welcome meeting guidelines
play

WELCOME MEETING GUIDELINES Participants should be respectful This - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

INTERSTATE 75 / COUNTY ROAD 99 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC MEETING August 13, 2020 | 5 p.m. WELCOME MEETING GUIDELINES Participants should be respectful This meeting is being recorded. All o o and considerate of the opinions questions


  1. INTERSTATE 75 / COUNTY ROAD 99 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC MEETING August 13, 2020 | 5 p.m. WELCOME

  2. MEETING GUIDELINES Participants should be respectful This meeting is being recorded. All o o and considerate of the opinions questions and comments received of others are considered public record. Demeaning, derogatory, o Please keep questions and o inflammatory, or vulgar language comments as specific as possible or actions will not be permitted and relevant to this project The moderator may interrupt, o Please limit spoken questions and o warn, or mute a speaker if comments to two minutes or less statements are too lengthy, For technical assistance, call o personally-directed, abusive, or obscene (419) 999-6830 3 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  3. AGENDA & COMMENTS QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS AGENDA Chat Box: Located to the right side of o Announcements o the video box Introductions o Text: Text Y305 to 73224, then follow o Presentation o prompts Question and Comment Session Voicemail: (855) 925-2801, code 9532 o o *2 to record Speak Live: (855) 925-2801, code 9532 o *3 to enter queue Comment Form: Located below the o video box All comments carry equal weight o 4 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  4. INTRODUCTIONS SLM 6.69 o C hris Hughes, ODOT District 1 Deputy Director CR-62 CR-62 o Jenn Gasser, ODOT District 1 Project Manager o Nate Tessler, ODOT District 1 Environmental SLM 1.29 Coordinator SLM 5.63 SLM 0.04 o Matt Selhorst, HDR Project Manager SLM 1.96 CR-65 CR-65 CR-68 5 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  5. ODOT WELCOME WELCOME TO THE MEETING! Chris Hughes, ODOT District 1 Deputy Director 6 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  6. OVERVIEW SLM 6.69 o ODOT is working to make travel around the I-75 and CR 99 interchange easier and safer CR-62 CR-62 o CR 99 improvements are an ODOT priority. Area drivers experience: Travel delays o SLM 1.29 Higher than average crash rates o SLM 5.63 SLM 0.04 o Current feasibility study Explores recommended alternatives in detail o SLM 1.96 CR-65 CR-65 Identifies a Preferred Alternative o o Project Partners CR-68 Hancock County o City of Findlay o 7 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  7. STUDY AREA 8 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  8. STUDY OVERVIEW � PROPOSED SCHEDULE 2020 2021 2022 2023 Jan-March April-June July -Sept Oct - Dec Jan-March April-June July -Sept Oct - Dec Jan-March April-June July -Sept Oct - Dec Jan-March April-June July -Sept Oct - Dec Feasibility Study Design Right of Way Acquisition Construction 9 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  9. STUDY COMPONENTS Scope of Study o Traffic projections o Analyze alternative improvements for I-75 Interchange and CR 99 o intersections Geometrics to address traffic demands, right-of-way impacts, o utility impacts, construction traffic maintenance, costs Engage stakeholders/public o Recommend a preferred alternative o Deliverables o Feasibility study with preferred alternative o Plan, profile, cross sections, cost estimate for preferred alternative o 10 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  10. PURPOSE o Amount of Crashes: Create more efficient and safer intersection travel through this corridor; o Limited Capacity: Reduce crashes due to speeding and distracted driving by allowing for less congestion at intersections; and o Future Development: Plan for new development leading to congestion through this corridor, especially on the exit ramps. 11 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  11. CRASH HISTORY 93 crashes (27 injury, 66 Property Damage Only) between 2017-2019 for the corridor Rear-End- 40 o Angle- 16 o Sideswipe - 8 o 12 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  12. CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT 13 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  13. TRAFFIC � CAPACITY ANALYSIS Current 2020 traffic 2044 No Build projections Intersection PM Level Delay Intersection PM Level Delay of (Seconds) of (Seconds) Service Service Technology/CR 99 D 28.2 Technology/CR 99 F >100 I-75 Southbound/CR 99 C 33.1 I-75 Southbound/CR 99 F >100 I-75 Northbound/CR 99 D 50.8 I-75 Northbound/CR 99 F >100 Speedway B 10.2 Speedway F >100 Ventura F >100 Ventura F >100 N. Main D 31.1 N. Main D 41.3 14 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  14. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES o Alternative 1 � Traditional Diamond Interchange, Widen Existing Bridge o Alternative 2 � Traditional Diamond Interchange, New Bridge o Alternative 3 � Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) o Alternative 4 � Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI), Separate Pedestrian Access 15 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  15. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES � ALT. 1 WIDEN EXISTING STRUCTURE Insert plan view exhibit 16 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  16. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES � ALT 2. NEW STRUCTURE Insert plan view exhibit 17 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  17. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES � ALT. 3 DDI (3) Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) Insert revised plan view exhibit 18 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  18. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES � ALT. 4 DDI WITH SEPARATE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 19 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  19. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES - ALT. 4 DDI WITH SEPARATE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 20 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  20. DDI OPERATIONAL VIDEO To watch, go to: https://youtu.be/-I90S3p6XJs

