ASSOCIATION Physician leadership Effectiveness program 360 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

association
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ASSOCIATION Physician leadership Effectiveness program 360 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MONTANA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION Physician leadership Effectiveness program 360 ASSESSMENTS Catherine J. Grott, PhD, MPA Development of survey tool Several months to develop survey tool; tested to enhance validity. Calculated like a score


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MONTANA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Physician leadership Effectiveness program

360 ASSESSMENTS

Catherine J. Grott, PhD, MPA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Development of survey tool

  • Several months to develop survey tool; tested to

enhance validity.

  • Calculated like a score in a class but think of it more

like a survey.

  • Survey tool includes perceptions by physicians and

their colleagues regarding emotions, tasks, relationships, and engagement.

  • Open-ended questions were added to help enrich the

data and gain a better understanding of leadership skills

slide-3
SLIDE 3

360 Scores

  • A performance appraisal evaluation developed over 20 years ago

that uses a multiple-input approach to performance feedback.

  • The assessments are a collection of data from colleagues,

subordinates, supervisors and where appropriate, clients.

  • The goal of the 360 assessment is to illuminate how well

employees are performing and how individuals might need to change their behaviors to create a more productive workplace.

See: Edleson, H. 2012. Do 360 evaluations work? American Psychological Association, Vol. 43, No. 10, P. 58. US Office of Personnel Management, 360-Degree Assessment: An Overview, OPM-91-2958, retrieved from https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/performance-management/performance-management-cycle/rating/360assessment.pdf, September 1997.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Limitations

  • Not a random sample
  • A “snapshot” in time
  • Must get same 360 respondents to respond at follow-up
  • r at least same number of people
  • Changes are made in fractions of a point
  • This is only one piece of data

See: Jackson, E. 2012. The 7 reasons why 360 degree feedback programs fail, Forbes, retrieved from http://onforbes.es/Rnuo7q

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Mosaic Emotional quotient™

84%

Average physician confidence scores Average 360 respondent scores

87%

  • Physicians and respondents both said physicians

demonstrate strong moral principles, but are not sure how they are perceived by others.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Mosaic task quotient™

75%

Average physician confidence scores

83%

Average 360 respondent scores

  • Physicians and respondents both believe physicians

take ownership of issues, but don’t create written, long- term plans. Physicians also believe physicians think beyond their own self interest.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Mosaic relationship quotient™

Average physician confidence scores Average 360 respondent scores

80% 85%

  • Physicians and respondents believe physicians keep one’s word

and are dependable, but physicians believe they might not demonstrate effective non-verbal skills and respondents believe they may not maintain relationships by managing tense situations

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Mosaic Physician engagement score™

Average physician confidence scores Average 360 respondent scores

82% 88%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Qualitative questions

  • Open-ended questions are designed for rich feedback
  • Comments gave good examples of strengths and

areas of opportunity

slide-10
SLIDE 10

How to use your assessment?

  • Identify your areas of strengths and reinforce them
  • Work with Wendy on areas of opportunity
  • Use this feedback experience to learn how to give

constructive employee feedback

  • Seek out others in this class to learn from

SEE: Stone, D., Patton, B., Heen, S. ( 2010). Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss what Matters Most, New York, NY: Penguin Books.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Physician Leadership PROGRAM

QUESTIONS?