uhe cosmic particles studies from space super euso a
play

UHE Cosmic Particles studies from space: super-EUSO: a possible - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Villa Mondragone - Frascati (Roma) / May 14, 2009 UHE Cosmic Particles studies from space: super-EUSO: a possible next-generation experiment ? Alessandro Petrolini Universit` a di Genova and INFN sezione di Genova BR-247 Cosmic Vision Cosmic


  1. Villa Mondragone - Frascati (Roma) / May 14, 2009 UHE Cosmic Particles studies from space: super-EUSO: a possible next-generation experiment ? Alessandro Petrolini Universit` a di Genova and INFN sezione di Genova BR-247 Cosmic Vision Cosmic Vision Space Science for Europe 2015-2025

  2. My Framework (for this talk...) Frascati / May 14, 2009 My Framework (for this talk...) • I am not discussing any science issue: they are extensively discussed elsewhere and I leave them to people more qualified than I am. • I restrict myself to discuss the conception and design of a space-based experiment for observation of UHE Cosmic Particles from space in the post Pierre Auger Observatory (PAO) era. I am assuming that: – the present: Auger-south; – .......... the (hopefully) near future: Auger-south plus Auger-north; – .................... the (hopefully not too far) far future: a space-based experiment ??? Alessandro Petrolini - Phys. Dept. University of Genova and INFN, Italy. 2

  3. Beyond the Pierre Auger Observatory from space ??? Frascati / May 14, 2009 Beyond the Pierre Auger Observatory from space ??? • Exceeding the PAO performance requires a huge experiment, on a long time-scale, requiring a large amount of preliminary R&D and ancillary studies. • The challenging goal of a big experiment from space requires intermediate steps, some of which are on the way: JEM-EUSO, ... Other intermediate steps include some path-finder and/or technological model (see later...). • What we are learning from PAO will help to tune the future scientific objectives. • A tuning of the scientific objectives is mandatory because the Experiment-For-Everything is, most likely, impossible: a choice of scientific objectives will be needed, to drive trade-offs and choices on the performance. • Such a challenging enterprise would require the involvement of a large part of the UHECP physicists community, in a coordinated effort. Alessandro Petrolini - Phys. Dept. University of Genova and INFN, Italy. 3

  4. Beyond the Pierre Auger Observatory from space ??? Frascati / May 14, 2009 • Science will be, obviously, the driving force. However, after a careful assessment of the predictable status of science in some ten/fifteen years from now, we need to consider a realistic implementation of possible Experimental Apparata, to avoid dreams which will never become a reality, at least on the time-scale of a human life... • Most new big projects have a long time duration and require a long time for conception, design, commissioning (plus getting funds...). Therefore we must start right now to think about concrete proposals for realistic implementations of post PAO :=(south+north) experiments. High Energy Physicists, for instance, are already thinking of post-LHC experiments, since years, even before LHC has started taking data. • It is not too early! Some ten years are certainly necessary to design and build such an apparatus... Alessandro Petrolini - Phys. Dept. University of Genova and INFN, Italy. 4

  5. The apparatus required for space-based UHECP observation Frascati / May 14, 2009 The apparatus required for space-based UHECP observation • The required apparatus is an Earth-watching large aperture, large FoV, fast and highly pixelized digital camera for detecting near-UV single photons superimposed on a huge background capable of (at least!) five years operation in space. • It is (see Marco’s talk on JEM-EUSO) made of: – a main optics, collecting photons and focusing the EAS image onto the FS; – the Photo-Detector on the FS, registering the EAS image which is made of: sensors, f/e electronics, b/e electronics, triggering and data analysis systems; – ancillary instrumentation ??? (to be evaluated...): ∗ LIDAR for atmospheric monitoring (?); ∗ IR camera (?); ∗ a suitable radio-detection system (?). – system instrumentation. Alessandro Petrolini - Phys. Dept. University of Genova and INFN, Italy. 5

  6. Order of magnitude estimates: the EAS signal Frascati / May 14, 2009 Order of magnitude estimates: the EAS signal Hadron-induced EASes and a huge space-based apparatus • Hadron-induced EAS: E ≃ 10 19 eV , θ z ≃ π/ 4 , and φ = π/ 2 . • Apparatus: H ≃ 400 km height, entrance pupil diameter D ≃ 5 m , half-angle FoV γ = 20 ◦ and total apparatus detection efficiency ε ≈ (0 . 1 ÷ 0 . 2) . See: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/0810.5711 . Alessandro Petrolini - Phys. Dept. University of Genova and INFN, Italy. 6

