cha hara racteriza cterizati tion on of of bo botrytis
play

CHA HARA RACTERIZA CTERIZATI TION ON OF OF BO BOTRYTIS TIS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CHA HARA RACTERIZA CTERIZATI TION ON OF OF BO BOTRYTIS TIS CINE NEREA EA RE RESIS ISTANCE ANCE TO O FU FUNGI GICIDES CIDES IN IN CAL ALIF IFORNIA ORNIA STRA RAWB WBERRIES ERRIES SCOTT TT COSSEBOOM SSEBOOM Outline


  1. CHA HARA RACTERIZA CTERIZATI TION ON OF OF BO BOTRYTIS TIS CINE NEREA EA RE RESIS ISTANCE ANCE TO O FU FUNGI GICIDES CIDES IN IN CAL ALIF IFORNIA ORNIA STRA RAWB WBERRIES ERRIES SCOTT TT COSSEBOOM SSEBOOM

  2. Outline ■ Introduction ■ Fungicide resistance screening ■ Fungicide use survey ■ Species Identification ■ Field Trial

  3. When strawberries are 4 Show where strawberries are Where strawberries are 1 2 3 Season in California The biology of Botrytis Maybe show life cycle Cultural management grown grown grown Fight The Chemical management Fungicide resistance Resistance management Recent research 5 6 7 8 Resistance

  4. Strawberry production Three districts grow 95% of strawberry fruit in CA Northern District Central District Southern District

  5. 20 California production regions Production (millions of trays) 18 Northern district Central district 16 Southern district 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month

  6. Life cycle of Botrytis Adapted from: Agrios 2005

  7. Cultural management Show where strawberries are Season in California Maybe show life cycle grown

  8. Chemical management ▪ Most effective method when weather is favorable for the pathogen ▪ Multiple applications are made per season ▪ Three types: Site-specific, multi-site, biological Photo: G. Holmes

  9. Fungicide resistance sensitive individual fungicide application resistant individual regeneration Adapted from: Deisling, H. B. et al. 2008.

  10. Resistance management ■ Rotate modes of action ■ Tank-mix ■ Use fungicides less

  11. Previous research Eastern U U.S. ▪ High levels of resistance to important fungicides for Botrytis gray mold control in strawberries ▪ Resistance changing over time ▪ Isolates resistant to multiple modes of action Califo fornia ▪ Resistance reported to frequently used fungicides ▪ Resistance increasing in a population within a season

  12. FU FUNGICIDE GICIDE RE RESIS ISTANCE ANCE SCREENING REENING

  13. • 47 fields • 888 isolates collected • 2 sampling times U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

  14. 20 18 Northern district Production (millions of trays) 16 Central district 14 Southern district 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Early-season sampling Late-season sampling

  15. Table. Fungicides labeled for Botrytis gray mold of strawberry in California Example trade name Active ingredient(s) FRAC code(s) Topsin Thiophanate-methyl 1 Rovral Iprodione 2 Fontelis Penthiopyrad 7 Kenja 400 Isofetamid 7 Luna Sensation Fluopyram Trifloxystrobin 7 11 Luna Tranquility Fluopyram Pyrimethanil 7 9 Pristine Boscalid Pyraclostrobin 7 11 Merivon Fluxapyroxad Pyraclostrobin 7 11 Scala Pyrimethanil 9 Switch Cyprodinil Fludioxonil 9 12 Elevate Fenhexamid 17 Ph-D Polyoxin-D 19 active ingredient was not tested in this study

  16. 1 2 3 5 6 4 Fernández-Ortuño, D. et al. 2014. No fungicide Cyprodinil Iprodione Fludioxonil Fenhexamid T-methyl Boscalid Fluopyram Penthiopyrad Isofetamid Experimental 1 Experimental 2

  17. Boscalid Fludioxonil Fenhexamid Control

  18. California conventional Early-season (n=340) 100 Late-season (n= 362) 90 Frequency of resistance (%) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 T-methyl Iprodione Boscalid Penthiopyrad Isofetamid Fluopyram Cyprodinil Pyraclostrobin* Fludioxonil Fenhexamid 2 7 7 7 9 1 11 12 17 7 Active ingredient FRAC code

  19. Early-season (n=92) California organic Late-season (n=94) 100 90 Frequency of resistance (%) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 T-methyl Iprodione Boscalid Penthiopyrad Isofetamid Fluopyram Cyprodinil Pyraclostrobin* Fludioxonil Fenhexamid 1 2 7 7 7 7 9 11 12 17 Active ingredient FRAC code

  20. 7 Early-season Late-season 6 5 Average CCR a 4 b bc 3 c 2 1 0 Conventional Organic Production type

  21. Early-season 50 Late-season Frequency of phenotype (%) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Chemical class resistances

  22. Geneti tics s behin ind d resis sistanc tance Genotype observed Chemical Class Gene ERG27 F196C, F412I, F412S Hydroxyanilides Bos1 I356N, I365N, I365S Dicarboximides Beta-tubulin E198A MBCs Cytochrome b G143A QoIs SDHb H272R, H272Y, N230I, P225F SDHIs Genotypes matched phenotypes 94%

  23. FU FUNGICIDE GICIDE USE E SURVEY VEY

  24. Peroxyacetic acid Hydrogen dioxode Aureobasidium pullulans Thiophanate-methyl Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ▪ 15 applications per season Streptomyces lydicus Thiram Extract of Reynoutria Sachalinensis Active ingredient ▪ 12 day interval Bacillus subtilis Trifloxystrobin BLAD Fluopyram Extract of Neem Oil Polyoxin D Fluxapyroxad Sodium Tetraborohydrate Decahydrate Penthiopyrad Pyrimethanil Fenhexamid Boscalid Fludioxonil Cyprodinil Pyraclostrobin Captan 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Avg. no. applications per season

  25. SPE PECIES CIES ID IDENT ENTIFICA IFICATI TION ON

  26. FI FIEL ELD D TRI RIAL AL

  27. No fungicides applied Fungicides applied weekly 2 1 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 6 7 Week 2 3 5 1 4 Sampling time (collection) Resistance testing 1) non-amended control 2) Endura (boscalid) 3) Scholar (fludioxonil) 4) Elevate (fenhexamid)

  28. 100 Fenhexamid Timing of isolate collection I II III IV V 90 80 Frequency of resistance (%) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Non-treated Fenhexamid Rotation Tank-mix + rotation Field treatment

  29. 100 Fludioxonil 90 Timing of isolate collection I II III IV V 80 Frequency of resistance (%) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Non-treated Cyprodinil + fludioxonil Rotation Tank-mix + rotation Fungicide treatment

  30. 100 Boscalid 90 Timing of isolate collection I II III IV V 80 Frequency of resistance (%) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Non-treated Boscalid + pyraclostrobin Rotation Tank-mix + rotation Fungicide treatment

  31. Summary ■ 79 isolates were B. cinerea and one isolate was B. mali . ■ Fungicide resistance frequency was high to FRAC 1, 11, 17 – Low frequency of resistance to FRAC 12 – Moderate frequency of resistance to FRAC 2, 7, 9 ■ Multi-fungicide resistant isolates were present in all three growing districts. CCR3 was the most common. Few isolates were CCR0 or CCR7. ■ There was an average of 15 applications per season. – Captan, a multisite fungicide, was applied the most frequently – Site-specific fungicides were applied less than twice per season ■ A within-season increase in CCR frequency was observed in conventional fields.

  32. Conclusions ■ Botrytis cinerea is the primary causal agent of strawberry gray mold in California. Other species may exist at low frequencies. ■ The frequency of resistant isolates in a population is a.i. dependent – 73% statewide frequency of resistance to fenhexamid – 2% statewide frequency of resistance to fludioxonil – Fenhexamid was applied less (1.5 times per season) than fludioxonil (2.2) ■ The survey, the CCR shift, and the field trial all indicate that populations of Botrytis may respond rapidly to a single application of a site-specific fungicide – The survey: Site-specific fungicides applied < 3 times per season – CCR shift: Within-season increase within conventional fields – Field trial: Rapid increase in fenhexamid resistance frequency following either one (rotation treatment) or three (fenhexamid treatment) exposures to fenhexamid ■ The field trial indicated that after rapid selection for resistance, the population may revert back to being sensitive if the selection pressure is removed (e.g., fenhexamid).

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend