Waveband Luminosity Correlations in Flux-Limited Multiwavelength - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

β–Ά
waveband luminosity
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Waveband Luminosity Correlations in Flux-Limited Multiwavelength - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Waveband Luminosity Correlations in Flux-Limited Multiwavelength Data JIBRAN HAIDER, JACK SINGAL Introduction Knowing the intrinsic correlations between different waveband emissions is important in many astronomical questions e.g.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Waveband Luminosity Correlations in Flux-Limited Multiwavelength Data

JIBRAN HAIDER, JACK SINGAL

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

  • Knowing the intrinsic correlations between different waveband emissions is

important in many astronomical questions e.g.

  • Radio-far IR correlation
  • Accretion disk vs. jet vs. torus emission in AGN
  • Let’s focus on quasars as an example…
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Do you see any correlation?

Real optical-mid-infrared (SDSS x WISE) Real optical-radio (SDSS x FIRST) Simulated optical-radio No intrinsic correlation!

slide-4
SLIDE 4

How Did That Observed Correlation Get Induced? (SDSS x WISE Dataset)

Infrared Optical

Missing data!

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Correlational Techniques in Bins

  • We use the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) as a measure of the linear

luminosity-luminosity and luminosity-redshift correlations: 𝑠

𝑦𝑧 = σ𝑗 π‘Œπ‘— βˆ’ ΰ΄€

π‘Œ 𝑍

𝑗 βˆ’ ΰ΄€

𝑍 π‘‚πœπ‘¦πœπ‘§

  • We use the Pearson partial correlation coefficient (PPCC) as a measure of the

luminosity-luminosity correlation minus their mutual dependence on redshift: 𝑠

𝑦𝑧,𝑨 =

𝑠

𝑦𝑧 βˆ’ 𝑠 𝑦𝑨𝑠 𝑧𝑨

(1 βˆ’ 𝑠

𝑦𝑨 2 )(1 βˆ’ 𝑠 𝑧𝑨 2 )

.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Redshift Evolutions & Local Luminosities

  • We can determine the β€œlocal luminosities” for our data by removing the best-

fit redshift evolution from the β€œraw” luminosities.

  • Local luminosity is defined by

𝑀′𝑏 = 𝑀𝑏 𝑕𝑏(𝑨) , where the best-fit luminosity-redshift correlation is 𝑕𝑏 𝑨 =

(1+𝑨)𝑙𝑏 1+(1+𝑨

π‘Žπ‘‘π‘ )𝑙𝑏 ,

(e.g. Singal, J., Stawarz, L., Lawrence, A., & Petrosian, V. 2013a, β€œThe Radio and Optical Luminosity Evolution of

  • Quasars. II. The SDSS Sample." ApJ, 764, 43, and Singal, J., George, J., & Gerber, A. 2016, β€œThe Mid-Infrared

Luminosity Evolution and Luminosity Function of Quasars with SDSS and WISE." ApJ, 831, 60).

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Simulated Data (No Intrinsic Correlation)

Raw luminosities Local luminosities Raw luminosities Local luminosities

20 Bins 10 Bins

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Simulated Data (With Intrinsic Correlation)

Raw luminosities Local luminosities

20 Bins

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Real Optical x Mid-IR Data (SDSS x WISE)

Raw luminosities Local luminosities

20 Bins

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Real Optical x Radio Data (SDSS x FIRST)

Raw luminosities Local luminosities

20 Bins

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Conclusions

  • The observed correlation between two waveband luminosities is not necessarily the intrinsic

correlation!

β†’ Correlations can be induced by flux limits and similar luminosity evolutions with redshift

  • Using PCCs and PPCCs in bins of redshift can access whether the observed correlations

between two waveband luminosities are intrinsic

β†’ We’ve shown this with simulated observed data with known degrees of intrinsic luminosity correlation

  • We find that in quasars the optical and mid-infrared luminosities are very highly intrinsically

correlated, while optical and radio luminosities are less highly intrinsically correlated

β†’ Supports general picture where accretion disk luminosity is directly responsible for torus luminosity, while jet strength is a function of both black hole size and black hole spin

β†’ Reminder: Degree of correlation does not indicate functional form of correlation – that can be investigated with different methods