Widening the Historic Harrods Creek Bridge Photo Richard - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
widening the historic harrods creek bridge
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Widening the Historic Harrods Creek Bridge Photo Richard - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aug 30, 2022 290 likes •765 views

Widening the Historic Harrods Creek Bridge Photo Richard Sutherland, P.E. Optional Daryl Carter, P.E. Project History Deteriorating rapidly Initially NOT eligible for the NHR Deemed eligible during the LSIORB later Project

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Widening the Historic Harrods Creek Bridge

Richard Sutherland, P.E. Daryl Carter, P.E.

Photo Optional

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Project History

  • Deteriorating

rapidly

  • Initially NOT

eligible for the NHR

  • Deemed eligible

during the LSIORB later

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Project History

  • JCPW initiated a bridge replacement project in

2000

  • Finished under Metro in 2010
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Project Scope

“Widen existing one lane bridge to two lanes while preserving the historic character of the structure.”

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Project History

  • Initial project didn’t include Section 106
  • Added by contract modification
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Project History

  • Section 106 of the National Historic

Preservation Act

  • Required due to the Coast Guard permit (404)
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Steps in Section 106 Process

  • Initiation of the Section 106 Review
  • Identification of Historic Properties
  • Assessment of Adverse Effects
  • Resolution of Adverse Effects
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Section 106

  • Initial public meeting September 21, 2000
  • Section 106 public meeting October 2, 2001
  • Consulting parties’ meeting November 1, 2001
  • Consulting parties’ meeting April 16, 2002
  • Consulting parties’ meeting September 24, 2002
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Opposition

  • Organized opponents
  • Frequent opponent challenges
  • Filed suit to block the Coast Guard permit
  • Delays tripled the initial construction estimates
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Benefits of Section 106

  • “By-the-book” process insulated against future legal

actions

  • Stakeholder and agency engagement critical
  • MOA led to successful project
slide-14
SLIDE 14

MOA

  • Width of lanes and shoulders
  • Boating traffic was not disrupted
  • Wolf Pen Branch Road NOT listed as a detour
  • Landscaping replaced scrub trees
  • Curve revision improved sight distance
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Design of the Structure

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38
slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Original Bridge

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Original Bridge

slide-46
SLIDE 46
slide-47
SLIDE 47

QUESTIONS?