Advanced oxidation process treatment of membrane filtration - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

advanced oxidation process treatment of membrane
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Advanced oxidation process treatment of membrane filtration - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Advanced oxidation process treatment of membrane filtration concentrate using hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet light Mengye Chen Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign GE Osmonics HL


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Advanced oxidation process treatment of membrane filtration concentrate using hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet light

Mengye Chen Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Project overview

Membrane biological reactor, synthetic wastewater with ≈ 3300ppm of COD MFC: SMP, dead cells, biofilm, low biodegradability, high organic concentration

Anaerobic Chamber Concentrate Influent Internal Circulation Effluent Organic Carbon CH4 + CO2 GE Osmonics HL Waste Sludge Aerobic Downflow Hanging Sponge Reactor

AOP

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESS

Introducing

slide-4
SLIDE 4

One of the strongest oxidants in nature (Zeta potential: +2.33V)

  • Non-selectively reacts with organic

molecules

  • Break up cell membrane
  • Remove COD, TOC, color and odor

Chemistry

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Batch experiment

Table 1- Composition of NFC Parameters Unit Concentration TSS mg/L 8.8 ± 0.96 VSS mg/L 5.1 ± 0.68 COD mg/L 46.0 ± 8.21 TOC mg/L 16.0 ± 4.03 Ca mg/L 40.1 ± 4.3 Mg mg/L 31.9 ± 0.7 K mg/L 572.2 ± 29.9 Na mg/L 329.3 ± 5.4 pH

  • 8.8 ± 0.098

Table 2-Composition of Urbana WWTP secondary effluent Parameters Unit Concentration COD mg/L 24 ± 0.075 TOC mg/L 7.2 ± 0.082 pH

  • 8.2 ± 0.06

WWTP secondary effluent Filtration concentrate

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Higher H2O2 dosage gave higher removal
  • Complete COD removal appeared in treating

secondary effluent but not TOC (dosage of 600 ppm H2O2 at 2 hours, COD removal was 100% and TOC removal was 29%)

  • The preliminary optimal dosage for AOP treating

NFC is [H2O2] = 1000 mg/L or [H2O2]/ [COD] =18.35 and the UV intensity is 9.07 kWh/m3, with COD and TOC removal of 63.89% and 38.54% respectively in 5 hours.

  • COD and TOC were not removed at the same rate

Results and COD/TOC ratio change

Resistance to dichromate oxidation increased

slide-7
SLIDE 7

AOP running in sequential batch mode

Removal efficiency 5 hours: COD- 45.92%±14.32% TOC- 32.67%±5.54% 24 hours: COD- 77%±10.9% TOC- 59.36%±7.9% Removal efficiency without UV malfunction 5 hours: COD- 53.04%±8.85% TOC- 35.48%±3.53% 24 hours: COD- 82.98%±7.94% TOC- 63.09%±5.19%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Post treatment- Biofilm reactor

  • Average TOC removal: 30.63%±9.13%
  • COD/TOC ratio increased and COD concentration

increased

  • Overall TOC removal: 78.65%
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Recent works- AOP CSTR

Average removal efficiency: COD- 76.46%±7.29%, TOC- 65.79%±5.27%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Recent works-HPLC analysis

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Recent works-Post treatment

Malfunction of MnO2 reactor Shock response

Average TOC removal: 35.88%±9.93%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Questions?

slide-13
SLIDE 13