  7. Order of magnitude estimates: the EAS signal Frascati / May 14, 2009 How does the EAS appear in our digital camera ? • Time-integrated signal reaching the apparatus (irradiance): I ≈ 50 photons · m − 2 : a large entrance pupil is required. • This irradiance implies a total number of detected photons from the EAS: I Aε ≈ 150 = ⇒ ∆ E /E ≈ 0 . 1 (statistical error only). • Apparent time duration: T ≈ 80 µ s . • The typical (angular) length is: ∆ ξ ≈ 1 . 5 ◦ : a fine granularity of the photo-detector is needed (better than ≈ 0 . 1 ◦ × 0 . 1 ◦ ) to get ∆ θ ≈ 1 ◦ ; this and the large FoV implies a large number of channels. Alessandro Petrolini - Phys. Dept. University of Genova and INFN, Italy. 7

  8. Order of magnitude estimates: night-glow background Frascati / May 14, 2009 Order of magnitude estimates: night-glow background • In the real world background makes the previous estimations too optimistic... • Reference background in the 330 nm ÷ 400 nm wavelength range: B ≈ 5 · 10 11 photons · m − 2 · s − 1 · sr − 1 . Current estimates: it can be up to a factor two larger. Its detailed space-time structure is poorly known. • Total background rate intercepted (on the whole entrance pupil and full FoV): ≈ 4 THz . • Total background rate detected on the PD per pixel (pixel size: 0 . 1 ◦ × 0 . 1 ◦ for a total of N = 1 . 2 · 10 5 pixels ): 3 MHz / pixel . This gives: – one order of magnitude more background than signal photons superimposed on the typical EAS (all space-time length). – roughly the same number of signal and background photons near the EAS maximum. • One needs to find a way to cope with this huge background ... Alessandro Petrolini - Phys. Dept. University of Genova and INFN, Italy. 8

  9. Extraction of the EAS signal from the background Frascati / May 14, 2009 Extraction of the EAS signal from the background • The previous figures show that it is a real challenge... In order to extract the EAS from the background a precise knowledge of the properties of the background is required, at the space-time level of the EAS kinematics. • A continuos monitoring (and subtraction) of the average background on a pixel-by-pixel (or so) basis is unavoidable to go at E ≈ 10 19 eV . • The acceptable background level also depends on the energy of the EAS. In order to allow for background dependent observations a precise knowledge of the Instrument sensitivity as a function of the background is required, which requires a precise Instrument calibration. • In order to face the background a clever and powerful triggering and data-handling scheme needs to be invented. • Many other types of backgrounds, in addition to the night-glow, exist... Most of them appear not to be dangerous (kinematics very different from an EAS)...but? Alessandro Petrolini - Phys. Dept. University of Genova and INFN, Italy. 9

  10. EUSO: some history Frascati / May 14, 2009 EUSO: some history • EUSO was proposed to the European Space Agency (ESA) as a free-flyer with: – optics diameter: ≃ 3 . 5 m ; – orbit height and inclination as a free parameter to be tuned; – mass, volume, power, telemetry and other budgets: largely unconstrained. • ESA recommended to consider the accommodation on the ESA Columbus module on the ISS: many constraints had to be taken into account, including: – fixed orbit height; – limits on mass, volume, power, telemetry and other budgets. – The accommodation had to be made compatible with the ISS/Columbus resources including: mass ( 1 . 5 ton), volume ( 2 . 5 × 2 . 5 × 4 . 5 m 3 ), power ( 1 kW ), telemetry ( 180 Mbit / orbit ). – volume limited by the envisaged accommodation on the Shuttle, not by its capabilities... Many constraints, mainly due to the ISS, limited the final EUSO performance Alessandro Petrolini - Phys. Dept. University of Genova and INFN, Italy. 10

  11. The heritage of EUSO projected into the future Frascati / May 14, 2009 The heritage of EUSO projected into the future • EUSO, an European-led project of the European Space Agency, underwent a detailed phase-A study. • We have learnt a lot from the EUSO phase-A studies about space-based observation of UHECP. • The EUSO heritage is exceedingly precious: many lessons were learnt... and we must use what we learnt from EUSO, to develop a second generation experiment. • We can consider EUSO as our prototype exercise: we have possibly done mistakes! One needs a safe design margin on the expected performance at design stage ! Aim (dream of ?) to an experiment with much better performance than EUSO... Alessandro Petrolini - Phys. Dept. University of Genova and INFN, Italy. 11

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend