9-11am – Pl Please se attend!! end!! Space Analytics meetings with Registrar, Provost and College Deans Campus Walk with Landscape Architects Update for President’s Cabinet (tentatively Dec 11) Schedule 2nd Workshop in January

• Observations
• Space Analysis

Schedule 3nd Workshop in February

• Planning Framework, Concepts
• Space Analysis + Projections