WELCOME MEETING GUIDELINES Participants should be respectful This - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
welcome meeting guidelines
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

WELCOME MEETING GUIDELINES Participants should be respectful This - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 29, 2023 440 likes •761 views

INTERSTATE 75 / COUNTY ROAD 99 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC MEETING August 13, 2020 | 5 p.m. WELCOME MEETING GUIDELINES Participants should be respectful This meeting is being recorded. All o o and considerate of the opinions questions

slide-1
SLIDE 1

INTERSTATE 75 / COUNTY ROAD 99 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS

WELCOME

PUBLIC MEETING

August 13, 2020 | 5 p.m.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

3 |

MEETING GUIDELINES

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  • This meeting is being recorded. All

questions and comments received are considered public record.

  • Please keep questions and

comments as specific as possible and relevant to this project

  • Please limit spoken questions and

comments to two minutes or less

  • For technical assistance, call

(419) 999-6830

  • Participants should be respectful

and considerate of the opinions

  • f others
  • Demeaning, derogatory,

inflammatory, or vulgar language

  • r actions will not be permitted
  • The moderator may interrupt,

warn, or mute a speaker if statements are too lengthy, personally-directed, abusive, or

  • bscene
slide-3
SLIDE 3

4 |

AGENDA & COMMENTS

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

AGENDA

  • Announcements
  • Introductions
  • Presentation
  • Question and Comment Session

QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

  • Chat Box: Located to the right side of

the video box

  • Text: Text Y305 to 73224, then follow

prompts

  • Voicemail: (855) 925-2801, code 9532

*2 to record

  • Speak Live: (855) 925-2801, code 9532

*3 to enter queue

  • Comment Form: Located below the

video box

  • All comments carry equal weight
slide-4
SLIDE 4

5 |

INTRODUCTIONS

CR-62 CR-62 CR-65 CR-65 CR-68 SLM 6.69 SLM 5.63 SLM 1.96 SLM 0.04 SLM 1.29 HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  • Chris Hughes, ODOT District 1 Deputy Director
  • Jenn Gasser, ODOT District 1 Project Manager
  • Nate Tessler, ODOT District 1 Environmental

Coordinator

  • Matt Selhorst, HDR Project Manager
slide-5
SLIDE 5

6 |

ODOT WELCOME

WELCOME TO THE MEETING! Chris Hughes, ODOT District 1 Deputy Director

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

7 |

OVERVIEW

CR-62 CR-62 CR-65 CR-65 CR-68 SLM 6.69 SLM 5.63 SLM 1.96 SLM 0.04 SLM 1.29 HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  • ODOT is working to make travel around the I-75 and CR 99

interchange easier and safer

  • CR 99 improvements are an ODOT priority. Area drivers

experience:

  • Travel delays
  • Higher than average crash rates
  • Current feasibility study
  • Explores recommended alternatives in detail
  • Identifies a Preferred Alternative
  • Project Partners
  • Hancock County
  • City of Findlay
slide-7
SLIDE 7

8 |

STUDY AREA

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

9 |

STUDY OVERVIEW PROPOSED SCHEDULE

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

Jan-March April-June July -Sept Oct - Dec Jan-March April-June July -Sept Oct - Dec Jan-March April-June July -Sept Oct - Dec Jan-March April-June July -Sept Oct - Dec

Feasibility Study Design Right of Way Acquisition Construction 2020 2021 2022 2023

slide-9
SLIDE 9

10 |

STUDY COMPONENTS

  • Scope of Study
  • Traffic projections
  • Analyze alternative improvements for I-75 Interchange and CR 99

intersections

  • Geometrics to address traffic demands, right-of-way impacts,

utility impacts, construction traffic maintenance, costs

  • Engage stakeholders/public
  • Recommend a preferred alternative
  • Deliverables
  • Feasibility study with preferred alternative
  • Plan, profile, cross sections, cost estimate for preferred alternative

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-10
SLIDE 10

11 |

PURPOSE

  • Amount of Crashes: Create more efficient and safer

intersection travel through this corridor;

  • Limited Capacity: Reduce crashes due to speeding and

distracted driving by allowing for less congestion at intersections; and

  • Future Development: Plan for new development leading to

congestion through this corridor, especially on the exit ramps.

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

12 |

CRASH HISTORY

93 crashes (27 injury, 66 Property Damage Only) between 2017-2019 for the corridor

  • Rear-End- 40
  • Angle- 16
  • Sideswipe - 8

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

13 |

CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-13
SLIDE 13

14 |

TRAFFIC CAPACITY ANALYSIS

Current 2020 traffic 2044 No Build projections

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

Intersection PM Level

  • f

Service Delay (Seconds) Technology/CR 99 D 28.2 I-75 Southbound/CR 99 C 33.1 I-75 Northbound/CR 99 D 50.8 Speedway B 10.2 Ventura F >100

  • N. Main

D 31.1 Intersection PM Level

  • f

Service Delay (Seconds) Technology/CR 99 F >100 I-75 Southbound/CR 99 F >100 I-75 Northbound/CR 99 F >100 Speedway F >100 Ventura F >100

  • N. Main

D 41.3

slide-14
SLIDE 14

15 |

INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  • Alternative 1 Traditional Diamond Interchange, Widen

Existing Bridge

  • Alternative 2 Traditional Diamond Interchange, New Bridge
  • Alternative 3 Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI)
  • Alternative 4 Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI),

Separate Pedestrian Access

slide-15
SLIDE 15

16 |

INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES ALT. 1 WIDEN EXISTING STRUCTURE

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

Insert plan view exhibit

slide-16
SLIDE 16

17 |

INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES ALT 2. NEW STRUCTURE

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

Insert plan view exhibit

slide-17
SLIDE 17

18 |

INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES ALT. 3 DDI

(3) Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI)

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

Insert revised plan view exhibit

slide-18
SLIDE 18

19 |

INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES ALT. 4 DDI WITH SEPARATE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-19
SLIDE 19

20 |

INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES - ALT. 4 DDI WITH SEPARATE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-20
SLIDE 20

DDI OPERATIONAL VIDEO

To watch, go to: https://youtu.be/-I90S3p6XJs

slide-21
SLIDE 21

22 |

ALTERNATIVE TRAFFIC SIMULATIONS - TRADITIONAL

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-22
SLIDE 22

23 |

ALTERNATIVE TRAFFIC SIMULATIONS - DDI

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-23
SLIDE 23

24 |

CR 99 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS

  • Install turn lanes to Technology, Speedway Drive, and Ventura

Drive intersections

  • New traffic signals at Technology Drive and Ventura Drive
  • Upgrade existing traffic signals
  • Multiuse path on south side of CR 99 and sidewalk on north side
  • f CR 99

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-24
SLIDE 24

25 |

CR 99 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS

CR 99/Technology Drive Intersection:

  • Add Traffic Signal and Westbound and Eastbound left turning lanes

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

Insert revised plan view exhibit

slide-25
SLIDE 25

26 |

CR 99 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS

CR 99/Ventura Drive Intersection:

  • Add Traffic Signal and Eastbound and Westbound left turning lanes

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-26
SLIDE 26

27 |

CR 99 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS

CR 99/N. Main Street Intersection:

  • Maintain Existing

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-27
SLIDE 27

28 |

ALTERNATIVE COMPARISON

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

Alternatives Interchange Capacity and Safety Benefits Property Requirements Estimated Cost

(includes CR 99 improvements) Alternative 1: Widen existing bridge (Traditional interchange configuration)

  • Dedicated turn lanes improve traffic flow and reduce risk of crashes
  • Max queue expected at I-75 NB ramp intersection: 570'
  • Max queue expected at Speedway: 680'

6.8 acres $14-17 million Alternative 2: Add second bridge (Traditional interchange configuration)

  • Dedicated turn lanes improve traffic flow and reduce risk of crashes
  • Max queue expected at I-75 NB a eec: 570
  • Max queue expected at Speedway: 680'

6.9 acres $14-17 million Alternative 3: Construct a Diverging Diamond Interchange with bicycle/pedestrian access on CR 99 bridge

  • Eliminates queues for left turning vehicles to I-75
  • Max queue expected at I-75 NB ramp intersection: 410
  • Ma ee eeced a Seeda: 560
  • Reduces crashes by 33% compared to traditional configuration
  • Value of Safety benefits = $2-3 million savings over 20-30 yrs.

compared to Traditional configuration 7.7 acres $16-19 million Alternative 4: Construct a Diverging Diamond Interchange with separated bicycle/pedestrian bridge

  • Eliminates queues for left turning vehicles to I-75
  • Max queue expected at I-75 NB ramp intersection: 410
  • Ma ee eeced a Seeda: 560
  • Reduces crashes by 33% compared to traditional configuration
  • Value of Safety benefits = $2-3 million savings over 20-30 yrs.

compared to Traditional configuration 7.4 acres $18-22 million

slide-28
SLIDE 28

29 |

NEXT STEPS

  • Receive comments by September 13
  • Recommend preferred alternative
  • Complete feasibility study and begin design

Mail:

Jennifer Gasser, P.E. ODOT District 1 1885 North McCullough Street Lima, Ohio 45801

Email: Jennifer.Gasser@dot.ohio.gov Phone: (419) 999-6871

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

slide-29
SLIDE 29

30 |

QUESTIONS & COMMENTS

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

  • Chat Box: Located to the right side of

the video box

  • Text: Text Y305 to 73224, then follow

prompts

  • Voicemail: (855) 925-2801, code 9532

*2 to record

  • Speak Live: (855) 925-2801, code 9532

*3 to enter queue

  • All comments carry equal weight
  • We will respond to each comment/

question received. Depending on time, we may respond to questions in writing following the meeting.

  • Speakers should limit comments to

two minutes or less. If time allows, participants may be permitted to speak again for an additional two minutes.

  • Verbal comments may also be

submitted in writing; doing so will not provide the comments additional weight.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

31 |

TO SUBMIT COMMENTS AFTER TONIGHTS MEETING

HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

Email: Jennifer.Gasser@dot.ohio.gov Mail:

Jennifer Gasser, P.E. ODOT District 1 1885 North McCullough Street Lima, Ohio 45801

Phone: (419) 999-6871 Comment Form: transportation.ohio.gov/Hancock99 Submit by Sept. 13 to be documented in the Public Input Summary Report