Access to Excess CAP Access to Excess CAP Water, 2010 & beyond - - PDF document
The following slides were presented as concepts for discussion on 2/24/09 Access to Excess CAP Access to Excess CAP Water, 2010 & beyond Water, 2010 & beyond Customer/Stakeholder Workshop Customer/Stakeholder Workshop February 24,
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop Customer/Stakeholder Workshop February 24, 2009 February 24, 2009
The following slides were presented as concepts for discussion on 2/24/09
AZ Colorado River Entitlement
CAP Annual Entitlement
CAP Delivery Supply
M&I Subcontract water (2009 orders)
Indian Subcontract water (2009 orders)
Ag Subcontract water (2009 orders)
Excess Supply
(2009)
Excess Supply (2009)
Remaining Excess Pool (2009)
Excess water orders (2009):
Full Cost Excess
61,000 AF
Incentive Water
345,000 AF
AWBA/CAGRD RR
196,000 AF
Total
602,000 AF
Excess Pool Deficit
The following slides were presented as concepts for discussion on 2/24/09
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
500,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,500,000 1,750,000 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 2042 2044 2046 2048 2050 2052 2054 2056 2058
Acre-Feet
Excess; Other Excess; Ag Pool NIA; M&I M&I Indian; Lease P3; Exchange NIA; Indian Indian; On‐Res
Indian Uses M&I Uses Ag Pool Other Excess
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
(Excluding Ag Settlement Pool) (Excluding Ag Settlement Pool)
200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 2042 2044 2046 2048 2050 2052 2054 2056 2058 Acre-Feet Excess; Other Water Orders (excluding AWBA & GRD RR)
The following slides were presented as concepts for discussion on 2/24/09
The following slides were presented as concepts for discussion on 2/24/09
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
For analytical purposes,
Assume there is a defined block of Excess CAP water available to
entities other than the AWBA & CAGRD RR
Assume that the demand for that block of water is substantially larger
than the supply
Policy question: “Who should have access to that water?”
The following slides were presented as concepts for discussion on 2/24/09
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
Factors under consideration by CAP staff for access to the
“Other” pool
Who ordered the water? How does order relate to past? Where will the water be used? When will the water be used? What other policies will be advanced?
For each factor, consider the question “Does it matter….”
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
Excess Orders Placed for 2009
(Percent by Volume; excluding AWBA & Ag Pool) CAGRD 10% Indus 28% SRP 6% Muni 43% Remarket 12% Other 1%
The following slides were presented as concepts for discussion on 2/24/09
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
Existing customer
Order “consistent” with past Order “inconsistent” with past
New customer
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
Within CAP’s Service Area
Differentiated by AMA/County Not differentiated by AMA/County
Outside CAP’s Service Area
Phoenix AMA Pinal AMA Tucson AMA
32k 1 k 7k 1k 52k 99k 33k 24k 36k 4k 26k 63k 7k 55k 53k Vidler TDRP Tonopah ID AFRP; HMRP SRP; SWC RWCD NMIDD QCID GRIIDD (PHX) MSIDD CAIDD; HIDD GRIIDD (PIN) Kai LSCRP; AVRP CMID; BKW CAVSRP SAVSRP PMRRP 63kGSFs USFs Direct
Incentive Recharge, AWBA and CAGRD RR Orders
The following slides were presented as concepts for discussion on 2/24/09
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
Now, by customer
Direct delivery Treatment plant, supplemental Ag, turf, etc. Annual storage & recovery; Replenishment USF or GSF Within or outside the Area of Impact
Now, by partner; Later, by customer
Long-term storage credits @ GSF
Later, by customer
Long-term storage credits @ USF
No credit earned Long-term storage credit earned
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
Water management benefit
AMA management goals CAP’s public policy purposes
Credit recovery targets Local/regional economic benefit Support for agriculture Support for municipal water providers
Reduction in CAGRD obligation Self-firming
The following slides were presented as concepts for discussion on 2/24/09
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
How… Existing New
Consistent Inconsistent
Where… Inside Outside
Phoenix AMA Pinal AMA Tucson AMA
When… Now/Now Now/Later Later/Later Who… Muni CAGRD
Subcontractor CAGRD
Remarket Industrial
Non-CAGRD Mines Power Turf Other
SRP What… Water Mgmt. Recovery Ag support Muni support
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
How involved should CAP be in customers’ business? Should the size of individual orders be limited? What role should rates play? How should pool access be set?
Implementation must include mechanisms to discourage ‘gaming’ but also be manageable
The following slides were presented as concepts for discussion on 2/24/09
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
9
Fake example #1: Single pool, with access based on
scoring
Highest score: Muni provider, inside CAP service area, reducing
CAGRD reliance through direct delivery
Lowest score: Speculator, with no previous history, earning long-term
storage credits outside of CAP service area
8 3 7 2 1 6 5 4
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
Fake example #2: Three pools, with separate eligibility
requirements
Pool A: Muni providers and CAGRD Pool B: Industrial users storing at GSFs Pool C: Unrestricted
The following slides were presented as concepts for discussion on 2/24/09
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
Fake example #2: Three pools, with separate eligibility
requirements
Pool A: Muni providers and CAGRD Pool B: Industrial users storing at GSFs Pool C: Unrestricted
Bottom Line: Many decisions will be required to design an effective program
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
The following slides were presented as concepts for discussion on 2/24/09
Customer/Stakeholder Workshop, February 24, 2009
AWBA meeting on April 1st
Agenda item or back-to-back
Recommendation to Board on Incentive Recharge
Program
Develop alternatives for “Other” access
Timing Considerations:
CAP’s planning Rates
Send comments & questions to Ken Seasholes (kseasholes@cap-az.com)
The following slides were presented as concepts for discussion on 2/24/09