6:40 8:00 : Open House 1 Update of King County Communities FEMA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

6 40 8 00 open house
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

6:40 8:00 : Open House 1 Update of King County Communities FEMA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

6:00 : Doors Open 6:10 : Presentation 6:40 8:00 : Open House 1 Update of King County Communities FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Open House March 21, 2018 2 Agenda Background of the National Flood Insurance Program


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

▸6:00 : Doors Open ▸6:10 : Presentation ▸6:40–8:00 : Open House

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Update of King County Communities’ FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map

Open House

March 21, 2018

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Agenda

  • Background of the National Flood Insurance Program
  • Flood Study Map Update
  • Process and Schedule
  • Open House Layout
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

King County Communities

Background of the National Flood Insurance Program

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Purpose of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

The NFIP is a Federal program enabling property owners in

participating communities to purchase insurance as a protection against flood losses in exchange for State and community floodplain management regulations that reduce future flood damages.

...If a community adopts and enforces a floodplain

management ordinance to reduce future flood risk to new construction in floodplains, the Federal Government will make flood

insurance available within the community as a financial protection against flood losses. Program started in 1968.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Purpose of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Basis for Floodplain Mapping

1% Annual Chance Flood (“100-year”) Standard

1,125,000 Miles of River are mapped for the NFIP – on average 11,250 miles of river are seeing the 1% flood or greater every year. 42,500 Miles of Coastline are mapped – on average 425 miles of coastline are seeing the 1% flood or greater every year.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Purpose of the National Flood Insurance Program

Reduce duce economic

  • nomic loss

ss cause sed d by flood

  • od events

ents

  • Between 1980 and 2013, the

United States suffered more than $260 billion in flood- related damages.

  • Flooding accounts for

approximately 85% of all disaster declarations.

  • On average, more people die

annually from flooding than any other natural hazard. Graphs from http://www.nws.noaa.gov/hic/ With adjustment for katrina

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Purpose of the National Flood Insurance Program

Reduce uce economic

  • mic loss

ss caused d by flood d events ts

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

King County Flood Insurance Claims 1977-Present

Community Claims Paid Building Contents Total Auburn 6 44,223.24 $

  • $

44,223.24 $ Bellevue 35 642,502.31 $ 119,102.93 $ 761,605.24 $ Burien 10 75,323.02 $ 8,730.57 $ 84,053.59 $ Carnation 21 634,440.21 $ 122,206.47 $ 786,646.68 $ Des Moines 5 216,514.76 $ 4,237.18 $ 220,751.94 $ Duvall 4 136,708.84 $ 9,802.75 $ 146,511.59 $ Enumclaw 3 56,801.50 $ 12,699.15 $ 69,500.65 $ Federal Way 3 17,532.90 $ 2,132.60 $ 19,665.50 $ Issaquah 125 3,089,181.06 $ 892,651.36 $ 3,981,832.42 $ Kenmore 1 14,697.30 $

  • $

14,697.30 $ Kent 15 148,628.44 $ 1,205.06 $ 149,833.50 $ Unincorporated King County 1000 18,654,592.46 $ 3,045,796.34 $ 21,818,494.17 $ Kirkland 4 40,083.87 $ 4,434.97 $ 44,518.84 $ Lake Forest Park 1 1,886.44 $

  • $

1,886.44 $ Mercer Island 2 20,830.35 $

  • $

20,830.35 $ Milton 4 70,379.73 $

  • $

70,379.73 $ Normandy Park 3 13,978.43 $

  • $

13,978.43 $ North Bend 61 826,087.52 $ 159,679.81 $ 985,767.33 $ Pacific 35 579,145.56 $ 19,864.30 $ 599,009.86 $ Redmond 5 22,290.75 $

  • $

22,290.75 $ Renton 10 71,134.89 $ 13,840.03 $ 84,974.92 $ Sammamish 2 41,996.22 $

  • $

41,996.22 $ SeaTac 1 1,319.24 $

  • $

1,319.24 $ Seattle 122 1,692,480.66 $ 358,460.87 $ 2,050,941.53 $ Shoreline 1 4,021.74 $

  • $

4,021.74 $ Skykomish 23 362,992.17 $ 11,247.47 $ 374,239.64 $ Snoqualmie 872 15,570,635.09 $ 2,300,850.94 $ 18,114,839.26 $ Tukwila 1 1,309.89 $

  • $

1,309.89 $ Total 2375 43,051,718.59 $ 7,086,942.80 $ 50,530,119.99 $

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Flood Definition

From FloodSmart.com: A flood is a general and temporary condition where two or more acres of normally dry land or two or more properties are inundated by water or mudflow.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Mandatory Purchase Requirement

Two federal statutes mandate purchase of flood insurance

  • The Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973
  • The National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994

▸Applies to properties in the 1% Chance Floodplain

  • Insurance is a prerequisite to receive a loan from Federally regulated and insured

lenders.

  • The requirement is triggered when a loan is:
  • Made
  • Increased
  • Renewed
  • Extended
  • The insurance must be in effect for the life of the loan.
  • Monetary penalties on lenders for non-compliance, requires escrow accounts for
  • ther insurance purposes, and requires that lenders review flood maps and map

changes.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

How the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Works

Three disciplines of the NFIP:

  • Mapp

pping ng – Fl Floo

  • od

d Studi dies

  • Regulations

lations

  • Ins

nsuran rance ce

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

King County Communities

Review of the Flood Study Map Update

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

▸ New maps are digital county-wide ▸ Follows a USGS Quad layout – countywide coverage with no city “cut-outs” ▸ Re-delineation of flooding sources where better topography was available ▸ Vertical Datum change (NGVD 1929 to NAVD 1988)

Map Modernization Process

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

What’s new

Vertical tical Da Datum tum Chang ange

▸ NGVD 29

  • Based on a mean sea level from 21 tidal stations in the US & 5

stations in Canada ▸ NAVD 88

  • Based on the density of the Earth instead of varying values of sea

heights

  • More accurate

▸ Conver

versio sion n for King Count nty y Varies ies

  • NGVD + (vertical adjustment’) = NAVD
  • Conversion factor for County for FIS ranges from 3.5 to 4.1 feet
slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps

Vertical Datum and FIRMs (e.g. uses 3.8’ conversion)

NGVD D 29 NA NAVD VD 88 BFE E = 5 5.8 ft BFE E = 2 2 ft ft

15 15 5 10 10 15 15 10 10 5

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

King County DFIRM Timeline

  • Scoping Meeting – July 27, 2005

Discuss proposed scope of work, identify available data and update needs, 25 Attendees

  • Levee Certification Documentation Needs Identified – April 2006
  • Preliminary Map Release – September 2007
  • King County Appeal – February 2008
  • Revised Preliminary Map Release – November 8, 2010
  • FEMA Letter to Senators on Levee Policy– March 2011

Hi History

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

King County DFIRM Study Timeline

Hi History y

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Seclusion (2017) Seclusion and appealable areas 38 map panels

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Riverine Floodplain and Floodway Definitions

100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN

SURCHARGE

FLOODWAY

FLOODWAY FRINGE

FLOODWAY + FLOODWAY FRINGE = 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN SURCHARGE NOT TO EXCEED 1.0 FEET

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Survey Collection

  • Collected by Minister Glaeser

Surveying in 2006

  • 42 bridges
  • 282 cross sections
  • 40.5 miles of stream

LiDAR Survey

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Hydrologic Methods

0.1 0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 95.0 98.0 99.0

EXCEEDANCE FREQUENCY IN PERCENT

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10,000 100,000 1,000,000

DISCHARGE (cfs)

0.2 LOG TRANSFORM SYSTEMATIC STATISTICS NUMBER OF EVENTS MEAN=
  • ST. DEV.=
COMPUTED SKEW= REGIONAL SKEW= ADOPTED SKEW= 4.9744 0.1744 0.6973 0.0000 0.5000 HISTORIC EVENTS= HIGH OUTLIERS= LOW OUTLIERS= ZERO OR MISSING= SYSTEMATIC EVENTS= HISTORIC RECORD= 4 52 99 YRS

SKAGIT RIVER NEAR CONCRETE USGS #12194000 UNREGULATED PEAK FLOWS DERIVED FROM PEAK VERSUS 1DAY REGRESSION CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SEATTLE DISTRICT 28 APR 1998 BASIN AREA= 2737 SQ MI WATER YEARS OF RECORD HISTORIC EVENTS= 1898, 1909, 1917, 1921 RECORDED EVENTS= 1925, 1944-1991, 1994-1996

CONSTRUCTED BY:

  • C. FITZGERALD, E.I.T.

APPROVED BY: ____________________________________ HEC-FFA COMPUTED CURVE EXPECTED PROBABILITY ADJUSTMENT 5% CONFIDENCE LIMITS 95% CONFIDENCE LIMITS MEDIAN PLOTTING POSITIONS

F l

  • w

Frequency

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Hydraulic Methods

Method Description Detailed (Zone AE)

  • Steady State HEC-RAS model
  • Roughness is examined closely (calibrated to gages)
  • High water mark data were collected by nhc and MGS for

the high flow events of January 7, 2006, November 11, 2006, and March 25, 2007

  • Floodway Analysis
slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Green River Scope of Work (2010)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Why Modify our Current Approach?

▸ Throughout Map Modernization,

stakeholders expressed concern on the “without-levee” procedures used to map non-accredited levees

▸ In February 2011, a group of U.S.

Representatives and Senators wrote to FEMA requesting a revision to the current practice of mapping levees and their associated flood risk.

▸ Stakeholders and Congress felt the

historical mapping approach did not reflect the hazard reduction that some non-accredited levees may still afford.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Levee Policy Process

▸ Th

The e King County ty Fl Flood d Insur surance ance Stu tudy y has s bee een on ho hold as i s it t waits ts for r FEMA A to to f finalize alize a ne new appro roach ach in sh showin ing g floodp

  • odplains

lains on th the landwa ward rd si side of leve vees es th that t are re not t accre redit ited ed to to pr prote tect t against nst th the e 1% f flood.

  • od.
slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Seclusion criteria

▸ The

e le leve vee e has s not t be been n sh show

  • wn

n to to meet et 44 CFR R 65.10

▸ The

e leve vee e is h s hydrau draulicall ically y si signifi nificant cant du duri ring g th the e 1% fl flood,

  • d,

▸ The

e leve vee e has s an owner, er,

▸ The

e leve vee e meets ets th the e de definition nition of a leve vee e as s sp spelled led out t in 44 CFR R 59, and/ d/or,

  • r,

▸ The

e flo lood

  • d hazards

ards at t th the e le levee ee we were re upd pdate ted d wi with th a new w analy alysis sis in in th the e Kin ing g County unty flood

  • d st

study dy effort forts. s.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Seclusion Mapping Process

Current Effective FIRM Depicted

Seclusion Boundary

St Study dy Findi inding ngs Depicted ed

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Preliminary Map Format

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

King County Communities

The Flood Mapping Process and Schedule

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

RiskMAP, the NFIP and Hazard Mitigation Planning

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

WA State Risk MAP Website

https://waecy.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=8451cb0db0c4461182e592eb5a43400a

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Timeline

Leve vee e Seclus usion n Meet eting ng fo for Commu muni nity ty St Staff

June 14, , 2016

CCO Meet eting ng

Nov

  • vembe

ber 20, , 2017

Preliminar minary y Maps s issued ed

Septembe ber 15, , 2017

Public c Open en Hous

  • use

e Meetin eting

March h 21, , 2018

Appeal eal Period

~Apri ril 17, , 2018

Effe fecti tive e Date

~Summ mmer r 2019 19

“Letter of Final Determination”

To communities and publishes the BFEs in the Federal Register Communities have 6 months to adopt the study before the data becomes “effective”. Failure to adopt results in suspension from NFIP

End of Appeal eal Period

~July y 15, , 2018

FEMA issues es LFD

~Winter r 2018/1 /19

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Input & Comments

▸ Private

vate lando ndowne wners rs submit bmit to their eir commu munity ity officials icials

▸ Commun

munity ity bundles dles all the comment ments s and nd forwards rds them m to FEM EMA A Regi gion

  • n 10 Servi

vice ce Cent nter

▸ Forms

ms will ll be available ilable at the e Op Open en House se

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Letters of Map Change (LOMC)

Lette ter r Of Of Map p Amendment endment (LOM OMA) A) – for property owners who

believe a property was incorrectly included in a floodplain, primarily through showing that the lowest elevation of the structure is above the 1% flood elevation.

(LOM OMA) A) Hotline line – 1-877 877-FE FEMA-MAP MAP Lette ter r Of Of Map p Revision vision (LOM OMR) R) – for communities to submit

better technical information to change a floodplain or to reflect physical changes made to the floodplain.

LOMR

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

King County Communities

Open House Layout

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Information Tables

Proper perty y ID D & Di Digital ital Mappi pping ng

Receive a printed map

  • f your property and

understand the flood zone

Flood

  • d St

Study dy / Eng nginee ineerin ring

Understand the methodology and technical specifications of the maps

Flood

  • d Ins

nsuran urance ce

Learn about your insurance policy options and rates

St State e Table ble

Gain insights into state floodplain mapping priorities

Commu munity ity Table ble

Ask about city/county floodplain regulations and hazard plans

Flood

  • dplain

lain Regul gulations tions

Gather information on specific building requirements / restrictions