Attractive Visualization Hauptseminar Information Visualization - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
attractive visualization
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Attractive Visualization Hauptseminar Information Visualization - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 30, 2023 8 likes •249 views

Attractive Visualization Hauptseminar Information Visualization - Wintersemester 2008/2009" Benjamin Bafadikanya LFE Medieninformatik 16.02.2009 LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 |

slide-1
SLIDE 1

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 1 / 14

Attractive Visualization

Hauptseminar “Information Visualization - Wintersemester 2008/2009"

Benjamin Bafadikanya LFE Medieninformatik 16.02.2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 2 / 14

Overview

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Visualization in Attention-Limited Environments

2.1. Peripheral Displays 2.2. Attraction by Motion

  • 3. Visualization in Public Spaces

3.1. Public Displays and Ambient Visualization 3.2. Interactive Displays

  • 4. Interaction in Semi-Public Environments
slide-3
SLIDE 3

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 3 / 14

Introduction Why „attractive“ visualization? Many displays in our everyday life Displays facilitate many tasks Displays in different environments

[14]

slide-4
SLIDE 4

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 4 / 14

Visualization in Attention-Limited Environments Peripheral Displays

User is focused on a primary task Display in her periphery informs about important events Negative: Distraction from primary task Graphical vs. textual displays regarding distraction

slide-5
SLIDE 5

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 5 / 14

Visualization in Attention-Limited Environments Peripheral Displays (cont.)

Distraction in time critical situations Cognition speed depends on

Display presence time Information density

[12] [12]

slide-6
SLIDE 6

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 6 / 14

Visualization in Attention-Limited Environments Peripheral Displays (cont.)

Field of application

[15] [16]

slide-7
SLIDE 7

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 7 / 14

Visualization in Attention-Limited Environments Peripheral Displays (cont.)

Going over the top

[17] [18]

slide-8
SLIDE 8

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 8 / 14

Visualization in Attention-Limited Environments Attraction by Motion

Encoding information in motion – moving icons Cognition rate for motion does not decrease very much towards the periphery Different motion types

Anchored Travelling

slide-9
SLIDE 9

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 9 / 14

Visualization in Attention-Limited Environments Attraction by Motion

Encoding information in motion – moving icons Cognition rate for motion does not decrease very much towards the periphery Different motion types

Anchored Travelling

slide-10
SLIDE 10

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 10 / 14

Visualization in Public Spaces

Public Displays

When do people really look at public displays? Display requirements

Position – at eye level, towards the people’s flow, involves surroundings Size – combination of small and large displays Content – low information density, animated pictures or videos

slide-11
SLIDE 11

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 11 / 14

Visualization in Public Spaces

Public Displays (cont.)

[2]

slide-12
SLIDE 12

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 12 / 14

Visualization in Public Spaces

Public Displays (cont.)

[2]

slide-13
SLIDE 13

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 13 / 14

Visualization in Public Spaces

Public Displays

When do people really look at public displays? Display requirements

Position – at eye level, towards the people’s flow, involves surroundings Size – combination of small and large displays Content – low information density, animated pictures

  • r videos
slide-14
SLIDE 14

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 14 / 14

Visualization in Public Spaces

Public Displays (cont.)

[14]

slide-15
SLIDE 15

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 15 / 14

Visualization in Public Spaces

Ambient Visualization

Combines aesthetic aspects with computer supported information presentation Problems

Finding the right information type Finding the appropriate template Finding the right location

[11]

slide-16
SLIDE 16

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 16 / 14

Visualization in Public Spaces

Interactive Displays

Choice of information – of general interest Enticing people to interact with a display

Instructor or easy to use Honey-pot effect

[7]

slide-17
SLIDE 17

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 17 / 14

Displays in Semi-Public Environments

Advantages compared to public spaces

Enhances the collaboration Content is of general interest No privacy issues Good location for the display is available

slide-18
SLIDE 18

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 18 / 14

Displays in Semi-Public Environments

Example

[5]

slide-19
SLIDE 19

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 19 / 14

Questions?

[11] [2] [14]

slide-20
SLIDE 20

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 20 / 14

Thank You.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 21 / 14

Sources (1) [1] L. Bartram, C. Ware, and T. Calvert. Moving Icons: Detection And Distraction. In Proceedings of Human-Computer InteractionInteract, 2001. [2] H. Brignull and Y. Rogers. Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 2003. [3] C. Chen and M. Czerwinski. Empirical evaluation of information visualizations: an introduction. International Journal of Human-Computers Studies, 53(5):631–635, 2000. [4] E. Huang, A. Koster, and J. Borchers. Overcoming Assumptions and Uncovering Practices: When Does the Public Really Look at Public Displays? LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 5013:228, 2008. [5] E. Huang and E. Mynatt. Semi-public displays for small, co-located

  • groups. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in

computing systems, pages 49–56. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2003.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 22 / 14

Sources (2) [6] A. Noll. The beginnings of computer art in the United States: A memoir. Computers & Graphics, 19(4):495–503, 1995. [7] P. Peltonen, E. Kurvinen, A. Salovaara, G. Jacucci, T. Ilmonen, J. Evans,

  • A. Oulasvirta, and P. Saarikko. It’s Mine, Don’t Touch!: interactions at a

large multi-touch display in a city centre. 2008. [8] J. Redstr¨om, T. Skog, and L. Halln¨as. Informative art: using amplified artworks as information displays. In Proceedings of DARE 2000 on Designing augmented reality environments, pages 103–114. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2000. [9] R. Sekuler and R. Blake. Perception. New York, 1994.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 23 / 14

Sources (3) [10] T. Skog, S. Ljungblad, and L. Holmquist. Bringing computer graphics to

everyday environments with informative art. In International Conference

  • n Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pages 153–153. ACM

Press New York, NY, USA, 2002. [11] T. Skog, S. Ljungblad, and L. Holmquist. Between aesthetics and utility: designing ambient information visualizations. In Information Visualization,

  • 2003. INFOVIS 2003. IEEE Symposium on, pages 233–240, 2003.

[12] J. Somervell, D. McCrickard, C. North, and M. Shukla. An evaluation

  • f information visualization in attention-limited environments. In Proceedings
  • f the symposium on Data Visualisation 2002, pages 211–216.

Eurographics Association Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 2002. [13] J. Somervell, R. Srinivasan, O. Vasnaik, and K. Woods. Measuring Distraction and Awareness Caused by Graphical and Textual Displays in the

  • Periphery. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM Southeast Conference.
slide-24
SLIDE 24

LMU Department of Media Informatics | Advanced Seminar WS 2008/2009 | bafadika@cip.ifi.lmu.de

Slide 24 / 14

Sources (4) [14] http://www.stroeer.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Bilder/pressebilder/station_infoscreen.jpg [15] http://www.astrasound.de/images/monitor_480.jpg [16] http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2375/2145763283_e4364c8902.jpg?v=0 [17] http://www.mobilevideozone.com/images/anim/image5_1.jpg [18] source unknown