BONNER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Chris Kreider, PE Brian Keaney, PE Beth - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bonner bridge replacement
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

BONNER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Chris Kreider, PE Brian Keaney, PE Beth - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BONNER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Chris Kreider, PE Brian Keaney, PE Beth Howey, LG, PE Geo3T2 Conference April 4, 2013 BONNER BRIDGE TIMELINE October 1991 October 1990 June 1996 October 1993 Existing Bridges Navigation Span This inlet


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Geo3T2 Conference April 4, 2013

BONNER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

Chris Kreider, PE Brian Keaney, PE Beth Howey, LG, PE

slide-2
SLIDE 2

BONNER BRIDGE TIMELINE

slide-3
SLIDE 3

October 1991 October 1990 June 1996 October 1993

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Existing Bridge’s Navigation Span

slide-5
SLIDE 5

This inlet didn’t exist before Irene struck in August of 2011

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PROJECT WENT DESIGN BUILD ROUTE

► Design Build Team of PCL and HDR submitted proposal and

winning bid in July, 2011

► Winning Bid was $215,777,000.00

slide-7
SLIDE 7

SUPPLEMENTAL BORINGS OBTAINED

slide-8
SLIDE 8

SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OREGON INLET

► Boring near each of the 83 Bents ► Colored profile based on soil type and added design scour line ► Provided soil parameters specific for each bent

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SHIP IMPACT WAS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN

► Bridge Closed

October 26, 1990

► Re-opened February

12, 1991

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SCOUR WAS A HUGE CHALLENGE

► Design Scour to

Elevation -84

► Physical model scour

tests performed by OEI

► Conservative design

values

slide-11
SLIDE 11

DIFFERENT SCOUR CONDITIONS MODELED

Soil at EL = 0.0 ft Long Term Scour 100-yr Scour ► Different scour

conditions were evaluated at each bent to determine the critical condition for various loading scenarios.

► FBMP program

utilized for each scour and loading condition.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

TWO FOUNDATION ELEMENTS USED

► 36” Prestressed Concrete Square Piles ► 532 Piles Totaling 12 Miles in Length! ► Used under large footings constructed at the water

surface in navigation and transition zones

► Installed in battered configuration for increased bent

stability

► 6 to 30 piles under each footing ► Maximum Factored Axial Loads ranged from 638k to

1080k for the 36 inch piles

slide-13
SLIDE 13

TWO FOUNDATION ELEMENTS USED

► 54” Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Piles ► 137 Cylinder Piles totaling 3.4 Miles in Length! ► Installed in approaches where scour and ship impact

are significantly less

► Piles extend all the way up to the bent caps ► 3 or 4 piles support each cap ► Maximum Factored Axial Loads for the 54” piles ranged

from 751k to 1490k

slide-14
SLIDE 14

LOAD TEST PROGRAM PERFORMED IN NAVIGATION ZONE

► Near proposed Bent 24 ► Deepest scour area ► Deepest water depth

slide-15
SLIDE 15

JETTING TO INSTALL PILES

► PCL developed

innovative jetting system

► Jet frame surrounds

pile

slide-16
SLIDE 16

CLOSE UP OF JETTING PORTS

► Jet ports direct water

and air toward pile to limit disturbance to surrounding soil

► Important because 36”

square piles are only 7.5 feet apart

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Jet in action with water and air

slide-19
SLIDE 19

LARGE HAMMER REQUIRED!

► Delmag D-225

Ram Weight = 49.6 kips

Maximum Rated Energy = 565 kip- feet

Weighs 200 kips!

► After jetting to near

the final tip elevation, piles are driven to extend below potential disturbed zone beneath the tip

► Pile driving also helps

verify adequate resistance has been achieved

slide-20
SLIDE 20

LOAD TEST IN PROGRESS

slide-21
SLIDE 21

LARGE HAMMER REQUIRED!

► After jetting to near

the final tip elevation, piles are driven to extend below potential disturbed zone beneath the tip

► Pile driving also helps

verify adequate resistance has been achieved