advanced oxidation process treatment of membrane
play

Advanced oxidation process treatment of membrane filtration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Advanced oxidation process treatment of membrane filtration concentrate using hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet light Mengye Chen Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign GE Osmonics HL


  1. Advanced oxidation process treatment of membrane filtration concentrate using hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet light Mengye Chen Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

  2. GE Osmonics HL Aerobic Effluent Anaerobic Downflow Internal Concentrate Chamber Hanging Circulation Sponge CH 4 + CO 2 Reactor AOP Waste Sludge Organic Carbon Influent Project overview Membrane biological reactor, synthetic wastewater with ≈ 3300ppm of COD MFC: SMP, dead cells, biofilm, low biodegradability, high organic concentration

  3. Introducing ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESS

  4. Chemistry • One of the strongest oxidants in nature Non-selectively reacts with organic (Zeta potential: +2.33V) molecules • Break up cell membrane • Remove COD, TOC, color and odor

  5. Batch experiment WWTP secondary effluent Filtration concentrate Table 1- Composition of NFC Parameters Unit Concentration TSS mg/L 8.8 ± 0.96 VSS mg/L 5.1 ± 0.68 COD mg/L 46.0 ± 8.21 TOC mg/L 16.0 ± 4.03 Ca mg/L 40.1 ± 4.3 Mg mg/L 31.9 ± 0.7 K mg/L 572.2 ± 29.9 Na mg/L 329.3 ± 5.4 pH - 8.8 ± 0.098 Table 2-Composition of Urbana WWTP secondary effluent Parameters Unit Concentration COD mg/L 24 ± 0.075 TOC mg/L 7.2 ± 0.082 pH - 8.2 ± 0.06

  6. Results and COD/TOC ratio change • Higher H 2 O 2 dosage gave higher removal • Complete COD removal appeared in treating secondary effluent but not TOC (dosage of 600 ppm H 2 O 2 at 2 hours, COD removal was 100% and TOC removal was 29%) • The preliminary optimal dosage for AOP treating NFC is [H 2 O 2 ] = 1000 mg/L or [H 2 O 2 ]/ [COD] =18.35 and the UV intensity is 9.07 kWh/m 3 , with COD and TOC removal of 63.89% and 38.54% respectively in 5 hours. • COD and TOC were not removed at the same rate Resistance to dichromate oxidation increased

  7. AOP running in sequential batch mode Removal efficiency without UV malfunction 5 hours: COD- 53.04%±8.85% TOC- 35.48%±3.53% 24 hours: COD- 82.98%±7.94% TOC- 63.09%±5.19% Removal efficiency 5 hours: COD- 45.92%±14.32% TOC- 32.67%±5.54% 24 hours: COD- 77%±10.9% TOC- 59.36%±7.9%

  8. Post treatment- Biofilm reactor • Average TOC removal: 30.63%±9.13% • COD/TOC ratio increased and COD concentration increased • Overall TOC removal: 78.65%

  9. Recent works- AOP CSTR Average removal efficiency: COD- 76.46%±7.29%, TOC- 65.79%±5.27%

  10. Recent works-HPLC analysis

  11. Recent works-Post treatment Malfunction of MnO2 reactor Shock response Average TOC removal: 35.88%±9.93%

  12. Questions?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend