SIBLEY POND DESIGN-BUILD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ROUTE 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sibley pond
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SIBLEY POND DESIGN-BUILD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ROUTE 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SIBLEY POND DESIGN-BUILD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ROUTE 2 CANAAN/PITTSFIELD, MAINE Keith Donington, P.E. October 2012 1 Sibley Pond - Bridge Elevation 2 Bridge Open to Traffic November 2011 3 Bridge Highlights General: Design-Build


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

DESIGN-BUILD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ROUTE 2 CANAAN/PITTSFIELD, MAINE

Keith Donington, P.E.

SIBLEY POND

October 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Sibley Pond - Bridge Elevation

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Bridge Open to Traffic November 2011

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Bridge Highlights

  • General:

– Design-Build Project – Bridge designed and constructed in 15 months – Opened to traffic in November 2011 more than 10 months ahead of the owner set completion date of October 2012 – First design of PCI’s NEXT D (Northeast Extreme Double Tee Beam) with full depth integral deck – NEXT D and NEXT F were new beam sections developed by PCI New England in response to FHWA’s nationwide initiative for Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) – NEXT D - 8 inch full depth integral deck slab – NEXT F - 4 inch form deck w/CIP topping – NEXT D selected as faster to erect, less costly, improved durability, and perceived higher technical score for D/B

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Bridge Facts

  • Type of Bridge:

– Highway Bridge – Stream/Pond Crossing

  • Structure & Geometry:

– No. of Spans 10 spans arranged in two 5-span continuous units and a single expansion joint located in the center – Continuity Spans continuous for LL and SDL – Span Length 79’-0” – Overall Length 790’-0” C.L. to C.L. of end abutments – Overall Width 36’-0” curb to curb – No. of Traffic Lanes 2 – Alignment /Skew Tangent /0 skew – Longitudinal Grade ± 1.0% with crown at center of bridge

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Bridge Highlights

  • Design & Construction:

– Designed to AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications for HL-93 loading for all limit states except for Strength I – LL for Strength I Limit State is MaineDOT Modified Live Load consisting of the standard HL-93 Live Load with 25% increase in the design truck – Bridge designed to 100-year design life per owner’s project requirements

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Sibley Pond - Site Plan

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Design Parameters

  • Substructure:

Subsurface Profile

8

Organic Silt Silty Sand / Silty Clay Silty/Gravely Sand Fine Sand Bedrock

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Pile Driving

  • Steel pipe piles for piers near the

north abutment were driven from the old road during the first winter

  • Remainder of the piles were

driven by leapfrogging the pile driving crane from pier to pier, supported by temporary decking and temporary intermediate steel pile bents

9

Pile Driving Operations

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Intermediate Pier Bents

Elevation of several pier bents Fixed pier bent

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Design Parameters

  • Superstructure:

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Design Parameters

  • Superstructure:

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Design Parameters

  • Longitudinal Joint detail:

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

PCI NEXT D Beam

NEXT D Beam in casting bed

NEXT D Beam with steel studs

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

PCI NEXT D Beam

NEXT D Beam lifted from casting bed Completed NEXT D Beams

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Beam Erection

  • 4 – 79’ beams/ span erected using

a custom gantry crane

  • PB designed the gantry transverse

support beam system

  • Gantry lifted the beams from the

transporter vehicle parked on the

  • ld bridge deck
  • Transporter removed, steel rail

beams inserted

  • Gantry rolled sideways across the

new piers on Hillman Rollers.

  • Beams lowered onto the bearings
  • Less costly and quicker than 2

crane pick

  • 4 beams erected in an eight-hour

shift

  • turnaround time of 2 days per

span

Beam Erection Operations

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Existing Bridge Conditions

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Deck View

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

PCI NEXT D Beam

  • Innovations:
  • Ends of beams - no rebar or

strand projections allowed to clear legs of gantry crane

  • For live load negative moment

continuity over the piers, mechanical couplers were detailed to field splice the splice bars between adjacent beams

  • This layout required the

precaster to align the deck rebars from adjacent beams to tight tolerances

19

Couplers for (-) Moment continuity at intermediate diaphragms

slide-20
SLIDE 20

PCI NEXT D Beam

  • Innovations:
  • For positive moment continuity,

a special detail was developed for the bottom reinforcement using a steel end plate with ASTM A706 weldable rebar

  • In shop, steel plate and rebar

assemblies were cast into ends

  • f NEXT D forms
  • In field, following removal of

the gantry rail support system, hooked rebars were field welded to the steel plates

20

Couplers for (+) Moment continuity at intermediate diaphragms

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Durability – 100yr Life

  • Superstructure:

– NEXT D beams were selected by D/B team for best technical score as well as cost considerations – NEXT D has integral deck which is both precast and prestressed – Beams used a HP performance/self-consolidating concrete mix with 5.5 gals/CY calcium nitrite corrosion inhibitor (DCI) – 8,000 psi was specified by design but 10,000 psi concrete was consistently achieved by the precaster – CIP concrete construction was limited to only the curbs, longitudinal closure joints, and pier continuity diaphragms – HPC was also specified for all field-placed concrete along with 5.5 gals/CY of DCI – MMFX rebar specified in exposed bridge curbs and rail transition barriers – Deck protection: HP machine hot applied deck waterproofing with 3 inch minimum asphalt

  • verlay

– Only one expansion joint in 790 ft, located at high point, with semi-integral abutments at ends

  • Substructure:

– Concrete filled steel pipe piles are protected with a shop applied fusion bonded epoxy coating system, extending from the top of the pile to 10 feet (3 meters) below the mud line

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Acknowledgments

  • Owner:

– Maine Department of Transportation, Augusta, ME

  • Contractor:

– The Lane Construction Corp., Bangor, ME

  • Engineer/Designer:

– Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., Manchester, NH/Boston MA

  • Precaster:
  • J.P. Carrara & Sons, Inc., Middlebury, VT
  • PCINE

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Questions?

23