A CAPABILITY MODEL FOR LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT LCM2007: From analysis to implementation Zurich, August 27-29, 2007
- T. Swarr, United Technologies Corp.
- J. Fava, Five Winds International
A CAPABILITY MODEL FOR LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT LCM2007: From analysis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
A CAPABILITY MODEL FOR LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT LCM2007: From analysis to implementation Zurich, August 27-29, 2007 T. Swarr, United Technologies Corp. J. Fava, Five Winds International CONFLICTING GOALS Internal decision- making and learning
1
2
3
4
Description Span of control Metrics Decisions Core Competencies
1 Ad hoc Chaotic, success depends on heroic effort of individual Individual Compliance, waste, inci- dents Individual agenda Root cause Aspects & impacts 2 Managed Requirements man- aged, measured and repeatable results on project basis Project Process in- puts/ outputs Team- based, visible trade-
Risk mgmt 3 Defined Standard processes, consistent across
process & work prod- ucts Organization Gate- to- gate, use phase, regional or facility focus Rule- based, trade- offs to achieve org. goals EMS, LCA, eco- efficiency 4 Quantified Statistical process control, quantified
causes of variation corrected Value Chain Cradle – to- grave, value chain, global impacts Fact- based, anticipate en- terprise trade-
6 σ, SPC, LCIA, systems thinking 5 Optimizing Process improvement
revised to reflect changing business
innovative workforce Society Sustainability measures, externalities Value- based, co- evolution
within socio- economic con- text Dynamic modeling & simulation, eco- system valuation, innovation
5
PLANNING DEFINITION VALIDATION DELIVERY SUPPORT
6
7
Microtecnica, 2002 June p. 22
Performance to customer spec weight cost producibility (incl. Worker safety) reliable repairable schedule maintainable cost of ownership (fuel consumption) Environmentally Friendly (noise & haz mat) Product Safety SUM OF SCORES
A B C D E F G H I J K A a a a a a a a a a k A = 10 B c b e b g b b b k B = 6 C d e c g c c c k C = 6 D d d d d d d k D = 8 E e e e e E k E = 8 F g h i f k F = 2 G g g g k G = 7 H i h k K = 3 I I k I = 4 J k J = 1 The selection or prioritization of ultimately best suited solutions depends K K = 11
L = 1 M = 1 Method to use the "Selection Criteria" Table: N = 1
O = 1 criteria, then erase those values you will not use P = 1
Q = 1 For instance if A is nore important then B then on cell C7 enter the value A R = 1 Like wise if for instance H is more important then let's say F then enter H in cell I12. S = 1 T = 1 The sum of scores on the right are the weight of each criteria U = 1
Ranking of idea selection criteria
8
Disassembly Rating Table
Joining Aspects
Joining Configuration Visible Covered Hidden Disconnected nondestructively Partial destruction Disconnected only by part destruction Joining Score 1 2 3 Axial dismantling direction Axial accessible direction Radial or difficult direction 1 2 3 1 2 3 One or few joinings Low number of joinings High number of joinings 1 2 3 Joining elements standardized Standardized within type of joining Not (or almost not ) standardized 1 2 3 No fastener, pressure fit, snap fit Clips, screw, bolts, etc. Rivets, welding, soldering, adhesives 1 2 3
Total Score (Lower score is better) + + =
5 10 15 20 25
Hazardous Materials Index 8D 4168 6124 Legacy Military F135 STOVL*
Solvents Pb HF CN Cr+6 Cd
9
10
11