15 441 641 wireless networks
play

15-441/641: Wireless Networks Application Presentation ISO 15-441 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

4/28/2019 Standardization Local Area Networks Wireless networks are standardized by IEEE Under 802 LAN MAN standards committee 15-441/641: Wireless Networks Application Presentation ISO 15-441 Spring 2019 Session IEEE 802 OSI Profs


  1. 4/28/2019 Standardization Local Area Networks • Wireless networks are standardized by IEEE • Under 802 LAN MAN standards committee 15-441/641: Wireless Networks Application Presentation ISO 15-441 Spring 2019 Session IEEE 802 OSI Profs Peter Steenkiste & Justine Sherry Transport standards 7-layer model Network Logical Link Control Data Link Medium Access (MAC) Spring 2019 Physical (PHY) https://computer-networks.github.io/sp19/ Physical • 802.1 Overview Document Containing the Reference Model, Tutorial, and Glossary 802.1 b Specification for LAN Traffic Prioritization • “Ethernet” 802.1 q Virtual Bridged LANs • The 802 Class of Standards • 802.2 Logical Link Control 802.3 Contention Bus Standard 1 Obase 5 (Thick Net) • • 802.3a Contention Bus Standard 10base 2 (Thin Net) 802.3b Broadband Contention Bus Standard 10broad 36 • 802.3d Fiber-Optic InterRepeater Link (FOIRL) • 802.3e Contention Bus Standard 1 base 5 (Starlan) • • List on next slide 802.3i Twisted-Pair Standard 10base T • • 802.3j Contention Bus Standard for Fiber Optics 10base F • Some standards apply to all 802 technologies • 802.3u 100-Mb/s Contention Bus Standard 100base T 802.3x Full-Duplex Ethernet • • E.g. 802.2 is LLC 802.3z Gigabit Ethernet • 802.3ab Gigabit Ethernet over Category 5 UTP • 802.4 Token Bus Standard • • Important for inter operability 802.5 Token Ring Standard • • 802.5b Token Ring Standard 4 Mb/s over Unshielded Twisted-Pair • Some standards are for technologies that are outdated • 802.5f Token Ring Standard 16-Mb/s Operation • 802.6 Metropolitan Area Network DQDB WiFi Family • Not actively deployed anymore 802.7 Broadband LAN Recommended Practices • 802.8 Fiber-Optic Contention Network Practices • 802.9a Integrated Voice and Data LAN • E.g. 802.6 • 802.10 Interoperable LAN Security • Bluetooth, Zigbee, .. • 802.11 Wireless LAN Standard 802.12 Contention Bus Standard 1 OOVG AnyLAN • • 802.15 Wireless Personal Area Network 802.16 Wireless MAN Standard • 1

  2. 4/28/2019 Overview Wireless Communication • Link layer challenges and WiFi • Wireless communication is based on E • WiFi broadcast C • Basic WiFi design • A, B, and C can all hear each A other’s signal • Some deployment issues B • Looks like Ethernet! D • WiFi version • Why not use CSMA/CD? • Cellular • Carrier-sense Multiple Access / Collision Detection A B C D E • Well, it is not that easy 5 What is the Problem? Implications for Wireless Ethernet There are no Wires! • Collision detection is not practical • Attenuation is very high! • Ratio of transmitted signal power to received power is way too A B C D E high at the transmitter • Signal is not contained in a wire • Attenuation is 1/D 2 for distance D • Transmitter cannot detect colliding transmissions (deaf while transmitting) • In addition, there is significant noise and • So how do you detect collisions? interference A B C D E • Not all nodes can hear each other • No wire to protect the signal • “Listen before you talk” often fails • Much higher error rates • Hidden and exposed terminals • Not all nodes in the wireless network can hear each other • Made worse by fading • Wireless communication range is shorter • Changes over time! • Standard cannot limit the length of the wires 7 2

  3. 4/28/2019 Exposed Terminal Problem Hidden Terminal Problem S1 R1 RTS CTS CTS S1 R1 S2 S2 R2 Lack signal between S1 and S2 and cause collision at R1 • Carrier sense prevents two senders from sending simultaneously although they • do not reach each other’s receiver Severity of the problem depends on the sensitivity of the • carrier sense mechanism Severity again depends on CCA threshold • R2 Higher CCA reduces occurrence of exposed terminals, but can create hidden terminal • Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) threshold • scenarios Spectrum Allocation in US History Aloha wireless data network • Car phones • Big and heavy “portable” phones • Limited battery life time • But introduced people to “mobile networking” • Later turned into truly portable cell phones • Wireless LANs • Originally in the 900 MHz band • Later evolved into the 802.11 standard • Later joined by the 802.15 and 802.16 standards • Cellular data networking • Data networking over the cell phone • Many standards – throughput is the challenge • 12 3

