3 7 2017
play

3/7/2017 Assistant to Chair 17 th Multidisciplinary Management of - PDF document

3/7/2017 Assistant to Chair 17 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case based Approach Leslie Oesterich, MD Fellow, UC Davis Breast Tumor Board 2017 Panel Members Richard Bold, MD surgical oncology, UC Davis Session Chair


  1. 3/7/2017 Assistant to Chair 17 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case ‐ based Approach Leslie Oesterich, MD – Fellow, UC Davis Breast Tumor Board 2017 Panel Members Richard Bold, MD – surgical oncology, UC Davis Session Chair Cheryl Ewing, MD – surgical oncology, UC San Francisco Kate Horst, MD – radiation oncology, Stanford Helen K. Chew, MD, FACP Hope Rugo, MD – medical oncology, UC San Francisco Professor of Medicine George Sledge, MD – medical oncology, Stanford UC Davis Melinda Telli, MD – medical oncology, Stanford Amanda Wheeler, MD – surgical oncology, Stanford Case 1 Case 1 • A healthy 28 y/o woman presents with a palpable left breast • Core biopsy of the left breast reveals a high ‐ grade infiltrating mass. ductal carcinoma. There is no staining for estrogen or • A diagnostic mammogram reveals a 1.4 cm lobulated, progesterone receptors. There is no staining for HER ‐ 2 and irregular mass with pleomorphic calcifications, no amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). corresponding to the palbable mass. The Ki ‐ 67 index was 90%. • Ultrasound confirms the breast mass and reveals a 1.8 cm suspicious left axillary lymph node. • Fine needle aspiration of the axillary lymph node confirms metastatic carcinoma. 1

  2. 3/7/2017 Case 1 1.1 1.1 As As a ne next step step yo you re reco comme mmend • She has a clinical stage II, T1C N1, high grade, triple negative 1. Lumpectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy breast cancer. 2. Lumpectomy and axillary lymph node dissection • A urine test the same day confirms a 6 week 4 day desired 3. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy pregnancy. No surgery or systemic therapy until she’s in the 2 nd trimester of 4. pregnancy 5. Termination of the pregnancy, followed by chemotherapy and surgery 1.2 1.2 Wh What st staging aging st studies udies wo would yo you Case 1 re recomme commend? • The patient undergoes a lumpectomy and axillary lymph node dissection at 12 weeks of pregnancy. 1. CT chest, abdomen and pelvis and bone scan • Pathology reveals a 2.1 cm high grade, infiltrating ductal 2. PET/CT carcinoma with lymphovascular space invasion and accompanying high ‐ grade ductal carcinoma in situ of 9 mm. 3. Chest X ‐ ray with abdominal shielding and abdominal All margins of resection are negative. One of 11 lymph nodes ultrasound is positive for metastatic disease. • She has a pathological stage IIB, T2 N1, triple negative breast 4. None cancer. 2

  3. 3/7/2017 1.3 1.3 Whi Which adju adjuvant che chemotherapy do do yo you Case 1 re recomme commend no now? 1. Standard doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (A/C)  weekly • Chest X ‐ ray and abdominal ultrasound are unremarkable. paclitaxel (T) • Family history is significant for a paternal aunt and 2. Dose dense A/C  T grandmother with breast cancers in their 40’s and 50’s, 3. Dose dense A/C  T + carboplatin respectively. 4. Standard A/C  delivery then T • She is found to carry a BRCA1 mutation. 5. Standard A/C  delivery then T + carboplatin Breast cancer during pregnancy Breast cancer during pregnancy • Staging studies should minimize radiation to the fetus (CXR, • Anthracycline ‐ based chemotherapy can be given after 1 st mammogram with shielding, ultrasound). trimester. • Surgery is safe at any time but less risk of miscarriage after • No data on dose ‐ dense schedule, although growth factors 1 st trimester. are safe during pregnancy. • Radiation therapy should be deferred until after delivery. • Very limited data on the taxanes. ESMO Guidelines Working Group ESMO Guidelines Working Group Annals of Oncology 2013 Annals of Oncology 2013 3

  4. 3/7/2017 (Neo)Adjuvant therapy for TNBC Case 1 CALGB 40603 • She receives 4 cycles of standard A/C starting at 15 weeks gestation. • She delivers a healthy boy at 34 weeks. • She receives weekly paclitaxel and q 3 week carboplatin at AUC 5. Her course is complicated by neutropenic fevers, requiring growth factors and dose reduction of carboplatin to AUC 4 with C3. Sikov, et al, JCO 2015 1.4 1.4 Re Rega gard rding her her BRCA1 mut mutatio tion, wha what ar are Case 1 yo your ur furth further recommend ndations? ns? • CT chest, abdomen and pelvis and bone scan after delivery 1. Bilateral mastectomies reveal no metastases. 2. Annual mammogram and MRI breast screening 4

  5. 3/7/2017 1.5 1.5 Re Rega gard rding her her BRCA1 mut mutatio tion, wha what ar are Case 1 yo your ur furth further recommend ndations? ns? • At the completion of chemotherapy, she undergoes bilateral skin ‐ sparing mastectomies. Pathology reveals no malignancy. 1. Bilateral salpingo ‐ oophorectomies • She is undergoing q 6 month pelvic ultrasound and CA ‐ 125 levels 2. Pelvic ultrasound and CA ‐ 125 levels every 6 months 1.6 1.6 Do Do yo you re reco comme mmend pos post ‐ ma mastecto tomy XR XRT? Case 1: Take Home Points • Local and systemic treatment options for breast cancer in 1. Yes pregnancy 2. No • Adjuvant chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancer • Genetic counseling for triple negative breast cancer (diagnosed < age 60) 5

  6. 3/7/2017 End of Case 1 Case 2 • A 68 y/o woman presents with a right breast mass. • On exam, she has a palpable, mobile mass encompassing her entire right breast with peau d’orange and palpable right axillary adenopathy. • A biopsy reveals a low grade infiltrating ductal carcinoma. There is no staining for estrogen or progesterone receptors. HER2 is amplified. Case 2 Case 2 • Imaging reveals 2 hypodense, ill ‐ defined lesions in the liver. • She has a history of coronary artery disease, s/p stent The largest measures 1.6 cm. placement; hypertension; and hyperlipidemia on medical management. • Image ‐ guided fine needle aspiration of the larger liver lesion confirms metastatic carcinoma, hormone receptor negative • Echocardiogram shows normal LV wall motion and LVEF of and HER2 amplified. 70%. • She has a stage IV, T4d N1 M1, breast cancer. 6

  7. 3/7/2017 2.1 2.1 As As a ne next step step yo you recommend ndation? n? Case 2 • She receives 6 cycles of weekly paclitaxel and trastuzumab, 1. Taxane + trastuzumab and pertuzumab which she tolerates well. 2. Docetaxel, carboplatin + trastuzumab and pertuzumab • She has a dramatic response in her breast and after 4 cycles, her liver lesions cannot be detected by imaging. 3. Doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide  taxane + trastuzumab and pertuzumab 4. Taxane chemotherapy without HER ‐ 2 directed antibodies? 2.2 2.2 As As a ne next step step yo you re reco comme mmend 2.3 Wh 2.3 What lo local ther therapy do do yo you recom commend? end? 1. Right mastectomy 1. Continued paclitaxel and trastuzumab until disease progression 2. Right mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection 2. Continued trastuzumab alone until disease progression 3. Right mastectomy and chest wall/regional radiation 4. Right mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, and chest wall/regional radiation 7

  8. 3/7/2017 Case 2 Case 2 • After 6 cycles, the patient is treated with trastuzumab alone. • She continues on single agent trastuzumab and remains without radiographic evidence of disease. • She undergoes right mastectomy and ALND. • Regular echocardiograms reveal no decrease in LVEF. • Pathology reveals no residual disease in the breast and 2/11 axillary nodes contain metastatic disease. • Although she is tolerating trastuzumab, after 3 years, she • She receives right chest wall and supraclavicular field asks to go off therapy. irradiation. 2.4 As As a ne next ste step yo you re reco comme mmend Case 2 • The patient remains on trastuzumab, but self discontinues 1. Continue trastuzumab, as she is without measurable disease nearly 4 years since diagnosis. after 4 and ½ years of single agent therapy. • She remains without evidence of disease more than 3 years 2. Provide a treatment holiday with serial imaging. Restart trastuzumab if recurrent/progressive disease. later. 8

  9. 3/7/2017 Case 2: Take Home Points End of Case 2 • Treatment options for metastatic, HER2 positive breast cancer • Management of long ‐ term survivors with HER2 positive metastatic disease Case 3 Case 3 • Left breast ultrasound is unremarkable. • A 39 y/o healthy woman presents with a left breast mass. • Diagnostic mammogram reveals a large, asymmetric density • Exam reveals a large left breast mass and skin thickening, in the left breast, confirmed by magnification views. and left axillary adenopathy. • Stereotactic biopsy reveals a grade 2 infiltrating ductal • Family history reveals no breast or ovarian cancer. Father had carcinoma with associated grade 2 ductal carcinoma in situ. colon cancer and melanoma. Invasive cancer stains 99% for ER, 0% for PgR. Her2 is negative by IHC at 1+ staining and non ‐ amplified. 9

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend