tipp 2014 third international conference on technology
play

Tipp 2014 - Third International Conference on Technology and - PDF document

Tipp 2014 - Third International Conference on Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics Tipp 2014 - Th . . . / Report of Abstracts Cooling for the LHCb Upgrade . . . Abstract ID : 352 Cooling for the LHCb Upgrade Scintillating


  1. Tipp 2014 - Third International Conference on Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics

  2. Tipp 2014 - Th� . . . / Report of Abstracts Cooling for the LHCb Upgrade . . . Abstract ID : 352 Cooling for the LHCb Upgrade Scintillating Fibre Tracker Abstract content As part of the LHCb Phase-II upgrade programme, the existing downstream tracking systems will be replaced by a new scintillating fibre tracker read out by multi-channel silicon photomultipliers (SiPM). To ensure high tracking performance over the entire experiment’s lifetime, the SiPMs will be operated at sub-zero temperatures, down to -40 o C. This presentation outlines the proposed SiPM cooling system and describes the design considerations which led to the choice of the mono-phase liquid cooling solution. The requirements on the temperature uniformity and stability are discussed, along with the constraints which thermal considerations impose on the mechanical design of the tracker modules. The prospective refrigerants (C6F14 and 3M Novec thermal fluids) are compared with each other, including their effect on the environment. The SiPM cooling system consists of the remote cooling plant, insulated transfer lines, the local distribution pipework and the cooling structures inside 288 read-out boxes spread over twelve 5x6 m2 tracker planes. The main design challenges of this system are associated with its large extent (about 150 m of linear SiPM arrays to be cooled) and severe constraints on the geometrical envelope and, hense, insulation. Since the SiPM themselves produce very little heat, the estimated heat load of the cooling plant, 13 kW, is dominated by the heat influx through the insulation of read-out boxes, interconnection and transfer lines. Main system design parameters, as well as the latest results of the thermal mock-up tests, are summarised. Summary Primary author(s) : GORBOUNOV, Petr (CERN and ITEP(Moscow)) Co-author(s) : BLANC, Fred (Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (CH)) Presenter(s) : GORBOUNOV, Petr (CERN and ITEP(Moscow)) Track Classification : Emerging technologies: 4a) Cooling and cryogenics Contribution Type : Oral Comments: For the LHCb Upgrade SciFi Group Submitted by BLANC, Fred on Friday 28 February 2014 May 26, 2014 Page 1

  3. ( SiPM) Cooling for the LHCb Upgrade SciFi tracker (*) Presented by Petr GORBOUNOV (CERN, Geneva and ITEP Moscow) on behalf of the LHCb SciFi Tracker group TIPP 2014 , Amsterdam, 2 June 2014 ________________________ (*) SiPM = Silicon Photo-Multiplier(s); SciFi = Scintillating Fibres P. Gorbounov TIPP 2014, SiPM cooling for SciFi tracker 1

  4. SciFi Tracker • Motivation, design – covered by separate presentations at TIPP 2014: B.Leverington, Experiments & Upgrades Session, 6 June – SciFi tracker, general • • Z.Xu, Photon Detectors , 4 June – SiPMs • M. Deckendorff, Novel Technologies, 4 June – Scintillating Fibres • LHCb Tracker Upgrade TDR: CERN/LHCC 2014-001, LHCb TDR 15 SciFi Tracker – by 2019 r/o Rox (ROB) ROB: - fibre/photodetector interface ( 16 SiPMs ) - SiPM enclosure and cooling structures - r/o electronics ~32 mm P. Gorbounov TIPP 2014, SiPM cooling for SciFi tracker 2

  5. Why SiPM cooling ? • Small light yield (≤20 p.e./MIP) • decrease with time (fibres ageing) • Competing background hit rate: from dark noise 50-100 fold rise by the end of LHC Phase II – due to radiation damage ( 6x10 11 n eq /cm 2 ) • • Solution: sub-zero cooling • (noise is suppressed by factor ~2/10C) For satisfactory tracking performance after 50 fb -1 , the SiPMs have to operate at • down to -40C • The cooling system should permit to vary the SiPM temperature • Design challenges: • Large system extent (total length of SIPM arrays: ~150 m) • Tight space envelope : Δ Z ≤ 70 mm, no “guard” volume is possible Potential condensation and frost formation issues • • Difficult distribution/manifolding: 288 ROBs, over twelve 5x6 m2 planes, flexible sections P. Gorbounov TIPP 2014, SiPM cooling for SciFi tracker 3

  6. Other system requirements • Temperature uniformity in : Δ T<1°C per sub-array of four SiPM (~132 mm) • common gain and threshold adjustment for all channels in s/array • a gradient along the entire SiPM array is tolerable (up to 10°C over 3 m) • Temperature stability in time: ±1°C between calibrations (LHC fills?) • SiPM gain affects the detection efficiency (should be constant at 98-99%) • Can be relaxed for new generation of SiPMs • Modularity • To match the modular design of the FT: each ROB has its own cooling structure! • Safety • General LHC standards (flammability, toxicity etc); safe for detectors in case of failure • Environment friendliness: ozone, GWP,… • Desirable features: simplicity, flexibility, performance margin, low cost P. Gorbounov TIPP 2014, SiPM cooling for SciFi tracker 4

