Unmanned Aerial Systems Considerations for First Responder - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

unmanned aerial systems
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Unmanned Aerial Systems Considerations for First Responder - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DHS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Unmanned Aerial Systems Considerations for First Responder Organizations February 28, 2017 Stephen Hancock Director of Special Projects First Responders Group Science and Technology Directorate


slide-1
SLIDE 1

DHS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Unmanned Aerial Systems

Considerations for First Responder Organizations

Stephen Hancock

Director of Special Projects First Responders Group Science and Technology Directorate Stephen.Hancock@hq.dhs.gov February 28, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Small UAS vs Manned for First Responders

  • Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (sUAS) are rising in popularity as

supplement to or replacement for conventional manned aerial photography/reconnaissance for a variety of purposes

  • Benefits
  • Less expensive
  • Better (in some cases)
  • Faster (to operationally deploy at an incident, not in actual speed)
  • DIFFERENT: can do things manned aircraft cannot
  • Fly really close to buildings, persons of interest, etc.
  • Potential to fly inside structures to assist First Responders (FR)

DHS Science and Technology Directorate | MOBILIZING INNOVATION FOR A SECURE WORLD

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Section 107

  • Went into effect August 29, 2016
  • First step to bringing UAS into the National Airspace System
  • Greatly eases administrative and operational burdens
  • RESULT: EXPECT THE DRONE BOOM TO REALLY EXPLODE!
  • More and more FR agencies will be looking to use UASs
  • Hobby use will grow geometrically
  • FR agencies will have to contend with:
  • Privately used UASs “getting in the way”
  • Nefarious use of UASs by “bad actors”
  • Public distrust of “government use of UAS

DHS Science and Technology Directorate | MOBILIZING INNOVATION FOR A SECURE WORLD

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Typical FR Missions

  • SWAT and other LE support
  • A few localities are experimenting using

quadcopter for surveillance and responder location tracking

  • Fire (structures and wildfires)
  • Structures: quadcopters for fire

surveillance and responder location

  • Wildfire: fixed wing for surveillance, IR

packages to detect fire under canopy

  • Bomb Robot Support
  • Small quadcopters to aid operators

guiding robots to target

  • SAR
  • Urban: quadcopters for surveillance of

buildings

  • Other sensors: FRG piloting FINDER

and cell phone signal detection

  • Wilderness: IR cameras for detecting

body heat; video for open areas

  • Damage reports
  • High resolution cameras required
  • Quadcopters may be preferred for

close-up work

  • Traffic Forensics
  • A potential high-payoff use: aerial

cameras can clear a scene in 20-30min, versus typical 2-3 hours with conventional methods

  • Camera resolution is a major stumbling

block

4

DHS Science and Technology Directorate | MOBILIZING INNOVATION FOR A SECURE WORLD

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Legal Issues

  • Warrants for use:
  • Some states require a warrant for UAS law enforcement operations
  • Overflights:
  • Some states prohibit flying over private property that is not connected

to the mission

  • PII and privacy
  • Some jurisdictions allow only live viewing -- no storage of any

video/still files

  • Others have varying restrictions on length of retention, access, chain
  • f custody
  • Ground station versus drone capture
  • Requirements may vary on whether images may be captured on the

drone or on the ground

5

DHS Science and Technology Directorate | MOBILIZING INNOVATION FOR A SECURE WORLD

slide-6
SLIDE 6

sUAS vs Manned Video Package

  • 9 ounces
  • Power consumption 4W
  • 2-axis stabilization
  • IR, visible light, laser

pointer

  • Much less expensive
  • 35 lbs
  • Power consumption

120W

  • Better stabilization,

vibration reduction etc.

  • IR, visible light, laser

pointer, laser rangefinder

  • $300K range

High end professional packages compared:

DHS Science and Technology Directorate | MOBILIZING INNOVATION FOR A SECURE WORLD

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Fixed versus Rotary Wing

Rotary wing Fixed wing

Tethered Hover

Recreational Grade Military Grade Hand Launchable Experimental Fuel Cell Powered

DHS Science and Technology Directorate | MOBILIZING INNOVATION FOR A SECURE WORLD

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fixed versus Rotary Wing

Fixed wing

  • Endurance up to 8 hours +
  • Distance (but limited by line of

sight)

  • Relatively silent
  • Often larger payloads
  • Suitable for higher altitude work

Video Implications:

  • Rural SAR, wildfires, high level

reconnaissance

Rotary wing

  • Less range and endurance (typically

< 45 minutes)

  • Maneuverable in close urban

quarters

  • Can operate indoors
  • Typically for low altitude work

Video Implications

  • Close in tactical operations, urban

SAR, any indoor need, person of interest identification/tracking

8

Both

  • Typically proprietary with limited

interchangeability of payloads

  • Thus difficult to customize

systems to use case Video Implications

  • Available equipment may not be

useable for some applications

DHS Science and Technology Directorate | MOBILIZING INNOVATION FOR A SECURE WORLD

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Robotic Aircraft for Public Safety (RAPS)

The RAPS Program*

  • Essentially “Consumer

Reports” for sUAS – standardized testing of sUAS packages to carry out common public safety missions

  • Reports are LE Sensitive,

available to qualified users

  • Interpret results based on your

specific needs

RAPS Guidance on Needs

  • “No company is ‘your sUAS

solution’ until you really understand your needs.”

  • Too vague:
  • “We need to have air support and

cannot afford manned aircraft.”

  • Better:
  • “We serviced 37 high-risk search

warrants last year in unsafe tactical environments where pre-service aerial

  • bservation would have enhanced our
  • fficers’ safety.”

RAPS has a community of practice on communities.firstresponder.gov. Apply for membership there. * RAPS tests primarily crafted to test sUAS against CBP scenarios

DHS Science and Technology Directorate | MOBILIZING INNOVATION FOR A SECURE WORLD

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

System Assessment and Validation for Emergency Responders (SAVER)

Purpose

  • To conduct objective, relevant,
  • perationally oriented

assessments and validations of commercially available emergency responder technologies.

  • Results available to FR

communities.

Products

  • Tech Notes
  • Assessment Reports
  • Focus Group Reports
  • Handbooks
  • Market Survey Reports
  • Application Notes
  • https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-

technology/saver

DHS Science and Technology Directorate | MOBILIZING INNOVATION FOR A SECURE WORLD

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SAVER sUAS Testing Status

Test Agent

  • Developing FR specific

scenarios

  • Working with inputs from

FR agencies

  • Looking to the First

Responder Resource Group (FRRG) for help in validation

  • Need to develop

measurable performance specifications/criteria

Test Requirements

  • National Urban Security

Technology Laboratory (NUSTL)

  • Participating with team of

DHS offices to evaluate sites for potential sUAS testing

  • FRG scenarios are

extremely broad and challenging

DHS Science and Technology Directorate | MOBILIZING INNOVATION FOR A SECURE WORLD

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Use Case vs Resolution Needed

  • Homicide case
  • Needed to identify 2 cm drops of blood
  • n a driveway
  • Phantom 3 would have to be 15’ off

ground with limited area of view

  • Even this degree of resolution may not

be good enough for evidence in court

  • SWAT and LE operations
  • May need less than one foot resolution
  • Same aircraft could be at 230’ altitude

and see more than 400’ x 300’ area

  • Implication: Resolution needs for

use cases determine equipment, available flight plans, logistics

12

2 cm Drops of blood

  • n the ground

15 feet 230 feet

Sees 425’ x 320’ area Sees 24’ x 18’ area 1 ft Fugitive

DHS Science and Technology Directorate | MOBILIZING INNOVATION FOR A SECURE WORLD

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Video Mission Tradeoffs

  • Endurance
  • Rotary wing vehicles severely limited compared with fixed wing
  • Altitude (tradeoff with resolution)
  • Doubling the altitude increases the coverage by factor of 4, but

resolution is cut in half

  • Speed
  • Sometimes high speed is a mission priority (wildfires, wilderness

SAR)

  • Sometimes completely stationary tethered surveillance is necessary
  • Line of sight requirements
  • Relaxation of line-of-sight requirements will take some time
  • For immediate future, count on continued line-of-sight restrictions

DHS Science and Technology Directorate | MOBILIZING INNOVATION FOR A SECURE WORLD

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Final Thoughts

  • UAV today is growing fast, with incredible competition
  • If you can clearly define your requirements, you can often work with

manufacturers to customize products to suit your needs

  • CAUTION: Be sure you are complying with fairness requirements in

acquisition requirements

  • Collaborate: share lessons learned
  • Experienced videographers find that perspective from air makes them

change some approaches – use wider angles, different perspectives

  • This is only learned from experience
  • FRG established a sUAS community of practice for first responders

using UAVs to share tips, experiences, approaches

  • Join and share your thoughts on how to make it more useful!

https://communities.firstresponder.gov

DHS Science and Technology Directorate | MOBILIZING INNOVATION FOR A SECURE WORLD

14