using unmanned aircraft system uas photogrammetry to
play

Using Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Photogrammetry to Monitor Bank - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Using Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Photogrammetry to Monitor Bank Erosion along River Corridors 08-Jan-2018 Scott D. Hamshaw, Ph.D., P.E. Project Goals Evaluate UAS-based photogrammetry system Accuracy comparison to SenseFly eBee UAS


  1. Using Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Photogrammetry to Monitor Bank Erosion along River Corridors 08-Jan-2018 Scott D. Hamshaw, Ph.D., P.E.

  2. Project Goals ¨ Evaluate UAS-based photogrammetry system ¨ Accuracy comparison to SenseFly eBee UAS ground survey ¨ Geomorphic change measurement Ground survey: RIEGL VZ-1000 TLS TopCon HiperLite+ GPS

  3. What we get from UAS Orthomosaic imagery 1. Computer vision: Structure-from-motion (SfM) & multi-view stereo Photogrammetric point cloud (RGB colorized) 2. Filtering and/or Machine learning Derived products: classification and processing 3. n Digital surface model (DSM) n Digital elevation model (DEM)

  4. Orthomosaic imagery 3.2 cm UAS 0.5 m Ortho 1 m NAIP

  5. Photogrammetric point cloud

  6. Digital elevation and surface models Airborne LiDAR DSM DEM DEM

  7. Accuracy Assessment – X-Sections ¨ 11 cm vertical / 28 cm horizontal

  8. Accuracy Assessment - GCPs

  9. Field Data Collection

  10. Data collection metrics ¨ 43% of survey days rescheduled/shortened ¨ 2-3 person survey team ¨ Direct georeferenecing with sparse GCPs for check Total Length of Mean Length Total days** Number of days Number Year River Surveyed of River per in field for impacted* by of flights (km) Flight (m) surveying weather 2015 55 21.7 395 12 3 2016 18 13.7 760 5 5 2017 17 14.3 843 4 1

  11. Geomorphic Change Detection Volumetric Change Analysis ¨ Difference of DEMs (DoD) ‘12 ALS to ‘17 UAS ¨ Net change of -19,920 m 3

  12. Geomorphic Change Detection Cross Section Analysis 3.5 m 2

  13. UAS for monitoring river corridors ¨ Optimal survey time: early spring ¨ Sparse network of GCPs = check / bias adjustment ¨ Vegetation density dependent ¨ Technology rapidly developing (during project)

  14. Contact Info & Acknowledgements 14 ¨ Scott Hamshaw, Ph.D., P.E. Special thanks to ¤ Vermont EPSCoR | 23 Mansfield Ave, Burlington, VT co-authors: ¤ scott.hamshaw@uvm.edu • Mandar Dewoolkar ¤ 802.324.6221 • Jarlath O’Neil-Dunne • Donna Rizzo Support provided by: ¨ ¤ Vermont Water Resources and Lake Studies Center • Tayler Engel Vermont EPSCoR with (NSF) Grant EPS-1101317 and EPS-1556770 • Jeff Frolik ¤ NSF Graduate Research Fellowship ( Grant No. DGE-0925179NSF) ¤ Robert & Patricia Switzer Foundation ¤ University of Vermont ¤

  15. Supplementary Information Quantifying Streambank Movement and Topography Using Unmanned Aircraft System Photogrammetry with Comparison to Terrestrial Laser Scanning River Research and Applications 33 (8):1354–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3183.

  16. River corridor vegetation Spring ‘12 Fall ‘15 Spring ‘17 Summer ‘16 Bristol Flats, New Haven River

  17. DoDs – New Haven River 2017 - 2016 2016 - 2012

  18. DoDs – New Haven River 2015 - 2012 2015 - 2012

  19. SB

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend