single stage biocartilage
play

Single Stage Biocartilage (Micronized Articular Cartilage) Kevin F. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Advanced Practitioners Course: Dec 7, 2017 Single Stage Biocartilage (Micronized Articular Cartilage) Kevin F. Bonner MD Jordan-Young Institute; Virginia Beach, VA Assistant Professor, Eastern Virginia Medical School Kevin F Bonner MD


  1. Advanced Practitioners Course: Dec 7, 2017 Single Stage Biocartilage (Micronized Articular Cartilage) Kevin F. Bonner MD Jordan-Young Institute; Virginia Beach, VA Assistant Professor, Eastern Virginia Medical School

  2. Kevin F Bonner MD Disclosures 1.Royalties : Zimmer / Biomet 2.Consulting : Smith & Nephew LifeNet Health Abyrx 3.Research and educational support : Depuy / Johnson & Johnson Zimmer / Biomet LifeNet Health

  3. Chondral Defects in the Knee: Surgical Options Lesion < 2 cm 2 ? Lesion > 2 cm 2 ? Primary Tx? Secondary Tx? Primary Tx? Secondary Tx? Low High Low/High Low High Low/High Demand? Demand? Demand Demand? Demand? Demand Cole. Op Tech Orthopaedics 2001  Arthrsocopic   Arthrsocopic Autologous  Debridement Autologous   Autologous Autologous Debridement Chondrocyte  Marrow Chondrocyte  Chondrocyte Chondrocyte Marrow Implantation Stimulating Implantation Implantation Implantation  Stimulating Arthrsocopic  Technique Osteochondral   Osteochondral Osteochondral Technique Debridement (Microfracture, Autograft Autograft Allograft  (Microfracture, Marrow Abrasion, Abrasion, Stimulating Drilling) Drilling) Technique  Osteochondral (Microfracture, Autograft Abrasion,  Autologous Drilling)  Chondrocyte Osteochondral Implantation Autograft Everyone develops their own personal, and likely ever-evolving, algorithm for cartilage defects

  4. Relative frequency of Cartilage Procedures 2003-2014 55 Million private insured pts Truven Health Marketscan Research Database MFX to OAT 35:1 MFX to ACI 88:1 Khazai et al. AOSSM Toronto 2017

  5. Debate: How best to perform marrow stimulation • Abrade vs perforate ? • Drill vs Impaction awls • Optimal Size & Depth? • Augmentation helpful? Mithoefer et al. AJSM 2009

  6. Recent Reviews Half empty or half full? • Mithoefer K. Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee. An evidence-based systematic analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2009 • Mithoefer K. Clinical Outcome and Return to Competition after Microfracture in the Athlete's Knee: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review. Cartilage. 2010 • Chalmers. Activity-Related Outcomes of Articular Cartilage Surgery: A Systematic Review. Cartilage. 2013Goyal D. Evidence-based status of microfracture technique: systematic review of Level I and II studies. Arthroscopy. 2013 • Oussedik S. Treatment of Articular Cartilage Lesions of the Knee by MFX or ACI: A Systematic Review Arthroscopy. 2015

  7. Return to Play in the NFL Mai et al. Am J Sports Med 2016: 44(9)

  8. Return to Sport & Performance After Microfracture in the Knees of NBA Players 41 NBA Players Return to sport: 83% – Length of NBA career following microfracture (4.10 ± 3.91 years) was not sig different from controls. Harris et al. Orthop J Sports Med 2013: 1(6)

  9. Prospective Clinical Outcomes Following MFX Surgery For Isolated and Multi-site Defects: Mid-term Follow-up Weber AE, Locker PL, Tilton A, Cvetanovich GL, Erickson BJ, Yanke AB, Cole BJ • 101 knees : 72 had isolated MFX – Ave age 36, Ave f/u 5.6 yrs • Significant and clinically meaningful improvements • Isolated defects and those < 3.6 cm may be optimal for MFX AOSSM Toronto 2017

  10. Why not just jump to more sexy options? Failures Osteoarthritis MFX 32.5% 48% ACI 42.5% 57% • Differences not sig (p=0.356) Level 1 JBJS: 98-A;No.16: 2016

  11. MFX Poor Prognostic Factors: • Age > 35-40 • BMI > 30 • Size > 4cm 2 • Other than Femoral condyle • Duration of symptoms > 12 months • Not primary procedure • S/P debridement degenerative shoulders • <66% fill on MRI • Pre-op Tegner <4

  12. Results after microfracture in different compartments of the knee: • Patella the worst –Deteriorated between 18 and 36 months –Authors advocate other treatment methods Kreuz et al. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2006

  13. In search of a single-stage solution What to do with acute traumatic lesions? -Not many single-stage options

  14. Patella Defects >10 yr f/u J of Knee Surgery 2010: 23(2) Arthroscopy 2013 Oct 29(10)

  15. Reality: Insurance Challenges

  16. Microfracture procedure augmented with BioCartilage • Standard Microfracture • Prepare & apply Biocartilage • Apply Fibrin Glue over Biocartilage • Rehab similar to MFX But what is “BioCartilage”? And why do it?

  17. Cartilage Extracellular Matrix: Biocartilage Chitosan + Blood • MFX “plus” – augmentation • Basic science support • Off the shelf availability • Awaiting clinical outcome studies

  18. BioCartilage Cartilage Extracellular Matrix • What is it? – Allograft cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM) – Contains key components of cartilage: type II collagen, proteoglycans, and additional cartilaginous growth factors IHC staining for type II • How is it intended to be used? collagen – Provides a scaffold over microfractured defect – Signals autologous cellular interactions within the scaffold – Goal is to improve the tissue quality formed after utilizing a bone marrow Proteoglycan content stimulation technique evidenced by granular matrix (toluidine blue staining)

  19. BioCartilage Cartilage Extracellular Matrix • Processing? – Cartilage dehydrated then particulated – 100-300 microns – Aseptically packaged – Ambient temp storage – 5 year shelf-life

  20. Cartilage Extracellular Matrix In vivo supportive evidence Control Group Treatment Group Rabbit Model Baboon model Chadha N et al. Porous Cartilage-Derived Matrix Scaffolds for Repair of Articular Cartilage Defects. ORS 2012; Poster No. 0735. Malinin T et al. Induction of regeneration of articular cartilage defects by freeze dried particulate cartilage allografts. ICRS 2009 Meeting; poster presentation.

  21. 2 months BioCartilage MFX Defect Micronized allograft articular cartilage and PRP improved cartilage repair in this model compared to MFX alone Am J Sports Med 2016: 44(9)

  22. Single stage option: BioCartilage 31 yo female -Patellar Defect

  23. BioCartilage Cartilage Extracellular Matrix • Single stage MFX augmentation • Relatively inexpensive • No insurance issues thus far • Basic science support • Nearly 10,000 cases thus far • Awaiting clinical outcome studies

  24. 18 YO Basketball Player with activity related pain and swelling MFC Courtesy: Tom Carter MD

  25. 18 YO Basketball Player • Micronized articular cartilage allograft Courtesy: Tom Carter MD • Repeat scope for fibrosis

  26. MST Rehabilitation • Dependent on location, size, containment • CPM, stationary bike • Limited WB for 6-8 weeks – NWB to TTWB • Return to sports 5-9 months

  27. Marrow Stimulation ( + Biocartilage ) is a Viable Option • Consider patient & defect factors • Simple / Minimal morbidity / Low cost • Condylar lesions in young patients do best • > 30% Failure rates • Fibrocartilage not as durable but may be good enough for many • Risk/Benefit Analysis vs other options

  28. Micronized Articular Cartilage (BioCartilage) Can augmentation “MFX plus” improve results? We hope But, we really don’t know yet…..

  29. Thank you

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend