Analyzing the Eff ffect that Living Arrangements have on Control - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

analyzing the eff ffect that living
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Analyzing the Eff ffect that Living Arrangements have on Control - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Analyzing the Eff ffect that Living Arrangements have on Control of Diabetes Mellitus La Nyia J. Od Odoms, , M.Ed MD/MSPH Candidate 2016, Meharry Medical College, School of Medicine, Nashville, TN GE-National Medical Fellowships, Primary


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Analyzing the Eff ffect that Living Arrangements have on Control

  • f Diabetes Mellitus

La’ Nyia J. Od Odoms, , M.Ed

MD/MSPH Candidate 2016, Meharry Medical College, School of Medicine, Nashville, TN GE-National Medical Fellowships, Primary Care Leadership Program Health Care Center for the Homeless Orlando, FL July 26th, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

Health th Care Center for the Homeles ess NCQA Patient-Centered Medical Home- Level 2 Celebrating 20

20yr yrs of service!

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

Why Diabetes…Living Arrangements…Research?

Diabetes is a major cause of heart disease and stroke, and continues to be the leading cause of kidney failure, nontraumatic lower-extremity amputations, and blindness among adults, aged 20-74 (National Diabetes Fact Sheet, 2007). Homeless people suffer from significant levels of morbidity and mortality, but there is little evidence that homeless- ness has a direct adverse effect on health outcomes.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Research Objective

  • Analyze variance in hemoglobin A1C

levels to improve glycemic control

  • *Housing Status
  • Gender
  • Ethnicity
  • Race
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Methodology

PRACTICE CTICE ANALYTIC TICS S

  • Obtained

demographics from diabetic patients whose date of last visit was between June 2011-May 2013

  • Recorded

hemoglobinA1C levels SPSS SS

  • Frequency tables

for demographics and for demographics w/n two housing categories

  • Independent Samples

T- Tests for demographics and for demographics w/n two housing categories

  • Analysis of Variance

(ANOVA) tests for race and for race w/n two housing categories

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Results

HOUSING STATUS Frequency

Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Housed Homeless Total 434 121 555 78.2 21.8 100.0 78.2 21.8 100.0 78.2 100.0

GENDER

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Male Female Total 249 306 555 44.9 55.1 100.0 44.9 55.1 100.0 44.9 100.0

ETHNICITY

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Non-Hispanic Hispanic Total 431 124 555 77.7 22.3 100.0 77.7 22.3 100.0 77.7 100.0

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Results Cont’d

RACE Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Unknown African American White Haitian Hispanic Amer Indian Asia Total 57 274 93 56 63 5 7 555 10.3 49.4 16.8 10.1 11.4 .9 1.3 100.0 10.3 49.4 16.8 10.1 11.4 .9 1.3 100.0 10.3 59.6 76.4 86.5 97.8 98.7 100.0

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Results Cont’d

8.40 8.73 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 Housed Homeless Percent Mean Hemoglobin A1C Levels- Housing Status Mean difference NOT statistically significant (p = .136)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results Cont’d

8.34 8.63 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 Female Male Percent

Mean Hemoglobin A1C Levels- Gender

Mean difference NOT statistically significant (p = .128)

8.27 8.70 8.58 8.76 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 Female Female Male Male Percent

Mean Hemoglobin A1C Levels- Gender

Housed Homeless

Mean differences were NOT statistically significant (p = .143 housed/ p= .898 homeless)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results Cont’d

8.24 8.54 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 Hispanic Non-Hispanic Percent

Mean Hemoglobin A1C Levels- Ethnicity

Mean difference was NOT statistically significant (p = .175)

8.20 8.43 8.46 8.80 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 Hispanic Hispanic Non-Hispanic Non-Hispanic Percent

Mean Hemoglobin A1C Levels- Ethnicity

Housed Homeless

Mean differences were NOT statistically significant (p = .275 housed/ p= .498 homeless)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results Cont’d

8.68 8.16 8.35 8.29 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 African American White Haitian Hispanic Percent

Mean Hemoglobin A1C Levels- Race

Mean difference was NOT statistically significant (p = .172)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results Cont’d

8.69 8.67 7.97 8.64 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 African American African American White White Percent

Mean Hemoglobin A1C Levels- Race

Housed Homeless

Mean difference was NOT statistically significant (p = .063 housed/ p= .759 homeless)

8.25 9.23 8.13 9.50 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 Haitian Haitian Hispanic Hispanic Percent

Mean Hemoglobin A1C Levels- Race

Housed Homeless

Mean differences were NOT statistically significant (p = .063 housed/ p= .759 homeless)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Discussion

 No statistically significant difference in mean hemoglobin A1C between homeless and housed patients, nor across gender, race, and ethnicity.  When homeless and housed (housing status) were used as categorical controls, no statistically significant difference was found between the aforementioned demographics.  Data Collection: Quest Diagnostics vs. Florida Hospital  Endocrinology Referrals  Access to services at main clinical site  Promising Diabetic Profile

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Acknowledgements

  • Dr. Cadet, Medical Director/Site Advisor
  • Dr. Oliveira, Assistant Professor/Faculty Advisor

Mehrin Islam, Former AmeriCorps Intern

  • Mrs. Mariella Torrellas, Physician Assistant
  • Mr. Bakari Burns, CEO
  • Dr. Chianta Lindsey, Nurse Practitioner
  • Dr. Chen, Assistant Professor, Meharry Medical College
  • Dr. Brown, Assistant Professor/Advisor, Meharry Medical College

GE-NMF Primary Care Leadership Program Health Care Center for the Homeless Staff & Patients

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Questions/Comments