  4. 4/28/2019 Some IEEE 802.11 Standards Spectrum Use Comments IEEE 802.11a • PHY Standard : 8 channels : up to 54 Mbps : some deployment • IEEE 802.11b • • Each country is in charge of spectrum allocation and use PHY Standard : 3 channels : up to 11 Mbps : widely deployed. • • IEEE 802.11d internally • MAC Standard : support for multiple regulatory domains (countries) • IEEE 802.11e • Federal Communication Commission (FCC) and National • MAC Standard : QoS support : supported by many vendors • IEEE 802.11f Telecommunication and Information Administration in the US • Inter-Access Point Protocol : deployed IEEE 802.11g • • Spectrum allocation differs quite a bit – implications for mobile users? PHY Standard: 3 channels : OFDM and PBCC : widely deployed (as b/g) • IEEE 802.11h • Suppl. MAC Standard: spectrum managed 802.11a (TPC, DFS): standard • • Broadly speaking two types of spectrum IEEE 802.11i • Suppl. MAC Standard: Alternative WEP : standard • • Licensed spectrum: allocated to licensed user(s) IEEE 802.11n • MAC Standard: MIMO : significant improvements in throughput • • IEEE 802.11ac • Unlicensed spectrum: no license needed but device must respect rules Support for multi-user MIMO • • IEEE 802.11ad WiFi in the 60 GHz band • 13 IEEE 802.11 Overview Frequency Bands Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) bands • • Adopted in 1997 with goal of providing Generally called “unlicensed” bands • • Giving wireless users access to services in wired networks Short Wave Radio FM Broadcast Infrared wireless LAN AM Broadcast Television • High throughput and reliability Cellular (840MHz) NPCS (1.9GHz) • Continuous network connection, e.g. while mobile Medium High Very Super Millimeter Infrared Visible Ultra- Ultra • The protocol defines Low violet X-Rays High High wave Light 60 GHz High IEEE 802.11ad • MAC sublayer • MAC management protocols and services • Several physical layers: IR, FHSS, DSSS, OFDM 902 - 928 MHz 2.4 - 2.4835 GHz 5 GHz 26 MHz 83.5 MHz IEEE 802.11a • Wi-Fi Alliance is industry group that certifies (IEEE 802.11b and later interoperability of 802.11 products and later) 4

  5. 4/28/2019 Infrastructure and Ad Hoc Mode Features of 802.11 MAC protocol • Infrastructure mode: stations communicate with one or more access points which are connected to the wired infrastructure • Supports MAC functionality What is deployed in practice • Addressing – based on 48-bit IEEE addresses • • Two modes of operation: Our Focus CSMA/CA • Distributed Control Functions - DCF • • Error detection (checksum) Point Control Functions – PCF • • Error correction (ACK frame) PCF is rarely used - inefficient • • Alternative is “ad hoc” mode: multi-hop, assumes no • Flow control: stop-and-wait infrastructure • Fragmentation (More Frag) Rarely used, e.g. military • • Collision Avoidance (RTS-CTS) Hot research topic! • 802.11: Infrastructure Mode Wireless Collision Avoidance • Station (STA) 802.11 LAN 802.x LAN Problem: two nodes, hidden from each other, transmit complete frames to • terminal with access mechanisms to the wireless • base station medium and radio contact to the access point Collision detection not reliable: “listen before talking” canfail STA 1 • • Access Point BSS 1 Solution: rely on ACKs instead to detect packet loss Portal • station integrated into the wireless LAN and the Access • Point Collisions waste bandwidth for long duration ! distribution system • Distribution System • Basic Service Set (BSS) Plus also exponential back off before retransmissions – collisions are expensive! • Access group of stations using the same AP Solution: “CA” using small reservation packets • • ESS Point • Portal Nodes track reservation interval with internal “network allocation vector” (NAV) • BSS 2 bridge to other (wired) networks • This is called “virtual carrier sense” • • Distribution System Note that nodes still do “physical” carrier sense • interconnection network to form one logical • “Listen before you talk” often works and is cheap • network (ESS: Extended Service Set) STA 2 STA 3 802.11 LAN based on several BSS 20 5

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend