Broadband QoS Test Results Illustration Chanuka Wattegama LIRNEasia - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

broadband qos test results illustration
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Broadband QoS Test Results Illustration Chanuka Wattegama LIRNEasia - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Broadband QoS Test Results Illustration Chanuka Wattegama LIRNEasia Expert Forum on ICT Sector Indicators and Benchmark Regulation for SAARC Regulatory Authorities, Changi Village, Singapore June 15, 2008 Packages tested Advertised Advertised


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Broadband QoS Test Results Illustration

Chanuka Wattegama LIRNEasia Expert Forum on ICT Sector Indicators and Benchmark Regulation for SAARC Regulatory Authorities, Changi Village, Singapore June 15, 2008

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Advertised Download S peed Advertised Upload S peed India Airtel 512 kbps 512 kbps BSNL - Business 2 Mbps 256 kbps BSNL - Home 2 Mbps 256 kbps Hathway 256 kbps 256 kbps Sri Lanka Dialog 2 Mbps 512 kbps SLT - Business 2 Mbps 512 kbps SLT - Home 512 kbps 128 kbps Singapore StarHub* 1 Mbps 256 kbps

Packages tested

* Partial testing

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Test Results

Throughput (Download speed/ Upload speed)

Business Packages performance in

  • IS

P domain

  • Local domain
  • International level

S ri Lanka vs. India/ S ingapore performance Business vs. Home performance

Delay metrics (RTT/ j itter) Loss metrics (Packet Loss)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Test Results Throughput ‐ Download speed

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2 Mbps

Download speed (Business Packages): Relatively healthy in IS P domain…

> 75%

ISP

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2 Mbps

Download speed (Business Packages):

… poor in Local domain

> 75%

Local

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2 Mbps

Download speed (Business Packages):

… even poorer when accessing International sites

> 75%

Int’l

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Download speed: India and S ri Lanka (IS P Domain): S ri Lanka performs slightly better

ISP

> 75%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Download speed: India and S ri Lanka (Local Domain): India performs better

Local

> 75%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Download speed: India and S ri Lanka (accessing International servers): India looks good

Int’l

> 75%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Download speed S ri Lanka and S ingapore (accessing International servers): S ingapore wins

Int’l

> 75%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Download speed (S LT Business vs. S LT Home packages): … in % terms, home is better than business

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Download speed (S LT Business vs. S LT Home packages): … and comparable in reaching international sites

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Test Results Throughput ‐ Upload speeds

slide-15
SLIDE 15

512 kbps

Upload speed (Business packages): S

  • mewhat healthy in IS

P domain

ISP

> 75%

slide-16
SLIDE 16

512 kbps

Upload speed (Business packages): … a bit down at Local Domain

Local

> 75%

slide-17
SLIDE 17

512 kbps

Upload speed (Business packages): … and poor in accessing International sites

Int’l

> 75%

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Upload speed S ri Lanka and S ingapore (accessing International sites): S ingapore wins

Int’l

> 75%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Upload speed (S LT Business vs. S LT Home packages): … here too in % , home is better than business, but not in actual speeds

(aprox 100 kpbs) (aprox 200 kpbs)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Test Results Jitter and Packet Loss

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Jitter : S

  • metimes not enough quality for video/ high

quality audio (<+10ms) but satisfactory for other apps

slide-22
SLIDE 22

ISP –Week Day Local –Week Day INT –Week Day ISP –Weekend Local –Weekend INT –Weekend

Packet Loss : Most of the times, but not always, within acceptable limits (5% )

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Where is the bottleneck?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Accessing www.lankacom.net through S LT (2M/ 512k)

NB: All IP addresses are within SL (www.whois.net) 65 ms 25 ms 170 ms 10 ms

Local

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Accessing www.yahoo.com through S LT (2M/ 512k)

NB: Upto 5th hop IP addresses are within SL (www.whois.net) 65 ms 25 ms 170 ms 10 ms

Int’l

slide-26
SLIDE 26

What’ s next?

  • A decentralised approach based on ‘ Volunteer

Computing’ *

  • Automating the manual test process (otherwise too

resource consuming and cumbersome)

  • Need to conduct tests from different point (take Last Mile

issues into account)

  • A software application that tests with the minimal

involvement from the user

  • Volunteers report test results to a web site that stored

and presents on-line QoS data

* Volunteer computing is a type of distributed computing in which computer owners donate their computing resources (such as processing power and storage) to one or more "projects". It is distinct from Grid computing, which involves sharing of managed computing resources within and between organizations.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Example: www.internetpulse.com

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Thank You!

wattegama@ lirne.net www.lirneasia.net

Thanks to LIRNEasia team, Prof. Timothy Gonsalves and team, Ranga Kamaladasa, S riganesh Lokanathan, S anj ana Hattotuwa, S anath S iriwardena and all who contributed ideas/ opinions in online discussions at LIRNEasia blog.