Vulcano Workshop 2010 - May, 23-29, 2010
UHE Cosmic Rays in the Auger Era UHE Cosmic Rays in the Auger Era
Sergio Petrera, L'Aquila University email: sergio.petrera@aquila.infn.it
UHE Cosmic Rays in the Auger Era UHE Cosmic Rays in the Auger Era - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Vulcano Workshop 2010 - May, 23-29, 2010 UHE Cosmic Rays in the Auger Era UHE Cosmic Rays in the Auger Era Sergio Petrera, L'Aquila University email: sergio.petrera@aquila.infn.it Vulcano Workshop 2010 - May, 23-29, 2010 UHE Cosmic Rays in the
Vulcano Workshop 2010 - May, 23-29, 2010
UHE Cosmic Rays in the Auger Era UHE Cosmic Rays in the Auger Era
Sergio Petrera, L'Aquila University email: sergio.petrera@aquila.infn.it
Vulcano Workshop 2010 - May, 23-29, 2010
UHE Cosmic Rays in the Auger Era UHE Cosmic Rays in the Auger Era
Sergio Petrera, L'Aquila University email: sergio.petrera@aquila.infn.it
Motivations Present status of the Pierre Auger Observatory The physics items: energy spectrum CR composition arrival directions Summary and outlook
transition galactic/extragalactic origin GZK effect pointing to the sources (particle astronomy !?) E > 1018 eV
transition galactic/extragalactic origin GZK effect pointing to the sources (particle astronomy !?) E > 1018 eV
transition galactic/extragalactic origin GZK effect pointing to the sources (particle astronomy !?) E > 1018 eV
transition galactic/extragalactic origin GZK effect pointing to the sources (particle astronomy !?) E > 1018 eV
transition galactic/extragalactic origin GZK effect pointing to the sources (particle astronomy !?) E > 1018 eV
+ GZK reduces the horizon
AGASA: stopped Jan. 2004 HiRes: stopped Apr 2006 Auger: operating Telescope Array: starting
UHE UHE ankle GZK few/km sq per century
the all-particle spectrum
AGASA: stopped Jan. 2004 HiRes: stopped Apr 2006 Auger: operating Telescope Array: starting
Exposures Exposures
2 area
Vulcano Workshop
Nitrogen fluorescence detected as shower develops Particles detected as they reach ground
Fluorescence
Fluorescence (50 W light bulb @ c) (50 W light bulb @ c)
nearly calorimetric direct view of shower evolution 10% duty cycle Acceptance depends on energy +
atmosphere
Surface
Surface (10 (1012
12 particles over 20 km
particles over 20 km2
2)
)
100% duty cycle Flat acceptance above threshold Indirect measurements of primary
energy and mass (relies on simulation)
Hybrid = surface + fluorescence Hybrid = surface + fluorescence
SD energy calibration based on FD profiles “golden hybrid” events (independently detected) energy systematic error ~22 % mostly from systematics
(fluorescence yield, atmospheric transparency...)
Water Cherenkov tank
Rotomolded polyethylene tank 10 m2 x 1.2 m of ultrapure water in a light diffusing Tyvek liner, 3 PMTs Photonis (9’’ diameter); Autonomous unit: solar panel+battery, GPS timing, communication antenna, electronics Max 10 W power consumption
Camera with 440 PMTs
(Photonis XP 3062)
Schmidt Telescope using 11 m2 mirrors UV optical filter (also: provide protection from outside dust)
Camera with 440 PMTs
(Photonis XP 3062)
UV optical filter (also: provide protection from outside dust) Schmidt Telescope using 11 m2 mirrors
Construction ended Apr. 2008 Enhancements for Detection @ Low Energies: HEAT (High Elevation Auger Telescopes) AMIGA (Auger Muon and Infill Array) + AERA array of radio detectors
Construction ended Apr. 2008 Enhancements for Detection @ Low Energies: HEAT (High Elevation Auger Telescopes) AMIGA (Auger Muon and Infill Array) + AERA array of radio detectors New R&D: MW fluorescence detection [after Gorham et al., PR D 78 (2008) 032007] Towards an FD with 100% duty cycle?
