c ourts p roject update s teering c ommittee meeting
play

C OURTS P ROJECT UPDATE - S TEERING C OMMITTEE MEETING RESULTS 7 J AN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

C OURTS P ROJECT UPDATE - S TEERING C OMMITTEE MEETING RESULTS 7 J AN 2015 Slide 1 AGENDA 1. Review/recap Steering Committee process and Recommendation 2. Authorization for updated Study Court Cases update Test fit


  1. C OURTS P ROJECT UPDATE - S TEERING C OMMITTEE MEETING RESULTS 7 J AN 2015 Slide 1

  2. AGENDA 1. Review/recap Steering Committee process and Recommendation 2. Authorization for updated Study – Court Cases update – Test fit – Updated/Refined costs 3. Interim work Slide 2

  3. Review/recap Steering Committee process and Recommendation • July 1 st joint Board and City Council Meeting established Steering Committee • Committee members met multiple times Aug/Sep/Oct • 10/27/14 Committee members recommended: • continued focus on the downtown option for the County • further study the potential of co-locating the City and County General District Courts at the existing Levy Building site • the City indicated support for accommodating short-term parking needs and to study longer-term needs and solutions. • On December 15, 2014, the City Council: • voted to support the continuation of the due diligence effort currently underway for co-locating the General District Courts at the Levy Building and further investigating interim solutions to provide immediate parking space relief to the courts operations; • adopted a Resolution appropriating $7,435.00 in the City’s Capital Improvement Program Contingency for one-half of the cost of the update of the General District Courts Feasibility Study; and • directed City staff to proceed to develop a short and long term parking availability study for the downtown courts area. Slide 3

  4. Authorization for updated 2010 Levy Study Scope for limited study: • Program confirmation • Court Cases update • 2 alternative design concepts with massing models • Updated/Refined costs and schedule • ~ 3 months to complete study update once commissioned • Study Cost: $14,870 (county share = $7, 435) Slide 4

  5. Interim work To accommodate delay in planning and start of design request $150k from current approved funding to : • Provide a modest expansion and space reconfiguration of the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office within the footprint of the existing Courts Annex building • Accommodate additional storage needs • Investigate/procure sound system for Circuit court Slide 5

  6. Questions/Action Slide 6

  7. DOWNTOWN SOLUTION Slide 7

  8. Levy Building Concept - Parking Assumes ~ 23 Underground Secure spaces for Judges/Courts Slide 8 Officials

  9. Levy Building Concept – First Floor Assumes Space would be split between City/County Clerks (More study required) Albco Commonwealth Atty space Slide 9

  10. Levy Building Concept – Second Floor One “Court Set” Slide 10

  11. Levy Building Concept – Third Floor 2 Medium Trial Court Sets for General District Court (Albco) 1 Medium Trial Court Sets for City 1 Medium Trial Court Sets for Expansion/shared Slide 11

  12. Co-Located General District Court Cost Sharing Assumptions Total Building Gross Square Foot ~ 42,000 @ Study estimate of $526 PSF (which includes Soft Cost, escalation, contingency factors) Albemarle County (~75%) ~$15.5 Mil Court rooms sets + Clerk's Office + Shared Spaces/Uses + ½ overflow/expansion Court Set City of Charlottesville (~25%) ~$6.5 Mil 1 Court rooms set + Clerk's Office + Shared Spaces/Uses + ½ overflow/expansion Court Set TBD - build out additional 4th floor (future use adds another ~ 9-10K BGSF & ~ $5Mil) Slide 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend