- X. Creative Set
X. Creative Set Yuxi Fu BASICS, Shanghai Jiao Tong University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
X. Creative Set Yuxi Fu BASICS, Shanghai Jiao Tong University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
X. Creative Set Yuxi Fu BASICS, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Quotation from Post The terminology creative set was introduced by E. Post in Recursively Enumerable Sets of Positive Integers and their Decision Problems. Bulletin of American
Quotation from Post
The terminology ‘creative set’ was introduced by E. Post in Recursively Enumerable Sets of Positive Integers and their Decision
- Problems. Bulletin of American Mathematical Society, 1944.
“. . . every symbolic logic is incomplete and extensible relative to the class of propositions”. “The conclusion is inescapable that even for such fixed, well-defined body of mathematical propositions, mathematical thinking is, and must remain, essentially creative.”
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
1 / 30
What are the Most Difficult Semi-Decidable Problems?
We know that K is the most difficult semi-decidable problem. What is then the m-degree dm(K)? What is an r.e. set C s.t. A ≤m C for every r.e. set A?
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
2 / 30
What are the Most Difficult Semi-Decidable Problems?
An r.e. set is very difficult if it is very non-recursive. An r.e. set is very non-recursive if its complement is very non-r.e.. A set is very non-r.e. if it is easy to distinguish it from any r.e. set. These sets are creative respectively productive.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
3 / 30
Synopsis
- 1. Productive Set
- 2. Creative Set
- 3. The Lattice of m-Degrees
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
4 / 30
- 1. Productive Set
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
5 / 30
Suppose Wx ⊆ K. Then x ∈ K \ Wx. So x witnesses the strict inclusion Wx K. In other words the identity function is an effective proof that K differs from every r.e. set.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
6 / 30
Productive Set
A set A is productive if there is a total computable function p such that whenever Wx ⊆ A, then p(x) ∈ A \ Wx. The function p is called a productive function for A. A productive set is not r.e. by definition.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
7 / 30
Example
- 1. K is productive.
- 2. {x | c /
∈ Wx} is productive.
- 3. {x | c /
∈ Ex} is productive.
- 4. {x | φx(x) = 0} is productive.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
8 / 30
Example
Suppose A = {x | φx(x) = 0}. By S-m-n Theorem one gets a primitive recursive function p(x) such that φp(x)(y) = 0 if and only if φx(y) is defined. Then p(x) ∈ Wx ⇔ p(x) / ∈ A. So if Wx ⊆ A we must have p(x) ∈ A \ Wx. Thus p is a productive function for A.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
9 / 30
Productive Set
- Lemma. If A ≤m B and A is productive, then B is productive.
Proof.
Suppose r : A ≤m B and p is a production function for A. By applying S-m-n Theorem to φx(r(y)), one gets a primitive recursive function k(x) such that Wk(x) = r−1(Wx). Then rpk is a production function for B.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
10 / 30
Productive Set
- Theorem. Suppose that B is a set of unary computable functions
with f∅ ∈ B and B = C1. Then B = {x | φx ∈ B} is productive.
Proof.
Suppose g / ∈ B. Consider the function f defined by f (x, y) ≃ g(y), if x ∈ Wx, ↑, if x / ∈ Wx. By S-m-n Theorem there is a primitive recursive function k(x) such that φk(x)(y) ≃ f (x, y). Clearly x / ∈ Wx iff φk(x) = f∅ iff φk(x) ∈ B iff k(x) ∈ B. Hence k : K ≤m B.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
11 / 30
Property of Productive Set
- Lemma. Suppose that g is a total computable function. Then
there is a primitive recursive function p such that for all x, Wp(x) = Wx ∪ {g(x)}.
Proof.
Using S-m-n Theorem, take p(x) to be a primitive recursive function such that φp(x)(y) ≃ 1, if y ∈ Wx ∨ y = g(x), ↑,
- therwise.
We are done.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
12 / 30
Property of Productive Set
- Theorem. A productive set contains an infinite r.e. subset.
Proof.
Suppose p is a production function for A. Take e0 to be some index for ∅. Then p(e0) ∈ A by definition. By the Lemma there is a primitive recursive function k such that for all x, Wk(x) = Wx ∪ {p(x)}. Apparently {e0, . . . , kn(e0), . . .} is r.e. Consequently {p(e0), . . . , p(kn(e0)), . . .} is a r.e. subset of A, which must be infinite by the definition of k.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
13 / 30
Productive Function via a Partial Function
- Proposition. A set A is productive iff there is a partial recursive
function p such that ∀x.(Wx ⊆ A ⇒ (p(x) ↓ ∧p(x) ∈ A \ Wx)). (1)
Proof.