PLB 685 (2010) 239
Cutoff at ~1019.6 eV significant with > 30
PLB 685 (2010) 239
Cutoff at ~1019.6 eV significant with > 30
Within the energy scale systematics
photons protons Fe Energy Xmax
photons protons Fe Data Energy Xmax Xmax
Auger and HiRes Xmax measurements are compatible within systematic uncertainties
⇒ Mass composition getting heavier HiRes PRL 2010 “proton dominance above 1.6 EeV” but... difficult to compare with HiRes due to different definitions
PRL 104 (2010) 091101
PRL 104 (2010) 091101
More about Mass Composition by Analisa Mariazzi
Top down models strongly constrained
Typical accuracy of reconstruction <1°
No significant emission from Galactic Centre No broadband signals – e.g. Dipole – at any energy above 1 EeV e.g 1 < E < 3 EeV, Amplitude < 0.7% No clustering of the type claimed by AGASA No signal from BL Lacs as possibly seen by HiRes Summary: Previous reports have not been confirmed Summary: Previous reports have not been confirmed ICRC 2007
Based on a Prescribed Anisotropy Test: Correlation with Veron-Cetty-Veron AGN Catalog
20 out of 27 events E>57 EeV correlating within 3.1 degrees with z<0.017 AGN's Isotropy rejected with >99% C.L.
Update of the Prescribed Anisotropy Test (correlation with VCV catalog of AGNs) 38% (21/55) correlate (post exploration) vs. 21% expected from isotropy correlation decreased but still incompatible with isotropy at 99% C.L.
New paper in preparation: new catalogs, autocorrelation, CenA preliminary
High quality results on all the observables of UHECR's A comprehensive interpretation of the whole data still missing
High quality results on all the observables of UHECR's A comprehensive interpretation of the whole data still missing
High quality results on all the observables of UHECR's A comprehensive interpretation of the whole data still missing
High quality results on all the observables of UHECR's A comprehensive interpretation of the whole data still missing Much work to do... many more data....
What's coming next?What's coming next?
A new observatory: TA (Telescope Array) Auger South: low energy extension HEAT (3 high elevation telescopes) AMIGA (SD infill + muon detectors) +... Auger North: at Lamar (CO) undergoing evaluation Go to space!
What's coming next?What's coming next?
A new observatory: TA (Telescope Array) TA (Telescope Array) Auger South: low energy extension HEAT (3 high elevation telescopes) AMIGA (SD infill + muon detectors) +... Auger North: at Lamar (CO) undergoing evaluation Go to space!
30 km
576 scintillator detectors 1.2 km interval
3 FD stations (atmospheric fluorescence telescopes) 3 (+2) Communication Towers ~2.5 hours from SLC
What's coming next?What's coming next?
A new observatory: TA (Telescope Array) TA (Telescope Array) Auger South Auger South: low energy extension HEAT (3 high elevation telescopes) AMIGA (SD infill + muon detectors) +... Auger North: at Lamar (CO) undergoing evaluation Go to space!
What's coming next?What's coming next?
A new observatory: TA (Telescope Array) TA (Telescope Array) Auger South Auger South: low energy extension HEAT (3 high elevation telescopes) AMIGA (SD infill + muon detectors) +... Auger North Auger North: at Lamar (CO) undergoing evaluation Go to space!
What's coming next?What's coming next?
A new observatory: TA (Telescope Array) TA (Telescope Array) Auger South Auger South: low energy extension HEAT (3 high elevation telescopes) AMIGA (SD infill + muon detectors) +... Auger North Auger North: at Lamar (CO) undergoing evaluation Go to space! Go to space!
What's coming next?What's coming next?
A new observatory: TA (Telescope Array) TA (Telescope Array) Auger South Auger South: low energy extension HEAT (3 high elevation telescopes) AMIGA (SD infill + muon detectors) +... Auger North Auger North: at Lamar (CO) undergoing evaluation Go to space! Go to space!