Vessel slowdown trial: Info session breakfast Presented by: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

vessel slowdown trial info session breakfast
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Vessel slowdown trial: Info session breakfast Presented by: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Vessel slowdown trial: Info session breakfast Presented by: Vancouver Fraser Port Authority April 27, 2017 Morning Overview Welcome Overview of ECHO program and vessel slowdown trial Overview of industry considerations Trial


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presented by: Vancouver Fraser Port Authority April 27, 2017

Vessel slowdown trial: Info session breakfast

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Morning Overview

  • Welcome
  • Overview of ECHO program

and vessel slowdown trial

  • Overview of industry

considerations

  • Trial operational procedures
  • Trial participation
  • Discussion & Q&A
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Welcome

Robin Silvester President and CEO Vancouver Fraser Port Authority

(Video message not included)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overview of ECHO program and trial

Orla Robinson ECHO Program Manager Vancouver Fraser Port Authority

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Whales in our waters

  • Canadian and US Species at Risk

recovery strategies identify key threats

  • Whales use sound to find food,

communicate and navigate

  • Only 78 southern resident killer

whales (SKRW) remaining

  • Critical habitat overlaps with

shipping lanes

Photo: BeamReach

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Whale-vessel interactions - emerging issues internationally

Ports with vessel speed restrictions to reduce whale strike risk/air emissions Guidelines for measuring and reducing underwater noise

  • St. Lawrence

River Estuary

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What? A collaboration with marine transportation industries, conservation and environmental groups, First Nations, governments and scientists Why? T

  • better understand and

reduce the cumulative impacts of commercial vessel activities on at-risk whales throughout the southwest coast

  • f British Columbia, Canada

Enhancing Cetacean Habitat and Observation (ECHO) Program

Photo: Joan Lopez

*Cetacean: order of whales, dolphins and porpoises

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ECHO Program work areas

Advancing projects and initiatives to inform threat reduction

Physical Disturbance Environmental Contaminants Acoustic Disturbance

Photo: Joan Lopez

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Quiet operating

  • ptions

How can vessel underwater noise be reduced?

Quiet design, technology and maintenance

  • ptions

EcoAction incentives Vessel slow down trial

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Trial overview

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SRKW studies indicate: Southern resident killer whale – vessel interactions

Relative SRKW density May – Sept SRKW behavioural response to noise

  • 94% of SRKW behavioural responses in

model area occur between May-Nov

  • 26% of them take place in Haro Strait
  • Highest abundance July-Sept
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Initial evaluation of vessel slow down options (from pilot station to port) 18 slow down scenarios were

compared and ranked for a range

  • f different speeds and sub-areas
  • Biological Impact = behavioural

response (lost foraging time) in each sub-area

  • Industry Impact = % of pilot

transits > 8hr

  • Final mitigation value balances

biological and industry impact scores equally

11kn, 12kn, 14kn, 16km, 80%,90%

Biological impact (B) Industry impact (I)

Mitigation value

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • T
  • p four ranking scenarios

examined

  • Haro Strait slow down to 11

knots (rank #2) was the AWG’s preferred scenario

  • A voluntary vessel slow

down trial was proposed to gather real world data

  • Vessel operator committee

proposed

  • Economic impact

assessment recommended

Haro Strait

11kn Conclusion: vessel slow down options

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Voluntary vessel slow down trial

Trial parameters

Why: T

  • study the relationship

between vessel speed and underwater noise in a real world environment Where: ~16 nautical miles through critical whale foraging habitat in Haro Strait When: T wo month trial, Aug 7-Oct 6, 2017 What speed: 11 kn through the water

11kn

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What does a successful trial look like?

  • High vessel participation rates

with minimum impacts to industry

  • Robust data with which to:
  • confirm the relationship

between speed and underwater noise

  • confirm the relationship

between reduced underwater noise and threats to at-risk whales

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Industry considerations

Chris Hall Vessel Slowdown T rial Project Manager Vancouver Fraser Port Authority

slide-17
SLIDE 17

How will participating vessel transits be affected?

How much longer will each 11 kn transit take?

Vessel Type Allow Bulk 30 minutes Car Carrier 60 minutes Container 60 minutes General Cargo 30 minutes Passenger 60 minutes Tanker 30 minutes

Calculations based on 2015 PPA dataset, additional time through transition zones and 11kn speed zone Includes contingency No allowance for tidal current

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Already over 8 hr, 34, 3.7% New over 8 hrs, 37 , 4.1% Under 8 hours, 827,

How will vessel transits be affected?

How many vessels will be within the 8 hour pilot threshold?

Source: 2015 Transits for August/September

92.1%

Bulk Carrier, 24 Contain er, 2 General Cargo, 4 Passang er, 1 Tanker , 6 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

How will trial participation affect pilotage cost?

Additional Pilotage Cost

Total

  • No. Calls

No Additional Cost Additional 1 Hour > 8hrs Bulk 427 60% 28% 12% Car Carrier 77 25% 75% 0% Container 250 22% 77% 1% General Cargo 61 59% 30% 11% Passenger 27 70% 30% 0% Tanker 56 64% 20% 16% Total 898 47% 45% 8% Average $0 $208 $1,440

We do not expect participation of vessels where the transit time is assessed by the Pilot and Master to be at risk of triggering excess charges (i.e. >8hrs).

slide-20
SLIDE 20

How will trial participation affect fuel costs?

Bulk & Tanker: Additional fuel and ship time costs assuming delay time make-up is not required

Voyage No. Calls % Ship Time Fuel Savings Net Cost Bulk & General Cargo 488 90% $ 180

  • $ 229
  • $49

Tanker 56 10% 270 256 14 Total 544 100%

We do not expect participation of vessels where the transit time is assessed by the Pilot and Master to be at risk of triggering excess charges (i.e. >8hrs).

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Container Ships: Additional fuel costs assuming delay time make-up is required

Voyage No. Calls % Make up Fuel Cost Fuel Saving Net Cost To/from Asia 96 38% $1,876

  • $1,061

$815 Out to California 15 6% 2,772

  • 1,061

1,711 In from Prince Rupert 11 4% 3,350

  • 1,061

2,289 To/from PNW Ports 128 51% 2,466

  • 1,061

1,405 Total/Average 250 100% $2,296 $1,061 $1,235

We do not expect participation where transits are expected to result in delayed arrival for scheduled gangs, tugs etc.

How will trial participation affect fuel costs?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Cruise ships: additional fuel costs assuming delay time make-up is required

Voyage

  • No. Calls

Number Makeup Fuel Cost Fuel Savings Net Cost Seattle/Victoria 14 47%

  • 1,125
  • 1,125

West Coast 10 33% 3,301

  • 1,125

2,176 Hawaii 6 20% 3,301

  • 1,125

2,176 Total 30 100%

We do not expect participation where transits are expected to result in delayed arrival for scheduled gangs, tugs etc.

How will trial participation affect fuel costs?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Concern Investigation Response

Overall Costs Economic Impact Analysis conducted by Seaport Consulting Likely stipend for participation in ECHO research project Pilot time cost PPA and BCCP engagement, review of data and confirmation

  • f data findings

Transits over 8 hours are not expected to participate Scheduled Arrival Interviews with industry Transits resulting in possible late arrivals for scheduled gangs, tugs etc. are not expected to participate Tidal current Engagement with BCCP May be favourable or

  • unfavourable. Pilots will

provide “Favourable Windows” sheet ahead of the trial

Addressing industry concerns

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Trial operational communications, procedures and tracking

Jeff Pelton Marine Operations Specialist Vancouver Fraser Port Authority

slide-25
SLIDE 25

INDUSTRY CONSIDERATIONS:

How can we encourage & measure participation?

Issue Notices to Mariners Meet with agents & industry On-going communications & engagements

Steps prior to trial

Notices When Who Temporary and preliminary (T&P) notice 14 days prior (July 24) VFPA Notice to Industry 14 days prior (July 24) PPA Notice to Shipping First day of trial (Aug 7) VPFA

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Trial operational communications, procedures and tracking plan Step 1: At time of nomination, agent to inform master about trial (Decision matrix checklist) 3-7 days before ETA to Brotchie 24 hours before ETA to Brotchie

Steps prior to vessel arrival at Brotchie

4 days before ETA to Brotchie Step 2: PPA to request if vessel intends to participate Step 3: Master may radio MCTS operator re: trial

slide-27
SLIDE 27

DECISION MATRIX CHECKLIST

How can we mitigate delays to scheduled arrivals?

  • Container: Am I going to meet my ETA for gangs?
  • Bulkers: Am I going to arrive within my pilot window?
  • Optimized windows
  • Arrange for earlier arrival at Brotchie Pt.
  • One-page Checklist for PPA Dispatch
  • Prepared 2-3 days in Advance
  • Showing Planned ETA at terminal/anchorage
  • Signalling Intention to Participate – Yes, Yes if ETA not affected, No
  • Used by Pilot/Master at Bridge Watch Start to plan the transit
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Trial operational communications, procedures and tracking plan Step 4: VFPA to remind agent of trial & gauge intent to participate 24 hours before ETA to Brotchie

Steps prior to vessel arrival at Brotchie (con’t)

Step 5: Master to confirm pilot boarding time to allow for early arrival to Brotchie

BCCP may remind pilot of trial

Approaching the 12nm limit / Juan de Fuca Step 6: Pilot & Master decide to participate, VFPA to log The pilot arrives

  • n board
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Trial operational communications, procedures and tracking plan Step 7: Vessel participates in the trial by slowing down to 11kn through water in Haro Strait

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Trial operational communications, procedures and tracking plan Step I: Report on participation & reasons for opt-out Within 10 days of trial start & ongoing throughout trial Step II: Provide feedback to agencies or companies that are participating Within 10 days of trial start & ongoing throughout trial Upon completion of the trial Step III: Cancel Notices, ECHO team to communicate results

Steps throughout trial

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Trial participation

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Why participate?

  • Critically endangered species
  • Support evidence based

decision making

  • Join world leading initiative
  • Support corporate social

responsibility goals

  • Be recognized for participation
  • Receive potential stipend for

participation

  • Varies based on vessel type
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Confirmed intent to participate subject to conditions Container Lines

  • Zim
  • COSCO

Bulk Carriers

  • Oldendorff

Ferries

  • Washington State

Ferries

Cruise Lines

  • Carnival
  • Celebrity
  • Crystal
  • Disney
  • Holland America
  • Norwegian
  • Princess
  • Ponant
  • Royal Caribbean
  • Regent
  • Seabourn

The following companies have confirmed their intent to participate, where operationally and economically feasible, on a transit by transit basis.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Discussion and Q&A

slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • What other materials and/or

support do you need prior or during the trial?

  • What are your

recommendations to maximize participation?

  • Any other suggestions to

maximize trial success?

How do we further support industry participation?

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Next steps

  • Participation survey
  • Additional information will be shared

through associations

  • Continued exploration of recognition

program and stipend

  • Development of Participation Checklist
  • Preparation of Favourable Windows

sheet

  • Notices to Mariners – late July
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Find out more about the trial

Photo: Vancouver Aquarium/NOAA

For more information about the trial please contact us:

echo@portvancouver.com portvancouver.com/echo