Suppose p is a partial recursive function satisfying (1). Let s be a primitive recursive function such that φs(x)(y) ≃ y, p(x)↓ ∧ y ∈ Wx, ↑,
- therwise.
A productive function q can be defined by running p(x) and p(s(x)) in parallel and stops when either terminates.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
14 / 30
Productive Function Made Injective
- Proposition. A productive set has an injective productive function.
Proof.
Suppose p is a productive function of A. Let Wh(x) = Wx ∪ {p(x)}. Clearly Wx ⊆ A ⇒ Wh(x) ⊆ A. (2) Define q(0) = p(0).
◮ If p(x+1), ph(x+1), . . . , phx+1(x+1) are pairwise distinct, let
q(x+1) be the smallest one not in {q(0), . . . , q(x)}.
◮ Otherwise we can let q(x+1) be µy.y /
∈ {q(0), . . . , q(x)}. This is fine since Wx ⊆ A due to (2). It is easily seen that q is an injective production function for A.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
15 / 30
Myhill’s Characterization of Productive Set
- Theorem. (Myhill, 1955) A is productive iff K ≤1 A iff K ≤m A.
K ≤1 A implies K ≤m A, which in turn implies “A is productive”.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
16 / 30
Proof
Suppose p is a productive function for A. Define f (x, y, z) ≃ 0, if z = p(x) and y ∈ K, ↑,
- therwise.
By S-m-n Theorem there is an injective primitive recursive function s(x, y) such that φs(x,y)(z) ≃ f (x, y, z). By definition, Ws(x,y) = {p(x)}, if y ∈ K, ∅,
- therwise.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
17 / 30
Proof
By Recursion Theorem there is an injective primitive recursive function n(y) such that Ws(n(y),y) = Wn(y) for all y. So Wn(y) = {p(n(y))}, if y ∈ K, ∅,
- therwise.
We claim that K ≤m A. y ∈ K ⇒ Wn(y) = {p(n(y))} ⇒ p(n(y)) / ∈ A. y / ∈ K ⇒ Wn(y) = ∅ ⇒ p(n(y)) ∈ A. By the previous theorem we may assume that p is injective. So the reduction function p(n( )) is injective. Conclude K ≤1 A.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
18 / 30
- 2. Creative Set
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
19 / 30
Creative Set
A set A is creative if it is r.e. and its complement A is productive. Intuitively a creative set A is effectively non-recursive in the sense that the non-recursiveness of A, hence the non-recursiveness of A, can be effectively demonstrated.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
20 / 30
Creative Set
- 1. K is creative.
- 2. {x | c ∈ Wx} is creative.
- 3. {x | c ∈ Ex} is creative.
- 4. {x | φx(x) = 0} is creative.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
21 / 30
Creative Set
- Theorem. Suppose that A ⊆ C1 and let A = {x | φx ∈ A}. If A is
r.e. and A = ∅, N, then A is creative.
Proof.
Suppose A is r.e. and A = ∅, N. If f∅ ∈ A, then A is productive by a previous theorem. This is a contradiction. So A is productive by the same theorem. Hence A is creative.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
22 / 30
Creative Set
The set K0 = {x | Wx = ∅} is creative. It corresponds to the set A = {f ∈ C1 | f = f∅}.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
23 / 30
Creative Sets are m-Complete
- Theorem. (Myhill, 1955)
C is creative iff C is m-complete iff C is 1-complete iff C ≡ K.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
24 / 30
- 3. The Lattice of m-Degrees
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
25 / 30
What Else?
Q: In the world of recursively enumerable sets, is there anything between the recursive sets and the creative sets?
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
26 / 30
What Else?
Q: In the world of recursively enumerable sets, is there anything between the recursive sets and the creative sets? A: There is plenty.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
26 / 30
Trivial m-Degrees
- 1. o = {∅}.
- 2. n = {N}.
- 3. o ≤m a provided a = n.
- 4. n ≤m a provided a = o.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
27 / 30
Nontrivial m-Degrees
- 5. The recursive m-degree 0m consists of all the nontrivial
recursive sets.
- 6. An r.e. m-degree contains only r.e. sets.
- 7. The maximum r.e. m-degree dm(K) is denoted by 0′
m.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
28 / 30
The Distributive Lattice of m-Degrees
❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅
- 0m
0′
m
a b c . . . The m-degrees ordered by ≤m form a distributive lattice.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
29 / 30
Problem with m-Degree
The m-reducibility has two unsatisfactory features: (i) The exceptional behavior of ∅ and N. (ii) The invalidity of A ≡m A in general. The problem is due to the restricted use of oracles. We shall remove this restriction in Turing reducibility.
Computability Theory, by Y. Fu
- X. Creative Set
30 / 30