  21. ALTERNATIVE TRAFFIC SIMULATIONS - TRADITIONAL 22 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  22. ALTERNATIVE TRAFFIC SIMULATIONS - DDI 23 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  23. CR 99 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS o Install turn lanes to Technology, Speedway Drive, and Ventura Drive intersections o New traffic signals at Technology Drive and Ventura Drive o Upgrade existing traffic signals o Multiuse path on south side of CR 99 and sidewalk on north side of CR 99 24 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  24. CR 99 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS CR 99/Technology Drive Intersection : Add Traffic Signal and Westbound and Eastbound left turning lanes o Insert revised plan view exhibit 25 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  25. CR 99 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS CR 99/Ventura Drive Intersection : Add Traffic Signal and Eastbound and Westbound left turning lanes o 26 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  26. CR 99 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS CR 99/N. Main Street Intersection : Maintain Existing o 27 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  27. ALTERNATIVE COMPARISON Estimated Cost Property (includes CR 99 Alternatives Interchange Capacity and Safety Benefits Requirements improvements) Alternative 1: Widen existing • Dedicated turn lanes improve traffic flow and reduce risk of crashes bridge (Traditional interchange 6.8 acres $14-17 million • Max queue expected at I-75 NB ramp intersection: 570' configuration) Max queue expected at Speedway: 680' • Alternative 2: Add second bridge • Dedicated turn lanes improve traffic flow and reduce risk of crashes 6.9 acres $14-17 million (Traditional interchange • Max queue expected at I- 75 NB �a�� ���e��ec����: 570� configuration) Max queue expected at Speedway: 680' • Eliminates queues for left turning vehicles to I-75 • Alternative 3: Construct a • Max queue expected at I-75 NB ramp intersection: 410� Diverging Diamond Interchange Ma� ��e�e e��ec�ed a� S�eed�a�: 560� • $16-19 million 7.7 acres with bicycle/pedestrian access on • Reduces crashes by 33% compared to traditional configuration CR 99 bridge Value of Safety benefits = $2-3 million savings over 20-30 yrs. • compared to Traditional configuration • Eliminates queues for left turning vehicles to I-75 Alternative 4: Construct a • Max queue expected at I-75 NB ramp intersection: 410� Diverging Diamond Interchange Ma� ��e�e e��ec�ed a� S�eed�a�: 560� • $18-22 million 7.4 acres with separated • Reduces crashes by 33% compared to traditional configuration 28 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation bicycle/pedestrian bridge Value of Safety benefits = $2-3 million savings over 20-30 yrs. • compared to Traditional configuration

  28. NEXT STEPS o Receive comments by September 13 o Recommend preferred alternative o Complete feasibility study and begin design Mail: Jennifer Gasser, P.E. ODOT District 1 1885 North McCullough Street Lima, Ohio 45801 Email: Jennifer.Gasser@dot.ohio.gov Phone: (419) 999-6871 29 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend