WP 1 Stakeholder involvement through a co-creation approach Rome 15-16 February 2017 GIULIA PRATO - WWF ITALY This project has been funded with support from the European Commission
WP1 DELIVERABLES Deliverables: D.1.1 Stakeholder analysis D.1.2 ,1.3 Formal institutional support letters D.1.4 Introductory meetings - 1 per case study D.5 Multi-stakeholders workshops at each case study D.6 Final meeting g.prato@wwf.it
1 ST I NTRODUCTORY MEETING : M AZARA DEL VALLO 6 S EPTEMBER 2016
P ARTICIPANTS NAME AFFILIATION CONTACT Ilaria Rinaudo AMP Isole Egadi i. rinaudo@ampisolegadi.it Antonino Bono CREA Soc. Coop. sigane17@hotmail.com Pino Gullo Legacoop Agroalimentare pino.gullo@gmail.com Fabio Giardina AMP Isole Pelagie fabiogiardina2@gmail.com Leonardo Dip. Pesca Regione Sicilia leonardo.catagnano@gmail.com Catagnano Alessandro Iannitti Dip. Pesca MIPAAF a.iannitti@politicheagricole.it Giovanni Basciano Agci Agrital giovanni.basciano@gmail.com Giuseppe Pernice Osservatorio Pesca Mediterranea giuseppe.pernice@cnr.it Ignazio Piazza Soc. Coop. Pescatori Sciacca ipiazza@libero.it Bartolomeo Lino Conf. Imprese Pesca Mazara (ad. Federpesca) tumbiolino@libero.it Tumbiolo braschitoto@gmail.com, Salvatore Braschi Federcoopesca e Cogepa Trapani info@cogepatp.it Giovanni Didia FLAI - CGIL Trapani giovannididia@libero.it Domenico Asaro Conf. Impresa Pesca (Coldiretti) asarodomenico64@gmail.com Emilio Sardo Fiume Mazaro Soc. Coop sardoemilio@libero.it Roberto Falcetta Fiume Mazaro Soc. Coop Salvatore Ajello Cogepa Mazara ajellosaltore@inwind.it Marco Toccaceli CREA Soc. Coop creacoop@gmail.com Ilaria Vielmini Oceana ivielmini@oceana.org Roberto Ingargiola Fisherman, OP siculpesca siculpesca@gmail.com Vito Gancitano Captain and shipowner 360652385 Adamo Antonino Fisherman Maltese Ministry for Sustainable development, Marie Louise Pace marie-louise.pace@gov.mt Environment and Climate change. (skype) Christopher Environment and Resources Authority (ERA), Cousin (skype) Malta Marco Costantini WWF Medpo m.costantini@wwfmedpo.org Giulia Prato WWF Italia g.prato@wwfmedpo.org Fabio Fiorentino IAMC-CNR fabio.fiorentino@iamc.cnr.it g.prato@wwf.it
P ARTICIPATORY M APS – HAKE , RED SHRIMP DEPTH VITAL POINT DEPTH SPECIES (local U.M LOCAL NAME REFERENCE POINTS MONTHS PHASE ON MAP (m) U.M) Hake Nursery N1 100-300 fathom 180-550 Secca Capoduono 1-12 Hake Nursery N2 100-300 fathom 180-550 1-12 Hake Nursery N3 120 fathom 220 Scirocco 22 miglia E-SE Lampedusa, Capo 1-12 roccia Grecale Hake Nursery N4 120 fathom 220 Fondaletto 1-12 g Hake Nursery N5 90-120 fathom 170-220 Scivolare 1-12 Hake Nursery N6 80-100 fathom 150-180 W Curva 1-12 Hake Nursery N7 fathom Da Grecale, Levante e Scirocco La 1-12 Galita fino a Levante Capoduono Red shrimp Nursery N1 320-330 fathom 590-600 Fino al 32° parallelo 2,3,9 Red shrimp Nursery N2 300 fathom 550 40 miglia Est Lampedusa 2,3,9 Red shrimp Nursery N3 320 fathom 590 25 miglia NE Linosa 2,3,9 Red shrimp Nursery N4 310-320 fathom 570-590 46-47 miglia Sud Malta 2,3,9 g.prato@wwf.it sa
P ARTICIPATORY M APS – MULLET Red mullet Nursery N1 80 fathom 150 Scivolare/Ponente 1 Testata Red mullet Nursery N2 70-80 fathom 130-150 Fondaletto a Girare Girare (Zona fondaletto) 1.2 Red mullet Nursery N3 40 fathom 70 Sud Ovest 29 2 Red mullet Nursery N4 35-40 fathom 60-70 Zona Ponente, Capo 2.3 Ponente Red mullet Spawn. S1 150 fathom 270 Scirocco 4.5 Red mullet Spawn. S2 140-150 fathom 260-270 Fondaletto 4.5 Red mullet Spawn. S3 140-150 fathom 260-270 Scivolare 4.5 g.prato@wwf.it
P ARTICIPATORY M APS – DW ROSE SHRIMP Rose Nursery N1 120-130 fathom 220-240 Secca Capoduono Dentro la batimetrica delle acque 12,1,2 shrimp territoriali Rose Nursery N2 140-150 fathom 260-270 Scirocco Testata 12,1,2 shrimp Rose Nursery N3 100 fathom 180 W Fondaletto 12,1,2 shrimp Rose Nursery N4 100 fathom 180 W Curva 40 miglia Nord Ovest Tripoli 1-4 shrimp Rose Nursery N5 shrimp Rose Nursery N6 110-120 fathom 200-220 Scivolare 80 miglia Sud Lampedusa 12,1,2 shrimp Rose Spawn. G1 shrimp Rose Nursery Nvito1 90-140 fathom 170-260 33.52- 34.16- 34.08-12.12 shrimp 12.07 12.24 Rose Nursery Nvito2 37.22- 37.20.5- shrimp 10.30 10.36.5 Rose Nursery Nvito3 A Nord di Zembra 37.17.00- 37.17.5- shrimp 10.42.30 10.52.5 Rose Nursery Nvito4 Canale tra le isobate dei 200m,tra la sabbia shrimp piattaforma continentale di Capo Bon e il Banco di Auria. Fondo sabbioso Rose Nursery Nvito5 Nursery lunga 4 miglia e larga 5, shrimp circondata da isobata 100m, si g.prato@wwf.it estende da 14 a 18 miglia a Levante delle Isole Kuriat. Circonda una secca a 73 m.
2 ND I NTRODUCTORY MEETING : A NCONA 18 NOVEMBER 2016 Name Organization Contact Giuseppe Nardone O.P. San Basso, Ma.Mol.Ab 3393709835 Emilio Caselli Fisher, Ma.Mol.Ab 3334246436 fabio.fiorentino@iamc.cnr Fabio Fiorentino CNR-IAMC .it Enrico Arneri FAO-AdriaMed enrico.arneri@fao.org Giuseppe Scarcella CNR-ISMAR 3387043071 Gianmaria Barducci Progetto Blu Soc. Coop. Fano 3383124081 Fabio Vallarola AMP Torre del Cerrano 3481401966 Uriano Meconi Regione Marche 3316875651 Simone Leoni CNR-ISMAR s.leoni1985@gmail.com Giulia Prato WWF g.prato@wwf.it g.prato@wwf.it
P ARTICIPATORY M APS - A DRIATIC N1 Hake(N2 – only in 1990s) Mullet Sole Scogli del tagliere: spawning Scogli della Puntonata: site for other spp. spawning site for other N2 spp. N1 N2 S1, N1 PUNTO FASE SPECIE SU PROF. U. M. PROF. (m) DESCRIZIONE MESI VITALE MAPPA Scogli del Tagliere, tra Ancona e Sibenik Nasello Nursery N1 60 braccia 110 (Croazia). Quantità inferiori alla Fossa di 1-12 Pomo Solo in passato (1990-91), di fronte al monte Nasello Nursery N2 20 braccia 40 4 Conero Riprodizio Non su Nasello 30-40 braccia Zona Sud Ancona, fondo sabbioso 11 ne mappa Riproduzio Triglia S1 <30-50 60-90 5-6 miglia dalla costa 7 ne Triglia Nursery N1 10-20 braccia 20-40 Oltre le 3 miglia 8-9 Oltre 30-35 miglia dalla costa, al largo (meno Triglia Nursery N2 50 braccia 90 3-4 concentrati) g.prato@wwf.it Sogliola Nursery N1 Nord Adriatico, d'accordo con mappe CNR Scalata della fossa di Pomo. D ’accordo con Scampo Nursery mappe CNR
SUGGESTED MANAGEMENT MEASURES Full protection of Jabuka Pit (including longliners) + a larger area managed through rotation of fishing boats Protection of the coastal zone up to 6 miles + management of the fishing activity after the trawling ban (reduction of fishing days in order to avoid market saturation and keep prices stable). Specific regulations are needed to avoid the issuing of exclusive rights to fish within the 6 miles. Anticipation of the biological ban to June and July to protect cephalopods with high economic value. Protection of the refuge area “ Zona Barbare ” Protection of the area North of Ancona important for the reproduction of sole and the spiny dogfish (spinarolo ) Ma.Mol.Ab. request: establishment of a technical-scientific table of researchers and fishers to develop joint fisheries management proposals and get Ministry’s + GFCF attention g.prato@wwf.it
Q UESTIONNAIRES – N UMBERS Questionnaires N. Artisanal fishers 5 Industrial fishers 4 Fishers association respresentative 5 MPA 3 Fisheries/environment authority 3 Producers organisation (OP) 1 Researchers 3 Total 24 g.prato@wwf.it
F ISHERIES STATE 35 Fisheries state at present 30 25 % of repsondents positive 20 acceptable negative 15 very negative 10 5 0 MPA Authorities Fishers/fishers Scientist association 25 Fisheries change in the last 10 years 20 Improved a little 15 Unchanged Worsened a little 10 Worsened a lot don't know 5 0 g.prato@wwf.it MPA Authorities Fishers/fishers Scientist association
F ISHERIES STATE 35 Threats to fisheries state 30 Ecessive fishing effort 25 Illegal fishing 20 Bad fisheries management 15 Lack of transnational agreements 10 Pollution 5 Climate change Conflicts with other marine users 50 0 Other Most important threat Second important threat 45 40 Moderate conflict 35 Strong conflict 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
M ANAGEMENT Recommended management measures 40 Enforce existing Other suggestions: management measures 35 Increase the minimum 30 reference size • Eliminate illegal fishing 25 Reduce fishing effort • Enforce bans on recreational fishing 20 • Management plans Introduce seasonal fisheries closures 15 • Control/reduce fishing effort after Increase spatial fisheries 10 seasonal closures to avoid closures 5 Reduce spatial fisheries overpredoction closures 0 Other Most recommenable Second most Involvement in decision making recommendable 70 60 50 40 Yes 30 No 20 Doesn't know 10 0 Has been involved Believes it is Is interested in in co-management important that his being involved in initiatives category is involved co-management initiatives
Recommend
More recommend