  7. Choice of cooling technology • Observations: External heat exchanger (discrete SiPMs, no internal cooling) • Expected heat load of O(10 W)/ROB is dominated by parasitic influx through • the insulation, flex PCB and fibres • No concerns about material budget (outside of acceptance) and radiation resistance (~50 Gy, ~10 12 neq/cm 2 ) The cooling options considered at pre-TDR phase: • Thermoelectric, with low-temperature heat pipes • • Chilled air, with local vortex tubes • 2-phase evaporative, C3F8, CO2, …? • Mono-phase liquid P. Gorbounov TIPP 2014, SiPM cooling for SciFi tracker 5

  8. Baseline cooling option Mono-phase liquid cooling, with serial connection of ROBs in a branch (a branch=6 ROBs, ~3 m ) and low-GWP “Novec 649” refrigerant + No compelling reasons to use 2-phase cooling Branches + Established technology, commercial components 4 branches/layer + Big reserve in cooling power, room for optimization 48 branches total + Probably, the simplest and least expensive option – Low-loss cold transfer lines (~100 + 100 m) Serial connections : • • “modularity” is slightly compromised, but… • pipework and overall system flow rate are reduced ~6-fold • optimal balance between Δ T and Δ P – to be further studied in mock-up tests P. Gorbounov TIPP 2014, SiPM cooling for SciFi tracker 6

  9. Inside Read-Out Box (ROB) Cooling pipe, Refrigerant In/outlet “cold volume” Cu, 7x7 mm flushed with bore 4 mm dry gas (smooth or grooved) Cooling Thermal pipe interface 7 mm stiffener SiPM stiffener (low CTE alloy) Heat Transfer Flex PCB SiPM Gap ≈4 mm assembly SiPM chip SiPM carrier SciFi ribbon 11 mm 42-45 mm P. Gorbounov TIPP 2014, SiPM cooling for SciFi tracker 7

  10. Mock-up tests Direct heat load measurement • P=Mass flow rate x Δ T(inlet/oulet) x C(T fluid ) Δ T (fluid/SIPM), cooling uniformity, Δ P and Δ T(in/out), external temperature distribution • • Refrigerant flow optimization (currently, with C6F14) • Validation of predictions from CFD simulations • Input for engineering designs of the ROB and cooling plant 53 sm Single mock-up ROB thermal mock-up, module under test with front cover removed Mock-up = Cooling pipe + insulation + 10 cm of support plate + 4 dummy SiPM sub-arrays with flex cables and calibrated PT1000 sensors instead of SiPMs Chiller: down to -80 ° C, smooth flow control and monitoring (0-60 g/s for C6F14 and Novec) P. Gorbounov TIPP 2014, SiPM cooling for SciFi tracker 8

  11. Mock-up tests, single module results • In agreement with simulations, at v > 1.0 m/s (>20 g/s), the flow becomes largely turbulent (Re > 2300, secures a high HTC and small Δ T) “Inlet/outlet effect” … still compatible with 1°C /sub-array requirement • • Δ P(in-out) and Δ T(out-in) per module agree with simulation: Δ P = 0.2 bar and ΔT ≤ 0.3 °C, at -40°C and 1.5 m/s • Thermal load is largely compatible with 10…13 W/module. Measurements with 3…6 serially connected modules will provide a more accurate estimate ΔT ( SiPM – fluid inlet ) vs Flow Rate Theor. Re and Δ P(branch) ΔT ( SiPM – fluid inlet ) vs T fluid V= 1.5 m/s Flow, g/s Novec 649, ID 4 mm tube -40°C vs fluid velocity v, m/s laminar …………… turbulent ΔT, ° C ΔT, ° C -20°C 0°C Velocity, m/s Distance along the pipe, mm Distance along the pipe, mm Preliminary design values: v=1.5 m/s, Δ P ≈1.2 bar/branch, thermal load =20 W/module P. Gorbounov TIPP 2014, SiPM cooling for SciFi tracker 9

  12. IR images of the module, at T fluid = -50°C (T room = 23°C) ~17.5°C ~17.7°C No outer insulation (bare Alu sheets Back side Front side With extra outer Rohacell insulation sheets Front side Outlet edge Conclusions • Outer Alu heat spreader is effective, the surface T is well above dew point (≈10 °C in cavern) • Extra outer insulation gives 10-15% reduction in heat load • Expected cold spots: module edges and lids having no internal insulation P. Gorbounov TIPP 2014, SiPM cooling for SciFi tracker 10

  13. Conceptual system design Main cooling system design specifications (see TDR for more details): • Industrial chiller: cooling power ≥13 kW at -55 ° C, working T(fluid) ≤ -50 ° C • Refrigerant mass: 330 kg (~210 l at +40 ° C) • Pump: ΔP ≥ 3 bar, flow rate ≥ 3.3 m3/h • Transfer lines: Δ T = O(1 ° C), each way • Estimated cost (infrastructure only): 290-350 kCHF P. Gorbounov TIPP 2014, SiPM cooling for SciFi tracker 11

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend